40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  PSL  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Tue May 15 16:53:36 2018, anchal, Notes, BEAT, Analysis for idea of sending beam at Brewster angle to Photo diode InGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.pdfInGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.zip
    Reply  Tue May 15 18:19:05 2018, Koji, Notes, BEAT, Analysis for idea of sending beam at Brewster angle to Photo diode 
Message ID: 2187     Entry time: Tue May 15 16:53:36 2018     Reply to this: 2188
Author: anchal 
Type: Notes 
Category: BEAT 
Subject: Analysis for idea of sending beam at Brewster angle to Photo diode 

Recently we were given the idea of sending the beam to the photodiode at Brewster angle. If we do so, ideally one particular polarization (parallel to the plane of incidence) will not reflect back. So if we send the beam polarized in this direction (or set the incidence plane such that these conditions are matched), we can minimize the reflection from PD significantly.
Sounded like a good idea, so I started reading about the InGaAs detector we have. Unfortunately, the datasheet of the C30642 detector we use does not mention either the fraction of In in InGaAs or the refractive index of it. So I went into the literature found these two papers:
Kim et al. Applied Physics Let Vol 81, 13 23 (2002) DOI: 10.1063/1.1509093
Adachi et al. Journal of Applied Physics 53, 5863 (1982); doi: 10.1063/1.331425
Using the empirical coefficients and functions from these paper, I calculated the refractive index for InGaAs for various fractions of x and the corresponding Brewster angles (Find Attached).
However, just after doing the analysis, we realized that doing this is not really possible. The Brewster angle is arctan(n2/n1) where n2 is the medium light is going into. This implies the Brewster angle would always be greater than 45 degrees and detector won't really absorb much light at this angle. So currently the conclusion is that this idea won't work.
However, there might be some error in our assumption of InGaAs as a transparent medium as the calculations do not take into account absorption of the photon at all. Attaching the python notebook too in case someone figures this out.

Attachment 1: InGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.pdf  23 kB  Uploaded Tue May 15 18:09:52 2018  | Hide | Hide all
InGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.pdf InGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.pdf
Attachment 2: InGaAsIncidenceAngleAnalysis.zip  90 kB  Uploaded Tue May 15 18:10:43 2018
ELOG V3.1.3-