40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  ATF eLog  Not logged in ELOG logo
Message ID: 2601     Entry time: Fri Jul 9 13:44:39 2021
Author: Radhika 
Type: Summary 
Category: Cryo vacuum chamber 
Subject: 1D cooling model updates 

*Takeaway*: The current 1D cooling model is getting closer to matching our observed cooling trends, mainly in the lower temperature limit. The predicted time constant is still much smaller than we are seeing in reality (by about a factor of 3), but this can potentially be improved by revising specific heat values and/or dimensional estimates for chamber components.

The model uses the known cooling power of the cold head [attachment 2] and considers radiative heat from the outer shield, baseplate (bottom lid), and mylar wrapping around braid. I increased the complexity of the script by solving a system of ODEs (for braid and coldplate temperature) simultaneously instead of assuming the temperatures are equal at all times, and solving only 1 ODE. This resulted in the model's lower temperature limit prediction matching our observed data, at ~66 K. 

The model still predicts a much smaller time constant than we are seeing. This is affected by specific heat values for Cu and Al, along with dimensional estimates of the coldplate and braid (AKA how much mass is being cooled). It is possible that these values are being underestimated in the model, which would lead to the smaller time constant. Currently the model uses constant values for the specific heat of Cu and Al (room temperature). But since specific heat increases with temperature, accounting for temperature dependence would lower the specific heat values and shift the model in the opposite direction (towards an even smaller time constant). Therefore I suspect the model is underestimating the mass of the coldplate, though I am unsure if this would completely correct the discrepancy. 

If the term (specific_heat * density * volume) of the coldplate (Al) is increased by a factor of 4, the model resembles the data well [attachment 3]. 

Attachment 1: model_vs_data_7-1.pdf  21 kB  Uploaded Fri Jul 9 14:58:06 2021  | Hide | Hide all
model_vs_data_7-1.pdf
Attachment 2: coldhead_capacity.pdf  17 kB  Uploaded Fri Jul 9 14:59:24 2021  | Hide | Hide all
coldhead_capacity.pdf
Attachment 3: model_vs_data_7-1.pdf  20 kB  Uploaded Fri Jul 9 15:04:57 2021  | Hide | Hide all
model_vs_data_7-1.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-