40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  ATF eLog  Not logged in ELOG logo
Message ID: 2353     Entry time: Sun May 26 01:12:33 2019
Author: Anjali 
Type: Update 
Category: 2micronLasers 
Subject: Frequency noise measurement of 2 micron source using PLL 
  • I added one more amplifier stage (ZFL-500 LN) after the detector. Since noise figure of ZFL-500LN (2.9 dB) is lower than that of ZHL-3A (5 dB), ZFL-500LN is the first amplifier stage after the photo detector and it is followed by ZHL-3A.

  • Attachment # 1 shows the beat note spectrum measured from the spectrum analyser. There was a 30 dB attenuator in the path during the measurement. So, the output RF power from the MZI (with two stages of amplification) is now about 3 dBm and the SNR of 37 dB is preserved even after two stages of amplification.

  • So, now the RF power to the RF port of the mixer is 3 dBm. I have attached the video of signal from the PLL loop at different gain (G=1, G=2,G=5) values in SR 560. The time domain trace seems to very noise. I suspect this is because of the inherent large noise in 2-micron laser diode with a broad line width of 2 MHz.

  • I then attempted to do the closed loop transfer function in the present PLL configuration by injecting the signal from SR 785. Attachment 2 shows the closed and open loop transfer functions at different gain values in SR 560 when the actuation slope is 10 kHz/V. Attachment 3 shows the closed and open loop transfer functions at different values of actuation slope when the gain is 5. The magnitude and phase traces are not very smooth as we observed when we did the similar measurement with an arbitrary function generator (AFG) as the RF source. In this case, when MZI output is fed in as the RF source, the RF power is fluctuating.

  • I also tried to do the frequency noise measurement. Attchement # 4 is the FM noise at different gain values when the actuation slope is 10 kHz/V. Attachement 5 is the FM noise at different actuation slope values when the gain is 5. This time, depending on the gain value and the actuation slope value, a short frequency span was considered in SR 785 for the frequency noise measurement. The frequency span is considered based on the value of unity gain frequencies  that are approximated from the open loop transfer functions measured from attachment # 2 and #3

Attachment 1: beat_note.pdf  41 kB  Uploaded Sun May 26 02:13:46 2019  | Hide | Hide all
beat_note.pdf
Attachment 2: Transfer_function_S_10kHzV_different_gain.pdf  194 kB  Uploaded Sun May 26 02:14:03 2019  | Hide | Hide all
Transfer_function_S_10kHzV_different_gain.pdf
Attachment 3: transfer_function_G_5_different_actuation.pdf  193 kB  Uploaded Sun May 26 02:14:17 2019  | Hide | Hide all
transfer_function_G_5_different_actuation.pdf
Attachment 4: FM_noise_diff_gain.pdf  51 kB  Uploaded Sun May 26 02:14:52 2019  | Hide | Hide all
FM_noise_diff_gain.pdf
Attachment 5: FM_noise_G_5_different_actuation_slope.pdf  65 kB  Uploaded Tue May 28 12:40:18 2019  | Hide | Hide all
FM_noise_G_5_different_actuation_slope.pdf
Attachment 6: Gain_1.mp4  10.962 MB  Uploaded Tue May 28 12:40:50 2019
Attachment 7: Gain_2.mp4  10.898 MB  Uploaded Tue May 28 12:41:09 2019
Attachment 8: Gain_5.mp4  13.470 MB  Uploaded Tue May 28 12:41:30 2019
ELOG V3.1.3-