40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
ATF eLog |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Sat Mar 12 05:32:40 2011, Zach, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise  
|
Sat Mar 12 16:11:35 2011, Koji, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise
|
Sat Mar 12 16:22:53 2011, Zach, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise
|
Sat Mar 12 19:20:19 2011, Koji, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise
|
Sat Mar 12 21:24:14 2011, Zach, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise
|
Sun Mar 13 00:27:29 2011, Koji, Laser, GYRO, current gyro noise
|
|
Message ID: 1348
Entry time: Sat Mar 12 16:22:53 2011
In reply to: 1347
Reply to this: 1349
|
Author: |
Zach |
Type: |
Laser |
Category: |
GYRO |
Subject: |
current gyro noise |
|
|
This is the answer I would give:
- The magnitude is lower because the differential noise of the input optics is suppressed by the secondary (CW) loop gain in the PLL readout (but not in the AOM readout). This was the main advantage to this readout scheme in the first place (see this post)
- The shape above ~100 Hz is different either because the residual primary loop noise ("spillover noise") is also suppressed in the PLL readout OR because the PLL bandwidth is lower than this. We don't have an OLTF of the PLL yet, but we can see which one it is by carefully reviewing the diagram in the above post to see if the spillover noise should indeed be suppressed (we didn't think it would).
Quote: |
Why the AOM actuation (blue) and the PLL actuation (green) different so much?
Quote: |

|
|
|