40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  PSL  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Sat Jul 2 16:12:49 2016, Antonio, Notes, FSS, FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 
    Reply  Wed Jul 13 10:24:24 2016, rana, Notes, FSS, FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 
       Reply  Wed Jul 13 13:31:33 2016, Evan, Notes, FSS, FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 
          Reply  Wed Jul 13 20:03:07 2016, Antonio, Notes, FSS, FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 
             Reply  Wed Oct 5 14:20:53 2016, awade, Notes, FSS, FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 
                Reply  Wed Jan 4 12:02:51 2017, awade, Notes, EOM, EOM drivers 100_0269.JPG
Message ID: 1668     Entry time: Wed Jul 13 20:03:07 2016     In reply to: 1666     Reply to this: 1736
Author: Antonio 
Type: Notes 
Category: FSS 
Subject: FSS : THINGS TO BE DONE (some notes) 

That is perfectly in agreement with my analysis.

 

36MHz and 37MHz are good according with our analysis if 1MHz separation between the two modulation frequencies is good enough;

If 1MHz separation is not enough than we should consider 34.5MHz and 37MHz. Here the risk is to get close to the order 23 (n+m) at

a nominal detuning frequency that is around 2.2MHz.

 

Quote:

I did the same analysis as Antonio: https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/PSL_Lab/1394

My recollection is that this was the justification for ordering the 36 and 37 MHz OCXOs.

 

ELOG V3.1.3-