40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
PSL |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Fri Jan 4 19:04:29 2019, awade, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Wed Jan 9 17:25:38 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Wed Jan 9 19:05:56 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Thu Jan 10 11:38:53 2019, awade, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Thu Jan 10 17:30:24 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Thu Jan 10 18:52:20 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
Sat Jan 12 13:11:02 2019, awade, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at beatnote after RF AM and RIN tuneup
|
Wed Jan 16 11:07:41 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, NoiseBudget, Beatnote after RF AM and RIN tuneup    
|
Thu Jan 10 14:19:46 2019, anchal, DailyProgress, RFAM, Time to look at RF AM and RIN
|
|
Message ID: 2281
Entry time: Thu Jan 10 18:52:20 2019
In reply to: 2280
Reply to this: 2282
|
Author: |
anchal |
Type: |
DailyProgress |
Category: |
RFAM |
Subject: |
Time to look at RF AM and RIN |
|
|
I think I found the culprit. the polarizer behind the EOM (PMC loop EOM) was a multi-order one and hence was extremely sensitive to temperature. I replaced it with a zero order half wavepleate and realigned the EOM to minimise the RF AM to about -70 dBm. The PMC has got misaligned in this procedure, so tomorrow I'll align it back and see if our changes made a difference. |