40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
PSL |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Tue Feb 15 23:19:54 2011, Frank, DailyProgress, BEAT, some (minor) calibration problem found 
|
Tue Feb 15 23:33:51 2011, tara, DailyProgress, BEAT, some (minor) calibration problem found
|
Wed Feb 16 09:14:14 2011, Frank, DailyProgress, BEAT, some (minor) calibration problem found
|
|
Message ID: 499
Entry time: Tue Feb 15 23:33:51 2011
In reply to: 498
Reply to this: 501
|
Author: |
tara |
Type: |
DailyProgress |
Category: |
BEAT |
Subject: |
some (minor) calibration problem found |
|
|
So, from the first plot, is the calibration factor for cable delay technique ~ 8MHz/Volt?
Quote: |
Found at least two (minor) problems:
- So far i measured the zero-crossing of the mixer signal and both peak values and modeled the signal using a sine.
For calibration i used the slope of the sine near the zero-crossing.
As the frequency range for pi in shift is about 60MHz the function is almost linear for the range we measure over 24h (~2MHz).
Today i measured the mixer signal in small steps and compared both techniques. The result surprised me a little bit:

it is not a lot of difference in slope but it is surprisingly linear over a range of 40MHz!
- the channel which contains the calibrated VCO monitor signal uses a wrong sign.
The fit is right, but i remembered that i exchanged the BNC to 2-pole LEMO connector some time ago because it had the wrong sign.
However, the frequency tuning curve i measured with the old (wrong) cable.
I used the right sign on my computer but implemented the wrong one in EPICS, so that data was/is wrong. Will change that tomorrow.
This can't explain the problems i had last week as i used Matlab to convert the monitor signal into frequency, not that channel.
Anyway, this is how the data i took last night (19h) looks like using the right slope (see item 1):

so i think once the EPICS channel is fixed we can trust that channel
|
|