40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
PSL |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Apr 8 17:44:20 2013, Evan, Notes, PMC, About PMCs
|
Tue Apr 9 15:39:16 2013, tara, Notes, PMC, About PMCs
|
Mon Apr 15 10:59:35 2013, tara, Notes, PMC, Debra matrix for PMC design 
|
Tue Apr 16 13:24:46 2013, Evan, Notes, PMC, Debra matrix for PMC design
|
Wed May 1 01:45:55 2013, tara, Notes, PMC, Debra matrix for PMC design
|
Wed May 1 11:57:02 2013, Zach, Notes, PMC, Debra matrix for PMC design
|
Wed May 1 15:28:06 2013, not Zach, Notes, PMC, Debra matrix for PMC design
|
|
Message ID: 1146
Entry time: Tue Apr 9 15:39:16 2013
In reply to: 1145
Reply to this: 1149
|
Author: |
tara |
Type: |
Notes |
Category: |
PMC |
Subject: |
About PMCs |
|
|
Considerations for PMC design:
- Stiffness(Acoustic susceptibility) & heavy material: With heavier material, the pmc motion on the support becomes smaller.(RXA: please quantify with a formula)
- Filtering factor (Finesse/FSR/Cavity pole), g-factor: Filter out intensity noise around 10 MHz (RXA: please quantify with a formula)
- Design for thermal expansion cancellation between the spacer and the end cap: So that the PMC is less sensitive to ambient temperature
- 3 or 4 mirrors? 3 is polarization selective. For general lab use with power less than 1 W, 3 mirror design should be good. (RXA: I don't follow this logic at all)
RXA: In general, all of these considerations need some sort of quantitative detail. Make a DeBra Matrix so that we can evaluate. |