40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
PSL |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Oct 30 01:56:38 2013, tara, DailyProgress, optic, table work 
|
Thu Oct 31 00:02:17 2013, tara, DailyProgress, Electronics Equipment, TTFSS 
|
Thu Oct 31 18:10:07 2013, Evan, DailyProgress, Electronics Equipment, TTFSS
|
Sun Nov 3 19:37:32 2013, rana, DailyProgress, Electronics Equipment, TTFSS
|
Tue Nov 5 01:11:15 2013, tara, DailyProgress, Electronics Equipment, TTFSS
|
Wed Nov 6 01:14:58 2013, tara, DailyProgress, Electronics Equipment, TTFSS 
|
Thu Nov 7 05:08:13 2013, tara, DailyProgress, NoiseBudget, photothermal noise in SiO2/Ta2O5 
|
Wed Nov 20 18:19:01 2013, tara, DailyProgress, NoiseBudget, photothermal noise in SiO2/Ta2O5 
|
|
Message ID: 1383
Entry time: Wed Nov 6 01:14:58 2013
In reply to: 1381
Reply to this: 1384
|
Author: |
tara |
Type: |
DailyProgress |
Category: |
Electronics Equipment |
Subject: |
TTFSS |
|
|
We made a mistake by choosing the input power to the cavities to be 0.25 mW, so today I turned them back to 1mW and measure the beat.

Setup:
- input power: 1mW
- TTFSS gain (C/F): RCAV (760/980), ACAV (630/650)
Note about the measurement:
- The noise at error point from ACAV is pretty high (~up to 100 nV/rtHz around 6 kHz). Better characterization will be done later to see if the suppression is enough or not. I made sure that this measurement is good up to ~2kHz, (this was done by changing the gain level a bit and beat level did not change).
- Table was floated, but the air springs was not activated. I hope we will get better signal around 20-100 Hz once the air spring is re-installed.
- Intensity noise->photothermal around a few hundred mHz, cause the PLL to drift away from the input range. This effect becomes worse when the input power is increased.
- RIN from ACAV is about a factor of 10 higher than that of RCAV.
- I measured the beat with ISS on/off on ACAV, nothing were significantly different. So maybe it is not a problem for now.
To do next:
- I'll compare this measurement with the one from 8" cavity to see if the results agree or not. They are different mirrors, but from the same coating run. I suspect that the loss in these mirrors are higher than what we estimate (Ta2O5=2.5e-4, SiO2 1e-4).
- Think about the error in the measurement (calibration, spotsize etc).
|
|