40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
PSL |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Fri Nov 1 17:54:47 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - RFPD RF Ouput under inspection   
|
Tue Nov 5 18:37:59 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - TTFSS Testpoint Spectrum Data
|
Sat Nov 9 19:28:36 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Loop nonlinearity Test  
|
Mon Nov 11 20:42:49 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Two Tone Test  
|
Tue Nov 12 18:36:59 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Two Tone Third Order Intermodulation Test
|
Thu Nov 14 12:19:32 2019, rana, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Two Tone Third Order Intermodulation Test
|
Tue Nov 19 18:51:02 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Second-order Distortion Calculation 
|
Mon Dec 9 19:54:44 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - How much distortion affects the functioning of PDH?
|
Wed Nov 27 13:59:24 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - TTFSS TP1 TimeSeries
|
Wed Nov 27 15:17:51 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Quick HF OLTF of NFSS
|
Wed Nov 27 16:31:20 2019, rana, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Quick HF OLTF of NFSS
|
Wed Dec 4 18:11:09 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, Free running laser frequency noise spectrum
|
Thu Dec 5 18:25:11 2019, rana, DailyProgress, FSS, Free running laser frequency noise spectrum
|
Tue Dec 17 18:29:58 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, Need for ISS?
|
Wed Dec 18 18:40:32 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, Maybe the NPRO Laser isn't bad after all
|
Wed Dec 18 22:03:17 2019, rana, DailyProgress, FSS, Maybe the NPRO Laser isn't bad after all
|
Fri Dec 20 15:00:30 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, PZT, EOM to RIN TF Measurement
|
Fri Dec 20 18:08:44 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, PZT, EOM to RIN TF Measurement Through FSS
|
Tue Jan 7 17:59:20 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, NPMC TF
|
Thu Dec 12 19:15:55 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - Beatnote Spectrum wrt Laser Power and Modulation Index
|
Tue Dec 17 16:55:07 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - TTFSS North U7 Boost Stage Input-Output TimeSeries
|
Tue Nov 12 11:39:48 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - RFPD RF Ouput under inspection
|
Fri Dec 13 16:24:02 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - RFPD Circuit Latest Available Photos   
|
Fri Dec 13 17:44:05 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - RFPD RF Coupled Output Offset
|
Mon Jan 13 19:04:38 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - SN009 (North RFPD) Notch Improvement Attempt  
|
Tue Jan 14 18:19:33 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - SN009 (North RFPD) Notch Improved!  
|
Thu Jan 16 11:17:15 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - SN010 (South RFPD) Notch Improvement Attempt  
|
Thu Jan 16 20:18:44 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - SN010 (South RFPD) Notch Improved  
|
Mon Jan 27 18:29:19 2020, anchal, DailyProgress, FSS, FSS Diagnostics - RFPD RF Out Spectrum
|
|
Message ID: 2499
Entry time: Tue Dec 17 16:55:07 2019
In reply to: 2474
|
Author: |
anchal |
Type: |
DailyProgress |
Category: |
FSS |
Subject: |
FSS Diagnostics - TTFSS North U7 Boost Stage Input-Output TimeSeries |
|
|
As suggested few group meetings ago, I took time series data at the input and output of boost stage opamp U7 (at TP15 and TP16) using TDS 3034C. I know trusting oscilloscope for synchronous measurement of two channels is not a great idea, but this is a good zeroth order approximation for this approach. 500 MHz 10MOhm impedance probes were used for the measurement of the signals. The data is taken at two different acquisition rates and I used basic math to calculate the expected ideal output. Following formula was used:

Ofcourse the offset point above wouldn't work. Also, I have not included the notch filter that is also present at this stage.
The results of this analysis are attached. I also, calculated the required slew rate of the AD847 at this position. At the 100 MSa/s sampling rate, we saw that maximum required slew rate for ideal signal was around 110 V/us, much less than rated 300 V/us. I don't see a bad change in shape of the waveform. At 1 GSa/s sampling rate, we see that required slew rate reached about 220 V/us at indeed oscillations at high frequencies are limited even though this is below the rated value.
Looking from data taken at CTN:2474 present in this directory, these fast oscillations that we are seeing on the oscilloscope are around the modulation frequency 36 MHz. These leftover downconverted 2-Omega from teh RFPD might be saturating slew rate limtis of many opamps in the TTFSS box. I think I should look back into Andrew's implimentation of the elliptical filter right after the mixer in the RF board. He did say that we need to make the filter lossy to ensure the reflected signal at 36 MHz gets absorbed at a 50 Ohm resistor. For this we need to add a resistor to gnd at node rfbn2. Seeking permission to make modifications to board.
Data |
|
|