40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  PSL  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Sun Sep 23 18:28:04 2012, tara, Notes, Drawings, 1.45" refcav mount cav_mount_assembly2.PDFcav_mount_assembly2.PDFcav_mount_bottom.PDFcavity_mount_top.PDF
    Reply  Thu Sep 27 17:13:13 2012, tara, Notes, Drawings, 1.45" refcav mount cav_mount_assembly_3.PDFpeek_v2.PDF
       Reply  Thu Oct 4 23:28:06 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension cavity_sagging_2012_10_04.pngcavity_sagging_0_2012_10_04.png
          Reply  Wed Oct 10 01:38:49 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension 
             Reply  Wed Oct 10 21:31:57 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension plot.pngcavity_sagging_0_2012_10_04.png
                Reply  Thu Oct 11 19:07:06 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension plot_degree_area.png
                   Reply  Sat Oct 13 23:38:08 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension dis_tilt_12_45.png
                      Reply  Tue Oct 16 01:14:00 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension disx_y.png
                         Reply  Wed Oct 24 11:16:52 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension analyzed_plot.pnganalyzed_plot.figIMG_1914.jpg
                            Reply  Fri Oct 26 04:05:18 2012, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension plot_line.pngplot_line.pngplot_line.pngplot_angle.png
                               Reply  Tue Feb 4 01:11:01 2014, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension 
                                  Reply  Tue Mar 4 18:53:48 2014, tara, Notes, RefCav, comsol simulation for cavity suspension hist_small_mount_err.pnghist_small_mount_err.fig
       Reply  Wed Oct 31 16:00:13 2012, tara, Notes, Drawings, 1.45" refcav mount Assem2.PDFAssem2_1.PDF
          Reply  Thu Nov 8 20:00:33 2012, tara, Notes, Drawings, 1.45" refcav mount 7x
Message ID: 1065     Entry time: Wed Oct 24 11:16:52 2012     In reply to: 1063     Reply to this: 1067
Author: tara 
Type: Notes 
Category: RefCav 
Subject: comsol simulation for cavity suspension 

As Rana and Jan suggested, I thought about the effect of mirror's radius of curvature and DC tilt effect to cavity length noise. I ran a few simulation tests and the results were not changing much.

==cavity length noise==

The cavity length mainly changes from two effect

1) Actual position change:

2) Tilting of the mirror: If both mirrors tilt up or down together by theta, the cavity length will be longer by R*theta^2, see the attached picture. The calculation takes mirror's ROC and optical axis shifting into account.

IMG_1914.jpg

   So, to find the best place to support the cavity, the contribution from both effects should be minimize.

==COMSOL Simulation: effects from different boundary conditions==

We have been discussing about different boundary conditions for support points whether to use fixed in all direction, fixed in only vertical direction, point support, or finite area. So I decided to check the effect from the following condition

  •  Point like support, fixed in all direction
  •  Point like support, fixed only in vertical direction
  • Area support, fixed in all direction  (The size of the area does not change the result that much, see PSL:1061. This time I chose 1mm^2 which is 1.5x10^-3 [in^2].)

 ==result==

    There are no significant differences among the chosen boundary conditions. I varied the angle from 30, 45 and 60 degree, all the boundary conditions resulted in the same sagging behavior, so the best choice will be 30 degree as discussed in PSL:xx .The plot below shows the displacement per [m/s^2] of the mirror center along the beam line and tilt angle per [m/s^2] of the mirror, (the support angle is 30degree). With any boundary conditions, the optimum position will be quite the same (30 degree,  1.2" apart).

analyzed_plot.png

==where is the optimum spot? what is the coupling from seismic to cavity length?==

 From the simulation, with our restriction on support position (angle between 30 to 60 degree, 0.5 - 1.2" apart), the mirror positions always extend the cavity length. Since tilt will always increase the cavity length, we cannot cancel the effect between translation and tilt. The best way is to minimize translation and choose zero tilt as before.

About the coupling, at the optimum spot where tilting is zero, there will be no tilting motion. Displacement noise will only come from translation of the mirrors.

Attachment 2: analyzed_plot.fig  15 kB  Uploaded Wed Oct 24 19:08:00 2012
ELOG V3.1.3-