40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  ATF eLog  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Fri Oct 29 15:34:36 2010, Zach & Koji, Laser, GYRO, CCW loop characterization bart-simpson-generator.png
    Reply  Sat Oct 30 20:02:01 2010, Koji, Laser, GYRO, gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (1) open_loop_primary.pdf
       Reply  Sat Oct 30 20:18:06 2010, Koji, Laser, GYRO, gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (2) error_primary.pdffeedback_primary.pdf
          Reply  Sat Oct 30 20:57:19 2010, Koji, Laser, GYRO, gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (3) error_secondary.pdf
             Reply  Sat Oct 30 22:49:04 2010, Koji, Laser, GYRO, gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (4) 
                Reply  Sat Oct 30 23:41:31 2010, Koji, Laser, GYRO, gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (5) 
Message ID: 1118     Entry time: Sat Oct 30 20:18:06 2010     In reply to: 1117     Reply to this: 1119
Author: Koji 
Type: Laser 
Category: GYRO 
Subject: gyro characterization Oct 27, 2010 (2) 

[Zach / Koji]

Measurement of the primary (CCW) cavity error / feedback signal.

Method:

- Lock the cavity. Measure the spectrum of the input monitor output.
- Close the laser shutter. Measure the same spectrum.

- Measure the feedback signal after the notch filter.

Result:

- The global shape of the error signal is a kind of flat. Though it's spiky due to mechanical resonances.
  Below 10Hz it got smoother but the actual shape is not obvious because of the rough resolution.
- At around 100Hz, the error is below the dark noise. This means the out-of-loop stability does not go below the dark noise level.

Thought:

- The broad peak at around 10Hz is the servo bump.
- Note that the signal is supposed to be amplified by a factor of +41. This means the dark noise floor level is ~25nV/rtHz.

To Do:

  • Calibrate these spectra in Hz/rtHz.
    • How much is the optical gain in V/Hz or V/m.
  • Convert this measurement into the noise budget of the Gyro signal.
  • Make the unsuppressed spectrum
    • => How much cavity length fluctuation does the error signal feel if there is no feedback and the sensor is infinitely linear?
    • This requires the model of the open loop TF
    • Compare the consistency with the same quantity derived from the feedback signal
    • Compare the unsuppressed frequency noise spectra with the free running laser freq noise (see rana's phd thesis P.80).
    • Convert the spectrum into the displacement noise (m/rtHz) and compare with the displacement on the table.
  • Measure the shot noise level
    • How much DC power do we typically have? (Actually we don't have the record during this measurement, but we can measure it again)
  • Measure low frequency spectra with CDS
  • How to improve the noise floor
    • Is this noise level disturbing in terms of the gyro requirement? How about in the low frequency?
    • How much is the demodulator noise? Put a 50-ohm terminator on the cable instead of the PD. Then measure the same signal.
    • How much is the gain of the input stage. It is supposed to be +41, but we are not sure.
      => Think about the noise level at the demodulator output.
    • How much is the noise level of the PD measured by an RF analyzer? Is it consistent with the above analysis?
    • Do we need a new resonant RF PD? How much should we improve the noise level with the new PD? And how much noise does the new one actually have?
Attachment 1: error_primary.pdf  76 kB  | Hide | Hide all
error_primary.pdf
Attachment 2: feedback_primary.pdf  75 kB  Uploaded Sun Oct 31 00:21:51 2010  | Hide | Hide all
feedback_primary.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-