ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
9844
|
Wed Apr 23 23:48:30 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | Y end whitening board |
The MON outputs of the Y end QPD whitening board were hot earlier today while pulling it out of the crate. After swapping the 4 pin lemo connector with an isolated panel mount bnc connector, I stuck the board back into the crate and this immediately kicked the ETMY suspension. Jenne and I went to the Y end to look at what was going on. We removed the board from the crate after smelling something burning. The MON output ports of the whitening board were super hot this time. There is no sign of any components melting on the board (comparing the board with its pictures that were taken earlier) and a tester board stuck into the crate lights up just fine.
So the back panel is still ok. We need to troubleshoot or replace the whitening board.
Edit, JCD: The attached photos are from right after I replaced the "Rgain" resistor, elog 9823. What they show is that it looks like some of the melting / burning may have already been happening before I pulled the board, and I just never noticed :( In particular, look at the resistors on the main board above the blue "G" sticker. There isn't a difference that I can tell between this photo from last week, and today's situation.
 |
9869
|
Mon Apr 28 15:47:57 2014 |
manasa | Summary | IOO | MC2_TRANS QPD Servo trend |
Quote: |
We turned on the MC2_TRANS paths for both PIT/YAW tonight.
I turned off the BLP200 and turned on the RLP7 (RLP always are better than BLP). G_PIT = -0.111, G_YAW = 0.111. On Monday, let's let Steve look at the trends and determine if this centering servo is bad or good.
|
The MC was showing slow but periodic alignment drifts and eventually unlocked around noon. I looked up the alignment trend (Attach: 2 day trend)
MC_TRANS_PIT_ERR and MC_TRANS_Y_ERR show that the MC_TRANS servo slowly drifted the IMC alignment causing it to lose lock from time to time (mostly in yaw).
To confirm that the drift was NOT due to off-centering in the MC2_TRANS QPD, I turned off the WFS servo, moved MC2 to recenter the trans beam on the QPD, and re-enabled WFS servo.
MC_TRANS path in WFS is still left enabled. |
9877
|
Wed Apr 30 00:40:55 2014 |
manasa | Configuration | LSC | Y arm IR lock troubleshooting |
[Koji, Manasa]
The Y arm locks stably for IR PDH now.
The reason for ETMY getting kicked during lock acquisition was finally found to be related to the limiter value set in the Y arm servo. We reduced the limiter value unintentionally and found that the lock acquisition stayed smooth. The limiter value was stepped in 1000s from 7000 and eventually found that the ETMY suspension was kicked when we try to acquire lock with the limiter value was set at 11000.
The limiter for X arm at 11000 is not causing any trouble at the moment.
In the process, we did a bunch of things through the evening to troubleshoot IR locking of the Y arm.
Earlier today running the IFO configure script did not restore the arms to lock and both the ETMs needed to be aligned to lock the arms. The arms stayed locked for 15 minutes and the Y arm lost lock eventually leaving the ETMY in a misaligned state.
The state of the Y arm was similar to what Jenne has explained in ELOG where the ETMY was kicked during lock acquisition and would move to a misaligned state.
To trouble shoot, there were several things that were done. A few of them might not have any direct correlation to the locking issue but could just be a coincidence.
1. The trigger time for the filters in the arm filter modules were set such that they switch on after the SUS violin filters. Arm FM trigger time = 3 s (previously set at 0.1s) and SUS violin trigger time = 1s. This reduced the number of lock loss events.
2. There was some drop in transmission when the bounce filter of Y arm (FM6) turned ON. This was fixed by changing its ramp time (initially set at 1s). The filter has been modified to turn on immediately upon arm lock acquisition before the other triggered filters in the filter module turn on.
3. The QPD and SUS signal cables running to the rack were checked to be intact. Koji found some of them to be loose. But this had no evident correlation with the arm locking problem.
4.The oplev and PD alignment was checked at the Y end. The high gain trans PD for Y arm was checked for good alignment by looking at TRY. It was found that the EXIT light at the Y end is injecting some noise to the transmission PD.
5. The ETMY was given offsets in PIT, YAW and POS and the OSEM sensor values were checked to see if the suspension is behaving well. It was behaving well. |
9879
|
Wed Apr 30 14:21:50 2014 |
manasa | Update | CDS | fb restarted |
c1sus and c1isey were not talking to fb. The usual mxstream restart did not help.
Restarted fb
>>ssh fb
>>telnet fb 8087
shutdown
All lights on the FE status screen are green now.
Note that Steve did an mxstreamrestart earlier today because the same machines c1sus and c1isey were not talking to fb. |
9880
|
Wed Apr 30 16:07:59 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | ALS X noise post servo modification |
I. The Y arm stayed stable through last night and I have saved the arm lock settings to IFOconfigure.
II. ALS X arm noise measurements
I looked at the before and after noise of ALSX.
Settings:
Phase tracker gain = 85
Xarm servo gain = -17
The rms in loop noise has dropped from 3KHz to 500 Hz.
Attachment 1: Phase tracker OLTF
Attachment 2: Free running noise and in loop noise
Attachment 3: Out of loop noise (measured with arms locked using PDH for IR)
Attachment 4: ALS arm servo OLTF
xml data files can be found in /users/manasa/data/140430/ |
9981
|
Wed May 21 11:11:01 2014 |
manasa | Update | IOO | MC tuned |
I found MC unlocked this morning. I looked at the 2 day trend of the MC suspensions and found MC2 suspensions have been misaligned.
I used Rana's ezcaservo trick to recover MC lock. This brought the MC_REFL down to 0.7 counts. I did the rest of the alignment by moving the MC2 suspension sliders only. MC_REFL is down to 0.45-0.5 counts and TRANS_SUM is at ~16300.
Also, I found the WFS servo was left turned OFF. I re-enabled them as well. |
9983
|
Wed May 21 13:20:34 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | ALS X noise from angular motion of mirrors |
Quote: |
[Rana, Jenne]
9. Arm cavity alignment. Significant DC effect.
* When the alignment of one of the arm cavity mirrors is changed, the DC value of the beatnote signal changes.
* ITMX moved in yaw, we see a 7kHz/15urad DC shift in the BEATX_FINE_PHASE_OUT_HZ time series.
* ETMX moved in yaw, we see an 8kHz/5.5urad DC shift in the time series. We aren't sure why this is about a factor of 3 times larger effect (same shift for smaller misalignment) than the ITM.
* We want to do a Yuta-style analysis to see what the angle to length coupling looks like, so that we can measure the angular motion of our cavity mirrors and put the expected noise into our ALS noise budget. Perhaps this will help us understand the low frequency difference between our in-loop beatnote error signal and our in-loop PDH error signals (red vs. maroon on the ALS noise budget posted above Pianosa).
* I've asked Manasa to take some transfer functions in the morning, so that we can start to have an idea of what is going on with this.
|
Attached is the measurement of the transfer function from ITMX oplev error in yaw to the ALSX error signal.
The arm was locked to the IR using POX and the green beat frequency (between X arm trans in green and PSL green) in this case was 27MHz.
The transfer function looks mostly flat between 1Hz - 30Hz at 700-800 Hz/urad. The DC shift that Jenne measured from the time series is ~500 Hz/urad.
So far I have not been able to measure the TF below 1Hz without the arm losing its lock. Updates will follow.
Data xml file can be found in /users/manasa/data/140521/ |
9988
|
Thu May 22 00:30:40 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | ALS X noise from angular motion of mirrors |
Below are the transfer functions measured between the angular (pit, yaw) motion of X arm mirrors and the ALSX error signal. The measurements were again made for 1Hz-30Hz.
The transfer functions are mostly flat.
ITMX P - 200-300 Hz/urad (beat freq = 45 MHz)
ITMX Y - 700-800 Hz/urad (beat freq = 27MHz)
ETMX P - 500-600 Hz/urad (beat freq = 56 MHz)
ETMX Y - 1000-2000 Hz/urad (beat freq = 62.5MHz)
Data xml files can be found in /users/manasa/data/140521/ |
9990
|
Fri May 23 11:58:28 2014 |
manasa | Update | Green Locking | Y arm green alignment tuned |
The Y arm green transmission had come down to 0.3 and the green steering mirrors on the Y end table required some minor alignment adjustments to bring back transmission to around 0.75 counts. |
9999
|
Wed May 28 14:13:06 2014 |
manasa | Update | IOO | MC relocked |
Quote: |
MC wouldn't relock, it looked misaligned in pitch and yaw on MC camera.
I've touched the alignment, and gotten the reflection below 0.5, but it unlocks periodically, spot positions aren't great, and turning on WFS throws it out of alignment. ughhhhh
|
The IMC has not been happy since the weekend and were left with WFS disabled because of the bad alignment state that the MC has been left at.
I realigned the MC mirrors and brought down MC_REFL to 0.42 and MC_TRANS_SUM came up to ~ 17400 counts.
I measured the spot positions after alignment. MC1 and MC3 are slightly off in pitch :
spot positions in mm (MC1,2,3 pit MC1,2,3 yaw):
[2.0535418031770249, 0.84870716159663184, 1.9759940800847962, -1.6706240175650202, 0.089441353070240759, -1.0339963871771678]
I reset the WFS filterbank offsets and engaged the MCWFS servo. Atleast now the MC is not being thrown out of lock with WFS enabled. I have NOT touched the alignment to the WFS PDs. |
10000
|
Wed May 28 17:51:48 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | X green broadband PD NOT working |
Quote: |
Grr. I am very frustrated. After lunch I redid alignment for both X and Y green systems (Yarm both at the end and on the PSL table, Xarm just on the PSL table). After that realignment work, I cannot find a beatnote for the Xarm!!!
At this point, I still hadn't touched anything on the X path (except the PZT input steering mirrors, remotely from the control room). The beatnote was about the same size as it was on Friday, around -27dBm. I went onto the PSL table and did the same alignment procedure that I had just done for the Yarm: Remove the green trans PD and the accompanying lens so that I get far-field spots on the wall, and then steer the PSL green and the X green spots until they are nicely overlapped at both the camera (near-field) and on the wall. I looked at the DC output of the beat PD, and centered the beam on the diode. I put back the thorlabs DC transmission PD and the lens, and centered the beam on that. However, after this work, I cannot find a beatnote for the X arm! I still see the nice big Ygreen beatnote, and I have the PSL and Xend temperatures where they usually are ( abs(FSS Slow) < 0.1, and X end Slow around 10,090. ) I scanned -10,000 counts, and +5,000 counts from there, and still don't find a beatnote!
I went back inside, and I don't see an RF signal coming into the beatbox from the Xarm. It's not the cable's fault though, since I then hooked the RF output of the beat PD to a 'scope, and still didn't see any beatnote. The DC path of the PD is definitely seeing things, because when I switch the 'scope over to the DC output of the Xbeat PD, and I block/unblock the beam, I see the voltage step up and down as expected.
I have not pulled out the Xgreen broadband PD, but unless someone else has a good idea of what to check, that might be one of the next things to do. 
Ideas of things I could try:
* Put the X broadband PD on the Y beatnote path to see if I see the same Y beatnote (use the port where the Y green trans PD is, since it has the coaligned beams, and a lens).
* Open the PD and see if anything on the RF path is fried.
* Move the Y PD over to the X path, to see if it sees the beatnote.
* ????
|
I made my attempts trying to figure out what was wrong.
Checking if we are at the right X end laser temperature:
I aligned the arms and found the Y beatnote.I blocked the light falling on the X beat PD so that the RF analyser was only looking at the output from the Y beat PD. AT the RF analyser, I found the strong Y-PSL beatnote, the X-Y beat note and a weak X-PSL beatnote. This confirmed that we have the X end laser at the right temperature to be able to detect the beatnote. Unblocking the light on the X beat PD did not bring in any additional peaks.
Checking the RF cabling from the X beat PD to the beat box:
I swapped the RF cables such that the signal from the Y beat PD output was going to the X input on the beatbox. I could still see the beatnote on the RF analyser. This confirmed that there aren't any broken RF cables along the X path.
Checking X green PSL alignment:
I replaced the X beat PD with the Y beat PD to check if the alignment of X&PSL green are alright. I could find the X beat note this way without any alignment tweaking.
I suspect we probably have some RF component burnt in the X beat PD. Do we have any spares lying around? There is a Koji's box with a PD having the same serial number.
IFO status report for anyone who is looking to do some locking tonight :
The Y beat PD is back along the Y path and I have confirmed the presence of Y-PSL beat note after replacing the PD.
The X beat PD has been removed and now rests on the electronics bench for checking.
While aligning the arms today, I noticed that enabling LSC would cause misalignment of the ETMY suspension. I haven't tried to find out what has been causing this. Could be something similar to what was noticed with the ETMX suspension a couple of weeks ago elog9969. |
10003
|
Thu May 29 08:43:34 2014 |
manasa | Update | PEM | Ant season already in |
Ant season has set in. I spotted and killed a few ants around the optics and the enclosure of the PSL table yesterday. TIme for our pest control crew to get busy! |
10042
|
Mon Jun 16 12:58:50 2014 |
manasa | Summary | IOO | Ringdown recap |
A recap of the ringdown measurements made at the 40m in mid 2012, the hardware that was installed for the same and results from the measurements.
IMC ringdown:
Hardware installed
A trans PD was installed (elog 7122).
This PD does not exist in the trans path anymore.
Measurements
The polarity in the MC servo was flipped with the MC WFS disabled and the PD trans signal was used to look at the cavity ringdown.
Ringdown time = 13 us
Cavity finesse from the measurement = 453 (inconsistent with actual finesse).
Attachment: Ringdown measurement and fits
PMC ringdown:
Hardware installed
The AOM was installed before the PMC. The AOM was driven by the driver installed on the PSL table. (RF power ~1.5W @ 80MHz @1.0V modulation input). An RF switch was installed to control the AOM driver input. ZASWA-2-50DR+ was installed.
Note: The AOM was used by the ISS crew after this. So the RF switch has been removed and the AOM is no more a part of the ringdown setup.
Measurements
No measurements were made as we could not obtain relevant TTL signals to control the switch remotely. |
10048
|
Tue Jun 17 12:04:40 2014 |
manasa | Update | Computer Scripts / Programs | MC autolocker NOT running, FB needs some attention |
MC autolocker and Ottavia
I assume that the MC was left with a fully functioning autolocker enabled and running on ottavia last night.
But as of this morning, the MC autolocker is NOT running alright. The MC was in an unlocked state and the autolocker has been doing nothing to the servo sliders. I think this was the state of MC since last night as seen on the stripchart.
Since the autolocker has been left to run on ottavia, I tried to look at the cronlogs to see if it running the autolocker script at all. I looked at the list on ottavia and it has the MCautlocker on it cronjobs list and yet doing nothing.
Later, I did a softreboot on ottavia when I could not ssh into it from rossa or pianosa. ssh to ottavia now works just fine.
I am leaving Ottavia at this and returning to the more important job of fixing the MC. I locked the MC manually and am now working on the alignment.
Framebuilder
Also, the CDS FE status screen had red lights blinking as if it required an 'mxstream restart'. I did the same and it did not fix the problem. So I tried to restart fb using the usual 'telnet fb 8087'; but could not restart fb that way.
Attached: FE status screen |
10078
|
Fri Jun 20 09:46:49 2014 |
manasa | Update | IOO | MC WFS servo turned ON |
The IMC stayed locked last night, but with a high REFL ~3.0. I found the WFS servo OFF; so went ahead and enabled it. (Did somebody disable it for reasons not elog'd?)
MC returned to a happy state. But the WFS offsets are quite large. So I tweaked the alignment and got MC REFL down to ~0.45 and MC TRANS SUM to ~16500 counts. MC WFS offsets also dropped significantly after this without any need to touch the alignment to the WFS PDs. |
10134
|
Mon Jul 7 11:02:22 2014 |
manasa | Configuration | General | IFO status post earthquake |
Quote: |
All suspension damping restored. There had to be an earth quake.
|
PMC was relocked.
MC did not need any fixing to its alignment. I had to lock it manually and autolocker is set running now. So that should take care of things
The arms were aligned and ASS'd for IR PDH.
Green light PDH locks to the arms alright. |
10140
|
Mon Jul 7 16:39:09 2014 |
manasa | Update | PSL | PMC ringdown setup |
I moved stuff on the PSL table to accommodate the PMC ringdown setup.
I used the beam that leaks from the steering mirror at the PMC transmission that was dumped to a razor blade dump. I installed a Y1 to steer the beam to the ringdown PD. Power in the beam 75mW.
Results are in here elog |
10142
|
Mon Jul 7 16:52:02 2014 |
manasa | Update | Electronics | RF cables need to be rerouted |
The RF cables have been routed incorrectly. The cables run to the module from the front of the rack. We cannot close the doors to the racks if they are to remain this way.
I have asked Nichin to reroute the cables properly. |
10164
|
Wed Jul 9 16:33:05 2014 |
manasa | Update | PSL | PMC ringdown setup |
Quote: |
Quote: |
I moved stuff on the PSL table to accommodate the PMC ringdown setup.
I used the beam that leaks from the steering mirror at the PMC transmission that was dumped to a razor blade dump. I installed a Y1 to steer the beam to the ringdown PD. Power in the beam 75mW.
|
I am guessing that 75 mW will burn / destroy any Thorlabs PD. I hope that mW is supposed to be uW.
|
It was ~7.5mW and measured ~2V at the PD output (given its range 0-5V ) on the oscilloscope . So PD is safe ! |
10168
|
Wed Jul 9 21:05:31 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | AOM and PSL Ringdown |
After the fits, here are the numbers!
Component |
Measured |
Expected |
AOM |
85.1 ns |
200 ns (spec sheet) |
PMC |
164.6 ns |
Finesse/(2*pi*FSR) = 163.4 ns |
* We have a huge difference to the AOM switching time that was measured. The spec sheet mentions acoustic velocity in the material to be 4.2 mm/us and the well matched diameter in the AOM to be 1100 um. This would give a switching time ~ 200 ns. We could probably be having a much smaller beam size in the AOM for the measured switching time.
* The PMC parameters that I had been referring to from the wiki were actually wrong and which was the reason for the mismatch that I was finding. I modified the wiki according to the found references to the actual measurement here: PMC parameters The measured values now and then match pretty well.
* Since the AOM does not change the power of the output beam by very much, what we see is actually a step response. Also, we have a lot of noise in the data obtained at the PD.
RXA: some more comments...
- The fact that the AOM can only modulate the power by a tiny bit means that it is very mis-aligned or that the driver is broken.
- You need to take into account the AOM step time in the calculation of the PMC step time. Its not a step response if the input step is not a step, but a exponential.
- I wouldn't trust that old John Miller entry for the PMC Finesse. As you can see from his elog, even he didn't trust it.
- As we were discussing before, making a little step is not the same as a full ringdown. cf. G000413 and T900007
|
10171
|
Thu Jul 10 00:38:20 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | AOM and PSL Ringdown |
Quote: |
RXA: some more comments...
- The fact that the AOM can only modulate the power by a tiny bit means that it is very mis-aligned or that the driver is broken.
- You need to take into account the AOM step time in the calculation of the PMC step time. Its not a step response if the input step is not a step, but a exponential.
- I wouldn't trust that old John Miller entry for the PMC Finesse. As you can see from his elog, even he didn't trust it.
- As we were discussing before, making a little step is not the same as a full ringdown. cf. G000413 and T900007
|
I think we should revisit the AOM alignment because the last time it was aligned, PMC trans dropped from 0.84 to 0.15 (a little more than 80%) for 0-1V modulation input to the AOM driver [elog]. The drop in power right now is ~10-15% only.
I could not find any elogs of AOM alignment touchups after Oct 2012.
But can the ISS team throw some light on the status of AOM when they were installing the ISS servo before we decide on touching the AOM alignment? [elog] |
10203
|
Tue Jul 15 17:34:01 2014 |
manasa | Update | PSL | proposing AOM re-alignment |
I am going to tweak the alignment of the beam into the AOM (before the PMC) tomorrow morning. If anybody has any objections to this, please raise a red flag.
Proposed alignment procedure:
1. Reduce PSL power to say 10%
2. Since the AOM is not on any sort of a mechanical stage, I will have to just play around carefully until I see a maximum power rejection into first order.
I am assuming that moving the AOM is not going to affect the input pointing because all these activities are happening before the PMC. So as long as I have the output beam from the AOM aligned to the PMC at the end, everyone should be happy. |
10219
|
Wed Jul 16 19:38:37 2014 |
manasa | Summary | PSL | AOM alignment issues and removed from beam path |
AOM removed from the beampath and PMC relocked.
AOM alignment:
1. Measured the initial power after PMC as 1.30W and reduced it down to 130mW.
2. Checked the power in the AOM zero order transmission before touching it. For 0-1V modulation input, the power dropped from 125uW to 98.3uW.
3. Steered the mirror right before the AOM to increase AOM zero order transmission and then carefully moved the AOM around to obtain maximum power attenuation. I repeated this a few times and the maximum attenuation that I could obtain was 125uW to 89.2uW (~30% attenuation).
Although this is not the right way to align the AOM, we do not have much options with the current setup as there is not enough separation between the zero order and first order beams and the AOM is on a fixed rigid mount.
4. I tried to dump the first order beam from the AOM and it wasn't satisfactory as well. There is barely any separation between the zero order and first order beams.
PMC relocking:
1. SInce the alignment to the PMC was disturbed by moving the AOM and the steering mirror in front of it, the PMC alignment was lost.
2. I could not relock the PMC at low power or high power. Rana had to come to rescue and fixed the alignment so that we could see flashes of PMC on the trans camera (This was done by aligning refl beam to the PMC REFL PD while giving a triangular ramp to the PMC PZT voltage).
Also I should not have tried to lock the PMC at high power as I could have been steering the beam at high power to the edges of the PMC mirrors that way and burning stuff easily.
3. Before fine tuning the alignment, I decided to remove the AOM from the beam path as there needs some work done on it to make it useful.
4. I removed the AOM from the beam path and relocked the PMC.
5. PMC is relocked with 0.79 counts in TRANS and I measured the power after PMC 1.30W
Attachment: picture showing AOM removed from the beampath. |
10470
|
Mon Sep 8 12:11:36 2014 |
manasa | Update | Computer Scripts / Programs | preparing vac system to reboot |
Quote: |
FYI: in that rack, the +15V pulls ~0.5 A more than -15V usually. I think this is due to some RF amplifiers which are powered by this (e.g. the AOM that Manasa set up). The Sorensen's can source ~30A in principle, so we should make sure to set the current limit appropriately so as to not overheat them when there is a short.
Was this power supply not fused for all of its connections? I remember that this was connected to at least one un-fused connection in the past year.
|
+15V supply powers the following (from what I see):
1. PMC and MC boards on the rack.
2. RF amplifiers on the rack for the beat signals from the green beat PDs.
3. Beatbox itself.
The beatbox was the one that had an un-fused connection last year. I re-did it properly to go through a fuse quite sometime ago.
I dont see any other un-fused connections now from the +15V supply right now.
P.S. AOM driver takes a 0 to +28V power supply and not connected to the +15V |
10531
|
Wed Sep 24 11:02:38 2014 |
manasa | Update | LSC | Moving SRM |
I looked at the CAD layout and it seems like we will clearly be clipping POY if we move SRM by 7.5cm. Since POY is not visible at low power, we cannot be sure about the clipping.
We should have a plan B before we move everything. I suggest we move a combination of SRM and SR2 to get the desired SRC length.
Moving SR2 will require extra effort to walk the beam unclipped through all the 6 output steering mirrors that follow; but there will be little room for error if we use irides to propagate the beam through the first 4 mirrors that are in the BS and ITMY chamber. |
10567
|
Mon Oct 6 10:04:58 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Unexpected power shutdown |
We had a unexpected power shutdown for 5 sec at ~ 9:15 AM.
Chiara had to be powered up and am in the process of getting everything else back up again.
Steve checked the vacuum and everything looks fine with the vacuum system. |
10569
|
Mon Oct 6 10:28:18 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Unexpected power shutdown |
Quote: |
We had a unexpected power shutdown for 5 sec at ~ 9:15 AM.
Chiara had to be powered up and am in the process of getting everything else back up again.
Steve checked the vacuum and everything looks fine with the vacuum system.
|
The last time we had a power failure IFO recovery elog |
10573
|
Mon Oct 6 18:15:12 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Unexpected power shutdown: end green alignment |
After Q brought back the IR, I went to check the green situation.
1. The end lasers had to be turned ON.
2. The heaters for the doubler crystals had to be enabled. The heaters are at the set values.
3. The X arm PZTs for the steering mirrors had to be powered up (Set voltage 100V and current 6.7mA)
4. I aligned the green to the already IR-aligned arms.
Green PSL alignment has to be done after Q finishes his work on the MC WFS. |
10575
|
Tue Oct 7 10:09:07 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Chiara not responding |
Chiara doesn't seem to be responding and I guess something happened 7 hrs ago.
I tried to hook up chiara to a monitor to reboot or atleast look for error messages; but it is not even detecting the external monitor (Tried changing monitors and vga cables; still see nothing).
I tried to ssh into it and only received errors :
NFS lookup failed for server XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX : error 5 (RPC: Timed out)
ssh: chiara: host/servname not known
Steve had the vacuum checked and everything seems fine with the status of the vacuum system atleast. |
10586
|
Thu Oct 9 10:52:37 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Power outage II & recovery |
Post 30-40min unexpected power outage this morning, Steve checked the status of the vacuum and I powered up Chiara.
I brought back the FE machines and keyed all the crates to bring back the slow machines but for the vac computers.
c1vac1 is not responding as of now. All other computers have come back and are alive. |
10610
|
Wed Oct 15 17:09:49 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Diode laser test preparation |
[EricG, manasa]
The He-Ne laser oplev setup was swapped with a fiber-coupled diode laser from W Bridge. The laser module and its power supply are sitting on a bench in the east side of the SP table. |
10629
|
Tue Oct 21 18:40:46 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | End laser fiber setup |
[Manasa, Diego]
This is our first time touching tables for Frequency Offset Locking.
The goal was to couple the 1064nm that leaks after the SHG crystal and couple it into the fiber before we run it along the length of the arm.
The fiber has been mounted at the end but there is no light coupled into the fiber as yet.
In the process, the following were done:
1. ETMY oplev servo disabled. This was enabled after the work.
2. NPRO laser power was reduced so that nothing gets burnt accidently while putting things on the table. This was also reset after the work.
The arms could be locked to green and IR after the work. So I am hoping today's work will not affect locking. |
10638
|
Fri Oct 24 10:08:24 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Y AUX laser - fiber coupled |
The Y end aux laser light leaking after the doubling crystal has been coupled into the 70m long PM fiber.
Input power = 250mW; Output after 70m = 20mW
The poor efficiency is partially due to the ellipticity of the beam itself and partially due to the compromise I had to make using a single lens to couple the light into the fiber (given the limitations in space). But 20mW should be more than sufficient for a beat note setup.
Light propagates as follows after the doubling crystal:
Doubler ---> Harmonic Separator (45deg) ---> Lens (f=12.5cm) --> Steering mirror (Y1) --> Fiber collimator ( Thor labs CFC-2X-C) --> FIber end
I will update photos of the setup shortly.
I have left the 70m fiber in its spool sitting at the Y end and blocked the light before the last Y1 steering mirror in the above setup. So it should be safe.
Other:
Through the course of the work, I disabled the ETMY oplev and enabled it before closing the enclosure. I also reduced the AUX laser power and brought it back up after the work.
I did a check to see if the arms are locking in both IR and green and they did.
|
10640
|
Mon Oct 27 12:17:46 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Y AUX laser coupling telescope design |
Since I obtained a poor coupling efficiency from the earlier setup, I went back to calculate the coupling efficiency of the current setup.
For the current setup, I took the average of the x and y waist of the input beam and calculated the distance at which the input beam diameter would match the (fiber +collimator) beam diameter.
Average waist = 40.2um @-3.3mm from face of doubling crystal
(Fiber PM980 + Collimator f=2.0mm) beam waist = 205um
Distance(z) at which the input beam waist is 205um = 11.9cm
The closest available lens was f = 12.5cm. So I used it to couple the input beam by placing it at z ~12.5cm on a micrometer stage.
Since this gave only 10% coupling, I went back to calculate (using 'a la mode') the best possible coupling that can be obtained taking into consideration the ellipticity of the beam.
The maximum obtainable coupling (mode overlap) is 14.5% which is still poor.
Redesign
Taking into account the ellipticity of the input beam, the available lenses and the space restrictions (lens can be placed only between z= 8 to 28cm), I calculated the best possible coupling efficiency (using 'a la mode').
The maximum possible mode overlap that can be obtained is 58.6% (matlab code and plot attached)
>>auxmode
modematching = 0.58632
Optimized Path Component List:
label z (m) type parameters
----- ----- ---- ----------
L1 0.0923 lens focalLength: 0.0750
|
10645
|
Tue Oct 28 11:45:21 2014 |
manasa | Update | SUS | ETMX - observation |
I looked at what are the situations that make ETMX lose alignment.
This is not occur all that often this morning; less than 10 times in may be the last 4 hours of poking the X arm. I found that the bad behavior of ETMX also exists in certain other cases apart from the case when we enable LSC.
(I) Even the MISALIGN and RESTORE scripts for the suspensions make the suspension behave bad. The RESTORE script while in the process of bringing back the suspension to the place where it was, kicks it to some place else sometimes (even with LSC disabled)
(II) The suspension also gets kicked while realigning ETMX manually using sliders at 10^-3 (pace of 2-3 steps at a time).
I am suspecting something wrong right at the coil inputs and gains of the suspension.
Also, I recollect that we haven't done a check on the X arm LSC limiters and filters ramping times like it was done for the Y arm ( Elog 9877 ). We should do this check to be sure that we are not seeing a mixed puddle of problems from 2 sources. |
10650
|
Wed Oct 29 11:45:11 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Y AUX laser - fiber coupled (52%) |
Quote: |
Redesign
Taking into account the ellipticity of the input beam, the available lenses and the space restrictions (lens can be placed only between z= 8 to 28cm), I calculated the best possible coupling efficiency (using 'a la mode').
The maximum possible mode overlap that can be obtained is 58.6% (matlab code and plot attached)
>>auxmode
modematching = 0.58632
Optimized Path Component List:
label z (m) type parameters
----- ----- ---- ----------
L1 0.0923 lens focalLength: 0.0750
|
I used the above configuration and was able to obtain ~52% coupling.
Input power = 250mW
Output power with absorptive ND 1.0 = 13 mW
I used the absorptive ND filter before the lens to keep the coupled output power within the range of fiber power meter and also avoid scattering of enormous amount of uncoupled light all over the table.
I have attached the screenshot of the out of loop ALS noise before opening the table (BLUE) and after closing down (MAGENTA). The beat note frequency and amplitude before and after were (14.4MHz/-9.3dBm) and (20.9MHz/-10 dBm). |
10651
|
Wed Oct 29 18:07:28 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Diode laser test preparation |
I ran 3 BNC cables from the SP table to 1X7 rack so that we can have 16 bit channels for the Ontrak PD that will be used to test oplev lasers. The BNC cables are plugged to the Ch 29, 30 & 31 that were already created for this purpose (elog 10488) |
10657
|
Fri Oct 31 11:46:15 2014 |
manasa | Update | | Rattling HEPA : Eventually stops |
The PSL HEPA stopped working while it was running at 80%. I have closed the PSL enclosure.
Steve is working to fix this. |
10666
|
Tue Nov 4 14:46:00 2014 |
manasa | Update | Green Locking | Missing beatnotes |
Summary: Cannot find beatnotes between the arms and PSL.
I wanted to measure the ALS out of loop noise before putting stuff on the PSL table for frequency offset locking.
But I was not able to find the beat notes between the arms and PSL green. All I could find while scanning through the end laser temperatures is the beatnote between the X and Y green.
EricQ says that he spent some time yesterday and could not find the beatnotes as well.
Debugging and still could not find:
1. Checked the FSS slow actuator. This was close to zero ~0.003
2. Checked the green alignment on the PSL table. Everything seems fine.
3. Checked the actual PSL laser temperature. It was 31.28deg and not very far from when it was last set at 31.33deg elog.
4. Also checked the end laser temperatures. Both the lasers are ~40deg (where I could see the beatnote between the arms). Based on the plot here and here , we are very much in the regime where there should be a beatnote between the PSL and the arms. |
10670
|
Wed Nov 5 11:37:29 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | Light from Y end reaches PSL table |
[Steve, Diego, Manasa]
Since the beatnotes have disappeared, I am taking this as a chance to put the FOL setup together hoping it might help us find them.
Two 70m long fibers now run along the length of the Y arm and reach the PSL table.
The fibers are running through armaflex insulating tubes on the cable racks. The excess length ~6m sits in its spool on the top of the PSL table enclosure.
Both the fibers were tested OK using the fiber fault locator. We had to remove the coupled end of the fiber from the mount and put it back in the process. So there is only 8mW of end laser power at the PSL table after this activity as opposed to ~13mW. This will be recovered with some alignment tweaking.
After the activity I found that the ETMY wouldn't damp. I traced the problem to the ETMY SUS model not running in c1iscey. Restarting the models in c1iscey solved the problem.
|
10671
|
Wed Nov 5 17:50:29 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | PSL and AUXY beatnote in IR found |
Found the IR beatnote between PSL and Y end laser.
Since our goal was to find the beatnote ASAP to recover ALS, I ignored the fine details in alignment. I will revisit the setup to make some improvements in the near future.
1. Coupled the PSL IR beam leaking after the doubler into the fiber. We have only 10% coupling into the fiber at the PSL table right now (6mw); but this will be improved once I get a suitable translation stage for the telescope.
2. PSL IR --> PM980 fiber --->50-50 fiber beam splitter ---> 50-50 fiber beam combiner
AUX Y ---> PM980 fiber ---> 50-50 fiber beam combiner
The output port of the fiber beam combiner is connected to the fiber coupled broadband RF PD.
3. The RF output of the PD when connected to a spectrum analyzer shows a beatnote of -50dBm. The small amplitude of the beatnote is due to the laser power being attenuated before coupling into the fiber to keep the PD safe.
Attached is photo of how the setup is put on the PSL table. We will put all the stuff in a box once the X setup is also in place. |
10702
|
Wed Nov 12 15:14:09 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | X end AUX laser fiber setup |
I looked at the endtable for possible space to setup optics in order to couple the X end laser into a PM fiber.
Attached is the layout of where the setup will go and what are the existing stuff that will be moved.

|
10715
|
Fri Nov 14 11:07:59 2014 |
manasa | Update | CDS | Not able to run models on FE machines |
Quote: |
PRM, SRM and the ENDs are kicking up. Computers are down. PMC slider is stuck at low voltage.
|
Still not able to resolve the issue.
Except for c1lsc, the models are not running on any of the FE machines . I can ssh into all the machines but could not restart the models on the FE using the usual rtcds restart <modelname>
Something happened around 4AM (inferring from the Striptool on the wall) and the models have not been running since then.
|
10730
|
Fri Nov 21 11:41:24 2014 |
manasa | Update | General | X end fiber insulated and on cable tray |
Quote: |
Quote: |
[Steve, Diego, Manasa]
Since the beatnotes have disappeared, I am taking this as a chance to put the FOL setup together hoping it might help us find them.
Two 70m long fibers now run along the length of the Y arm and reach the PSL table.
The fibers are running through armaflex insulating tubes on the cable racks. The excess length ~6m sits in its spool on the top of the PSL table enclosure.
Both the fibers were tested OK using the fiber fault locator. We had to remove the coupled end of the fiber from the mount and put it back in the process. So there is only 8mW of end laser power at the PSL table after this activity as opposed to ~13mW. This will be recovered with some alignment tweaking.
After the activity I found that the ETMY wouldn't damp. I traced the problem to the ETMY SUS model not running in c1iscey. Restarting the models in c1iscey solved the problem.
|
AP Armaflex tube 7/8" ID X 1" wall insulation for the long fiber in wall mounted cable trays installed yesterday.
The 6 ft long sections are not glued. Cable tied into the tray pressed against one an other, so they are air tight. This will allow us adding more fibers later.
Atm2: Fiber PSL ends protection added on Friday.
|
[Steve, Manasa]
Two 70m long fibers are now running through armaflex insulating tubes along the X arm on the cable racks. The excess length of the fiber sits in its spool on top of the PSL enclosure.
Fibers were checked after this with the fiber fault locator (red laser) and found OK. |
10760
|
Sun Dec 7 13:11:57 2014 |
manasa | Summary | General | Frequency Offset Locking - To Do List |
Attached is the timeline for Frequency Offset Locking related activities. All activities will be done mostly in morning and early afternoon hours. |
10765
|
Mon Dec 8 15:54:39 2014 |
manasa | Summary | General | Dec 8 - Check Frequency Counter module |
Quote: |
Attached is the timeline for Frequency Offset Locking related activities. All activities will be done mostly in morning and early afternoon hours.
|
[Diego, Manasa]
We looked into the configuration and settings that the frequency counters (FC) and Domenica (the R pi to which the FCs talk to) were left at . After poking around for a few hours, we were able to readout the FC output and see it on StripTool as well.
We have made a list of modifications that should be done on Domenica and to the readout scripts to make the FC module automated and user-friendly.
I will prepare a user manual that will go on the wiki once these changes are made.
|
10767
|
Tue Dec 9 00:30:27 2014 |
manasa | Summary | General | Dec 9 - Elaborate to do list |
Quote: |
Attached is the timeline for Frequency Offset Locking related activities. All activities will be done mostly in morning and early afternoon hours.
|
Elaborate to do list:
1. The FC module should be mounted on the IOO rack. Domenica has to be powered up appropriately to the rack power supply.
2. The fiber chassis needs to be built. This will hold all the fiber components and will sit inside the PSL enclosure.
Fiber connectors and fiber couplers need to be installed in the chassis. Attached is the cartoon sketch of layout in the chassis.
3. User guide for FC module (work in progress) |
10771
|
Tue Dec 9 16:07:16 2014 |
manasa | Summary | General | Dec 9 - FC module and fiber chassis |
Quote: |
Quote: |
Attached is the timeline for Frequency Offset Locking related activities. All activities will be done mostly in morning and early afternoon hours.
|
Elaborate to do list:
1. The FC module should be mounted on the IOO rack. Domenica has to be powered up appropriately to the rack power supply.
2. The fiber chassis needs to be built. This will hold all the fiber components and will sit inside the PSL enclosure.
Fiber connectors and fiber couplers need to be installed in the chassis. Attached is the cartoon sketch of layout in the chassis.
3. User guide for FC module (work in progress)
|
1. FC module has been mounted on the IOO rack. The module gets it AC supply from the powerstrip already installed on the back side of the rack.

2. The fiber chassis has not been put together completely. We have still not received the front and back panels for the chassis; which is keeping me on hold. Diego is almost done with his housekeeping on Domenica. He will post an elog with all the details.
3. User guide for FC module (work in progress) |
10775
|
Wed Dec 10 16:12:29 2014 |
manasa | Summary | General | Dec 10 - PSL table |
Quote: |
Attached is the timeline for Frequency Offset Locking related activities. All activities will be done mostly in morning and early afternoon hours.
|
I was working around the PSL table today.
I wanted to modify the telescope that couples PSL light into the fiber; now that I have the translation stages for the lenses. I could not finish it as the locking work started earlier than usual this afternoon. I measured the out of loop noise for ALS error signals before I opened the PSL enclosure. X and Y beat notes were at -18dBm at 49.3MHz and -29.56dBm at 62.2MHz for this measurement. DTT data can be found in /users/manasa/data/141210/ALSoutLoop.xml; so there is reference to go back to in case of any damage done due to the work on the PSL table.
Also, I received the front and back panels for the Fiber chassis and put it together. Find photos (front panel and inside) of chassis in attachment. This will go inside the PSL enclosure tomorrow.

|
10777
|
Thu Dec 11 09:11:18 2014 |
manasa | Update | PSL | PSL FSS Slow actuator |
I am not sure if people have been noticing it lately; but the slow actuator on the PSL FSS has been railing up quite often these days. I found it at >0.8 and as high as 1.5 on certain occasions before resetting it to nominal zero.
It could be because the PMC alignment needs to be tweaked. The night crew should consider doing this before starting to lock. |