40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  PSL  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Sun Nov 6 22:58:46 2016, awade, DailyProgress, EOM, EOM driver doesn't seem to be amplifying. 100_0266.JPG100_0272.JPG
    Reply  Tue Nov 8 11:53:15 2016, awade, DailyProgress, EOM, EOM driver doesn't seem to be amplifying. 2016-11-08_11.45.23.jpg
Message ID: 1763     Entry time: Tue Nov 8 11:53:15 2016     In reply to: 1760
Author: awade 
Type: DailyProgress 
Category: EOM 
Subject: EOM driver doesn't seem to be amplifying. 

Although I haven't done anything more in determining why the shape of the EOM driver transfer function doesn't quite match what Tara initially measured, it appears that we are not getting an error signal for the north path.  Its possible that the units are/aren't logarithm in the previous post compared to what Tara measured.  All this aside, it seems to peak at about the right frequency (14.75 MHz) and have the right gain (as measured at the monitor).  

I just noticed that the power supply lines going into the unit are bare (picture).  Its possible that when I was trying to obtain an error signal on the oscilloscope, they were just shorting.  This might explain some intermittence in the past.  I will heat shrink these later in the day. With them off the table I now see a decent error signal in line with previous checks of its Vpp.

I'll mark this mystery down as solved.



It appears that the EOM driver in the north path is not amplifying RF signals as we might expect.  This is used to drive the broadband Newfocus 4004 EOM at 14.75 MHz.  On Friday I had disconnected it from its power supply to re solder a banana plug.  I don't have a record of the voltage used so I have used the specified ±18 V in its schematic (see PSL:1090).  It was not this value before, I think I remember ~14.5 V

I have now managed to reoptimize the alignment into the north cavity but was unable to lock.  It appears that there is no error signal being generated.  I checked the RF coming out of the amplfier with it powered up, it was -28 dBm (with 50Ω load of the Aglient 4395A) the 14.75 MHz RF signal going into the amplifier was -14 dBm.  It is evident from Tara's posts on testing and returning the EOM driver (see PSL:1092 and others in that sequence) that gain should be on the order of 18.5 dB to 23 dB.  Something is not right.  

When I power down the EOM driver all the RF goes, so it is actively doing something. I hooked the input and output to the Aglient and attempted a transfer function (attached below).  Its not obvious that there is any resonant amplification.  Not sure what is going on here.  It is clear that that it seems to be attenuating signal going through it and not helpfully amplifying.  



I measured the transfer function with the Aglient, strait through from input to output, I realize now that this isn't quite right because the driver is designed to be loaded with the EOM at its output to work properly.

The source excitation voltage was set to -14dBm.  It appears that we are not getting any amplification peak around 14.75 MHz as we should expect.

I did this again with the EOM driver connected directly to the Newport 4004 and looking at the response through the monitor port. There is kind of a a peak but nothing like what Tara had here PSL:1317

RF transfer function of EOM driver when directly connected to newport-4004, as measured through the monitor.

I realize now, that the EOM driver needs to be connected to the EOM to operate correctly. However, its still no clear why the transfer function has changed shape and what is leading to no error signal being produced at the monitor port of the FSS.


Attachment 1: 2016-11-08_11.45.23.jpg  1.598 MB  | Hide | Hide all
ELOG V3.1.3-