ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
291
|
Mon Feb 6 11:19:13 2017 |
Gabriele | Optics | Daily Progress | Laser swap |
The Thorlabs laser has been misbehaving for the whole weekend. Even after many days being continuosly on, the wandering line is still moving all over the frequencies.
So this morning I swapped in a JDSU 1125P borrowed from the 40m lab, which provides about 6.8 mW of power. I tested it over the weekend on a separate test table, and after one day or so of operation the power looks reasonably stable. Now it's been on for a few hours: there is still a line moving around, but it's slowing down and hopefully setting down in a good place.
I started a series of test measurements on the samples that were already installed.
- Quiet time before excitation: 1170443490
Excitation (broad band) at 1170443523 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1170443586
|
295
|
Tue Feb 7 16:16:37 2017 |
Gabriele | Optics | Daily Progress | Lasers |
The high power lasers I tested so far (the Thorlabs 21mW and the JDSU 1125P) are noisy: they both have wandering lines that from time to time are alised down into the base band, destroing the measurement.
I have three JDSU 1103P units: two of them dlived about 2.5 mW, the third one delivers about 1.4 mW. One of the 2.5mW was installed in the test setup. I swapped it out with the 1.4 mW, so now I have two good 2.5 mW laser. My plan is to modify the new setup to use those two lasers in parallel, splitting each one in two, for a total of four beams of about 1.2 mW each.
The new optical layout is atttached. |
64
|
Wed Jul 27 10:19:36 2016 |
Gabriele | Electronics | Configuration | Last finding in the signal jump saga |
This plot shows a signal which is generated purely digitally inside a code that I was testing.
Jumps are present even in this case.

Another addition: I was testing some simple code I was writing. Forget about OUT1 and OUT2, but OUT3 and OUT4 should be simple counters. Here's what I get by running the code on cymac3:

Since it didn't make any sense, I ran the same code on cymac2. Here's the (correct) result:

So there's something wrong even when all-digital signals are generated. |
703
|
Tue May 28 15:48:42 2019 |
Alena | General | Vacuum | Low pressure gauge exchange |
After venting the vacum chamber (CR14) a few times, checking for leaks and trying to tune settings to the gauges controller, I gave up. I removed the low pressure gauge from the newer vaccum system (CR14). Inspection did now show any obviouse depositions around the electrode (due to some burns). I will pack the gauge ans send it to the manufacture for an RMA. Took the same gause from the older vaccum system (CR0) and installed it on CR14. Started pumping down. The low pressure gause turned on just fine. Will check the preassure in an our before starting a measurement. |
19
|
Fri May 27 02:09:37 2016 |
Gabriele | Mechanics | Characterization | Lowest usable mode of fused silica disks |
I did some FEA simulation of fused silica disks, to identify the lowest usable eigenmode. By usable I mean a mode that has zero elastic energy stored in the center.
Diameter |
Thickness |
Frequency |
75 mm |
1 mm |
2500 Hz |
100 mm |
0.4 mm |
564 Hz |
200 mm |
0.4 mm |
141 Hz |
75 mm |
0.12 mm |
293 Hz |
In the attached figures, the dfisk deformation is shown exaggerated, and the color map shows the elastic energy density. All results are obtained with COMSOL/MATLAB, the disk are constrained at a point corresponding to the center of the lower surface. No gravity. |
173
|
Thu Nov 10 14:13:34 2016 |
gabriele | Electronics | Configuration | MATLAB code to control Thorlabs stages |
To be used to automate the laser polishing. |
223
|
Fri Dec 2 14:05:47 2016 |
Gabriele | General | General | MIT bare disk losses reproduced with edge and surface losses |
The measured losses of the MIT bare disk show a remarkable split into families. The plot belo shows the measured total loss angles (error bars comes from dispersion of multiple measurements)

Using a COMSOL model, and tuning some parameters (E = 73.2 GPa, nu = 0.164, rho = 2202 kg/m^3, thickness = 0.511 mm) I can roughly reproduce the measured mode frequencies, within some tens of Hz:

There is still some splitting into families, so my guess is that the Poisson ratio is not quite right. But this is good enough for now. From this simulation, I can extract the various energies (bulk and shear) in different domains. In particular I'm focusing on the edge and surface energies. The following plot shows the ratio of shear/bulk edge energies over the total energy, as an example.
Now I used the edge shear energy ratio and the surface bulk energy ratio, and that's enough to reproduce the distribution of the measured loss angles:

The measured losses are well described by the following equation:
loss = 4.8e-6 * E_surface_bulk / E_tot + 1.2e-3 * E_edge_shear
The energy ratios here are not dimensionless, since they are the result of a surface integral over a volume integral. So to extract the real loss angles of the surface/edge defects we have to estimate the thickness of the surface/edge lossy area. |
334
|
Wed Mar 29 11:57:09 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample |
2017-03-29
- 11:47am, in chamber CR0, balanced
- 11:48am roughing pump on
- 12:00pm, turbo pump on
- Excitations:
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174976553
Excitation broadband: 1174976585
Quiet time after excitation: 1174976607
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174977837
Excitation broadband: 1174977869
Quiet time after excitation: 1174977891
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174979121
Excitation broadband: 1174979153
Quiet time after excitation: 1174979175
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174980405
Excitation broadband: 1174980437
Quiet time after excitation: 1174980459
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174981689
Excitation broadband: 1174981721
Quiet time after excitation: 1174981743
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174982973
Excitation broadband: 1174983006
Quiet time after excitation: 1174983028
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174984258
Excitation broadband: 1174984291
Quiet time after excitation: 1174984313
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1174985543
Excitation broadband: 1174985575
Quiet time after excitation: 1174985597
|
212
|
Mon Nov 28 15:06:09 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample 1 (bare disk) |
2016-11-28
- 3:00pm: removed the retaining ring and the alignment pins
- 3:05pm, 100mm/0.5mm disk installed, balanced
- 3:06pm, roughing pump on
- 3:19pm, turbo pump on
- Excitations:
- quiet time before 1164414276
band pass 100-3000 Hz, amplitude 3 x 2 kV, 60 seconds
quiet time after 1164414439
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164426582
Excitation (broad band) at 1164426615 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164426677
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164437507
Excitation (broad band) at 1164437539 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164437601
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164448433
Excitation (broad band) at 1164448465 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164448527
2016-11-29
Results
2016-11-28 A
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
315.9 2.8096e+06 2.8096e+06
726.7 1.8635e+06 1.8635e+06
1265.9 1.4194e+06 1.4029e+06
1930.4 1.1427e+06 1.1427e+06
1945.3 3.8068e+06 3.8068e+06
2717.9 9.7820e+05 9.6825e+05
2937.1 2.9339e+06 2.8810e+06
3626.4 8.4222e+05 8.4139e+05
4082.7 2.4345e+06 2.3090e+06
4638.8 5.2362e+06 5.1759e+06
4654.2 7.4042e+05 7.4042e+05
5374.9 1.9928e+06 1.9928e+06
5800.3 6.7081e+05 6.6269e+05
6164.3 4.0627e+06 3.8329e+06
6808.9 1.8131e+06 1.7073e+06
7063.0 6.2208e+05 6.2066e+05
7849.1 3.0518e+06 3.0518e+06
8381.5 1.6107e+06 1.6105e+06
10089.4 1.3860e+06 1.3793e+06
10476.0 4.6551e+06 4.6551e+06
12692.5 3.7473e+06 3.7473e+06
2016-11-28 B
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
316.2 2.9559e+06 2.9559e+06
726.7 1.9471e+06 1.9471e+06
1265.9 1.4767e+06 1.4596e+06
1324.0 1.7317e+06 1.7317e+06
1930.3 1.1866e+06 1.1826e+06
1945.2 3.8606e+06 3.8606e+06
2247.0 1.2821e+06 1.2442e+06
2717.8 1.0111e+06 9.8894e+05
2936.9 2.9926e+06 2.9494e+06
3626.2 8.6881e+05 8.6809e+05
4082.4 2.4804e+06 2.3513e+06
4638.7 5.2732e+06 5.1865e+06
4654.1 7.6228e+05 7.6228e+05
5374.6 2.0240e+06 2.0240e+06
5800.0 6.8894e+05 6.7200e+05
6164.1 3.9378e+06 3.9270e+06
6808.7 1.8616e+06 1.7343e+06
7062.7 6.2617e+05 6.2617e+05
7849.0 3.1323e+06 3.1323e+06
8381.2 1.6487e+06 1.5110e+06
8419.4 6.2761e+06 6.0088e+06
9687.4 2.6263e+06 2.6263e+06
10088.7 1.4209e+06 1.4209e+06
10475.5 4.5819e+06 3.9452e+06
11929.4 2.0706e+06 8.4521e+05
13900.0 1.1087e+06 1.1087e+06
2016-11-29 C
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
316.1 3.0133e+06 3.0133e+06
726.7 1.9621e+06 1.9621e+06
1265.8 1.4754e+06 1.4754e+06
1324.0 1.5486e+06 1.5486e+06
1930.3 1.1968e+06 1.1968e+06
1945.2 3.8326e+06 3.8326e+06
2717.8 1.0236e+06 9.9498e+05
2937.0 3.0102e+06 2.9815e+06
3626.2 8.7624e+05 8.7624e+05
4082.3 2.4965e+06 2.3709e+06
4638.6 5.2551e+06 5.2551e+06
4654.0 7.6848e+05 7.6176e+05
5374.4 2.0713e+06 2.0713e+06
6164.0 4.6657e+06 4.6657e+06
6808.7 1.8860e+06 1.7018e+06
8381.1 1.6553e+06 1.6553e+06
8419.0 6.3696e+06 6.3696e+06
|
214
|
Tue Nov 29 11:26:46 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample 2 (disk with 4 1"/0.1mm glued blanks) |
2016-11-19
 
- 11:24am, in chamber, balanced. Installed with the four glued blanks facing down
- 11:25am, roughing pump on
- 11:35am, turbo pump on
- Excitations
-
~2:40pm, Roughing pump off
-
Reduced excitation amplitude by a factor 2
-
Increased excitation back to original value
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164497423
Excitation (broad band) at 1164497455 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164497517
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164498267
Excitation (broad band) at 1164498300 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164498362
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164499112
Excitation (broad band) at 1164499144 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164499206
- 4:01pm, turbo pump off
Results
2016-11-28 B
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
329.0 8.4824e+04 8.4824e+04
335.7 1.4025e+05 1.4025e+05
440.4 9.8646e+03 9.8646e+03
497.0 9.0449e+03 9.0449e+03
776.2 9.3536e+04 9.3536e+04
1112.1 7.1969e+03 7.1969e+03
1350.2 8.7756e+04 8.7756e+04
1358.5 7.4121e+04 7.4121e+04
1552.4 1.8858e+04 1.8858e+04
1609.0 3.3215e+04 3.3215e+04
1784.0 1.1629e+04 1.1629e+04
1798.6 2.0767e+04 2.0767e+04
1888.4 1.7837e+04 1.7837e+04
1945.0 3.3859e+04 3.3859e+04
2030.0 1.0957e+04 1.0957e+04
2050.5 7.5373e+04 7.5373e+04
2080.0 8.8890e+04 8.8890e+04
2134.5 1.1641e+04 1.1641e+04
2416.0 2.1993e+04 2.1993e+04
2470.5 2.7733e+04 2.7733e+04
2520.0 2.2354e+04 2.2354e+04
2527.0 4.5688e+04 4.5688e+04
2856.0 2.0405e+04 2.0405e+04
2874.4 5.1657e+04 5.1657e+04
3192.0 4.0038e+04 4.0038e+04
3438.0 2.4531e+04 2.4531e+04
3528.0 4.3625e+04 4.3625e+04
3810.3 8.4299e+04 8.4299e+04
3812.7 8.4331e+04 8.4331e+04
4214.0 4.5810e+04 4.5810e+04
4379.8 1.2693e+05 1.2693e+05
4550.5 4.2404e+04 4.2404e+04
4867.4 8.2873e+04 8.2873e+04
4870.5 7.8134e+04 7.8134e+04
2016-11-28 D
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
335.6 1.4056e+05 1.4056e+05
672.0 1.5677e+05 1.5677e+05
777.6 9.2059e+04 9.2059e+04
1112.7 1.0553e+05 1.0553e+05
1203.1 5.5487e+04 5.5487e+04
1350.1 8.4536e+04 8.4536e+04
1358.4 7.1777e+04 7.1777e+04
1714.6 7.2616e+04 7.2616e+04
2050.5 7.6493e+04 7.6493e+04
2080.0 8.7699e+04 8.7699e+04
2098.0 9.7959e+04 9.7959e+04
2416.0 1.0540e+05 1.0540e+05
2874.4 5.6525e+04 5.6525e+04
3128.9 2.3520e+04 2.3520e+04
3134.3 2.0219e+04 2.0219e+04
3810.5 8.7060e+04 8.7060e+04
3812.5 8.7089e+04 8.7089e+04
4323.4 5.2924e+04 5.2924e+04
4379.8 1.2308e+05 1.2308e+05
4867.1 8.1170e+04 8.1170e+04
4870.4 8.9835e+04 8.9835e+04
5704.3 6.9120e+04 6.9120e+04
5728.4 6.6924e+04 6.6924e+04
6033.9 7.5637e+04 7.5637e+04
6036.0 8.0112e+04 8.0112e+04
7204.0 1.0233e+05 1.0233e+05
8625.9 1.4731e+05 1.4731e+05
|
215
|
Tue Nov 29 16:42:51 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample 3 (disk with 4 0.5"/0.125" glued blanks) |
2016-11-29
 
- 4:40pm, in chamber, blanks facing down
- 4:41pm, roughing pump on
- 4:53pm, turbo pump on
- Injections:
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164516798
Excitation (broad band) at 1164516830 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164516892
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164518722
Excitation (broad band) at 1164518754 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164518816
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164520646
Excitation (broad band) at 1164520678 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164520740
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164522570
Excitation (broad band) at 1164522602 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164522664
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164524494
Excitation (broad band) at 1164524526 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164524588
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164526419
Excitation (broad band) at 1164526451 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164526513
2016-11-30
Results
2016-11-29 A
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
251.9 2.8630e+04 2.8630e+04
270.6 4.3984e+04 4.3984e+04
329.0 5.2792e+04 5.2792e+04
387.4 6.4408e+04 6.4408e+04
692.9 2.1202e+04 2.1202e+04
705.5 2.7294e+04 2.7294e+04
1121.5 1.9490e+04 1.9490e+04
1127.2 2.3102e+04 2.3102e+04
1242.2 1.6168e+04 1.6168e+04
1318.1 2.5395e+04 2.5395e+04
1800.6 2.3235e+04 2.3235e+04
2124.1 1.8960e+04 1.8960e+04
2797.5 9.8183e+03 9.8183e+03
2841.8 1.1002e+04 1.1002e+04
2921.3 1.2820e+04 1.2820e+04
2959.7 7.8878e+03 7.8878e+03
3701.0 8.0007e+03 8.0007e+03
3839.4 1.3538e+04 1.3538e+04
4692.3 3.4420e+04 3.4420e+04
2016-11-29 B
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
251.9 2.6513e+04 2.6513e+04
329.0 5.4964e+04 5.4964e+04
387.0 5.9983e+04 5.9983e+04
692.9 2.4150e+04 2.4150e+04
705.4 2.7301e+04 2.7301e+04
1127.3 1.8674e+04 1.8674e+04
1242.1 1.2792e+04 1.2792e+04
1318.1 2.4187e+04 2.4187e+04
1800.7 2.2498e+04 2.2498e+04
2124.2 1.8534e+04 1.8534e+04
2797.5 9.8734e+03 9.8734e+03
2841.6 1.2921e+04 1.2921e+04
2959.8 1.0940e+04 1.0940e+04
3400.4 1.5128e+04 1.5128e+04
3700.7 1.0732e+04 1.0732e+04
4692.2 4.3243e+04 4.3243e+04
2016-11-29 C
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
251.6 2.8079e+04 2.8079e+04
271.0 4.1437e+04 4.1437e+04
329.0 5.4328e+04 5.4328e+04
387.4 5.8614e+04 5.8614e+04
692.8 2.2689e+04 2.2689e+04
705.5 2.8442e+04 2.8442e+04
1127.2 1.8216e+04 1.8216e+04
1242.0 1.8455e+04 1.8455e+04
1317.8 2.3628e+04 2.3628e+04
1800.6 2.2896e+04 2.2896e+04
2124.2 1.8450e+04 1.8450e+04
2797.7 1.0904e+04 1.0904e+04
2841.8 1.4721e+04 1.4721e+04
2921.4 1.0612e+04 1.0612e+04
2959.8 1.0875e+04 1.0875e+04
3700.7 1.1009e+04 1.1009e+04
3705.3 1.0344e+04 1.0344e+04
3839.3 1.3205e+04 1.3205e+04
4110.4 1.3077e+04 1.3077e+04
4692.3 4.8605e+04 4.8605e+04
|
234
|
Wed Dec 7 09:59:59 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample 3 (disk with 4 0.5"/0.125" glued blanks) second round |
2016-12-07
- Removed retaining ring and pins, aligned optical setup to horizontal reference
- 9:59am, in chamber, balanced
- 10:00am, roughing pump on
- 10:12am, turbo pump on
 
As visible in th second picture, the distance between the disk and the ESD is about 1.5 mm
- Excitations:
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1165178719
Excitation (broad band) at 1165178751 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1165178813
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1165180007
Excitation (broad band) at 1165180039 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1165180101
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1165181331
Excitation (broad band) at 1165181363 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1165181425
-
2:39pm, pumps off
Results
2016-12-07 A
 
 
% Freq Q Q (C.I. 95%) Q (C.I. 95%)
251.8 2.9528e+04 2.9325e+04 2.9732e+04
323.4 6.9039e+04 6.5071e+04 7.3509e+04
328.7 5.5337e+04 5.5222e+04 5.5453e+04
692.8 2.4543e+04 2.4515e+04 2.4571e+04
705.5 2.7474e+04 2.7356e+04 2.7592e+04
1128.5 2.1332e+04 2.1268e+04 2.1395e+04
1242.4 1.2258e+04 1.2079e+04 1.2442e+04
1318.0 2.4548e+04 2.4419e+04 2.4678e+04
1800.7 2.6692e+04 2.6451e+04 2.6937e+04
1933.3 9.2002e+03 8.9167e+03 9.5022e+03
1937.7 8.5766e+03 8.5339e+03 8.6198e+03
2124.0 2.4927e+04 2.4872e+04 2.4982e+04
2799.2 8.1222e+03 7.9880e+03 8.2609e+03
2924.5 8.1070e+03 8.0349e+03 8.1804e+03
2964.4 8.2661e+03 8.1772e+03 8.3570e+03
4692.7 4.5716e+04 4.4885e+04 4.6578e+04
2016-12-07 B
 
 
% Freq Q Q (C.I. 95%) Q (C.I. 95%)
251.7 2.8324e+04 2.8084e+04 2.8567e+04
329.0 5.4343e+04 5.4182e+04 5.4504e+04
692.7 2.4556e+04 2.4524e+04 2.4588e+04
705.5 2.7344e+04 2.7229e+04 2.7461e+04
1128.3 2.0844e+04 2.0548e+04 2.1148e+04
1242.1 1.2091e+04 1.1999e+04 1.2185e+04
1317.8 2.4709e+04 2.4659e+04 2.4760e+04
1322.0 2.8932e+04 2.6985e+04 3.1179e+04
1800.6 2.6879e+04 2.6691e+04 2.7069e+04
2123.6 2.4719e+04 2.4619e+04 2.4820e+04
2798.1 9.5908e+03 9.2072e+03 1.0008e+04
2841.0 1.1254e+04 1.0614e+04 1.1976e+04
2924.0 1.1666e+04 1.0395e+04 1.3291e+04
2963.1 9.7910e+03 9.3703e+03 1.0251e+04
3427.6 8.7265e+03 8.2911e+03 9.2102e+03
3700.2 1.4646e+04 1.3418e+04 1.6120e+04
4691.8 5.0056e+04 4.7715e+04 5.2638e+04
2016-12-07 C
 
 
% Freq Q Q (C.I. 95%) Q (C.I. 95%)
251.8 2.8868e+04 2.8741e+04 2.8997e+04
313.8 4.8299e+04 4.4161e+04 5.3275e+04
658.0 4.5409e+04 4.4859e+04 4.5971e+04
692.6 2.4089e+04 2.3929e+04 2.4251e+04
705.4 2.7821e+04 2.7639e+04 2.8006e+04
1128.2 2.1583e+04 2.1087e+04 2.2103e+04
1242.1 1.2540e+04 1.2303e+04 1.2786e+04
1317.9 2.4663e+04 2.4626e+04 2.4700e+04
1571.0 1.4941e+04 1.4265e+04 1.5685e+04
1800.4 2.8559e+04 2.8113e+04 2.9019e+04
2123.4 2.7042e+04 2.6498e+04 2.7608e+04
2452.3 2.9667e+04 2.8231e+04 3.1256e+04
2797.4 8.7540e+03 8.0589e+03 9.5802e+03
2840.2 1.3484e+04 1.2967e+04 1.4043e+04
3706.5 1.0864e+04 1.0328e+04 1.1457e+04
4107.6 1.5757e+04 1.5573e+04 1.5946e+04
4690.7 4.8903e+04 4.7899e+04 4.9949e+04
2016-12-07 D
 
 
% Freq Q Q (C.I. 95%) Q (C.I. 95%)
251.8 2.9311e+04 2.9189e+04 2.9434e+04
323.2 2.7246e+04 2.4352e+04 3.0908e+04
692.6 2.4309e+04 2.4226e+04 2.4392e+04
698.0 1.7009e+04 1.5425e+04 1.8954e+04
702.0 2.7209e+04 2.6645e+04 2.7796e+04
705.5 3.0025e+04 2.9300e+04 3.0785e+04
1127.6 2.0285e+04 1.9811e+04 2.0781e+04
1317.3 2.5325e+04 2.5209e+04 2.5442e+04
1800.3 3.2511e+04 3.1223e+04 3.3909e+04
1935.2 6.5014e+03 4.9517e+03 9.4607e+03
2122.5 2.8808e+04 2.7758e+04 2.9940e+04
2795.4 1.0237e+04 8.7193e+03 1.2393e+04
4688.8 4.9909e+04 4.1120e+04 6.3475e+04
6847.5 7.9848e+03 7.7352e+03 8.2510e+03
|
218
|
Wed Nov 30 10:02:20 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | MIT sample 4 (disk with 3 1"/0.1mm glued blanks) |
2016-11-30
 
- 9:57am, in chamber, balanced, glued balnks facing down
- 9:59am, roughing pump on
- 10:09am, turbo pump on
- Excitations
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164570059
Excitation (broad band) at 1164570091 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164570153
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164571983
Excitation (broad band) at 1164572015 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164572077
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164573907
Excitation (broad band) at 1164573939 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164574001
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1164575831
Excitation (broad band) at 1164575863 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1164575925
-
3:34pm, pumps off
Results
2016-11-30 A
 

% Freq Q1 Q2
329.0 8.3663e+04 8.3663e+04
764.8 6.6913e+04 6.6913e+04
1093.6 7.4978e+04 7.4978e+04
1173.2 4.7789e+04 4.7789e+04
1333.5 5.8904e+04 5.8904e+04
1529.0 6.9659e+04 6.9659e+04
1597.4 1.0552e+05 1.0552e+05
1748.0 4.8237e+04 4.8237e+04
2007.8 3.8014e+04 3.8014e+04
2017.3 6.4686e+04 6.4686e+04
2066.8 4.6047e+04 4.6047e+04
2077.3 5.7698e+04 5.7698e+04
2832.1 4.1680e+04 4.1680e+04
2850.9 6.3764e+04 6.3764e+04
3101.5 2.6027e+04 2.6027e+04
3468.7 1.9827e+04 1.9827e+04
3784.7 3.5492e+04 3.5492e+04
4301.1 3.6826e+04 3.6826e+04
4822.6 6.6123e+04 6.6123e+04
4834.9 4.6789e+04 4.6789e+04
6014.6 6.6507e+04 6.6507e+04
2016-11-30 B
 

% Freq Q
328.8 8.5064e+04
764.6 6.7065e+04
1093.6 6.4289e+04
1173.2 4.7921e+04
1333.5 5.8311e+04
1529.0 6.4720e+04
1597.4 1.5015e+05
1748.4 4.2924e+04
2007.7 4.1694e+04
2017.4 6.3609e+04
2067.0 4.6240e+04
2077.2 5.8395e+04
2406.0 4.5908e+04
2832.1 4.5323e+04
2851.0 6.4089e+04
3101.5 2.9677e+04
3468.7 1.6697e+04
3784.5 2.1703e+04
4299.7 3.7688e+04
4835.1 4.6841e+04
5659.7 3.4913e+04
2016-11-30 C
 

% Freq Q
329.1 8.3839e+04
658.0 8.6457e+04
764.6 6.6619e+04
1093.7 7.3246e+04
1163.3 2.7214e+04
1172.5 4.1708e+04
1333.7 5.9429e+04
1597.4 1.4036e+05
1748.0 2.8271e+04
2007.8 4.7532e+04
2017.4 6.5563e+04
2067.0 4.5528e+04
2077.2 5.8753e+04
2346.0 3.4762e+04
2832.1 3.9431e+04
2851.1 6.4498e+04
3101.5 3.0334e+04
3469.0 1.6427e+04
3784.7 5.0161e+04
4299.8 4.0081e+04
4835.2 5.3962e+04
4860.0 5.4326e+04
5659.8 3.5224e+04
6015.4 4.6382e+04
8739.5 4.7841e+04
|
255
|
Fri Jan 6 11:23:10 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | Mark Optics 4 |
This is one of the samples we got from the first batch, no flats, edge not polished
2017-01-06
- 11:10am, in chamber, balanced
- 11:11am, roughing pump on
- 11:23am, turbo pump on
- Excitations:
- Quiet time after excitation 1167770663
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1167781499
Excitation (broad band) at 1167781532 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1167781594
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1167792424
Excitation (broad band) at 1167792457 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1167792519
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1167803349
Excitation (broad band) at 1167803381 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1167803443
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1167814274
Excitation (broad band) at 1167814306 (60 s)
Quiet time after excitation: 1167814368
2017-01-10
Results
2017-01-06A

2017-01_06B

2017-01-06C

2017-01-06D

|
360
|
Fri Jun 30 11:02:18 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Matching Forces |
2017-06-30
- I adjusted the plot parameters slightly so that it only showed the actual force profile on the sample in the direction perpendicular to the sample surface. Additionally I compared the two methods of computing the force, as
and as . The profile of the force in both instances appear equal, but they differ in magnitude by exactly a factor of 2, I plotted the force computed with the explicit polarization doubled and the force magnitudes matched exactly. I'm still not entirely sure where this factor of two could be coming from.
 
|
371
|
Thu Jul 20 11:37:01 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Matlab Script |
2017-07-20
- I believe my MATLAB script successfully calculates the force distribution into each of the modes specified by the parameters. My previous error was caused by my neglecting the proportionality factor of
. Now the force order of magnitude is on the order of 103. I am currently unclear how to think about the units of the mode shapes from the disk_frequencies script, but I will pick it apart more carefully and try to figure that out. Then it will be a matter of converting units so that it matches with the N/m^3 from the COMSOL script and then comparing with real lab results. It seems to me that the error in force distribution should be inversely proportional to the number of modes calculated, in which case it would be useful to determine an appropriate number of modes to calculate.
|
104
|
Tue Aug 23 09:44:11 2016 |
Gabriele | General | General | Measurements on MO-02 |
Two good ring-downs measurements were performed on MO-02. The first one was already reported in a previous elog entry. I performed another measurement, and refined the mode identification. I think I had misidentified some modes in my previous analysis. The following plot shows the difference between the modes as predicted by COMSOL and as measured. A clean quadratic trend is visible and fitted:

Here's the spectrum with all the modes:

And the updated Q measurement plot:

A second ring down was measured on Monday morning . Here are the relevant plots:
 
This is the same disk as before, but almost all Q values are systematically higher. Here's a direct comparison:

I'm not sure what changed between the two measurements, except for a re-alignment of the QPD. The disk might have moved a bit... |
210
|
Wed Nov 23 14:16:59 2016 |
Alena | General | General | Microscope inspection |
Microscope inspection of samples:
S1600487 https://dcc.ligo.org/S1600487-v7
S1600438 https://dcc.ligo.org/S1600438
|
204
|
Mon Nov 21 11:46:57 2016 |
Gabriele | General | General | Microscope inspection of 439 and 487 |
S1600439
This is the sample that was CO2 polished (198) and measured after polishing (197, 199). Unfortunately it got damaged during annealing:

I looked at the edge under the microscope. The first image is taken with light from above, and it shows a bit of residual defects in the center of the edge:

The images below are taken with light from below (which seems always the best choice) and they show some residual defects on the edge. Also, there is some "stuff" on the borders, like some fibers of some contamination. The first image is taken in correspondence of the damage, which is barely visible on the left edge. No clean problem is visible here.
  
S1600487
This is a sample as received from Mark Optics. I will measure its Q values, laser polish it, measure again and then anneal it. Here are some images of the edges for future reference. The last one in particular shows the transition from the round part to the flats. The surface quality is clearly different.
  
|
201
|
Fri Nov 18 15:48:09 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | Microscope inspection of CO2 polished samples |
S1600470
For reference, this sample has not been CO2 polished, but it has been annealed and measured. It has quite low Q values. Here are some images of the edges. The first two are taken with light from above. In the second one there some clear red residual, which is also visible as a coloration with the naked eye. The microroughness and some larger defect are well visible.
 
The following images instead are taken with light from below. The red residual is even more evident, and some traces probably due to the machining are clearly visible.
 
S1600479
This sample has been laser polished with a double pass (first at 0.5 mm/s, second at 0.25 mm/s). The first two images are taken with light from above: they are not very clear because of the specular reflection of the lamps. This already indicates that the surface is much smoother. Some defects (bubbles?) are visible close to the main surfaces.
 
The surface quality is more apparent in the following pictures, taken with light from below. The second one is taken where there is a chip in the main surface, and indeed one can see the shading due to the light distortion iduced by the chip. Also a cluster of "bubbles" is clearly visible there.
 
S1600462
This was our first polishing test. It is interesting because the laser tripped during the procedure, so we have a neat transition from the original surface to the polished one. First image taken with light from above, second with light from below
 
|
412
|
Wed Aug 16 11:36:13 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Middle ESD |
2017-08-16
- I created a model with a drive offset in the middle. It improved one of the modes by a factor of 14 or so, but overall, it diminished the vast majority of the modes by as much as a factor of 100.
 
|
403
|
Thu Aug 10 11:32:09 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | Mode peak amplitudes with reference ESD |
The uncoated, annealed and CO2 polished substrate S1600541 is installed in chamber CR0. This morning I performed a quick excitation: 1.6kV peak, broadband noise (500Hz - 32768 Hz), duration 20s. I measured the peak amplitude right after the excitation. The first plot below shows the SNR for all the detected 19 modes, as a function of frequency. The second plot shows the peak amplitude in physical units (radians/rHz of disk surface tilt) for all modes. The calibration of the surface motion should be reasonably good, better than a factor 2 of uncertaint. The attached TXT file contains the numerical data.
 
|
367
|
Wed Jul 12 15:08:59 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Model of actuator and sample |
2017-07-12
- I am attaching the first fully functioning model of the actuator and sample. I cleared both meshes and solutions to make the file a reasonable size, but they can quickly be built/solved again.
|
59
|
Mon Jul 25 12:24:06 2016 |
Gabriele | Electronics | Configuration | More on the signal jumps |
Here are two more tests I did this morning
- removed the DAC card from the cymac and the models, and restarted everything: signal jumps are still there
- move the cymac2 from the crackling noise lab to the CRIME lab, ans set it up with all the same hardware I was using with the cymac3: there are no jumps, signals look perfect (see plots at the end)
So in conclusion: the problem is in the cymac3 computer, either software or hardware. I tend to excluse an I/O hardware problem, since I used two different ADCs and removed the DAC, without improving the situation.
 
|
73
|
Tue Aug 2 16:00:32 2016 |
Gabriele | Electronics | Characterization | More on the signal jumps |
So I’m sending a 1.123 Hz sinusoid into the ADC, and generating 3.123 Hz sines and cosines in the model. Frequencies are reasonably incommensurable with one second.
The plots below shows all three signals. In the top panels, I just separate the two segments in each second: the “normal” segment in blue, and the “jumped” segment in orange.
In the bottom panels, I took the jumped segments (orange) and shifted them “in the future” by exactly one second. The signals are perfect!
I think we could explain this if the order of the samples in each second is scrambled, like we have a circular buffer but we point to the wrong starting point…
|
126
|
Mon Sep 26 15:54:01 2016 |
Gabriele | Facility | Configuration | Moved vacuum controllers |
I moved the turbo pump controller out of the clean room. Also, I installed the gauge controller on the Cymac rack.

|
42
|
Thu Jul 14 17:06:47 2016 |
Gabriele | Electronics | Configuration | Networking |
The laboratory workstation is coatings.ligo.caltech.edu
The RTS is cymac3.ligo.caltech.edu
I set up a ssh-mount of the /opt/rtcds/userapps folder in the workstation. I also created shared ssh keys for the controls user, so we can ssh into the cymac3 without password |
338
|
Fri Apr 7 16:19:03 2017 |
Gabriele | Optics | Daily Progress | New 1103P laser installed |
This afternoon I installed the new Lumentum (former JDSU) HeNe laser, model 1103P in CR0.
Realigned everything.
I installed a sample in the chamber to reflect a beam back inot the QPD. Checking the QPD signals over a hour and more did not show any sign of excess noise or instability. |
323
|
Tue Feb 28 14:20:50 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | New MIT sample #1 |
2017-02-28
- 2:19pm, installed in CR0, balanced, with 1/2" inserts facing down
- It looks dusty and there is a fingerprint on the edge. I didn't clean it
- 2:21pm, roughing pump on
- 2:35pm, turbo pump on
- Excitations:
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172377933
Excitation broadband: 1172377965
Quiet time after excitation: 1172378027
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172381657
Excitation broadband: 1172381689
Quiet time after excitation: 1172381751
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172385381
Excitation broadband: 1172385414
Quiet time after excitation: 1172385476
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172389106
Excitation broadband: 1172389138
Quiet time after excitation: 1172389200
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172392830
Excitation broadband: 1172392863
Quiet time after excitation: 1172392925
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172396555
Excitation broadband: 1172396587
Quiet time after excitation: 1172396649
2017-03-01
2017-03-02
- 9:00am. The laser beam was probably hitting one of the glued inserts. Checked that te disk is not touching, moved the ESD a bit lower
- 9:04am, roughing pump on
- 9:17am, turbo pump on
- 1:50pm, pumps off
|
328
|
Fri Mar 3 13:01:59 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | New MIT sample #2 |
2017-03-03
- 1:00pm, in chamber, realigned optical lever to get as close as possible to the edge of the disk
- 1:02pm, roughing pump on
- 1:14pm, turbo pump on
- Excite
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172633160
Excitation broadband: 1172633192
Quiet time after excitation: 1172633224
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172634454
Excitation broadband: 1172634486
Quiet time after excitation: 1172634518
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172635748
Excitation broadband: 1172635781
Quiet time after excitation: 1172635813
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172637043
Excitation broadband: 1172637075
Quiet time after excitation: 1172637107
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172638337
Excitation broadband: 1172638369
Quiet time after excitation: 1172638401
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1172639631
Excitation broadband: 1172639663
Quiet time after excitation: 1172639695
2017-03-06
|
330
|
Tue Mar 7 11:09:33 2017 |
Gabriele | General | Measurements | New MIT sample #3 |
2017-03-07
- 11:08am, in chamber CR0
- 11:09am, roughing pump on
- 11:23am turbo pump on
- 3:37pm, pumps stopped, the turbo is saturating CR1
2017-03-08
- 8:00am pumps restarted
- Excitations
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173048953
Excitation broadband: 1173048986
Quiet time after excitation: 1173049018
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173050248
Excitation broadband: 1173050280
Quiet time after excitation: 1173050312
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173051542
Excitation broadband: 1173051574
Quiet time after excitation: 1173051606
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173052836
Excitation broadband: 1173052868
Quiet time after excitation: 1173052900
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173054130
Excitation broadband: 1173054163
Quiet time after excitation: 1173054195
-
Quiet time before excitation: 1173055425
Excitation broadband: 1173055457
Quiet time after excitation: 1173055489
2017-03-09
|
112
|
Thu Sep 15 08:27:57 2016 |
Gabriele | General | General | New band-limited excitation |
Same as in elog #110, but now the amplitude is proportional to frequency squared:
ampl = (x/x[0])**2
xx = multi_band_noise(bands, ampl, T=20, fs=65536)
n = AWGNoiseStream(4e-4*xx, channel='X3:CR1-ESD_EXC', rate=65536)
n.start()
Noise stopped at 8:27:40am LT.
Turbo pump off and spinning down at 9:37am LT. Pumo completely stopped at 11:15am LT
Openend the chamber and removed the sample at ~11:20am LT |
264
|
Thu Jan 19 07:32:33 2017 |
Alena | General | Vacuum | New chamber first pimp down |
The new chamber was build. The first attempt to pump down was unsuccessful because of dislocated lid. After the lit was placed properly, the chamber was pumped down to 0.1 torr within 8 min. In future a sky hook will be used to help placing the lid properly. The clamps should not be placed on the lid before the roughing pump turned on.
The turbo pump controller failed. Error code 698 – call the vendor.

|
266
|
Thu Jan 19 14:16:53 2017 |
Gabriele | Mechanics | Design | New concept for retaining ring motion |
Since my experiment with coil and magnets didn't work out very well, here's a new concept for the motion of the four retaining rings (all together) using a translation stage and a picomotor. This follows the same idea put forward by Steve Penn. The translation stage is a Newport 9066-COM-V and the picomotor (which we already have) is a Newport 8301-V. Both stage and picomotor are vacuum compatible (rated at 1e-6 Torr) and tested down to 1e-8 Torr by Steve.
  
Here's the jig integrated in the full system:

 
|
94
|
Sun Aug 21 08:51:22 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | New disk installed |
Vented the chamber. Installed a new disk (MO 03). The one I measured yesterday is now named MO 02 and it is the one with the "burnt mark" from the previous experiment (due to the electrostatic drive).
Startep roughing pump at 8:50am. Started turbo pump at 9.00am.
Excited the disk at 9:50:30am with white noise, amplitude 10 V. Pumps are still running, pressure is about 2e-6 Torr
At 11:10am I stopped the roughing pump, pressure is 1.4e-6 Torr. Exciting again the disk at 11:10:45am. At 12:25am I checked again the situation, since both measurements look quite weird, especially for the first couple of modes.
I think the reflection from the balck glass is interfering with the reflection from the disk. Probably I wasn't careful enough when I aligned the disk. At about 12:35 I stopped the turbo pump. I'm going to open the chamber and realign everything again. |
554
|
Thu Jul 26 15:33:00 2018 |
Alena | General | General | New laser instaled for the old chanber cr0 |
Installed a new HeNe laser for the old chamber cr0. No major alignement was required. The laser mount restored the alinement. Will run a test measurement now. |
106
|
Sun Sep 11 10:05:33 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | New substrate in the chamber |
I installed one of the new substrates (with flats) into the chamber, and started the pumpdown at about 9:45am LT.
Before that, I removed the retaining ring: tomorrow I'm going to glue the magnet to it. |
96
|
Sun Aug 21 15:36:16 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | New test |
Roughing pump stopped at about 3:30:30pm. HV amplifier on at 3:33:30pm, excitation at 3:35:30pm. Recentered QPD at 3:36pm |
98
|
Sun Aug 21 17:41:34 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | New test |
I checked the status at about 5:20pm, the turbo pump was in error and spinning down, since the roughing pump has been off for about 1.5 hours.
I let the pump switch off.
Quote: |
Roughing pump stopped at about 3:30:30pm. HV amplifier on at 3:33:30pm, excitation at 3:35:30pm. Recentered QPD at 3:36pm
|
|
99
|
Mon Aug 22 08:29:24 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | New test |
Restarted roughing and turbo pump at about 8:10am.
Quote: |
I checked the status at about 5:20pm, the turbo pump was in error and spinning down, since the roughing pump has been off for about 1.5 hours.
I let the pump switch off.
Quote: |
Roughing pump stopped at about 3:30:30pm. HV amplifier on at 3:33:30pm, excitation at 3:35:30pm. Recentered QPD at 3:36pm
|
|
|
133
|
Mon Oct 17 10:50:50 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Vacuum | No sign of problems in the electrostatic drive |
I opened the chamber and took the etched disk out. Inspection of the electrostatic drive does not show any sign of burn or damage.
So it seems that the problem we had previously was due to contamination of the chamber (in the first case) or of the ESD (in the second case) |
170
|
Wed Nov 9 15:32:11 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Noise hunting | Noise below 2 kHz is not due to the roughing pump, but to the clean air filters |
The two spectra below show basically no difference (blue roughing pump on, red, roughing pump off)

Instead, below is another comparison: blue same as before, standard condition, red with one of the two clean air filters momentarily off. There is some clear improvement. The second filter is too hard to switch off!

|
181
|
Sun Nov 13 10:11:19 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Noise hunting | Noise due to air |
The plot below compares the QPD signal spectra in different configurations (roughing pump on/off, air on/off).
The noise below ~<2kHz is making very hard to measure the Q of the first mode at 1100 Hz
The main source of noise are the clean air filters. I switched them to minimum for the moment being.


|
394
|
Mon Aug 7 13:19:48 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Normalized data |
2017-08-07
- I included the modal mass factors in the code and renormalized my data. The normalization has a noticeable impact, but does not change the general trends of the data
- In fact the impact is not even significant enough to warrant a change in the ideal parameters I picked for the rectangular ESD in my interim report
   
|
383
|
Thu Jul 27 16:56:03 2017 |
Zach | Electronics | Modeling | Offset Sweep |
2017-07-27
- I ran a low resolution sweep of the offset in the arms of the ESD, the space between the end of the arm and base of the opposite combs. The trends are much more subtle and are not coherent across as many of the modes. The lower frequency modes decrease slightly, while the force in the higher frequency modes increase more drastically. This is an interesting parameter, I will definitely run another sweep once I have written code that accounts for the mode pairs. Assuming the apparent trends are physically accurate, this could be a useful parameter because a greater offset gives a greater relative increase to the higher order modes while still leaving a substantial force on the lower order modes that are excited more easily anyway.

|
37
|
Mon Jul 11 15:21:12 2016 |
Gabriele | General | Daily Progress | One disk installed into the chamber |
[Alena, Gabriele]
We attached one of the silicon lenses to a 1" optical post using some kapton tape, and installed it into the vacuum chamber. We built a simple periscope using standard optical component, and managed to send the optical level beam into the disk and back out.
  
To set a reference for the horizontal position of the disk we used the LMA method: we put a small container with water in place of the disk, and mark on a reference where the reflected beam hits out of the chamber:
 
We then put back the disk, and aligned it to have the beam hitting the same position. During pumdown we couldn't see any shift of the disk, judging from the position of the optical lever beam. |
14
|
Thu May 19 11:33:44 2016 |
Gabriele | Electronics | Design | Optical lever electronics design |
The circuit design sent out for fabrication is available in the DCC: D1600196 |
280
|
Fri Jan 27 14:56:55 2017 |
Gabriele | Optics | Daily Progress | Optical lever setup completed |
The four optical levers are completely installed and aligned to a horizontal reference.
 
|
16
|
Fri May 20 15:18:58 2016 |
Gabriele | Optics | Design | Optical levers layout |
Attached a first layout of the optical lever systems. The beam spot radius on the QPD is about 0.8 mm, and the lever arm length is of the orer of 1.4-1.5 m for all four beams.
|
17
|
Sun May 22 23:40:45 2016 |
Gabriele | Optics | Design | Optical levers layout |
An improved design is attached. I modified the input telescope to avoid using shor focal length lenses, to make it less critical, and to reduce the beam spot radius at the QPD to 0.5 mm.
Quote: |
Attached a first layout of the optical lever systems. The beam spot radius on the QPD is about 0.8 mm, and the lever arm length is of the orer of 1.4-1.5 m for all four beams.
|
|