40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
ATF eLog |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Jul 14 14:39:09 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Thu Jul 15 15:41:40 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Fri Jul 16 18:54:57 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Sat Jul 17 01:41:20 2010, Koji, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Wed Jul 21 20:13:06 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Thu Jul 22 16:19:48 2010, Koji, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Fri Jul 23 00:45:46 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Tue Jul 27 00:10:20 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, PMC Calibrated
|
Tue Jul 27 19:04:35 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Wed Jul 28 19:51:10 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Fri Jul 30 16:48:11 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Sun Aug 1 18:37:07 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Mon Aug 2 00:46:13 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Mon Aug 2 22:23:36 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Tue Aug 3 01:31:15 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Tue Aug 3 13:47:55 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
Tue Aug 3 17:27:20 2010, Dmass, Laser, PSL, H1 NPRO Measured
|
|
Message ID: 857
Entry time: Sat Jul 17 01:41:20 2010
In reply to: 855
|
Author: |
Koji |
Type: |
Laser |
Category: |
PSL |
Subject: |
H1 NPRO Measured |
|
|
In terms of the damage of the optics, I have never seen the CVI mirror is damaged by this level of the power density.
What I have seen was a newport BK7 cube BS melting with the 10W focused on the <100um waist radius.
Quote: |
This thing really didn't want its modes matched. I had to open up a can O' parameter space on it. Notas:
- I added a static lens in front of the NPRO as well to change the mode I was working with
- I extended the path length (will have to use some folding mirrors)
- I checked that dwaist/dposition was dominated by one of the mirrors by about a factor of ten, so I might actually be able to fiddle with them easily once theyre in place and the PMC is locked.
- I tried to avoid making any nasty waists on the table, the one that does exist is bigger than 100 um radius, and MAY PASS OVER WHERE I HAVE A MIRROR CURRENTLY!
121 um waist with 1.5 Watts is about 3*10^3 W/cm^2 - is this fine to sit pretty much on a mirror,
- Damage thresholds for CVI coatings seem to have several to 10 "J/cm^2" for 20 nanosecond 1064 nm pulses\
- This means it can take 500 MW/cm^2 for 20 ns - unless I know how often these pulses happen I'm not sure how to make this a CW number
- To turn this into a normal number I assume I just do "1 J / pulse lase rate / cm^2" - I have no idea what rates are common for pulsed lasers
- CW damage thresholds of materials seem to be order "MW/cm^2" - and if these are what's quoted by a company, it would seem that their coatings would have to not be many orders worse than this (or else the number would be meaningless) - though these companies have done other ridiculous *&!# before so...
I would appreciate any input from the peanut gallery - for now I am inclined to think that 1.5W on an HR mirror with a 240 um spot size is fine.
|
|