I have modeled the PRMI sensing matrix as I bring the Xarm into resonance. In optickle, I have the PRMI on sideband resonance, the ETMY is artificially set to have a transmission of 1, and the ETMX has it's nominal transmission of 15ppm. I start with the ETMX's microscopic position set to lambda/4 (antiresonant for IR in the arm), and take several steps until the ETMX's microscopic position is 0 (resonant for IR in the arm).
Modeled sensing matrix, units = W/m, Offset = 2.66e-07, phase in degrees
MICH Mag MICH Phase PRCL Mag PRCL Phase
AS55 3.348E+04 142.248 5.111E+03 70.571
POX11 3.968E+01 -66.492 1.215E+04 54.312
REFL11 3.231E+05 24.309 9.829E+07 144.311
REFL165 9.946E+03 -159.540 4.540E+05 -64.710
REFL33 1.963E+04 -168.530 1.573E+06 -2.744
REFL55 1.160E+06 -6.755 5.429E+07 86.895
Modeled sensing matrix, units = W/m, Offset = 0, phase in degrees
MICH Mag MICH Phase PRCL Mag PRCL Phase
AS55 1.647E+06 57.353 3.676E+06 -81.916
POX11 3.927E+02 -118.791 2.578E+04 -102.158
REFL11 7.035E+05 61.203 1.039E+08 167.149
REFL165 1.602E+04 -144.586 5.971E+05 -49.802
REFL33 2.157E+04 171.658 1.940E+06 -9.133
REFL55 1.822E+06 7.762 6.900E+07 101.906
For REFL55, the MICH magnitude increases by a factor of 1.6, while the PRCL magnitude increases by 1.3 . The MICH phase changes by 15 degrees, while the PRCL phase also changes by 15 degrees. Just eye-balling (rather than calculating), the other REFL PDs look to have similar-ish magnitude and phase changes. Certainly none of them are different by orders of magnitude.
I've restarted the NDS2 process on Megatron so that we can use it for getting past data and eventually from outside the 40m.
1) from /home/controls/nds2 (which is not a good place for programs to run) I ran nds2-megatron/start-nds2
2) this is just a script that runs the binary from /usr/bin/ and then leaves a log file in ~/nds2/log/
3) I tested with DTT that I could access megatron:31200 and get data that way.
There is a script in usr/bin called nds2_nightly which seems to be the thing we should run by cron to get the channel list to get updated, but I' m not sure. Let's see if we can get an ELOG entry about how this works.
Then we want Jamie to allow some kind of tunneling so that the 40m data can be accessed from outside, etc.
I have done the following:
* installed the nds2-client in /ligo/apps/nds2-client
* moved the nds2 configuration directories to /ligo/apps/nds2/nds2-megatron
* set up a cron job to update the channel list every morning at 5 am. The cron line is:
15 5 * * * /usr/bin/nds2_nightly /ligo/apps/nds2/channel-tracker /ligo/apps/nds2/nds2-megatron
cron will send an email each time the channel list changes, at which point you will have to restart the server with:
* restarted nds2 with updated channel lists.
I have set the cron job up to restart the nds2 server automatically if the channel list changes. The only change is that the cron command was changes to /ligo/apps/nds2/nds2-megatron/test-restart.
I'm working on developing a full noise budget for the 40m. To that end, I'll use measurements from the GUR1 seismometer to characterize seismic noise. Without any unit calibration, I found the following spectrum,
To extract useful information from this data, I first used the calibration from "/users/Templates/Seismic-Spectra_121213.xml" to obtain the spectrum in [m / s / sqrt(Hz)].
calibrated_data = raw_data * 3.8e-09
I then divided each point in the power spectrum by the frequency of said point to obtain [m / sqrt(Hz)]. I don't think we can simply divide the whole spectrum by 40 meters to obtain [RIN / sqrt(Hz)], although that was my immediate intuition. Having power spectra of all the major noise contributions in units of [RIN / sqrt(Hz)] would make designing an appropriate filtering servo fairly straightforward.
I found the south end emergency doors not latched completely. There was a ~ 3/8" vertical gap from top to bottom.
Please pull or push doors harder if they not catch fully.
As mentioned in elog 8770, I wanted to give the POX beam a little more clearance from the pick-off mirror steering the outcoming oplev beam. I tweaked the position of this mirror a little this morning, re-centred the spot, and checked the loop transfer function once again. These were really close to those I measured last night (UGF for pitch ~8Hz, for yaw ~7Hz), reported in elog 8777, so I did not have to change the loop gains for either pitch or yaw. Plots attached.
There is no sensible REFL165 PD in the lab. I am supposed to prepare a new version of REFL165 using prototype BBPD.
I'm not sure what's going on today but we're seeing ~80% packet loss on the 40MARS wireless network. This is obviously causing big problems for all of our wirelessly connected machines. The wired network seems to be fine.
I've tried power cycling the wireless router but it didn't seem to help. Not sure what's going on, or how it got this way. Investigating...
Mike and Christian brought over a Mac laptop for surf Alex.
They power cycled the wireless router of 40Marsh and labtops are working. Seeing 75-80% signals on all 3 Dell lab top sisters at both end of the lab
[Lisa, Rana, Jenne]
Lisa asked to see a model of the PRMI sensing matrix with REFL165 included, in the hopes that it wouldn't be as degenerate as REFL33.
The conclusion, immediately after looking at this, is that I should make sure the REFL beam is nicely aligned onto the REFL165 PD (Koji did some tests, swapping out the REFL165 resonant PD with a broadband PD, and I don't remember if he aligned beam back onto the REFL165 PD). Then, I need to measure the PRMI sensing matrix, including REFL165. Hopefully, it is similar to the model, and we can use it as our 3f diode for locking.
Rana had the epiphany that I didn't have any antiwhitening for my POP QPD. Ooops.
We looked at the schematic for the Pentek Generic board (pdf), and saw that it has a Zero @ 15Hz, and Poles @ 150Hz and 1500Hz, times 2 stages. We determined from the TF that I posted that probably both stages are engaged, so I made an antiwhitening filter consisting of the inverse (so, 2 poles at 15Hz, 2 zeros at 150Hz and 2 zeros at 1500Hz). [Rana points out that for this low frequency system we may not want to include the 1500Hz compensation, since it is probably just enhancing ADC noise]. The ASC system worked really well, really easily, after that.
Another note though, the AA stage of the Pentek Generic boards have 4 poles at 800Hz, which are not compensated.
Rana also added a 60Hz comb to the filter bank with the AntiWhitening, since the QPD has an unfortunately large amount of 60Hz noise. Also, the 60Hz lowpass in the ASC loop was engaged for both pitch and yaw.
Rana, Lisa and Manasa also found that the ASC system was *more* stable with the PRM oplev ON.
So, the ASC locking situation is:
PRM oplev loops on.
AS-POP_QPD_[PIT/YAW] filter banks with FM1, FM6 on.
ASC-PRCL_[PIT/YAW] filter banks with FM1, FM5, FM6 and FM9 on.
ASC-PRCL_YAW_GAIN = -0.040
ASC-PRCL_PIT_GAIN = +0.030
(No triggering yet).
The ASC Up and Down scripts (which are called from the buttons on the ASC screen) have all of these gain settings, although they assume for now that all the filters are already on.
Here's a screenshot of the power spectra showing the angular motion suppression. The PDF is attached so you can zoom in and see some details. The dashed lines are the "PRMI locked, ASC off" case, and the solid lines are the "PRMI locked, ASC on" case. You can see that according to the QPD, we do an excellent job suppressing both the pitch and yaw motion (although better for yaw), but there isn't a huge effect on POPDC or POP110I. While we could probably do better if we had a 2 QPD system with the QPDs at differet gouy phases, this seems to be good enough that we can keep the PRMI locked ~indefinitely.
I would like to compile the ASC model, so that I can implement triggering. For tonight, we did not have the ASC engaged during our PRMI+Xarm tests (see Manasa's elog), but I think it'll make things a little easier if we can get the ASC going automatically.
X arm stabilized using ALS while PRMI stayed locked
[Rana, Lisa, Jenne, Manasa]
Time series : ALS enabled at t = 0 and disabled at t = 95s
What we did:
1. Jenne will elog about ASC (POP QPD) updates.
2. Found the beat note between Xarm green and PSL green.
3. Stabilized arm fluctuation by enabling ALS servo.
4. Scanned the arm for carrier resonance by ramping on the offset and set the offset such that we had IR resonating (TRX fluctuated between 0.1 and 0.8 counts).
5. Disabled the ALS servo and locked PRMI using AS55 for MICH and REFL33 for PRCL.
6. Enabled ALS.
Enabling ALS to detune the arm out of resonance kept PRMI locked (currently for a span of few tens of seconds). However we could not see PRMI locked as stably compared to when the arms are misaligned. Everytime the offset was set IR to resonate, the PRMI was kicked out of lock.
Also there is some leakage at the arm transmission when PRMI was locked. The leakage was visible at ETMX transmission as flashes in different higher order modes indicating the not-so sufficient ALS stability. The leakage sets an offset at TRX measuring 0.01-0.05 counts.
To do list:
The ALS_OFFSETTER1 has to be calibrated in FSR. We were giving random offsets to do the offset scan.
Installed a filter before ETMXT camera to remove the refl green. (Note to myself: The filter needs to go on a better mount/adapter).
I moved the old matlab directory from /cvs/cds/caltech/apps/linux64/matlab_o to /cvs/cds/caltech/apps/linux64/matlab_oo
and moved the previously current matlab dir from /cvs/cds/caltech/apps/linux64/matlab to /cvs/cds/caltech/apps/linux64/matlab_o.
And have installed the new Matlab 2013a into /cvs/cds/caltech/apps/linux64/matlab.
Since I'm not sure how well the new Matlab/Simulink plays with the CDS RCG, I've left the old one and we can easily revert by renaming directories.
Be careful with this. If Matlab starts re-saving models in a new file format that is unreadable by the RCG, then we won't be able to rebuild models until we do an svn revert. Or the bigger danger, that the RCG *thinks* it reads the file and generates code that does something unexpected.
Of course this all may be an attempt to drive home the point that we need an RCG test suite.
With rana's input, I changed the ITMx oplev servo gains given the beam path had been changed. The pitch gain was changed from 36 to 30, while the yaw gain was changed from -25 to -40. Transfer function plots attached. The UGF is ~8Hz for pitch and ~7Hz for yaw.
I had to change the envelope amplitudes in the templates for both pitch and yaw to improve the coherence. Above 3Hz, I multiplied the template presets by 10, and below 3Hz, I multiplied these by 25.
I installed ligoDV in the /ligo/apps/ligoDV/
Now, by pointing the tool at the local NDS2 server (megatron:31200) you can access the recent local data (raw, trends, etc.)
by running /ligo/apps/ligoDV/ligodv from the command line.
The keyboard on Pianosa workstation has been flaky for the last several days at least. Today, it was having troubles mounting the linux1 file system and was hanging on boot.
People in the control room emailed Jamie and then grew afraid of the computer. Annalisa suggested that we put garlic on it since was clearly possessed.
Typing 'dmesg' at the command prompt, I found that there were thousands of messages like these:
[ 3148.181956] usb 2-1.2: new high speed USB device number 68 using ehci_hcd
[ 3149.773883] usb 2-1.2: USB disconnect, device number 68
[ 3150.228900] usb 2-1.2: new high speed USB device number 69 using ehci_hcd
[ 3152.076544] usb 2-1.2: USB disconnect, device number 69
[ 3152.787391] usb 2-1.2: new high speed USB device number 70 using ehci_hcd
[ 3154.123331] usb 2-1.2: USB disconnect, device number 70
[ 3154.578459] usb 2-1.2: new high speed USB device number 71 using ehci_hcd
So I replaced the existing Dell keyboard with an older Dell keyboard and the bad messages have stopped. No garlic was used.
Its an increase in the microseismic peak. Don't know what its due to though.
Measured frequency noise is ~10Hz/rtHz @100Hz.
Measure the out-of-loop noise of Xarm ALS:
1. The X-arm was locked for IR using PDH error signal.
2. 'CLEAR HISTORY' of the phase tracker filters.
3. Measured the power spectrum of the phase tracker output. I have used the newly created calibrated channel "PHASE_OUT_DQ. So the phase tracker output now reads in Hz.
The measurement was done with beat note frequency at ~40MHz. The flat noise level of 10Hz/rtHz from 20-100Hz (in plot 2) is not good. We should investigate as to what sets this noise level. The spike at 60Hz is because the 60Hz frequency comb filter was not enabled.
I plan to the following to get a clearer outlook
1. Connecting the beat box to an RF source and measure the noise levels for a range of frequency inputs to the beatbox.
2. Measure the noise at C1:ALS-BEATX_FINE_I_IN1 (before the antiwhitening filters) and check whether the new whitening filters has done anything good with respect to minimizing the DAQ noise.
As I showed in [elog 8759], measuring the transfer function of my prototype servo was difficult due to physical limitations of either some portion of the construction or even the SR785 itself. To get around this, I tried using lower input excitation amplitudes, but ran into problems with noise.
Finding a TF consistent with theoretical predictions made by LISO was easy enough when I simply measured the TF of each of the two filter stages individually and then multiplied them to obtain the TF for the full servo. I still noticed some amount of gain limitation for 100 mV and 10 mV inputs, although I only had to lower the input to 5 mV to avoid this and thus did not see significant amounts of noise as I did with a 1 mV input. The individual transfer functions for each stage are shown below. Note that the SR785 has an upper cutoff frequency of 100 kHz so I could analyze the TF beyond this frequency. Additionally, the limited Gain Bandwidth Product of OP27 op-amps (used in the prototype) causes the magnitude and phase to drop off for f > 10^5 Hz approximately. The actual servo will use AD829 op-amps which have a much larger GBWP.
The measured TFs above are very close to ideal and agree quite well with theoretical predictions. Based on the [circuit schematics],
Indeed, this is exactly what we can see from the above two TFs. We can also multiply the magnitudes and add the phases (full_phase = phase1 + phase2 - 180) to find the TF for the full servo and compare that to the ideal TF produced by LISO,
And we find exceptionally consistent transfer functions, which speaks to the functionality of my prototype
As such, I'll proceed with designing this servo in Altium (most of which will be learning how to use the software)
Note that all TFs were taken using the netgpibdata python module. Measurement parameters were entered remotely using the TFSR785.py function (via control room computers) and following the examples on the 40m Wiki.
Jenne just aligned the X arm and I got a chance to check the status of the POX beam coming out of the chamber. Turned the Oplev servo off so that the red beam could be blocked, turned all the lights off, and had a look at the beam in the vicinity of the mirror steering the Oplev-out beam to the QPD with an IR view-card. The beam is right now about half a centimeter from the pitch knob of the said mirror, so its not getting clipped at the moment. But perhaps the offending mirror can be repositioned slightly, along with the Oplev QPD such that more clearance is given to the POX beam. I will work this out with Steve tomorrow morning.
Could be that this is OK, but it doesn't yet make sense to me. Can you please explain in words how this manages to apply the calibration rather than just add an extra gain to the phase tracking loop?
The calibration is applied by adding an extra gain. But, I missed the point that I should be doing this outside the phase-tracking loop....my BAD .
So I modified the model such that the calibration is done without disturbing the phase tracking loop.
Right now, epics input 'PHASE_OUT_CALIB' accepts the calibration and we get the calibrated phase tracker output converted from deg to Hz at 'PHASE_OUT_HZ'. I have also made it a DAQ channel to be used with dataviewer and dtt.
medm screens have been modified to accommodate these additions to the phase tracker screen. I used Yuta's phase tracker calibration data in elog to set PHASE_OUT_CALIB in the medm screens.
Y arm beat note found!
The green transmission on the PSL reads about 500 cts, and the transmitted power is about 50 uW.
(the second peak on the screen in the picture is the 29 MHz of the MC)
Last night before dinner, I copied over the ASC yaw servo filters to the ASC pitch filter bank. Using ASC gain of +0.001, I was getting the ~250Hz oscillations that Rana and I had seen with yaw.
Rana pointed out to me that my measured TF of the yaw loop doesn't look right up in the several hundred Hz region:
As you can see on the right side, which is all of the PRCL ASC yaw filter banks, multiplied by a simulated pendulum filter, the magnitude should just keep decreasing. However, on the measured plot on the left, you can see that I have a little gain hump. I'm not sure what this is from yet.
All of us in the control room / desk area heard a sudden whoosh of air a few minutes ago. It kind of sounded like a pressure washer or something. We determined that the northmost nitrogen bottle outside the front door was letting out all its gas.
It's a gazillion degrees outside (okay, only 91F, according to a google of "Caltech Weather"), and those bottles are in direct sun all day.
We are leaving the bottle as-is, since it seems like its has finished, and nothing else is happening.
Particle counts were measured inside the PSL enclosure at 40VAC variac setting.
Directly under HEPAs, on the east half of the optical table : 0.3 micron 20 particles / cu ft, 0.5 micron 0 p / cu ft, 0.7 micron 0 p / cu /ft
Away from the HEPAs, on the west edge of the op table: 0.3 micron 960 particles / cu ft, 0.5 micron 50 p / cu ft, 0.7 micron 20 p / cu ft
We may want to increase the RPM a little bit.
Checked our counters against recently calibrated Met One GT-526:
#1 is right on, #2 measured 25% less (it will go for calibration)
Flow bench at the south end : zero particle for all 3 sizes
IOO chamber particle logging measures 0.5 and 1 micron. Chamber opening limit is set to 10,000 particles max of 0.5 micron
At 10,000 p of 0.5 micron means ~100,000 - 180,000 p of 0.3 micron
We may have to lower the limit.
The BLRMS are totally crazy today! I'm not sure what the story is, since it's been this way all day (so it's not an earthquake, because things eventually settle down after EQs). It doesn't seem like anything is up with the seismometer, since the regular raw seismic time series and spectrum don't look particularly different from normal. I'm not sure what's going on, but it's only in the mid-frequency BLRMS (30mHz to 1Hz).
Here are some 2 day plots:
I'm still seeing some problems with this - some laptops are losing and not recovering any connection. What's to be done next? New router?
We had the same problem yesterday. However the Vacuum Dedicated laptop worked with fewer disconnects. Christian is coming over this after noon to look at this issue.
This happened a few weeks ago and it recovered misteriously. Jamie did not understand it.
I have modified the ALS model to now include PHASE_OUT calibration for both X and Y. MEDM screen has not been edited to include these yet.
Following the circuit design in elog 8748, I constructed a prototype for the servo portion of the ISS (not including the differential amp) to be used in the CTN experiment. The device was built on a breadboard and its transfer function was measured with the Swept Sine measurement group of an SR785. For various excitation amplitudes, the transfer function (TF) was not consistent.
Recall the ideal transfer function for this particular servo and consider the following comparisons.
This gain limitation is problematic for characterizing prototypes as my particular servo has very large gain at low frequencies.
At the risk of looking too deeply into the above data,
Unfortunately, the noise was too large for lower excitation amplitudes to be used to any effect. I'll try this again tomorrow, just as a sanity check, but otherwise I will proceed with learning Altium and drawing up schematics for this servo.
Steve and I tried to fix the Oplev situation detailed in elog 8684, today afternoon. We have come up with a fix which needs to be adjusted, possibly completely overhauled depending on whether the mirror steering the return beam to the QPD is blocking the POX beam coming out.
Situation in the chamber: the black line is meant to indicate what was happening, the red is indicative of the present path.
Plan of action:
Not sure why it was so poorly aligned, since the misalignment "event" happened while we were all away at lunch, but I steered the MC optics until their SUSYAW and SUSPIT values were about the same as they were before they got misaligned. MC autolocker took over, and things are back to normal.
Having established the serial link between the Doubling oven at the Y-end and the Raspberry pi, I wanted to use this interface to collect time-series from the oven after applying a step function in an effort to measure the transfer function of the oven. The idea was that knowing the transfer function of the oven, I could use some simple PID tuning rules like the Ziegler-Nichols rule or put everything in SIMULINK and find the optimal PID gains. However, I am unable to extract the oven transfer function from the time series data collected.
Last night, between 920pm and 940pm I applied a step function to the doubling oven by changing the setpoint of the controller from 35.7 Celsius to 39 Celsius (having checked elog 3203 to get an idea of a 'safe' step to apply). I then used the Pi to collect time series data for 6 minutes, then returned the set-point back to 35.7 Celsius, and took another time-series to make sure things were back to normal. Having gotten the time series data, I attempted to fit it using some exponentials which I derived as follows:
I couldn't think of a way to get the laplace transform of the time-series data collected, so I approximated the oven transfer function as a system with a one simple pole i.e. G(s)=K/(1+Ts), where K and T are parameters that characterise the oven transfer function. I then plugged in the above expression for Y(s) into Mathematica (knowing X(s)=constant/s, and H(s) = 250 + 60/s +25s from the PID gains) and did an inverse laplace transform to find a y(t) with two unknown parameters K and T to which I could fit the time-series data.
The time-series data collected via the Pi after applying the step was this:
The inverse laplace transform from mathematica yielded the following (formidable!) function (time, the independent variable, is x, and the fitting parameters are a=K and b=T where K and T are as described earlier):
(39*(exp(x*(1/(2*(25*a - b)) - (125*a)/(25*a - b) - sqrt(1 - 500*a+ 56500*a^2 + 240*a*b)/(2*(25*a - b)))) - exp(x*(1/(2*(25*a - b)) - (125*a)/(25*a - b) + sqrt(1 - 500*a + 56500*a^2 + 240*a*b)/(2*(25*a - b)))))*a)/sqrt(1 - 500*a + 56500*a^2 + 240*a*b)
My best attempts to fit this using MATLAB's cftool have given me useless fits:
I tried changing the start-points for the fitting parameters but I didn't get any better fits.
I have added more DAQ channels to the c1als model. Installed and restarted the model on c1ioo. Frame builder restarted.
DAQ channels added:
With Rana's help/supervision/suggestions, I have closed the loop on the PRMI ASC servo with the new QPD. I think I've had it locked for ~30+ minutes now. It was locked for ~45 minutes, but then the MC momentarily lost lock. I immediately recovered the PRMI+ASC (after small PRM yaw tweaking, since the ASC isn't triggered yet, so the MC lockloss caused a big yaw step function to go to the PRM, which displayed a bit of hysteresis.).
My biggest problem was that I didn't really understand Koji's servo filter choices, so I wasn't using the right ones / doing good things. In particular, I need to compensate for the oplev servo filters. The oplev servo shape is something like ^, so the 1/(1+G) shape is something like =v= (ignoring the lower horizontal lines there). For tonight, we just turned off the PRM oplevs, but clearly this isn't a permanent solution. (Although, after Rana went in and roughly centered the PRM oplev, we noticed that turning the oplev on and off doesn't make a huge difference for the PRM....we should investigate why not. Also, we turned off the FM2 3.2Hz resonant gains in the PRM oplevs, since the Q of those filters is too high, much higher than our actual stacks).
Rana and I also locked the PRM-ITMY half cavity, and used that beam to realign the beam onto the POP QPD, POP110 PD, and the camera.
The POP QPD pitch and yaw signals with the half cavity have some noise, that looks like 60Hz crap. Since this goes away (rather, is much less noticeable) with the regular sideband-locked PRMI, we suspect this is a problem with perhaps the normalization, with the sum very low, and having some noise on it.
Once we had our ASC filters set up (not the 10Hz boost yet though, I think), if I increased the gain from -0.02 to -0.03, we start to get some gain peaking. With a gain of -0.04, the peak is very noticeable around 250Hz. We aren't sure where this is coming from, since it shouldn't be coming from the ASC loop. The UGF of that loop is much lower (I measured it, to check, and the UGF is ~5Hz). Anyhow, this is still a mystery, although the gain of -0.02 holds the cavity pretty well.
I measured the power spectra of the POP QPD pit, yaw, sum, as well as POPDC and POP110I, with the ASC loop on and off (dashed lines are with the loop on. You can see that the yaw motion as seen on the QPD was reduced by almost 2 orders of magnitude below 1Hz. It also looks like we can win some more by turning on the equivalent pitch ASC servo (this is also something we see when looking at the dataviewer traces).
I also tried to measure the PRMI sensing matrix, but I get some weird results, even after I double the drive actuation. I need to be checking whether or not my drive is actually coherent with the error signals that I'm seeing, because right now I'm not sure that I believe things. I'm going to leave that on the to-do list for tomorrow night though.
* Engage POP QPD -> pitch loop, copying yaw loop.
* enable ASC triggering
* model PRMI sensing matrix and error signals, bringing one arm into resonance
* Lock the PRMI, and bring the Xarm into IR resonance using the ALS system.
Here are some numbers and plots from the night:
Right now, I'm locking the LSC with:
MICH LSC with AS55Q, FMs 4 and 5 on, FM 3 is triggered, gain = -40.0, normalized by sqrt(POP110I)*0.1
PRCL LSC with REFL33I, FMs 4 and 5 on, FM 9 is triggered, gain = +2.5, normalized by sqrt(POP110I)*10
(FM3 of MICH and FM9 of PRCL are the same, just in different spots).
The ASC (only POP yaw -> PRM yaw right now) has:
FMs 1,2,5,6 on (1 = integrator [0:0.1], 2 = 3.2 res gain, 5 = [1000,1000:1 and gain of 0.01], 6 = 10Hz boost). Gain = -0.020, Limit=5000.
Turn off the input, turn on the output and the gain, clear the histories (to clear out the integrator in FM1), then turn on the input.
PRM oplev is OFF. (need to put in a filter to compensate for it in the ASC servo, but for tonight, we just turned it off.)
We measured the spectra of the POP QPD signals with the ASC loop on and off:
I also measured the ASC loop (with the PRM oplev still off):
(sorry about the separate plots - I can't make DTT give me more than 2 plots on a page at a time right now, so I'm giving up, and just making 3 separate pages)
Weird sensing matrix, unsure if I'm really getting good coherence:
For quite a while (no one knows how long), we've seen fluctuations in the 10-30 Hz seismic motion. This shows up as the purple trace on the seismic BLRMS on the wall projector.
The second plot shows that this is not only a periodic increase in the usual 29.5 Hz HVAC peak, but also an anomolous 32.2 Hz peak. Probably some malfunctioning machinery - maybe in the 40m or maybe on the roof.
Beat note setup
I had some problem with the Oplev Servo today. I was working at the mode matching fine tuning and I left the Oplev servo enabled while aligning.
When I opened the Yend table lids, the Oplev beam started moving on the QPD and the Oplev servo didn't help in stopping the mirror movement, but it increased it.
So, the mirror was oscillating at a frequency of a few Hz
Koji suggested that maybe the shaking is due to the air conditioning moving the beam, so the servo tries to feed back the signal to the mirror, even if the mirror doesn't actually move.
I also measured the transfer function for the Oplev, but it didn't show any strange behavior.
Following Tara's noise budget, I have developed the following ISS, whose transfer function was computed with LISO and is also displayed below. The transfer function was computed from the output of the differential amplifier circuit (i.e. it does not include the portion of the schematic in the dashed box). The differential amplifier is included for completeness. Essentially, the resistor values of this portion (and even the voltage reference if need be) can be modified to handle various signals from PDs in different experiments. Some filtering may also be applied to the signal from the voltage reference. In previous designs for the ISS, a ~30 mHz low-pass filter applied to the output of the voltage reference has also been proposed.
LISO was also used to compute the input-referred noise of this circuit. Using the response function of Tara's PD the noise spectrum was converted from [V / sqrt(Hz)] to [W / sqrt(Hz)] and then subsequently converted to a frequency noise spectrum, specifically [W / sqrt(Hz)] to [Hz / sqrt(Hz)], using the following transfer function which couples RIN to frequency noise in the CTN experiment. In these particular units, we can make a direct comparison between the inherent noise contribution from the servo itself and other more significant noise contributions shown earlier in Tara's noise budget. Indeed, the servo contributes significantly less noise.
This servo has been prototyped on a breadboard and will soon be characterized with the SR785. Additionally, schematics will be drawn up in Altium and eventually put on PCB.
Additional servos for other experiments can be designed once various requirements for noise suppression are explicitly formalized.
From the ALS overview screen, opening up the ETMX and ETMY screens gives these white fields. The PV info indicates that the blank fields were made with some macro variable substitution that didn't work well.
Why are these different from the SUS screens I get from the sitemap?
This entry is meant to be a sort of inventory check and a tentative plan-of-action for the installation of the PZT mounted mirrors and associated electronics on the Y-endtable.
High-Voltage Power Supply
Situation at rack 1Y4
I have been working on setting up a serial-link with the temperature controller of the PPKPT crystal doubling oven at the Y-end for some time now. The idea was to remotely tune the PID gains of the controller and get temperature data. The device used to serially interface with the temperature controller is a Raspberry Pi model B, which is connected to the temperature controller by means of a USB to serial adaptor with a PL2303 chip. I installed the interface this morning, and have managed get talking with the doubling oven. I am now able to collect time-series data by ssh-ing to the Raspberry Pi from the control room. I will use this data to manually tune the PID gains for now, though automatic tuning via some script is the long-term goal.
The temperature controller for the doubling oven is a Thorlabs TC200, and supports serial communication via the RS232 protocol by means of a female DB9 connector located on its rear panel. I have hooked up the Raspberry Pi to this port by means of a USB-Serial adaptor that was in one of the cabinets in the 40m control room. After checking the Martian Host Table, I assigned the Raspberry Pi the static IP 192.168.113.166 so that I could ssh into it from the control room and test the serial-link. This morning, I first hooked up the Raspberry pi to an ethernet cable running from rack 1Y4 to make sure I could ssh into it from the control room. Having established this, I moved the raspberry pi and its power supply to under the Y-endtable, where it currently resides on top of the temperature controller. I then took down the current settings on the temperature controller so that I have something to revert to if things go wrong: these are
Set-Point: 35.7 Celcius
Actual Temperature: 35.8
I then connected the Pi to the temperature controller using the serial-USB cable, and plugged the ethernet cable in. Rebooted the Pi and ssh-ed into it from the control room. I first checked the functionality of the serial-link by using terminal's "screen" feature, but the output to my queries was getting clipped on the command line for some reason (i.e. the entire output string wasn't printed on the terminal window, only the last few characters were). Turns out this is some issue with screen, as when I tried writing the replies to my queries to a text file, things worked fine.
At present, I have a python script which can read and set parameters (set-point temperature, actual temperature, PID gains)on the controller as well as log time-series data (temperature from the temperature sensor as a function of time )to a text file on the Pi. As of now, I have only checked the read functions and the time-series logger, and both are working (some minor changes required in the time-series function, I need to get rid of the characters the unit spits out, and only save the numbers in my text-file).
For the time-being, I plan to apply a step to the controller and use the time-series data to manually tune the PID parameters using MATLAB. I am working on a bunch of shell scripts to automate the entire procedure.
My understanding is that that number is an in-loop evaluation of the loop so far (as the first step of the loop evaluation).
This is not what we can directly compare with the number in the paper.
Basically the entry 8741 is telling us that the new filter suppresses the error signal better than before.
That's clearly shown in the attachment 2.
RMS is now less than 1 kHz or ~50 pm. (in your face, Kiwamu!)
Isn't this still a factor of 2 away from the limit in the paper?
Alex Cole and Craig Cahillane received 40m specific, basic safety training last week.
ALS noise suppressed to 1KHz/rtHz. 1kHz RMS.
Plot 1: Scan of X arm by changing offset into Phase Tracker -> Xarm loop. Filter bank ramp time set to 120 s + using a 30 mHz low pass filter. IR beam is aligned to x arm, but not well.
Plot 2: ALS error signal with loop open (BLUE), closed with old filters (PURPLE), and with new, better boost (RED).
Plot 3: Bode plot of new boost (FM10), v. old, sad boost (1:50 pole:zero). RMS is now less than 1 kHz or ~50 pm. (in your face, Kiwamu!)
Changes made to the ALS servo:
ALS-TRX has been calibrated to read from 0-1 instead of counts in 1000 s. Calibration factor = 1/4500 = 0.00022
Old antiwhitening filter has been removed. Added LPF at 1000Hz to remove glitches at high frequencies.
No changes made.
FIlter FM5 modified. 1000:1 changed to 3000:1
5. Offset for ALS scan were given through C1ALS_OFFSETTER1 with LPF50m enabled.
The filter modules of the servo were:
Check PZT out range for ALS. Figure out what the deal is with ALS SLOW servos.
Add DQ channels for ALS.
Automatic ALS up script (enable and disable phase tracker included).
I have finished my work on the LSC and ASS models for now. The triggering is all implemented, and should be ready to go. There are no screens yet.
I have *not* compiled either the LSC or the ASS, since Rana and Manasa still have the IFO.
I am working on making the Proto-ASC less "proto". I have put IPC senders in the LSC model to send the cavity trigger signals over to the ASS model, for ASC use. I'm partially done working on the ASC end of things to implement triggering.
LSC should be compile-able right now, ASS is definitely not. But, I expect that no one should need to compile either before I get back in a few hours. If you do - call me and we'll figure out a plan.