40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  PSL  Not logged in ELOG logo
Message ID: 1660     Entry time: Mon Jul 4 16:38:24 2016
Author: Antonio 
Type: DailyProgress 
Category: Mode matching 
Subject: Mode matching plan to the North Cavity: few options 

Summary

A couple of mode matching solutions for the north cavity that look promising have been found.
I'm thinking the following plan 2c to be implemented.

introduction

- We'll use the PMC in each path
- We also need to insert a FI in each path (to use the reflected light from the cavities)
- EOMs after the PMC will be inserted for the in-vacuum cavities PDH

These constrains the mode macthing to be done with the use of three lenses. One to focus the beam
into the BB EOM and the other two to mode match the North cavity.

Approach

Question1: Can we place the FI without changing the mode matching solution?

Answer: In Plan1 the profile caluclation is shown. As you can find there, considering that
the maximum distance from the waist of the PMC for the FI is ~ 1.32m (FI length ~ 10cm)
we have a diameter around ~2mm.

Question2: OK. We need to use some focusing lenses. How strong will they be?

Answer: In Plan2-a/b/c the profile caluclations with the sensitivity to the displacement of the lenses
 are shown. As you can find there, we have at the FI a beam radius that is around ~750um at most.
However the three setups show a different sensitivity with Plan2a and 2c being lens sensitive to lens 
displacement compared to 2b.

Conclusion

Along with the discussion above, I will use 2c. (or 2a looks applicable too)



For all the profiles the reference point is the waist at the PMCc (330um), zero point in the plots
and the cavity waist is located at 1.96m far from the PMC waist.

Plan 1: FI after the two MM lenses

Setup

In this case we have 3 lenses of focal "fi"(mm) located at "li"(m):

l1 = 0.16;

l2 = 0.762;

l3 = 1.107;

f1 = 0.1432;

f2 = 0.688;

f3 = 0.572;

Beam Profile

If we want to "risk" a 2 mm diameter beam into the FI.

The following plans 2(a,b,...) have all the FI in the between the two MM lenses. I just report

one figure with the setup:

Plan 2a:

Setup

l1 = 0.183;

l2 = 0.773;

l3 = 1.32;

f1 = 0.229;

f2 = 0.143;

f3 = 0.229;

Beam Profile

We can place the FI around 1.2m or further than the North cavity. The further we go and the smaller is the beam

until we reach the waist at 0.9m.

Sensitivity of lenses displacement

Dipending on which directions we move the lenses we may have 20% mismatch with a displacement of ~4cm for lens 2

while for Lens 3 only few percent.

Plan 2b:

Setup:

l1 = 0.117;

l2 = 0.951;

l3 = 1.313;

f1 = 0.229;

f2 = 0.143;

f3 = 0.143;

Beam Profile

Sensitivity

Plan 2c:

Setup

l1 = 0.148;

l2 = 0.683;

l3 = 1.325;

f1 = 0.1432;

f2 = 0.1719;

f3 = 0.229;

Beam Profile

Sensitivity

This shows to be less sensitive to the lens displacement, compared to the others. Furthermore we notice that the two lenses are somehow indipendent as the curve are more circular;

There is something not ok with the Gouy phase, I need to cross check what is wrong there. I should fix this doubt later, for now it is not important.

 

I would propose plane 2c

 

Data:

Data are currently stored in a shared Box Inc folder, but we may wanto create an svn folder for all our data.

Attachment 1: MM_beam_Prop_FI_after.pdf  12 kB  | Hide | Hide all
MM_beam_Prop_FI_after.pdf
Attachment 2: North_layout_progress_dist_MM__FI_after.pdf  76 kB  | Hide | Hide all
North_layout_progress_dist_MM__FI_after.pdf
Attachment 3: North_layout_progress_dist_MMa.graffle  28 kB
Attachment 4: North_layout_progress_dist_MMa.graffle  28 kB
Attachment 5: North_layout_progress_dist_MMa.pdf  76 kB  | Hide | Hide all
North_layout_progress_dist_MMa.pdf
Attachment 6: MM_beam_Prop_a.pdf  12 kB  | Hide | Hide all
MM_beam_Prop_a.pdf
Attachment 7: MM_North_Sensitivity_a.pdf  14 kB  | Hide | Hide all
MM_North_Sensitivity_a.pdf
Attachment 8: MM_beam_Prop_b.pdf  12 kB  | Hide | Hide all
MM_beam_Prop_b.pdf
Attachment 9: MM_North_Sensitivity_b.pdf  16 kB  | Hide | Hide all
MM_North_Sensitivity_b.pdf
Attachment 10: MM_beam_Prop_f.pdf  12 kB  Uploaded Mon Jul 4 17:43:05 2016  | Hide | Hide all
MM_beam_Prop_f.pdf
Attachment 11: MM_beam_Prop_f.pdf  12 kB  Uploaded Mon Jul 4 17:43:10 2016  | Hide | Hide all
MM_beam_Prop_f.pdf
Attachment 12: MM_North_Sensitivity_f.pdf  13 kB  Uploaded Mon Jul 4 17:44:08 2016  | Hide | Hide all
MM_North_Sensitivity_f.pdf
ELOG V3.1.3-