40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
 Cryo Lab eLog, Page 8 of 59 Not logged in
ID Date Author Type Category Subject
2607   Wed Jan 6 10:47:18 2021 aaronDailyProgressPSOMADC to PSOMA rack, realtime model

enter Wed Jan 6 10:47:10 2021

## Making a new cable to run from the Sorensens' rack over to PSOMA rack

• Grabbed from EE: an appropriately chonky 3-wire cable (AWG 12, same as the old cable), the 18V 'ligo style' connectors (not needed), and some lugs. Confirm the cable is long enough
• open up the power strip, take a photo to make sure I get the wire mapping right.
• Remove the old (short) cable, crimp the lugs (and insulator jacket) onto the new cable and install it on the power strip.
• Run the cable along the cable tray to the Sorensen. Turn off the power supply, then attach the lugs on that end with a 10-32 screw/washer/nut
• Turn on the supplies, confirm +- 18 V at the power strip. All good, returned parts to EE.

## PSOMA realitime model

I figured I'd initialize our realtime model for PSOMA. First, copied over x1cry.mdl (cryo cavities model) into x1oma.mdl. When I build this model, I get the following error

Linux source does not match currently running kernel.

The RCG expects the linux source to be at /usr/src/linux.  For modern
distros this should be a symlink to the source installed as part of
the kernel header package for the running kernel.  For this system:

environment variable to bypass this check

I haven't seen this before, do I need to update something? I haven't made recent changes to cymac, so I would be surprised if it's running a newer version of linux / rtcds than the existing source (and only one version of rtcds exists in /usr/src anyway). Indeed, when I ask for the currently running kernel (uname -r), it is '3.2.88-rtcds'; and the link at /usr/src/linux points to /usr/src/linux-headers-3.2.88-rtcds. I would expect that the source "linux-headers-3.2.88-rtcds" matches the kernel '3.2.88-rtcds'. I'm setting the ignore flag for now, but would like to know what this means.

Setting ignore to '1' or 'True' does not avoid the error message. I don't see mention of this message on the 40m or other elogs, so I'm a bit stuck. Since the realtime model isn't critical right now anyway, that's all for now.

exit Wed Jan 6 16:27:10 2021

2606   Tue Jan 5 16:43:44 2021 aaronLab InfrastructureTemperature Sensingfresh temperature sensor

Here is the 10 min trend for the past day. The temperature fluctuates by up to ~0.3 F over short times, and drifted by only ~0.5 F on average throughout the day. The lab is running consistently hot.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2021-01-05_at_16.46.14.png
2605   Mon Jan 4 10:46:01 2021 aaronLab InfrastructureTemperature Sensingfresh temperature sensor

Entered Mon Jan 4 10:45:56 2021 .

Temperature in the lab is 89 F at the sensor by the electronics rack. I had been planning to put our AD590s on a board today, unnecessary equipment is already off but I also turned off cominaux and the Sorensen DC supplies. There is hot air coming from HVAC.

I spent some time gathering components and checking out AD's notes on the sensor. I'm using the same components as Andrew/Johannes' old circuit, and putting it on one of Anchal's "generic op amp / diff amp" boards (D1900129-v2). After checking out the old circuit, I realized we still have it in the cryo lab -- it's just missing the AD590. I put the AD590 on a breadboard, made a few connectors, and confirmed that I get a sensible reading (83 K near the center of the room, a couple degrees hotter in/by the electronics rack where the sensor is located).

I noticed that the AC connection on one of our Tenma power supplies is loose (wobbling the cable switches the supply off/on). It's a dual supply, but since I wouldn't want to use it elsewhere I'm powering the AD590 with it (doesn't need to move, out of the way above the rack).

Here's the temperature (second trend) over 20 min, will post the overnight minute trends tomorrow.

Picked up the mess, changed the dust mats, exit

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2021-01-04_16-13-53.png
2604   Wed Dec 23 11:13:57 2020 aaronThings to BuyPurchasesoptomechanics arrived

Entered lab around Wed Dec 23 11:14:29 2020 to bring in optomechanics from Newport, step stool from McMaster, and a few other items for around the lab.

2603   Thu Dec 17 10:23:08 2020 aaronNotesPSOMAlab entry

enter Thu Dec 17 10:24:44 2020

Just deskwork today.

exit Thu Dec 17 16:54:59 2020

2602   Mon Dec 14 10:32:51 2020 aaronUpdate

Enter Mon Dec 14 10:32:49 2020

Met with Shruti and finalized the fiber components we want to order.

Alignment procedure has apertures on the E beam path, one before the mixing BS and one after.

1. Use apertures to determine a path for the E beam
2. Place the PD such that signal from the E beam is maximized
3. Align W path to the PD using the penultimate aperture. Because the penultimate aperture and PD position are shared with the E beam, the beams should be copropagating.
4. Add short focal length lens before the PD.
5. adjust alignment to maximize beat note.
1. maximize DC level for E and W with the other path blocked.
2. maximize beat
3. repeat

W path laser is down to 25 uW at the PD. Also noticed that the y-alignment depends sensitively on the position of the final lens. The PD height is not the same as the height of the apertures, or the lens is off-center.

Exit Mon Dec 14 15:36:59 2020

2601   Thu Dec 10 10:05:03 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserpll

enter Thu Dec 10 10:04:54 2020

 Quote: Doesn't the phase meter just read out the noise even with no locking? I thought that was going to be the magic. For locking, the mixer readout is in units of phase and the laser current modulation gives a proportional frequency modulation with no frequency wiggles until > 1 MHz. So it should phase lock with no integrator, but I'm not sure if the free running noise will drive it out of the phase lock or not. I wonder if its possible to use the phase meter as an error signal. It would be much easier to lock frequency instead of phase via a mixer.

Hm, hadn't tried the phasemeter application. I'll check it out now... if I understand your second comment, you're saying because

$f = \frac{d\phi}{dt} \\ \implies \int f dt = \Delta \phi$

an error signal proportional to phase is already integrating the frequency error. Makes sense, but does 'easier to lock frequency instead of phase via a mixer' follow, or is that unrelated?

The Moku phasemeter does produce a nice power spectrum. Here it is up to 200 Hz, I'm working with Anchal's ctn-scripts and pymoku to get the higher frequencies.

Still odd that the beat amplitude is so small. Let's check:

 quantity Power of E beam @ 1611 (power meter) Power of W laser @ 1611 (power meter) 1611 DC voltage from E beam 1611 DC voltage from W beam DC voltage gain responsivity @ 1550 (approx) Expected DC voltage due to E beam Expected DC voltage due to W beam value 307.8 uW 65.7 uW -1.55 V -400 mV 10 V/mA 1 A/W -3.08 V -660 mV

Looks like neither beam is producing the expected photocurrent, but because the error is not the same factor for both beams I suspect alignment / beam size. I'm aligning with some apertures to avoid smearing the beam on lenses. Aligning each beam led to more power, but my procedure doesn't simultaneously align both beams.

exit Thu Dec 10 15:11:30 2020

Attachment 1: IMG_0016.PNG
2600   Sun Dec 6 19:22:10 2020 ranaNoise HuntingLaserpll

Doesn't the phase meter just read out the noise even with no locking? I thought that was going to be the magic.

For locking, the mixer readout is in units of phase and the laser current modulation gives a proportional frequency modulation with no frequency wiggles until > 1 MHz. So it should phase lock with no integrator, but I'm not sure if the free running noise will drive it out of the phase lock or not. I wonder if its possible to use the phase meter as an error signal. It would be much easier to lock frequency instead of phase via a mixer.

2599   Fri Dec 4 10:36:18 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserpll

Entered lab, then grabbed a spool of cable from EE, started elog Fri Dec 4 10:37:52 2020

thought about filters. The narrowest line I managed (yes really) is in the attached screenshot. I amplified +40 dB with Agilent 8447A before the splitter.

exit Fri Dec 4 16:14:19 2020

Attachment 1: IMG_0015.PNG
2598   Thu Dec 3 11:57:52 2020 ranaNoise HuntingLaserW laser oscillating

Definitely always use 50 Ohm for all inputs and output with RF frequencies. The Moku should be able to drive the current modulation input of the diode driver to directly phase lock based on the 1611 signal with no amplifiers. A 1 mW beat should give you ~1 Vpp, which is a few dBm.

2597   Thu Dec 3 10:18:07 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserpll

Entered somewhat before Thu Dec 3 10:18:07 2020

finishing up the PLL. I still need to set an appropriate gain for the LO, but in the meantime I'll try to use the Moku's laser lock feature

### Moku

This is pretty straightforward. Moku has an internal oscillator and lets you control the LP (corner frequency) and controller filter (proportional gain, integrator frequency, differentiator frequency, integrator saturation level, differentiator saturation level). I'm driving the E laser HF and LF inputs from the Moku outputs. Quickly acquire a lock and play around with filter settings for a while.

exit Thu Dec 3 12:30:47 2020

2596   Wed Dec 2 13:37:55 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserW laser oscillating

Enter Wed Dec 2 13:37:57 2020

I'd like to know whether the problem is in the W laser driver (S1500207) or the diode (104987). I swap the E laser drive over to the W laser diode, so am driving diode 104987 with driver S1600246. I still don't see the E laser driver oscillating, but the W diode power still reaches only 1.38 mW before falling off (ramping up current at T_set). Just in case, I also drive the W diode using the E driver but the cable from the original W driver (checking that the cable isn't the cause); no oscillation.

Entered EE to obtain grounding strap (Wed Dec 2 14:10:12 2020). On second thought, putting off diagnosing the W laser drive and just continuing with ITC 502. I did get a look inside, and don't actually see evidence that R33 was changed, just a added resistor from R30 to V_ref mentioned on the schematic.

Found this elog helpful for making sure the pinout for ITC 502 is compatible. Oddly, I can't set the laser diode current limit higher than 10mA, though the range of the device is +- 200 mA. I suspect the left 2 digits of the current display are just inoperable, because I can turn the adjustment pot in either direction until the digits stop moving. I set the current limit at 149 mA by counting by 10, and will double check the eventual current from the monitor. the diode definitely is nearing end of life, I'm only getting 1mW at nominal setpoint. I was squeezing a little extra out of the custom laser driver, but probably at the expense of the diode.

With the thorlabs driver, we're down to 1 peak at last!

Looking at the spectrum today, maybe the low frequency cutoff I noticed yesterday is just a frequency offset issue?

switching over to Moku... wow this is a user friendly device.

• beat note drifts by MHz over minute timescales
• FWHM ~ 140 kHz
• 35 dB above noise floor

Phaselock setup

• Photodiode output to splitter (ZFSC-2-4+)
• Long cable to 83 dB (!!?) gain amplifier to mixer (ZAY-1B) LO input. Mixer requires +23 dBm LO.
• short cable to [gain] to mixer (ZAY-1B) RF input

While choosing the gain for producing an LO from the 1611 output, I tried to measure the absolute power with the Moku. When I change the range from 1 Vpp to 10 Vpp, the overall peak height changes by almost 10 dB. I wondered if this were just a clipping issue, so I hooked up the Moku function generator output to the channel 2 input to see if the behavior is consistent. The beat note is 300 mVpp at the laser settings I'm currently using, which should be about 0 dBm dissipated into 1 MOhm. Sourcing 300 mVpp from the Moku into its channel 2 input gives the correct power reading, but the 300 mVpp from the 1611 reads -25 dBm with 10 Vpp range and -34 dBm with 1 Vpp range. What's going on?

• Probably just outside the linear range of the 1611, which saturates at 1mW input power. I'm seeing some unexpected sidebands (>> 9MHz), so nonlinearity makes sense. We're still well below the 10 mW damage threshold, but should add back the 90-10 pickoff mirrors now that alignment is done.
• After adding the 90-10 (power) BS, the AC output of the 1611 has ~3 mVpp (amplitude). nice
• The beat is now -53 dBm. That's still below what I'd expect for a 3 mVpp signal; Moku thinks it's seeing a 1.45 mVpp
• I want to attribute this to some setting of the oscilloscope or Moku, but it's also not consistent with my expectation. moku shows 6 mVpp when measuring its 3 mVpp output with 1 MOhm input impedance, suggesting there's a factor of 2 I'm missing somewhere; on the other hand, the signal from the 1611 needs a factor of 1/2 to be consistent with the oscilloscope measurement. Awkward.
• started these measurements at 50 Ohm input impedance for the SA, but when results didn't make sense I repeated at 1 MOhm. Should have stuck with 50.

I would have to string together eg 2x SR560 to get enough gain. I guess that's fine, because the noise floor of the SR560 is O(nV/rtHz)... but it gives me the feeling of doing something wrong, and I'm hungry so will pick it up tomorrow.

exit Wed Dec 2 18:42:15 2020

2595   Tue Dec 1 10:59:49 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserpll

Entered Tue Dec 1 10:59:48 2020

Turning on the lasers in a more controlled way today, trying to reach datasheet nominal setpoint

1. turn down current driver to 0mA
2. Turn on TEC (P and D at 0, only I => definitely no oscillating).
3. Ramp up the current to the datasheet's I_bias, while monitoring the DC current mon and laser power. According to the schematic, the total current mon is 1 V / 10 mA.
• Zach mentioned some modifications to this board in an elog. Hm, I've been using the schematic's current mon mapping (max 100mA), so maybe I've already damaged one of the diodes and that's why we're having issues. I don't see a record of the second (W) laser drive being modified, so perhaps this is why we are only seeing the 10MHz line on the E laser HF current mon.

I'm getting turned around, so I'll summarize the state of the drivers and lasers. Yellow highlight indicates this is a best guess based on things like dates on the DCC, but I haven't verified by eye (by opening the driver chassis or making a measurement).

 Laser Driver serial number Driver part number known Modifications Voltage limit DC current mon Measurements East S1600246 D1200719-v4 none no 1V / 10mA (this must be wrong) Zach 2017 West S1500267 D1200719-v3 current doubled no 100 V/A Zach 2017

Something seems wrong with the W laser path. At the nominal laser setpoint, the E path puts out a steady 5.33 mW; the W path puts out up to 1.9ish mW, but the power is fluctuating between 1 and 2 mW.

Spent some time changing the W/E mixing BS into a michelson BS for the W path (uneven arms). The AS beam from one leg was substantially brighter (by eye and ~10x on the PD) than the other. I confirmed that the mirror is HR for 1550. Probably just clipping, I had the plate BS kinematic mount in the wrong handedness to avoid remounting it; this was misguided anyway, I return it to original state. When I realigned the PLL path (identical to before this Michelson excursion), the forest of modes returned to the gaussian envelope state (not the bessel 2 looking envelope from yesterday). Could this be alignment / path length dependent? I returned the lasers to nominal T and I, and the gaussian envelope remains, so optical path is my best guess.

A little later, I lowered the TEC setpoint for W laser, and the Bessel envelope returned. However, whereas yesterday the 2nd sideband had a maximum now the 1st sideband is maximized.

Another feature that's been puzzling me -- when I sweep the temperature or current monotonically in a direction that moves the beat to 0Hz, the forest moves towards 0 until about 50 MHz. Below 50MHz, the modes are suppressed nearly to the noise floor; I think the carrier is just visible above the floor, but above 50Mhz the carrier is 50 dB above the floor. The cutoff is sharp, and if I continue sweeping temperature or current in the same direction the modes eventually reappear above 50 MHz moving up. My guess is it's another 'feature' of the analog spectrum analyzer that I haven't worked out (maybe secretly normalizing out the 1/f? but it's faster than 1/f rolloff), and that something cuts off low frequency sensitivity. Seeing as I'm well within 200MHz, I'm switching to the moku to check.

While the ipad charges, made this table of the modes I'm seeing at the nominal T_set of 23 C (10.940 kOhm) for W laser, 25 C (10.050 kOhm) for E laser. The marker tells me sideband spacing is 9.6 MHz; the W current drive HF mon has a line at 9.7 MHz, so it does seem these are related. I've attached the oscilloscope trace, where you can see that the W laser drive HF mon (chan 4) has RMS noise at least 100x the noise on E laser HF mon. The oscillation is dominated by the peak at 9.7 MHz, though there are a few others. Maybe the solution is just to swap in another laser driver -- this driver is a modified version an out of date revision of the circuit. Tomorrow I will swap in the combi controller for the W current driver and see if that helps.

 E laser current (mA / 2) W laser current (mA / 2) Envelope order carrier frequency (MHz) # of sidebands (100kHz RBW) 77.41 69.50 0 155 3 75.54 69.5 0 177 3 53.6 0 995 3

exit Tue Dec 1 18:08:59 2020

2594   Mon Nov 30 11:28:30 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaserpll

Entered lab about Mon Nov 30 10:21:35 2020, after taking a COVID test through Caltech's new surveillance testing program.

I'll pick up where Shruti left off on the beat note. The comb of sidebands becomes a single line  remains a comb when the PID is offKoji suggests maybe the (PLL) PID is oscillating at 10Mhz.

• Turned on both laser drivers, TEC, 15V PD power supply, HP 8560E spectrum analyzer.
• E laser TEC was set to 8.301 kOhm
• W laser TEC was set to 8.992 kOhm
• Located the thermistor resistance on the RIO data sheets
• Diode #104978 (E path) has thermistor resistance 10.050 kOhm at the nominal setpoint (25 C)
• Diode #104987 (W path) has thermistor resistance 10.940 kOhm at the nominal setpoint (23 C)
• Oddly, Dmass' elog on unboxing these lasers lists a different operating temperature than the datasheets
• Adjusted the PID on both TEC
• First, turned down I and D to 0. Next, increased P until there was oscillation. Added back a little D and turned down P until no oscillation. Increase I until it moves to the setpoint.
• Checked 'step response' when the laser is turned on, and adjusted PID until no overshoot or oscillating on the way to setpoint, and equilibrium reached within seconds. This did not affect the sidebands.
• toring the beat spectrum results in no change in the sidebands, until the temperature starts to oscillate and the beat is lost.
• Checking out the HF current mon on a 200MHz oscilloscope to see if something's going on there. The HF drive input is open, so there should be no peaks.
• W laser has a line at 9.75 MHz, 20 dB above the noise floor.
• E laser has a line at 22.5 MHz, 20 dB above the noise floor (on second look, this peak is not present. Lots of adjustment between the two measurements though, and I'm not sure what did the trick)
• I'm seeing the forest of sidebands hopping side-to-side (~38 MHz hops). Modehopping? [no, it was a triggering issue] I adjust the TEC setpoint to the nominal values on the datasheet.
• The hops are always by exactly 4 times the sideband spacing (~40MHz, so the second to the right sideband frequency at +20 MHz coincides with the second to the left sideband frequency at -20 MHz after the hop)
• Hm... turning off both lasers, I see several noise peaks in the dark spectrum that 'turn on and off' every other refresh of the spectrum video...
• This is present even when I take single spectra manually (not continuous). Every other spectrum has some noise forest around 20MHz. Is this an artifact of the SA settings? No reason something at MHz should exhibit such repeatable on/off behavior for my random-near-Hz button presses.
Indeed, when I turn on the 'frequency counter' on the spectrum analyzer, the hopping goes away... why?
• With frequency counter on, I now see two sets of sideband peaks. What's the spectrum analyzer doing for demodulation, this looks like some artifact. Perhaps some saturated stage of the spectrum analyzer is causing sidebands. Here's a nice technical note from HP on spectrum analyzers.
• Larger changes of temperature and current moves the forest of peaks out to higher frequency (after being lost for intermediate values of T and I).
• The forest of modes is still there even with both PID off.

exit Mon Nov 30 16:12:04 2020

Attachment 1: IMG_0195.jpg
2592   Mon Nov 30 10:26:17 2020 ranaPhotosSi fabSi cantilever photos

Thanks, the photos are now on the shared drive.

2590   Sat Nov 28 21:53:12 2020 ranaPhotosSi fabSi cantilever photos

For storing lab photos in W Bridge, you can use our shared google acct instead so that we all have access to it (see chat for secrets)

2589   Fri Nov 27 19:43:33 2020 KojiUpdateLab Workpsoma locking

Isn't the PID oscilating at 10MHz?

2588   Fri Nov 27 13:38:18 2020 ShrutiUpdateLab Workpsoma locking

Attachment 1: Video of spectrum analyzer with zoomed out beat after turning off the PID loop of west laser

Attachment 2: Another image of the zoomed in spectrum when the PID is on.

Attachment 1: Beat.mp4
Attachment 2: BeatZoomed.pdf
2587   Tue Nov 24 15:58:00 2020 aaronNotesEquipment Loanmoku CTN to Cryo

Anchal dropped off the Moku from CTN, along with its USBA->USBC cable, power cable, and ipad.

2586   Tue Nov 24 13:23:09 2020 aaronPhotosSi fabSi cantilever photos

Entered lab around Tue Nov 24 13:24:57 2020 to finish photographing Zach's cantilevers.

some things about cameras, and in particular the FinePix F300 EXR

• ISO -- the camera's sensitivity to light. More sensitive means more noise, but also more signal (useful when exposure time must remain short).
• aperture -- size of the opening before the lens. A wide aperture yields a shallow depth of field and lets in more light, but can cause blurriness in the foreground and background. Narrow aperture lets in less light and widens the depth of field, but can lead to diffraction effects or not enough exposure time depending on the application.
• shutter speed -- how long with the shutter remain open? All the usual tradeoffs of integrating.

For these shots, I have the camera mounted on a tripod and close enough to the cantilevers that the subject takes up the full field. I've turned off the overhead lights and oriented the bright, fluorescent desk lamp away from the camera and slightly up. I'm reflecting some diffuse light back to the cantilevers with a large kim wipe (and my white face / lab coat). I've set minimum ISO, long exposure time, and large aperture. Since I'm handling nominally clean Si, I'm wearing gloves, lab coat, mask, and hair net. I covered the wall behind the shot with paper towel to provide a dark, uniform surface that isn't visible in reflections off the wafer containers and doesn't backlight the shot. The photos are not taken from above because doing so resulted in reflection from the top cover, which I wanted to keep on to avoid dust.

Looks like 5-7 cantilevers could be high Q (no visible contaminants, pitting, cracks, etc). I think there's also a pair of high Q cantilevers in Zach's cantilever cavities cryostat, and maybe one in the cantilever op lev cryostat (QIL). If we measure the Q of the most promising bare cantilevers, we can identify the 3ish best candidates for aSi coating.

Photos can be found in this album. I've pulled a representative good-looking cantilever and attach them here, along with the photo booth setup.

attachment 1: the photo booth
attachment 2: the lines near the top are reflections from the edge of the container. The long sides are parallel, and can give you a sense of the angle of the photograph.

While doing this, I entered EE to retrieve a spare battery for the camera, and later again to return the camera to its place by the sink.

left around Tue Nov 24 17:50:48 2020
Attachment 1: DSCF3580.JPG
Attachment 2: DSCF3572.JPG
2585   Tue Nov 24 10:16:04 2020 shrutiUpdateLab Workpsoma locking

- Found a suitable power cable M-M for the New Focus 0901 power supply on the east table (I did not realize yesterday that these were the same cables). Then I checked the voltage on the pins and they were fine.

- Using the New Focus 1611 (1 GHz PD) powered by the New Focus 0901 +-15 V / 0.3 A max. power supply, I tried finding the beat note. I looked at the RF output on a HP 8560 E spectrum analyzer and the DC output on an oscilloscope.

The DC output ranged from 500 mV to over 1 V as I scanned the temperature of one or both lasers.

- When the east laser temperature read roughly 8.34 kOhm and west was 9.04 kOhm I saw a pattern as in Attachment 2.

Changing the temperature slightly did cause the peaks to shift about, and further when I changed the polarization of the east laser using the HWP the height of the peaks varied. They also disappeared when either of the beams were blocked.

The estimated peak power in the taller peaks is ~0.1 µW from the plot.

- I also tried scanning the temperature of both lasers again to possibly find a single peak. No luck yet.

Today, I didn't check the alignment very carefully and I probably have to tune it further after the changes that Aaron and I made over the past few days.

The next step is to do the phase-locking.

Attachment 1: BeatSetup.pdf
Attachment 2: BeatOrNot.pdf
2584   Fri Nov 20 19:24:00 2020 aaronElectronicsElectronicspower cables

Entered lab Fri Nov 20 19:24:32 2020, usual sanitation.

[blue "Photodiode Power Supply] Looking for a DB9 to BNC adapter. I found this spider instead -- close enough. Use multimeter to measure 24V between pints 4 an 9... not promising. Confirm power is connected, no signal on the frontpanel BNCs either. Could remove this one and take a look on the benchtop, but above is...

[Newfocus +-15V current-limited power supply] Has 3 pole bananas and a power switch on the front. Found a power cable for the back. There's a bananas to 3-pin LEMO already there. Double check the voltage with a multimeter. Alas the connector doesn't fit the PD, but should be some cables in the EE shop or elsewhere...

Didn't find the right connector in EE. On the 'power cables' rack (NE corner Cryo), there was a M-F connector, but I need M-M. Could cannibalize the 12VDC supply? I think for now +-12V is working, so should look a bit more.

I moved the power cables for our preamps for better strain relief (attachment 2 is the before photo).

I also had left this ND filter sitting on the table (attachment 1). Yikes!

More photos here.

ExitFri Nov 20 20:39:43 2020

Attachment 1: DSCF3541.JPG
Attachment 2: DSCF3542.JPG
2583   Thu Nov 19 16:34:01 2020 aaronDailyProgressGeneralcantilever photos, laser intensity noise

Entered lab Thu Nov 19 16:33:57 2020. Usual sanitation, personal reminder to report campus access with Caltech.

## Cantilevers

we want to coat some of Zach's cantilevers with a-Si so we can make a cold Q measurement. I've started to take some photos, but have become tired and will finish tomorrow. There are O(5) suitable cantilevers produced in January 2018, but I'll have to dig a bit more (or ask Zach) to determine what's what. We can measure the Q of the most promising few cantilevers to be sure they're acceptable.

I borrowed the digital camera from EE shop, but left its case (which is very dusty).

## Laser intensity noise

Sending W path beam to a Newfocus 1811 to measure free running laser intensity noise.

Following Shruti's recent diagram, I moved the Newfocus 1811 into position after OMTL1. I also moved PO1.1 back into the beam path, so I can use it to align into the 1811. Turn on the E laser and TEC, also had to move Ma for alignment. I still don't have a +-15V power supply, will ask around. Turn off the laser and TEC before exit at Thu Nov 19 20:41:22 2020

2582   Thu Nov 19 11:23:44 2020 shrutiUpdateLab Workpsoma locking

Attachment 1: An updated version of the diagram in elog 2577 where the path lengths to the beat beam-splitter are identical. The fiber launchers and some components have been moved around, but everything after PO1.1 along the beam has been retained as before.

Attachment 2: Retaining the same configuration to the beat BS, the cavity with Mach-Zehnder interferometer has been added. Also the path lengths to the MZ input BS along both laser beam paths have the same length. Except for the ring cavity, the Mach-Zehnder is also balanced.

Attachment 3: Updates pertaining to the current setup

• Work in progress to achieve the configuration in Attachment 1.
• I have switched the two PDs so the beat can be measured with the Newfocus 1611 (has a larger BW) and the noise measurement with the east laser can be done with the Newfocus 1811.
• I removed the 10/90 pick-off circled in green, so that would have to be added to the path to continue the noise measurement.

Attachment 1: PLL_FS_sym.pdf
Attachment 2: MZ_PLL_FS_sym.pdf
Attachment 3: NewBeat.pdf
2581   Wed Nov 18 08:24:02 2020 shrutiUpdatePSOMAtemp control and transverse beam profiles

D [in.]

West laser (X) [um]  West laser (Y) [um] East laser (X) [um] East laser (Y) [um]
2 327.2, 336.5 332.0, 340.9 327.1, 332.8 330.0, 335.2
3 358.2, 269.6 363.4, 374.7
4 420.4, 439.3 417.8, 439.8
5 511.7, 549.2 510.2, 549.9 527.6, 550.7 519.6, 540.4
6 642.8, 688.0 630.6, 674.9
7 766.4, 807.9 754.6, 801.4 778.0, 848.3 716.0, 782.7
8 891.1, 932.6 894.7, 942.1
9 974.3, 1023.1 943.9, 1000.6
10 1142.6, 1193.9 1152.7, 1203.5 1092.2, 1159.7 1040.6, 1103.4

This is the data using the Data Ray Beam'R2 profiler with the InGaAs window. Attachment 1 contains images of each of those profiles.

D: distance from fiber launcher in inches; The two values in each of the cells are [Clip 13.5%, 4 sigma] respectively, i.e., the method used to calculate the beam widths.

The previous measurement using a razor blade refers to 'sigma' which I believe explains why these values are 4 times larger.

These profiles were taken with temperature stabilized such that the powers were ~1 mW.

East laser set to 8.070 k Ohm, West laser set to 9.065 k Ohm. I don't understand why there is such a difference.

I had hooked up the ITC 502 combi controller to the west Rio laser and used only its temperature controller. (I believe both the thermistors that measure the diode temperatures are TH-20k Ohm.)

Both the PID controllers work satisfactorily: the TED 200 C with the east laser stabilizes to within few Ohms of the setpoint thermistor resistance within some seconds;

the ITC 502 stabilizes at a similar rate but at an offset of ~10 Ohms despite the integrator being set to maximum. I fiddled around with the P and I settings a little but realized that this configuration seemed optimal.

To measure these profiles at different distances I moved the fiber launcher head and then replaced it back to its original position, roughly.

Attachment 1: beamprofdata.zip
2580   Tue Nov 17 14:56:06 2020 aaronDailyProgressGenerallab entry

I entered the lab somewhat before Tue Nov 17 14:56:22 2020. Exited Tue Nov 17 16:39:12 2020

Hand sanitizer on entry, also sanitized the bulky green laser goggles before and after my use (forgot contacts). Turned off the laser, sat at desk and considered turning on the laser. Took a break. On my walk I wrote this haiku

Took another break.
Why align these mirrors when
photons have no mass?

I'm going to this seminar, so that's all for today. If nothing else, a reminder (even to myself) to always elog, no matter how small.
2579   Mon Nov 9 14:40:46 2020 shrutiMiscEquipment LoanStuff for N2 transfer

I've placed the following items outside the cryo lab:

1. Cryo liquid N2 dewar

2. Funnel

3. Tube

4. Two pairs of cryo gloves

Attachment 1: IMG_0334.pdf
2578   Wed Oct 28 18:10:27 2020 aaronNoise HuntingLaser

## Lab entry

in: Wed Oct 28 18:11:00 2020
out: Wed Oct 28 21:05:58 2020

## E laser noise

• Moved the Newfocus 1611 from W path cryo cantilevers transmission, to just after the PSOMA beam launch.
• nominal AC gain: 700 V/A
• nominal DC gain: 10 kV/A
• output impedance: 50 Ohm
• Max input power: 1 mW DC (10 mW CW)
• Measuring the following spectra across the PD band (~30kHz-1GHz) by connecting the 1611 AC output directly to an HP 8560E (50 Ohm input). I'm monitoring DC with TDS3024B oscilloscope (1 MOhm input).
• dark current
• free running E path laser intensity noise

Optical layout: beam launch -> lambda/2 -> steering mirrors -> lens 1 -> ND 0.6 -> lens 2 -> PD 1611

There is only a 12 VDC power supply compatible with the 1611 power port, but the PD requires +- 15V. Surely there's one somewhere. Perhaps this is why I observe only -6 V on the DC mon with 1mW input power at 1550nm (checked against the Thorlabs S122C; I expected -10V). Maybe the beam is too large.

2577   Wed Oct 28 12:42:31 2020 shrutiDailyProgressLab Workpsoma locking

## Phase-locking the two lasers:

- Although when we talked about adjusting the MZ-phase, we decided that having the phase/path length control with fiber components might be better initially (Refer Attachment 2), for now I began doing everything in free-space.

- Attachment 1 shows the setup as it is now. Previously I'd placed polarizing beam splitters instead of 90/10 beam-splitters because I thought it would be easier to work with, but now changed my mind and decided to stick with what we planned.

### Next steps:

(Once the beat is obtained on the spectrum analyzer)

1. Adjust set-point temperatures to adjust beat frequency to the right frequency.
Since ideally we want the two frequencies to be identical, it might be a good idea to add an AOM to one of the paths so that the first order beam is mixed with the other laser and this beat be compared to a stable reference for phase-locking.
But, initially we plan to skip the AOM.
2. Adjust the PID parameters if needed

- Measure the laser frequency noise

29 Oct 20:

I've added Attachment 3 -- which is the current free space version and some PLL electronics.

- It does not show the Mach-Zehnder part as that will be added only later

- This setup is asymmetric but in a future version we will change that

Attachment 1: Setup2020Oct27.pdf
Attachment 2: psoma_PLL.pdf
Attachment 3: psoma_pll_freespace_intermediate.pdf
2576   Tue Oct 27 15:57:27 2020 shrutiDailyProgressLab Workpsoma locking

Today I modified the optical setup with the aim of obtaining the beat between the two diode lasers for phase-locking.

I added pick-off polarizing beamsplitters with HWPs in each path for now (to be able to adjust their power) and mixed them at a 50/50 non-polarizing beam-splitter to eventually reach a Newfocus 1811 low noise PD.

I will add pictures and more details later.

2575   Fri Oct 23 19:06:05 2020 gautamUpdateEquipment LoanTwo resonant RFPDs ---> 40m

I was in the Cryo lab between 1215-1230 this afternoon. I removed two resonant RFPDs from what was Johannes' setup (encircled in Attachment #1). I also brought a SR554 preamplifier to the 40m.

I was wearing the usual PPE (gloves, face mask) while I was in the lab.

Attachment 1: IMG_8903.JPG
2574   Thu Oct 15 22:15:11 2020 Ian MacMillanComputingSimulationModeringer Simulation

This is the spectrum coming off of the sample. there should be a peak at 1038Hz... but there isn't. And what is even weirder is that the spectrum analyzer that is built into Simulink shows a peak where I expect but when I do it here it doesn't show up.

Update: I think I have found why there is a discrepancy between the two versions of the power spectrum. The spectrum analyzer in the Simulink model requires non-continuous data so you have to use a block to make your data discrete. The sampling rate of that block affects where the peak of the mode is seen. So it seems that that the mode seen in the previous post was just caused by making the data non-continuous.

Attachment 1: ModeRingerSpec.pdf
2573   Thu Oct 8 00:31:11 2020 Ian MacMillanComputingSimulationModeringer Simulation

I got the script to run the simulation and added color to the diagram just to make it pretty :0

The next step is quantifying the error of the loop. My plan for this was to just calculate the Q from figure 3 of the moderinger paper. Then I can see if that value is consistent. Aaron suggested settling time and phase margin of the loop. So that is the next step (once I figure out how to do that)

Also I added the code to the Qryo github

Attachment 1: ModeRingerLoopDig.pdf
Attachment 2: ModeRingerSim.zip
2572   Tue Sep 29 11:00:53 2020 aaronComputingSimulationModeringer Simulation

Beautiful! Want to push this to the repo under git large file storage?

 Quote: The step function represents the excitation of the sample. Ideally, it would excite to the setpoint and stay there but for some reason, it is jumping way past the point before returning. By messing with the gain and the frequency of the low pass filter I could get a variety of results the best is shown below at 50 gain and 40 rad/s.

The overshoot is interesting! To understand the loop shaping, I suggest checking out Gardner's Phaselock Techniques or Astrom and Murray's Feedback SystemsThey both have sections on optimal PID controller design (at least Astrom and Murray do). You can make a pole-zero plot to help choose the location of poles and zeros in your loop shaping filter (the discrete zero-pole TF we added, after the gain).

2571   Tue Sep 29 02:02:54 2020 Ian MacMillanComputingSimulationModeringer Simulation

Working with Aaron's suggestions (In the previous post) we got the mode ringer to converge. Previously the loop would continue to excite the sample to infinity but by fixing the following things we were able to get the step function to converge.

• Added a discrete zero-pole transfer function after the 100 gain
• Included the RMS block
• Disabled zero-crossing detection in the saturation
• Fixed the sign of the s^2 in the bottom of the plant TF (the i^2 included in s cancels the negative)

The step function represents the excitation of the sample. Ideally, it would excite to the setpoint and stay there but for some reason, it is jumping way past the point before returning. By messing with the gain and the frequency of the low pass filter I could get a variety of results the best is shown below at 50 gain and 40 rad/s.

The power spectrum shown is taken from the spectrum analyzer shown in the loop. It shows what I would expect with a peak around our mode frequency of 1038 Hz.

Next Steps:

• Figure out how to run the model entirely from a script. (I got this partially working but it is not fully functional)
• Fix the step function it still seems to be wild and we NEED to fix that before making meaningful progress on this project.
• Add some sort of error estimation: quantify how good this loop is at measuring what we want.
• How can we optimize our loop parameters to minimize this error?
• Make it look pretty (black and white is gross)
Attachment 1: ModeRingerLoop.pdf
Attachment 2: StepPlot.pdf
Attachment 3: PowerSpectrum.pdf
Attachment 4: ModeRingerSim.zip
2570   Tue Sep 22 21:30:07 2020 aaronDailyProgressLab Worklab entry, supplies

## notice of lab entry

Tue Sep 22 21:33:30 2020

### inventory

I'm cleaning a bit, and gathering items not in use or in need of repair. They would make less mess in my office.

took an inventory of optics cleaning supplies, first aid kit, general cleaning supplies, wipes, etc. I found most were included in the first round inventory, but I took photos this time to convince my future self of object permanence. Will add to the wiki and update in a bit.

### entered QIL, CTN

gloved up, shoe covers, went to QIL to check out the sprinklers and CTN to grab a GHz spectrum analyzer (HP8560E).

out: Wed Sep 23 00:20:03 2020

2569   Tue Sep 15 12:29:41 2020 ranaLab InfrastructureHVACHEPA filters for PSOMA enclosure

I suggest just using what's used for th QIL table.

2568   Thu Sep 10 10:21:34 2020 aaronLab InfrastructureHVACHEPA filters for PSOMA enclosure

Yesterday into today, I've been shopping for laminar flow HEPA fan filter modules for the PSOMA optical enclosure. I didn't find a lot of LIGO documentation listing specific filters, but here's what I've found online with some downselection on 'low vibration / high filter quality'. Please let me know If there's a company we often use, or if you can help direct this search at all.

Another consideration is flow rate relative to our volume. I can do this calculation, but what is the particle density (eg at 0.3 um) we want to achieve inside the enclosure? I realize that I never got the particle counter recording despite it being on my list, so I'll try to do that remotely today. We need to know the ambient particle count and the clean volume in the enclosure.

### Notes

Terra Universal Smart Whisperflow Fan Filter Unit $1,111 HEPA (H10-100k) 40 dB @ 90 ft/min velocity @ face datasheet, product page The 'Smart' model has 9dB less noise than the standard, but costs about$500 more. Also comes in 'low profile' version.
Clean Air Products CAP118   HEPA -- product page requested quote
Thomas Scientific Fan filter module, "low noise" \$1,760 HEPA   product page
Price Industries LFDC series laminar flow diffusers       product page, datasheet
Envirco Mac 10 original     51 dBA @ 90 FPM datasheet referenced in T2000382
A-J MFG SSLFHFD-FP "criti-clean" fan filter   HEPA 45dBA @ 90 FPM product page claims to be the lowest-height unit on the market (13.7''). The RFQ page looked fishy though, so I held off.
FungiFun (website)       link lists a number of other filter suppliers, by country

*all prices listed here are from publicly available pages

2567   Wed Sep 2 16:46:39 2020 aaronThings to BuyDrawingsdimension-full optical layout

I updated the stage 1/2 optical layout to be more detailed after getting a sense of the sizes of things again last week. Even though this isn't how the table is currently set up, it might be good to accommodate future vacuum chambers in our earlier designs to minimize how much we need to move and realign optics.

• just for convenience, I gave all of the vacuum chambers the footprint of the gyroscope vacuum chambers. I chose this footprint rather than the cantilever cavity cryostat footprint to allow 45 deg aoi on the mach zehnder BSs (the cryostat windows are all parallel)
• The chamber containing the output BS and BHD is cramped. If these all need to be in the same vacuum, we should get a larger vacuum; if the BHD and LO path can be moved to air that works too.
• If output BS chamber is larger and input MMT allows, the entire MZ can be shifted to the right (north).
• Picked off LO from input BS AR surface
• Need additional mode matching lenses into some of the photodiodes -- certainly into PL_RFPD, but I think also into the other PDs?
• The beam to TRANS_DCPD is probably geometrically unphysical.
• The cavity length is limited by the size of the cryostat.
• Perhaps want free-space EOM, EOAM, Faraday isolator?
• Not sure I've dumped all beams properly, for example the reflection from BHD_PD1 and from BHD_BS AR surface.

I will update the PSOMA hardware inventory tomorrow to reflect the additional details in the new drawing. The updated diagram is available on git LFS, and the hardware inventory now reflects the diagram up through stage 1.

Attachment 1: psoma_stage2.pdf
2566   Wed Sep 2 16:19:57 2020 shrutiUpdateLab Worklab entry, information gathering

Notice of lab entry: 20 Sep 2020   evening

Fiber modulators on the table :

1. Intensity modulators (BW: up to 12 GHz) MXAN-LN-10

2. EOM phase modulators (BW: up to 150 MHz) MPX-LN-01

Dimensions of vacuum cans mentioned in attachments.

Attachment 1: 7BA40146-4F86-4819-8D6C-FFDC8F246E50.jpeg
Attachment 2: 129FE089-1E57-4E6D-9E77-F80F8E124CD1.jpeg
2565   Mon Aug 31 10:00:25 2020 aaronUpdateLab Workoptics setup

Here's the layout.

Some easy things that should be changed:

• Transmission through the cavity end mirror should go to a steering mirror before PDA20CS
• Should clamp the cables (eg power to PDA255) with something soft so they stay in place and aren't strained
• Need to dump the reflection from transmon PD. Do we really need to dump transmission through mirrors with frosted backs?
Attachment 1: 200828_layout.jpg
2564   Fri Aug 28 16:59:59 2020 aaronUpdateLab Workoptics setup

I measured the transmission of the Coastline 1m mirror at 180. ppm (S122C).

Alignment procedure while setting location of optics:

1. use 2x irises to constrain a beam path at the locations of the eventual MZ input BS and the cavity BS.
2. Place the first (R~1) flat mirror at 45 degrees centered on the beam line. Use this mirror to steer into an iris at the location of the cavity's curved mirror.
3. Use steering optics to direct the eventual transmission beam into the trans mon PD (PDA 20CS)
4. Place the curved mirror at near normal incidence. Use this mirror to steer the beam through irises at the location of the MZ output BS and cavity BS.
5. Use steering mirrors to send the beam to the refl PD (PDA255).
6. Place the cavity BS and steer the reflected beam to the refl PD.

Alignment procedure subsequently:

1. Misalign the cavity BS
2. Use the cavity mirrors to steer the circulated reflection into refl PD.
3. Use cavity BS to align prompt reflection into refl PD.

2563   Thu Aug 27 13:24:30 2020 aaronLab Infrastructurestuff happenslocked out of optomechanics cabinet

Not sure how, but none of the drawers of the blue optomechanics cabinet are opening. I don't have a key. Here's what happened

1. I closed one drawer ("A") and opened the drawer below it ("B")
2. Closed B
3. Opened A and B simultaneously; I could not open only B, only A and B together. Close A and B.
4. Open both A and B. Close only A.
5. Close B
6. None of the drawers now open, even A and B together. seems locked

Found someone who's had this problem before, might give it a try...

[update]

This worked, I used the metal meter stick to unlock the drawer.

--> note that link formatting breaks link for me, so here it is - https://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/general/help-my-lista-locked-me-out-how-do-i-open-201606/

--> wrote up a similar experience with additional detail ENG_Labs/260

2562   Wed Aug 26 12:12:22 2020 aaronUpdateLab Workoptics setup
• aligned beam along the NS axis using two irises and the existing 2x f=100 lenses from the E path.
• HWP->steering mirror-> 90-10 BS -> iris -> lens -> lens -> iris -> PD
• all transmitted beams dumped
• Mounted a 1'' x 1m FL Si mirror in a polaris mount. Made a ring cavity with that and 2x mirrors coated for 45 deg.

### optics

Can anyone tell me the specs / history of some of the custom optics in cryo? I'm mounting the 1m Coastline mirror and will start with that in the PSOMA cavity.

• Laseroptik 1'' mirrors. Batch # 19028Kel. Part(?) numbers L-13997, L-13998. (these are in red boxes cases w clear lid)
• Coastline Optics 1.0''x0.25'' FS substrates. Coated for 1550nm at 45 degrees. (these are in stacks cylindrical clear cases, and include some witness and rejected samples)
• Coastline optics 1'' silicon substrate, 1 meter focal length. SN 1.0-Si-1.0M
• Photon Laseroptik 1'' FS substrates (~50), labeled 75S308926. Also labeled with a wedge angle or what looks like a focal length (no unit)
• Two stacks from Gooch & Housego, taped in bubble wrap with the data sheet. These are coated for 1550nm, transmission ~1% S and ~5% P at 45 deg.
2561   Tue Aug 25 13:42:40 2020 aaronUpdateLab Workoptics setup

## setting up PSOMA beam path

I took some photos of the existing layout. I'll just take apart the E beam path, and leave the W path unchanged for now as reference.

I moved the E fiber output coupler closer to the edge of the table, to make this path easier to reach.

Hopped around on the laser hysterisis curve for a minute. To optimize the temperature,

1. Started with TEC on near room temperature, then turned on the laser driver with the current set to maximize power on the meter (S122C)
2. increased the temperature setpoint (decrease resistance setpoint) slowly until the laser power starts to decrease.
3. Turn off the laser driver. Decrease temperature setpoint to just below the maximum power setpoint.
4. Turn on the laser driver. Total power is now 4.6mW, compared to ~2mW with TEC off.
2560   Tue Aug 25 13:23:49 2020 aaronThings to BuyGeneralcryo lab inventory

I started a cryo lab inventory that is separate from the PSOMA hardware inventory, and intended for stock items in the lab (optics, electronics, clamps, general safety and cleaning supplies, etc). It will be a work in progress. Both are accessible to anyone logged in to google drive with their ligo.org credentials.

Both are also linked on the PSOMA project wiki.

2559   Mon Aug 24 13:22:32 2020 aaronUpdateLab WorkalaPSOMA

Did some mode matching, see the git.

2558   Mon Aug 24 13:21:40 2020 aaronUpdateLab Worknotice of entry

## Notice of lab entry

Date of entry: 24 Aug 2020

time of entry: 12pm
time of exit:

Purpose: stage 1 cavity setup
2557   Wed Aug 19 12:15:40 2020 aaronUpdateLab WorkNotice of entry

The cameras were unfortunately lost in the mail, but we can use my laptop or other camera. Ended up leaving to do a couple comsol things that needed completing today.

2556   Wed Aug 19 12:11:47 2020 aaronUpdateLab WorkNotice of entry

## Notice of lab entry

Date of entry: 18 Aug 2020

time of entry: 12pm
time of exit:

Purpose: Identify some combination of optics that will let us mode match to our ring cavity, set up PDH locking with the existing ~33 MHz modulation.
ELOG V3.1.3-