| ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
59
|
Mon Jul 15 13:14:30 2013 |
Emory Brown | Optics | General | Umax curves for varying height test masses | I ran sweeps over the ratioR range
from 0.5 to 0.9 for test masses with modified
height, and thus mass, which were otherwise |
|
|
61
|
Tue Jul 23 18:26:04 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise | In this post I report of the results of
TE noise simulated by COMSOL for the TE noise
of Infinite test masses. |
|
|
67
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
66
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
65
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
64
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
63
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
62
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:37 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
68
|
Tue Jul 23 20:53:45 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Comparison between Liu and Thorne Results and COMSOL results for TE noise |
|
|
|
69
|
Wed Jul 24 21:08:24 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | TR results for different dimensions | In this post I simulate the procedure of
calculating the TR noise for finite cavities
as proposed by Heinert and check for a |
|
|
70
|
Thu Jul 25 11:36:17 2013 |
rana | Optics | General | TR results for different dimensions |
PDF |
|
|
71
|
Thu Jul 25 13:21:46 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | TR results for different dimensions |
|
|
|
72
|
Thu Jul 25 15:54:58 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | TR results for different dimensions |
|
|
|
73
|
Mon Jul 29 22:42:57 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Avoiding transient solutions in the Computation of TE/TR noise | An error was being encountered in the computation
of the TR noise lately. It was observed that
while running the simulations in the case |
|
|
74
|
Wed Jul 31 15:39:11 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | First try with paramter optimization for TE and TR noise profiles | After the simulations have been found to
match to a fair extent with the analytic
results by Heinert and Liu and Thorne, the |
|
|
75
|
Thu Aug 8 17:17:19 2013 |
Deep Chatterjee | Optics | General | Something like cancellation | For the material parameters of Sapphire
at 300K, the TE and TR Noise profiles, though
not very close, lie close to within an order |
|
|
77
|
Wed Nov 13 23:55:44 2013 |
Chris Couste | Optics | Analysis | Optical Mount Vibrational Analysis | Project: Vibrational Analysis of Optical
Mounts
Goal: Use COMSOL to run finite element |
|
|
78
|
Mon Nov 18 15:56:59 2013 |
Chris Couste | Optics | Analysis | Representative Models | The simpler models of the optical mounts
are finished, they will be run through the
comsol analysis software soon. |
|
|
79
|
Fri Nov 22 21:04:53 2013 |
Chris Couste | Optics | Analysis | analysis | The analysis is making nice eigenmode
and stress mode models, but the displacement
experiment needs work. Should be fixed by |
|
|
80
|
Fri Jan 24 17:26:38 2014 |
Chris Cousté | Optics | Analysis | Mount Analysis Functional! | The comsol eigenmode analysis is
complete, and the only thing left to do on
this part of the project is to run the analysis |
|
|
81
|
Sun Feb 16 21:10:56 2014 |
Chris Cousté | Optics | Analysis | Optical Mount data compilation 1: Aluminum | The time is finally here! this is
the highest displacement of each mount in
its lowest few eigenfrequencies, using 6061 |
|
|
83
|
Sun Jun 22 23:44:56 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | | Going through Heinert's 'TR noise of cylindrical test masses' paper | At this point, my are goals are to 1) convert
the time-dependent heat equation into stationary,
complex form, 2) use the Levin approach to |
|
|
84
|
Mon Jun 23 11:40:17 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | | Going through Heinert's 'TR noise of cylindrical test masses' paper |
|
|
|
85
|
Mon Jun 23 16:10:17 2014 |
Matt A. | Optics | | Going through Heinert's 'TR noise of cylindrical test masses' paper |
|
|
|
86
|
Tue Jun 24 14:35:42 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Trying to Verify the Heinert Model | |
|
|
87
|
Tue Jun 24 17:05:24 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Trying to Verify the Heinert Model | It does appear that the simplified
model is only relevant for the simulations.
To quote Heinert: "An efficient |
|
|
88
|
Sat Jun 28 21:59:11 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Difficulty with the COMSOL stationary module; Test Cases | Here, I describe some test cases
to see if COMSOL's solutions are agreeing
with some simple analytical solutions. Right |
|
|
89
|
Sun Jun 29 15:37:18 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Difficulty with the COMSOL stationary module; Test Cases |
|
|
|
90
|
Sun Jun 29 20:25:44 2014 |
Koji | Optics | General | Difficulty with the COMSOL stationary module; Test Cases | What about this example? The result is
easier to understand intuitively.
Consider a bar with the length of |
|
|
91
|
Sat Jul 5 13:04:32 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | | Heinert Model TR Noise Verification | Agreement with Heinert's paper for cylindrical
TR noise has now been achieved. Using
the stationary state assumption to calculate |
|
|
92
|
Mon Jul 7 19:47:00 2014 |
Koji | Optics | | Heinert Model TR Noise Verification | How close are these FEA calculations with
the analytical values?
Can you plot residual too? (Put analytical |
|
|
93
|
Thu Jul 10 16:51:14 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Duan and Heinert Comparison | (See Plots in attached document)
My plan has been to replicate Duan's |
|
|
94
|
Fri Jul 11 10:58:18 2014 |
not Koji | Optics | | Heinert Model TR Noise Verification |
|
|
|
95
|
Mon Jul 14 19:09:14 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Using Heinert's Solution for Duan's Parameters | I have plotted Heinert's analytical
solution for TR noise using Duan's parameters.
Since TO and TE noise can be found |
|
|
96
|
Mon Jul 14 19:14:31 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Duan and Heinert Comparison |
|
|
|
97
|
Thu Jul 31 20:55:38 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Finding the Right Meshing for the TIR cavity | In this document, I try to identify
I good mesh by comparing the numerical solution
from that mesh with my analytical model. |
|
|
98
|
Sat Aug 2 00:22:34 2014 |
Sam Moore | Optics | General | Finding the Right Meshing for the TIR cavity |
|
|
|
124
|
Thu Jan 18 21:13:59 2018 |
aaron | Optics | PonderSqueeze | modifications to Gautam's 40m finesse model | I made a copy of Gautam's 40m model
to add the unstable filter cavity for
the ponderomotive squeezing project. I wanted |
|