ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
13602
|
Fri Feb 2 22:47:00 2018 |
Koji | Summary | General | AP1053: Packaging & Performance |
I've packaged an AP1053 in a Thorlabs box. The gain and the input noise level were measured. It has the gain of ~10 and the input noise of ~0.6nV/rtHz@50MHz~200MHz.
Details
AP1053 was soldered on Thorlabs' PCB EEAPB1 (forgot to take a picture). The corresponding chassis is Thorlabs' EEA17. There is a 0.1uF high-K ceramic cap between DC and GND pins. The power is supplied via a DC feedthru capacitor (Newark / Power Line Filter / 90F2268 / 5500pF) found in the WB EE shop. The power cable has a connector to make the long side of the wires detachable. Because I did not want to leave the RF signal path just mechanically touched, the SMA connectors were soldered to the PCB. As the housing has no access hole, I had to make it at one of the sides.
The gain of the unit was measured using the setup shown in the upper figure of Attachment 2. When the unit was energized, it drew the current of about 0.1A. The measued gain was compensated by the pick off ratio of the coupler (20dB). The gain was measured with the input power of -20, -10, 0, 10, and 15dBm. The measurement result is shown in Attachment 3. The small signal gain was actually 10dB and showed slight degradation above 100MHz. At the input of 10dB some compression of the gain is already visible. It looks consistent with the specification of +26.0dBm output for 1dB compression above 50MHz and +24.0dBm output below 50MHz.
The noise level was characterized with the setup shown in the bottom figure of Attachment 3. The noise figure of the amplifier is supposed to be 1.5dB above 200MHz and 3.5dB below 200MHz. This is quite low and the output noise of AP1053 can not be measured directly by the analyzer. So, another LN amplifier (ZFL-500HLN) was stacked. The total gain of the system was measured in the same way as above. The measured noise level was ~0.7nV/rtHz between 50MHz and 200MHz. Considering the measurement noise level of the system, it is consistent with the input referred noise of 0.6nV/rtHz. I could not confirm the advertized noise figure of 1.5dB above 200MHz. The noise goes up below 50MHz. But still 2nV/rtHz at 3MHz. I'd say this is a very good performance. |
Attachment 1: AP1053.JPG
|
|
Attachment 2: AP1053_measurement.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: AP1053_gain.pdf
|
|
Attachment 4: AP1053_noise.pdf
|
|
13638
|
Fri Feb 16 21:03:17 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | Summary 2018/02/16 |
40m Lab Cad:
Updated the dimensions of and fleshed out the chambers in greater detail, by referring to the engineering drawings that Steve gave to me. I have scanned and uploaded most of these drawings to Dropbox in [40mShare]>[40m_cad_models]>[Vacuum Chamber Drawing Scans]. The excel file "LIGO 40m Parts List" in the [40m Lab CAD] folder also lists the Steve drawings I referenced for dimensions of each part.
Next steps:
1. Finish details of all chambers.
2. Start placing representative blocks on the optical table.
|
13654
|
Fri Feb 23 20:46:04 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | CAD Summary 2018/02/23 |
I have more or less finished cadding the test mass chamber by referring to the drawings Steve gave me. Finer details like lugs and bolts and window flaps can be left for later. Here's a quick render:

|
13662
|
Wed Feb 28 21:14:34 2018 |
gautam | Summary | PEM | Channel admin |
Since we decided to use the Acromag for readback of the temperature sensor for Kira's seismometer temperature control, I enabled logging of the channel Johannes had reserved for this purpose last week. Kira has made the physical connection of a temperature sensor to the BNC input for this channel - it reads back -2.92 V right now, which is around what I remember it being when Kira was doing her benchtop tests. I edited C0EDCU.ini to enable logging of this channel at 16 Hz. Presumably, a study of the ADC noise of the Acromag at low frequencies has to be made to ensure appropriate whitening (if any) can be added. Channel name is C1:PEM-SEIS_EX_TEMP_MON. Similarly, there is C1:PEM_SEIS_EX_TEMP_CTRL which is meant to be the control channel for the servoing. Calibration of the temperature sensor readback into temperature units remains. It also remains to be verified if we can have these slow EPICS channels integrated with a fast control model, or if the PID temperature control will be purely custom-script based as we have for the FSS slow loop.
I removed the fast channels I had setup temporarily in c1als. Recompilation and restart of the model went smoothly.
Quote: |
I then made a "PEM" namespace block inside the c1als model, and placed a single CDS filter module inside it (this can be used for calibration purposes). The filter module is named "C1:PEM-SEIS_EX_TEMP", and has the usual CDSfilt channels available. I DQ'ed the output of the filter module (@256 Hz, probably too high, but I'm holding off on a recompile for now). Recompilation and model restart of c1als went smoothly.
|
|
Attachment 1: tempSensData.png
|
|
13677
|
Fri Mar 9 20:35:41 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | Summary 2018/03/09 |
1. Optical Table Layout
I had discussed with Koji a way to record coordinates of optical table equipments in a text file, and load to solidworks. The goal is to make it easier to move things around on the table in the CAD. While I have succeeded in importing coordinates through txt files, there is still a lot of tediousness in converting these points into sketches. Furthermore, the task has to be redone everytime a coordinate is added to or changed in the txt file. Koji and I think that this can all be automated through solidworks macros, so I will explore that option for the next two weeks.
2. Vacuum Chamber CADs
Steve will help find manufacturing drawings of the BS chamber. I have completed the ETM chambers, while the ITM ones are identical to them so I will reuse parts for the CAD. |
13683
|
Thu Mar 15 16:00:25 2018 |
Larry Wallace | Summary | Computers | Cert renewal for NODUS |
The cert for nodus has been renewed for another 2 years.
The following is the basic procedure for getting a new cert: (Note certs are only good for two years as of 2018)
openssl req -sha256 -nodes -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.key -out nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.csr
Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:US
State or Province Name (full name) [Some-State]:CaliforniaLocality Name (eg, city) []:Pasadena
Organization Name (eg, company) [Internet Widgits Pty Ltd]:California Institute of Technology
Organizational Unit Name (eg, section) []:LIGO
Common Name (eg, YOUR name) []:nodus.ligo.caltech.edu
Leave the e-mail address, challenge password and optional company name blank. A new private key will be generated.
chown root nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.key
chgrp root nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.key
chmod 0600 nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.key
The nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.csr file is what is sent in for the cert.
This file should be sent to either ryan@ligo.caltech.edu or security@caltech.edu and copy wallace_l@ligo.caltech.edu.
A URL llink with the new cert to be downloaded will be sent to the requestor.
Once the files are downloaded, the new cert and intermediate cert, they can be copied and renamed.
The PEM-encoded host certificate by itself is saved at:
/etc/httpd/ssl/nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.crt
The nodus.ligo.caltech.edu.key file should be in the same directory or whichever directory is indicated in the ssl.conf located in /etc/httpd/conf.d/ directory.
httpd will need to be restarted in order for it to see the new cert.
|
13686
|
Mon Mar 19 07:37:00 2018 |
Angelina Pan | Summary | | Proposed QPD Optical Arrangement |
I am currently working on an optical arrangement consisting of a QPD that measures the fluctuations of an incoming HeNe laser beam that is reflected by a mirror. The goal is to add a second QPD to the optical arrangement to form a linear combination that effectively cancels out the (angular) fluctuations from the laser beam itself so that we can only focus on the fluctuations produced by the mirror.
In order to solve this problem, I have written a program for calculating the different contributions of the fluctuations of the HeNe laser and fluctuations from the mirror, for each QPD (program script attached). The goal of the program is to find the optimal combination of L0, L1, L2, and f2 that cancels the fluctuations from the laser beam (while retaining solely the fluctuations from the mirror) when adding the fluctuations of QPD 1 and QPD 2 together.
By running this program for different combinations of distances and focal lengths, I have found that the following values should work to cancel out the effects of the oscillations from the HeNe laser beam (assuming a focal length of 0.2 m for the lens in front of the original QPD):
-
L0 = 1.0000 m (distance from laser tube to mirror)
-
L1 = 0.8510 m (distance from mirror to lens in front of QPD 1)
-
L2 = 0.9319 m (distance from beamsplitter to lens in front of QPD 2)
-
f2 = 0.3011 m (focal length of lens in front of QPD 2)
Based on these calculations, I propose to try the following lens for QPD 2:
1’’ UV Fused Silica Plano-Convex Lens, AR-Coated: 350 - 700 nm (focal length 0.3011 m). https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=6508 |
Attachment 1: angelinaCode.py.tar.bz2
|
13699
|
Thu Mar 22 17:47:16 2018 |
Angelina Pan | Summary | | Proposed QPD Optical Arrangement |
|
Attachment 1: IMG_0869.jpg
|
|
13705
|
Mon Mar 26 21:25:55 2018 |
rana | Summary | IOO | MC2 Trans table has issues |
Gautam, Rana
While at the MC2 table, we noticed that it has some optical problems:
- There is an ND filter mounted to the beam reducing lens. ND filters are illegal, Steve. It causes too much scattering noise. We should instead have a beamsplitter and a dump.
- One of those bad U100-AC28 mounts is in use. This is one of those ones with plastic clips that Osamu liked, but the plastic gets in the way of the beam. Needs to be removed.
- Reflections from the QPD and the PDA255 are not dumped. This causes noise. Bad.
- The QPD transimpedance should be reduced so that it can handle more light. I don't know what it has now, but its probably 10-100 kOhm.
We estimated that the power in the IMC is (1 W)*Finesse/pi = 500 W. The MC2 Transmission spec is < 10 ppm, so the power on the table is probably ~5 mW. Since the PDA255 has a transimpedance of 10 kOhm and a max output power of 10V, it can handle up to ~1 mW. Probably we can get the QPD to handle 4 mW.
Gautam, Steve 3-27
We measured MC2 transmitted power right at the uncoated window ~2.5 mW The beam was just a little bigger than the meter. |
Attachment 1: 20180326_201929.jpg
|
|
13706
|
Mon Mar 26 21:40:26 2018 |
gautam | Summary | IOO | MC2 classical radiation pressure noise |
[rana, gautam]
we measured the RIN of the MC2 transmission using the PDA255 I had put on the MC2 trans table sometime ago for ringdowns. Attached are (i) spectra for the RIN, (ii) spectra for the classical rad. pressure noise assuming 500W circulating power and (iii) a tarball of data and code used to generate these plots.
We took a full span measurement (to make sure there aren't any funky high-freq features) and a measurement from DC-800 Hz (where we are looking for excess noise). The DC level of light on the photodiode was 2.76V (measured using o'scope)
I'll add this to the noise budget later. But the measured RIN seems consistent with a 2013 measurement at 100Hz (though the 2013 measurement is using DTT and so doesn't have high frequency information). |
Attachment 1: IMC_RIN.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: IMC_RadPress.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: MC2_radPress.tgz
|
13717
|
Thu Mar 29 12:03:37 2018 |
Jon Richardson | Summary | General | Proof-of-Concept SRC Gouy Phase Measurement |
I've been developing an idea for making a direct measurement of the SRC Gouy phase at RF. It's a very different approach from what has been tried before. Prior to attempting this at the sites, I'm interested in making a proof-of-concept measurement demonstrating the technique on the 40m. The finesse of the 40m SRC will be slightly higher than at the sites due to its lower-transmission SRM. Thus if this technique does not work at the 40m, it almost certainly will not work at the sites.
The idea is, with the IFO locked in a signal-recycled Michelson configuration (PRM and both ETMs misaligned), to inject an auxiliary laser from the AS port and measure its reflection from the SRC using one of the pre-OMC pickoff RFPDs. At the sites, this auxiliary beam is provided by the newly-installed squeezer laser. Prior to injection, an AM sideband is imprinted on the auxiliary beam using an AOM and polarizer. The sinusoidal AOM drive signal is provided by a network analyzer, which sweeps in frequency across the MHz band and demodulates the PD signal in-phase to make an RF transfer function measurement. At the FSR, there will be a AM transmission resonance (reflection minimum). If HOMs are also present (created by either partially occluding or misaligning the injection beam), they too will generate transmission resonances, but at a frequency shift proportional to the Gouy phase. For the theoretical 19 deg one-way Gouy phase at the sites, this mode spacing is approximately 300 kHz. If the transmission resonances of two or more modes can be simultaneously measured, their frequency separation will provide a direct measurement of the SRC Gouy phase.

The above figure illustrates this measurement configuration. An attached PDF gives more detail and the expected response based on Finesse modeling of this IFO configuration. |
Attachment 1: src_gouy_phase_v3.pdf
|
|
13825
|
Tue May 8 10:24:10 2018 |
Kira | Summary | PEM | plan for this week |
Here are a few things I will be working on:
- Design PCB boards for the heater circuit and temperature sensor circuits [by wednesday]
- Order the front panel I've designed for the seismometer block [today]
- [next week?] install the new Acromag when it comes
|
13832
|
Fri May 11 11:47:33 2018 |
johannes | Summary | PEM | Acromag issues |
The replacement Acromag we scooped from the West Bridge E-Shop does actually seem to work, although we thought it was broken - at first it was just outputting zeros, but after I did the calibration procedure, applying +10 V and -10 V, respectively, it was reporting voltage correctly, over the full range. I don't know why the factory settings would be messed up, but it had been out of the box before. I did this only with channel 7, so you need to calibrate channels 0-6 and confirm that they indeed also work properly. |
13844
|
Tue May 15 15:13:23 2018 |
Kira | Summary | PEM | Acromag issues |
I tried calibrating the other channels today, but they still fluctuate. Sometimes they do stabilize at +/- 10V, but then suddenly drop to 5 or 6 V before climbing back up to 10. Turning the legacy off made it go only up to 6.67V. This happens for all the channels, even after doing a factory reset and recalibrating. Not sure what's happening here. |
13865
|
Fri May 18 18:14:18 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | Summary 05/18/2018 |
Tip-Tilt Suspension Design:
Designed a new ECD plate and changed dimensions of the side arms after discussing with Koji. After getting feedback on the changes, I will finish the assembly and send it to him to get approved for manufacturing.
|
13884
|
Wed May 23 19:24:37 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | Summary 05/23/2018 |
Tip-Tilt Redesign Project with Koji:
Did further itirations to the ECD backplate. Going to determine minimum thickness between magnet hole and plus sign for eddy current damping.

Chamber optical table layouts
Finished the positioning of optics and instruments in SolidWorks for the Vertex chambers. The reference for positioning is "40m_upgrade_layout_Dec2012.dwg", and solidworks files I created are in the main 40m CAD folder. |
13898
|
Wed May 30 16:12:30 2018 |
Jonathan Hanks | Summary | CDS | Looking at c1oaf issues |
When c1oaf starts up there are 446 gain channels that should be set to 0.0 but which end up at 1.0. An example channel is C1:OAF-ADAPT_CARM_ADPT_ACC1_GAIN. The safe.snap file states that it should be set to 0. After model start up it is at 1.0.
We ran some tests, including modifying the safe.snap to make sure it was reading the snap file we were expecting. For this I set the setpoint to 0.5. After restart of the model we saw that the setpoint went to 0.5 but the epics value remained at 1.0. I then set the snap file back to its original setting. I ran the epics sequencer by hand in a gdb session and verified that the sequencer was setting the field to 0. I also built a custom sequencer that would catch writes by the sdf system to the channel. I only saw one write, the initial write that pushed a 0. I have reverted my changes to the sequencer.
The gain channel can be caput to the correct value and it is not pushed back to 1.0. So there does not appear to be a process actively pushing the value to 1.0. On Rolfs sugestion we ran the sequencer w/o the kernel object loaded, and saw the same behavior.
This will take some thought. |
13979
|
Mon Jun 18 11:12:23 2018 |
Kira | Summary | PEM | finishing up work at the lab |
Since I am finishing my job at the lab, I have stored all my electronics in a box (attachment 1) and placed it under the table in the control room where some other electronics are stored. The box contains the heater circuit box, two temperature sensor boards, one temperature sensor, a short power cable and +/- 15V supply cables. In the lab I left the wires for the current setup and tied them down to the wall so that they aren't in the way (attachment 2). I left the can as is and the other temperature sensor is still attached to the inside of the can. I have labeled the wires going from the sensor as 'in' and 'out'. I've also left the wires for the heater there as well (attachment 3). I turned off the PID control and deactivated the tmux session on megatron.
Thanks to Rana and the LIGO team for giving me the opportunity to work at the 40m on this project with the seismometer. |
Attachment 1: IMG_20180618_101640.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_20180618_093920.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_20180618_093932.jpg
|
|
13996
|
Thu Jun 21 14:23:22 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | A summary of the Tip-TIlt Mirror Holder design changes |
Here’s a quick summary of the Tip-Tilt Design updates (all files are in the dropbox in [TipTiltSus>TT_New]) that I have been working on with Koji and Steve's help.
1. Plate on top to hold mirror in place:

The plate is 0.5 mm thick. I did a rough FEA with 10 N force on the point of pressure on it, and it bent easily.
2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder:

I did a very simplified free body analysis to calculate the required length of the rod to achieve a +/- 15 mRad tilt, and got around 1.5 inches.
3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position:
- Front view (showing set screws on either side of the clamp to push it into the desired position, and the clamp in the middle with screws on top and bottom to fix its position):

- Exploded view showing protrusion in clamp that sits in the mirror holder inset:

- Exploded view showing inset in the mirror holder to slide protrusion in:

Comments:
1. Used the same screw size in most places to reduce complexity.
2. The mirror holder I have worked on is a little different from the actual piece I have on my table. Which one do you prefer (Koji)? |
13997
|
Thu Jun 21 14:57:59 2018 |
Koji | Summary | General | A summary of the Tip-TIlt Mirror Holder design changes |
> 2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder:
Too long. The design of the holder should be check with the entire assembly.
We should be able to make it compact if we heavier weights.
How are these weights fixed on the shaft?
Also can we have options for smaller weights for the case we don't need such a range?
Note the mass of the weights.
> 3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position:
How much is the range of the clamp motion limited by the slot for the side screws and the slot for the protrusion? Are they matched?
Can you show us the design of the slot made on the mirror holder?
>>
Where is the center of mass (CoM) for the entire mirror holder assy and how much is the height gap between the CoM and the wire release points. Can you do this with 3/8" and 1/2" fused silica mirrors? |
14014
|
Mon Jun 25 19:14:02 2018 |
Udit | Summary | General | Re: A summary of the Tip-TIlt Mirror Holder design changes |
2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder:
The screw length selected here (2") is not interfering with any part of the assembly.
The 'weights' I have here are just thumb nuts from Mcmaster, so their weight is fixed (1.65g each, btw).
Problem I'd like to solve: Find an assortment of weighted, symmetric nuts with caps on one end to fix position on shaft.
3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position:
Thanks for pointing out the mismatch in travel distance of protrusion and clamp screws. To match them, the clamp screw slot now sticks out of the profile (by 1.5mm). The range of the clamp motion is +/- 3 mm.

Also, here's a screenshot of the slot in the mirror holder:

--
- Excluding the weighted screw rod assembly, the height gap between assembly COM and wire release point is 3.1 mm.
Quote: |
> 2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder:
Too long. The design of the holder should be check with the entire assembly.
We should be able to make it compact if we heavier weights.
How are these weights fixed on the shaft?
Also can we have options for smaller weights for the case we don't need such a range?
Note the mass of the weights.
> 3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position:
How much is the range of the clamp motion limited by the slot for the side screws and the slot for the protrusion? Are they matched?
Can you show us the design of the slot made on the mirror holder?
>>
Where is the center of mass (CoM) for the entire mirror holder assy and how much is the height gap between the CoM and the wire release points. Can you do this with 3/8" and 1/2" fused silica mirrors?
|
|
14015
|
Mon Jun 25 21:14:08 2018 |
Koji | Summary | General | Re: A summary of the Tip-TIlt Mirror Holder design changes |
3.
- Do we need this much of extended range of the clamp location? How much range will we need if we use either 3/8 or 1/4 inch mirrors?
- This slot on the mirror holder ring is not machinable.
About the CoM height
- Include the angle adjustment screw and adjust the wire releasing point to have comparable pitch resonant freq to the SOS suspension.
|
14042
|
Fri Jul 6 19:39:37 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | General | CAD drawings of cantilever suspension required |
Request to Koji to acquire the drawings or 3D CAD of the cantilever suspensions of the Tip-Tilt Assembly! |
14044
|
Sun Jul 8 12:20:12 2018 |
Jon | Summary | AUX | Gouy Phase Measurements from AUX-Laser Scans |
This note reports analysis of cavity scans made by directly sweeping the AUX laser carrier frequency (no sidebands). The measurement is made by sweeping the RF offset of the AUX-PSL phase-locked loop and demodulating the cavity reflection/transmission signal at the offset frequency.
Y-Arm Scan
Due to the simplicity of its expected response, the Y-arm cavity was scanned first as a test of the AUX hardware and the sensitivity of the technique. Attachment 1 shows the measured cavity transmission with respect to RF drive signal.

The AUX laser launch setup is capable of injecting up to 9.3 mW into the AS port. This high-power measurement is shown by the black trace. The same measurement is repeated for a realistic SQZ injection power, 70 uW, indicated by the red curve. At low power, the technique still clearly resolves the FSR and six HOM resonances. From the identified mode resonance frequencies the following cavity parameters are directly extracted.
YARM |
Gautam's Finesse Model |
Actual |
FSR |
3.966 MHz |
3.967 MHz |
Gouy phase |
54.2 deg |
52.0 deg |
PRC Scan
An analogous scan was performed for the PRC, with the IFO locked on PSL carrier in PRMI. Attachment 2 shows the measurement of PRC transmission with respect to drive signal.

The scan resolves HOM resonances to at least ~13th order, whose frequencies yield the following cavity parameters.
PRC |
Gautam's Finesse Model |
Actual |
FSR |
22.30 MHz |
22.20 MHz |
Gouy phase |
13.4 deg |
15.4 deg |
SRC Scan
Ideally (and at the sites) the SRC mode resonances will be measured in SRMI configuration. Because every other cavity is misaligned, this configuration provides an easily-interpretable spectrum whose resonances can all be attributed to the SRC.
Due to time constraints at the 40m, the IFO could not be restored to lockability in SRMI. It has been more than two years since this configuration was last run. For this reason the scan was made instead with the IFO locked in DRMI, as shown in Attachment 3. The quantity measured is the AUX reflection with respect to drive signal.
This result requires far more interpretation because resonances of both the SRC and PRC are superposed. However, the resonances of the PRC are known a priori from the independent PRMI scan. The SRC mode resonances identified below do not conincide with any of the first five PRC mode resonances.

Based on the identified mode resonance frequencies, the SRC parameters are measured as follows.
SRC |
Gautam's Finesse Model |
Actual |
FSR |
27.65 MHz |
27.97 MHz |
Gouy phase |
10.9 deg |
8.8 deg |
Lessons Learned
From experience with the 40m, the main challenges to repeating this measurement at the sites will be the following.
- Pointing jitter of the input AUX beam. This causes the PSL-AUX beam overlap to vary at transmission (or reflection), causing variation in the amplitude of the AUX-PSL beat note. As far as we can tell, the frequency of the resonances (the only object of this measurement) is not changing in time, only the relative amplitudes of the diferent mode peaks. I believe the SQZ alignment loops will mitigate this problem at the sites.
- Stabilization of the network analyzer time base. We found the intrinsic frequency stability of the network analyzer (Agilent 4395A) to be unacceptably large. We solved this problem by phase-locking the Agilent to an external reference, a 10-MHz signal provided by an atomic clock.
|
Attachment 1: yarm_aux_carrier_trans.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: prmi_aux_carrier_trans.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: drmi_aux_carrier_trans.pdf
|
|
14047
|
Mon Jul 9 17:29:28 2018 |
Udit Khandelwal | Summary | Tip-TIlt | TipTilt mirror holder final changes |
Final Summary of changes to mirror holder in Tip-Tilt holder.
Determining minimum range for Side Clamp:
1. The initial distance b/w wire-release point and mirror assembly COM = 0.265 mm

2. But this distance is assuming that wire-release point is at mid-point of clamp. So I'm settling on a range of +/- 1mm. The screenshots below confirm range of ~1mm between (1) side screw & protrusion and (2) clamp screw and clamp.


Determining length of tilt-weight assembly rod at the bottom to get 20mRad range
The tilt-weight assembly is made from following Mcmaster parts:
Rod - 95412A864 18-8 SS #2-56 Threaded Rod
Nuts - 91855A103 18-8 SS #2-56 Acorn Cap Nut
Since the weights are fixed, only rod length can be changed to get the angle range.




So a range of 1 mm between nut's inner face and mirror-holder face should be enough. Since holder is 12 mm thick, rod length = 12mm + 2 x 1mm + 2 x (nut length) = 12 + 2 + 9.6 = 23.6 mm = 0.93 inch. So a 1" rod from Mcmaster will be fine.
|
Attachment 4: 2-1.png
|
|
Draft
|
Wed Jul 11 18:13:19 2018 |
keerthana | Summary | AUX | Gouy Phase Measurements from AUX-Laser Scans |
From the Measurement Jon made, FSR is 3.967 MHz and the Gouy phase is 52 degrees. From this, the length of the Y-arm cavity seems to be 37.78 m and the radius of curvature of the mirror seems to be 60.85 m.



FSR = Free spectral Range
L = Lenth of the arm
R = Radius of curvature of the mirror (R1 = , R2= unknown)
Quote: |
This note reports analysis of cavity scans made by directly sweeping the AUX laser carrier frequency (no sidebands). The measurement is made by sweeping the RF offset of the AUX-PSL phase-locked loop and demodulating the cavity reflection/transmission signal at the offset frequency.
Y-Arm Scan
Due to the simplicity of its expected response, the Y-arm cavity was scanned first as a test of the AUX hardware and the sensitivity of the technique. Attachment 1 shows the measured cavity transmission with respect to RF drive signal.

The AUX laser launch setup is capable of injecting up to 9.3 mW into the AS port. This high-power measurement is shown by the black trace. The same measurement is repeated for a realistic SQZ injection power, 70 uW, indicated by the red curve. At low power, the technique still clearly resolves the FSR and six HOM resonances. From the identified mode resonance frequencies the following cavity parameters are directly extracted.
YARM |
Gautam V. Finesse Model |
Actual |
FSR |
3.966 MHz |
3.967 MHz |
Gouy phase |
54.2 deg |
52.0 deg |
|
|
14069
|
Fri Jul 13 20:36:33 2018 |
Koji | Summary | General | In vac/In air heater wiring |
I went to the Y-end and took more photos of the cable stand. These revealed that in-vac pin #13 is connected to the shield of the cable (P.2). This in-vac pin #13 corresponds to in-air pin #1. So in the end, we bunch the pins in the following order.
In Air |
In Vac |
Pin #2-7 |
Pin #12-7 |
Pin #8-13 |
Pin #6-1 |
Pin #14-19 |
Pin #25-20 |
Pin #20-25 |
Pin #19-14 |
|
Attachment 1: heater_wiring.pdf
|
|
14073
|
Mon Jul 16 15:07:19 2018 |
Koji | Summary | VAC | Oven C vent |
[Steve Koji]
- Attachment1: Removed the thermal cap. Checked the temperature of the oven. It was totally cold.
- Attachment2: Confirmed the RGA section was isolated. The pumps for the RGA was left running.
- Attachment3: Closed the main valve. The pumps for the main volume was left running.
- Attachment4: Started removing the rid. This did not change the gause readings as they were isolated from the venting main volume.
- Attachment5: Opened the rid. Took the components out on a UHV foil bag. The rid was replaced but loosely held by a few screws with the old gasket, just to protect the frange and the volume from rough dusts. |
Attachment 1: P_20180716_141512.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: P_20180716_141601.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: P_20180716_141610.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: P_20180716_141827.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: P_20180716_143901.jpg
|
|
14077
|
Tue Jul 17 12:55:45 2018 |
Koji | Summary | General | Started pumping |
[Steve, Koji, Gautam]
We started pumping down at ~12:15PM.
Vent finalization ~ YEND
- The table leveling was way off. This was adjusted by the balancing weight. (Attachment 1~3)
- The alignment of ETMY was not too much off. Just aligned it with the oplev spot on MEDM and this already made the green flashing.
- The Green TEM00 was maximized with ITMY and ETMY. This made the PSL IR flashing.
- The heater wires were checked. I found that one of the heater wires was touching the optical table via the cable shield. This is because the upper pins were shifted to the left side (Attachment 4&5). The pins were shifted and now all 4 cables are isolated form the table. I also checked the mutual resistance between the 4 terminals. They were measured to be isolated except two pairs that showed 4.4 Ohms and 4.0 Ohms (Attachment 6)
- The tools were removed from the chamber. The Y arm was still flashing.
- We closed the ETMY door.
Vent finalization ~ Vertex
- Found the ITMX stuck. Gautam came in and showed us his black magic to release the optic...
- This allowed us to align X arm. The green flash was found and the TEM00 flash was seen. This allowed us to see the PSL IR flash at the X end.
- PRM Refl was aligned. SRM was aligned with the oplev.
- The beam on the AS port was checked. The AS beam came out from the window.
- Closed the OMC chamber.
Pumping
- Started pumping with RP1 and RP3. (~12:15PM)
|
Attachment 1: IMG_5408.JPG
|
|
Attachment 2: IMG_5400.JPG
|
|
Attachment 3: IMG_5401.JPG
|
|
Attachment 4: IMG_5402.JPG
|
|
Attachment 5: IMG_5403.JPG
|
|
Attachment 6: IMG_5404.JPG
|
|
14079
|
Tue Jul 17 18:16:38 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | pumpdown 81 at 6 hrs |
Precondition: 4 days at atm. Atm5
HEPA tent used during the vent at ETMY It reduced partical count 10 fold of 0.5 and 0.3 micron particals. Atm6
New items in vacuum: Clean manual gate valve [Cetec made] from John Worden with 6" id....as it came from Hanford... [ Throttle able gate valve- TGV ] Atm3
( note: we have 3 more identical in the lab. The original intention was to use them for purging gates )
Optiform Au plated reflector , Induceramics heating elements, similar as existing Cooner cables and related lenses, hardwear. see 14078
OMC related item : none......... 14,110
The pumpdown is at 510 mTorr with RP1 & RP3 still pumping. Koji will shut it down the roughing later tonight. Tomorrow morning I will start the pumping by switching over to TP1 maglev.
Thanks for Koji and Gautam' help of the installation of the manual gate valve. Atm4 This will allow us to control the load on our Varian foreline D70 turbo TP3
|
Attachment 1: pd81@6hrs.png
|
|
Attachment 2: before_c.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: tgv_c.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: TGVinstalled.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: 4_days_vent.png
|
|
Attachment 6: tentHEPA.jpg
|
|
14080
|
Tue Jul 17 22:25:41 2018 |
Koji | Summary | VAC | pumpdown 81 at 6 hrs |
10:20PM
- Opened VM2 to pump down the RGA section with TP1
- Stopped rotary roughing pumps
- Manually closed RV1
- Closed V3
- Stopped RP1 and RP3
- Vented the RP hose
The P1 pressure is 380mTorr. I allowed Gautam to use the full PSL power (~1W). |
14082
|
Wed Jul 18 12:49:08 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | pumpdown 81 at 6 +4.5hrs |
The manual gate valve scan was clean. Atm1 TP1 was pumping on it overnight.
Pumpdown continued to hand over the pumping to TP1 maglev turbo
V1 was opened at P1 400 mTorr with manual gate at 3/4 turn open position as Magev at 560 Hz rotation.
Two aux fans on to hold tubo temps TP1 & TP3 . Atm3
This is the first time we pumping down from atm with ONE small "beer can" turbo and throttled gate valve to control load on small turbo forepump
The 70 l/s turbo is operating at 50k RPM, 0.7 A and 31 C, pumping speed ~ 44 mTorr/h at 200-400 mTorr range with aux drypump in the foreline of TP3
Watching foreline pressures and current one can keep opening gate valve little by little the so the load is optimized. It is working but not fast.
Let's keep small turbo at 0.8 Amp and 32 C max at this pumpdown.
Quote: |
10:20PM
- Opened VM2 to pump down the RGA section with TP1
- Stopped rotary roughing pumps
- Manually closed RV1
- Closed V3
- Stopped RP1 and RP3
- Vented the RP hose
The P1 pressure is 380mTorr. I allowed Gautam to use the full PSL power (~1W).
|
|
Attachment 1: manlGateScan.png
|
|
Attachment 2: handing_over_Mag.png
|
|
Attachment 3: TGVw2auxfans_.jpg
|
|
14083
|
Wed Jul 18 17:36:50 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | pumpdown 81 at 6 +9 hrs completed |
IFO P1 6e-4 Torr, manual gate valve is fully open
The annuloses will be pumped down tomorrow.
Valve configuration: vacuum normal, RGA and annuloses are not pumped
Quote: |
The manual gate valve scan was clean. Atm1 TP1 was pumping on it overnight.
Pumpdown continued to hand over the pumping to TP1 maglev turbo
V1 was opened at P1 400 mTorr with manual gate at 3/4 turn open position as Magev at 560 Hz rotation.
This is the first time we pumping down from atm with one small "beer can" turbo and throttled gate to control load on small turbo forepump
The 70 l/s turbo is operating at 50k RPM, 0.7 A and 31 C, pumping speed ~ 44 mTorr/h at 200-400 mTorr range.
Watching foreline pressures and current one can keep opening gate valve little by little the so the load is optimized. It is working but not fast.
Let's keep small turbo at 0.8 Amp and 32 C max at this pumpdown.
Quote: |
10:20PM
- Opened VM2 to pump down the RGA section with TP1
- Stopped rotary roughing pumps
- Manually closed RV1
- Closed V3
- Stopped RP1 and RP3
- Vented the RP hose
The P1 pressure is 380mTorr. I allowed Gautam to use the full PSL power (~1W).
|
|
|
Attachment 1: pd81completed.png
|
|
Attachment 2: pd81@30hrs.png
|
|
14085
|
Thu Jul 19 01:56:25 2018 |
gautam | Summary | VAC | AUX pump shutdown |
[koji, gautam]
Per Steve's instructions, we did the following:
- TP3fl pressure reading was 65 torr.
- TP3 controller reported pumping current of ~0.18A, temperature of 24C.
- We throttled the manual valve which was connecting the "AUX" pump to the TP3fl.
- The TP3fl pressure went up to 330 torr.
- TP3fl controller reported current of 0.22A, temperature of 24C.
- After ~5mins, we shut the AUX pump off.
- We have monitored it over the last 1hour, no red flags.
- (Before stopping AUX RP)
0:56AM TP3 I=0.18A, P=6W, 23degC, TP3FL: 66
- 0:59AM TP3 I=0.22A, P=7W, 23degC, TP3FL: 336
- 1:15AM TP3 I=0.21A, P=7W, 23degC, TP3FL: 320
- 1:31AM TP3 I=0.21A, P=7W, 23degC, TP3FL: 310
- 2:06AM TP3 I=0.21A, P=7W, 23degC, TP3FL: 301
- 5:06AM TP3 I=0.21A, P=7W, 23degC, TP3FL: 275
|
14086
|
Thu Jul 19 04:44:09 2018 |
Annalisa, Terra | Summary | Thermal Compensation | frequency shift observed with heating! |
Annalisa, Gautum, Koji, Terra
Summary: with the reflector setup, we measured a frequency shift of the first and second order modes! First looks of shifts show 1st HOM shift ~-10 kHz, 2nd HOM shift ~-18 kHz (carrier ~4 kHz). We saw no shift with the cylinder/lenses set up.
- - - - -
Tonight we modified the cavity scan setup: the LO is provided by the Marconi which, at the same time, is also used to scan the AUX laser frequency instead of the Agilent. In order to get rid of the free running noise between Marconi and Agilent, the Marconi frequency was scanned and, point by point, the Agilent center frequency was changed accordingly. In order to speed up the process, the whole procedure was automated. The script is called AGfast.py and can be found in /users/annalisa/postVent.
One thing that helped in improving the data quality of the phase information was to set the Agilent IF bandwidth @1kHz. Not yet clear why, but it was better than having a lower bandwidth. To be further investigated.
With this setup, we made some coarse scan of the full FSR and then we "zoomed" around the main peaks in order to increase the resolution and get a more precise information about the peak frequency.
Here are the frequency ranges that we scanned:
- carrier - central frequency: 31.73MHz; range: [31.68MHz - 31.78MHz]
- HOM1 - central frequency: 32.88MHz; range: [32.84MHz - 32.93MHz]
- HOM2 - central frequency: 34.03MHz; range: [33.95MHz - 34.06MHz]
- HOM3 - central frequency: 35.18MHz; range: [35.09MHz - 35.25MHz]
We powered the heater of the lenses setup @4:55 am at 14.4V and 0.9A. Then we slightly increased the power @5:05am and the final "hot state" configuration is with heater powered at 16V and 0.9A.
With this setup we couldn't see any frequency shift
Then, at around 6:30 am we turned on the reflector setup and we measured a frequency shift of the first and second order modes. First scans show 1st HOM shift ~10 kHz, 2nd HOM shift ~18 kHz. First attachment shows carrier hot/cold, second attachment shows HOM2 hot/cold. We started to get plauged by high seismic noise. Heaters turned off at 7:45 am. Lots of scans and actual analysis to go.
gautam: about the questionable plotting -
- 10 faint (alpha~0.3) lines are individual measurements with the reflector doing its heating. (AG4395A, 0 span, single frequency measurements plotted together).
- charcoal line, labelled mean, is the mean of the 10 above lines.
- bright green ("Reference") is the mean of a coarse scan (cold ETM) overlaid for comparison.
- "cold" - self explanatory.
My personal favourite plot is Attachment #3, which is a 5 MHz scan (cold) to identify positions of the various peaks. The power of including phase information in the analysis is clear. The second FSR on the right edge of the plot is not as prominent as the first is because the arm transmission was degrading throughout the measurement. For future measurements, we should consider locking the IMC length to the arm cavity - this would eliminate such alignment drifts, and maybe also make the PLL control signal RMS smaller. |
Attachment 1: scanning_fine_2018-07-19-07-32-08_parsed.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: scanning_fine_2018-07-19-06-57-47_parsed.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: Yscan_scanning_parsed_2am.txt.pdf
|
|
14087
|
Thu Jul 19 11:01:03 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | pd81 @ 2e-5 Torr |
Cold cathode gauge just turned on. |
Attachment 1: pd81@2days.png
|
|
14088
|
Thu Jul 19 13:35:30 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | annuloses pumped |
Roughing down the annuloses required closing V1 for 13 minutes
IFO is 2.2e-5 Torr |
Attachment 1: AnsPumped.png
|
|
14090
|
Fri Jul 20 07:43:54 2018 |
Steve | Summary | SUS | ETMY |
|
Attachment 1: ETMY_leveling.png
|
|
Attachment 2: ETMY.png
|
|
14094
|
Sat Jul 21 01:06:49 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Thermal Compensation | Y arm locking |
I implemented this today. For now, the LSC output matrix is set to actuate on MC2 for Y arm locking. As expected, the transmission was much more stable, and the PLL control signal RMS was also reduced by factor of ~3. MC2 control signal does pick up a large (~2000 cts) DC component over a few hours, so we need to relieve this periodically.
Now that we have a workable ASS for the Y arm as well, we should be able to have more confidence in returning to the same beam spot position on the ETM and staying there during a scan using this technique.
The main improvement to be trialled next in the scanning is to improve the speed of scanning. As things stand, my script takes ~2.5 seconds per datapoint. If we can cut this in half, that'd be huge. On Wednesday night, we were extraordinarily lucky to avoid MC3 glitching, EPICS/slow machine failures, and GPIB freezes. Today, the latter reared its head. Fortunately, since I'm dumping data to file for each datapoint, this means we at least have data till the GPIB freeze.
Quote: |
For future measurements, we should consider locking the IMC length to the arm cavity - this would eliminate such alignment drifts, and maybe also make the PLL control signal RMS smaller.
|
Not related to this work: Terra, Sandrine, Keerthana and I cleaned up the lab a bit today, and made better cable labels. Aaron and I have to clean up the OMC area a bit. Huge thanks to Steve for taking care of our mess elsewhere in the lab! |
14096
|
Sat Jul 21 14:03:19 2018 |
Koji | Summary | Thermal Compensation | Y arm locking |
Ah. With MC2 feedback, we have about 3 times smaller "optical gain" for the ASS A2L. We have same dither, same actuator, but we need only 1/3 actuation of the MC2 compared to the ETMY case.
We had to reduce the ASS spot servo from 1 to 0.3 to make is stable, so this means that the ASS is really merginally stable. |
14098
|
Mon Jul 23 09:58:52 2018 |
Steve | Summary | VAC | RGA scan at day 6 |
|
Attachment 1: pd81-560Hz-d6.png
|
|
14103
|
Wed Jul 25 14:45:59 2018 |
Sandrine | Summary | Thermal Compensation | ETM Y Table AUX read out |
Attached is a photo of the set up of the ETM Y table showing the AUX read out set up.
Currently, the flip mount sends the AUX to the PDA255. Terra inserted a razor blade so the PDA255 will witness more HOMs. The laser is also sent to the regular PD and the CCD. |
Attachment 1: EY_table_.JPG
|
|
14110
|
Sat Jul 28 00:45:11 2018 |
terra, sandrine | Summary | Thermal Compensation | Heater measurements overview |
[Sandrine, Koji, Terra]
Summary: We completed multiple scans at different heating powers for the reflector set up, observing unique HOM peak shifts of tens of kHz. We also observed HOM5 shifts with the cylinder set up. Initial Lorentzian fittings of the magnitude give tens of Hz resolution. I summarize the main week's work below.
Set-up
Heater set-up is described in several previous elogs, but attachments #1 and #2 show the full heater set-up and wiring/pinouts in and out of vacuum, since we're all intimately aware of how confusing in-vacuum pinouts can be. We are not using the Sorenson power supply (as described in 14071); we just have the BKPrecision power supply 1735 sitting next to the ETMY rack and are manually going out to turn on/off.
We've continued to use the scan setup described in elog 14086, which is run using /users/annalisa/postVent/AGfast.py. Step by step notes for setting up the scan, running the scans, and processing the scans are attached in notes.txt.
Inducing/witnessing HOMs
The aux input beam was already clipped and on wednesday (after Trans was centered, 14093) we also clipped the output aux beam with razor blade (angled vertically and horizontally, elog 14103) before PDA255; we clipped ~1/3 of the output beam. Attachment #3 shows before and after clipping output, where orange 'cold' == unclipped, black 'mean' == clipped (all in cold state). Up to HOM5 is visible.
Measurements
Below is a summary of the available scan data. We also have cold (0A) scans CAR-HOM5 and full FSR scans for most configurations.
Elliptic Reflector
current[A] |
voltage[V] |
power[W] |
scans |
0.4 |
2 |
0.8 |
CAR-HOM3(x1) |
0.5 |
3.4 |
1.7 |
CAR-HOM3(x1) |
0.6 |
5 |
3.0 |
CAR-HOM3(x1) |
0.8 |
9.4(9.7) |
7.5(7.8) |
CAR-HOM5(>x5) |
0.9 |
12 |
10.8 |
CAR-HOM5(x4) |
1.09 |
17 |
18.5 |
CAR-HOM3 |
Cylinder + Lenses
current[A] |
voltage[V] |
power[W] |
scans |
0.9 |
15 |
13.5 |
CAR-HOM5(odds x4) |
We tried the cylinder set-up again tonight for the first time since inital try and can see shifts of HOM5 - see attachment #5; we haven't looked in detail yet, but it looks like odd modes are more effected, suggesting the ring heat pattern is off centered from the beam axis.
Scan data is saved in the following format: users/annalisa/postVent/scandata/{reflector,cylinder}/{parsed,unparsed}/{CAR,HOM1,HOM2,HOM3,HOM4,HOM5}{_datetime}{_parsed,_unparsed}.{txt,pdf}
Minimum heating
On 7/26 we increased the power to the elliptical reflector heater in steps to find the minimum heater power required to see frequency shifts with our measurement setup. Lowest we can resolve is a shift in HOM3 with 1.7W (0.5A/3.4V). According to Annalisa's measurements in elog 14050, this would be something like 30-60 mW radiated power hitting the test mass. We only looked at CAR - HOM3 for this investigation; data for scans at 0.4A, 0.5A, 0.6A is available as indicated above.
Lorentizian Fitting
The Lorentzian fitting was done using the equation a + b / sqrt(1+((x-c)/d*2), where a = constant background, b = peak height above background, c = peak frequency, d = full width at half max.
The fitting is still being edited and optimized. We will crop the data to zoom in around the peak more.
The Lorentzian fit of the magnitude shows ~10Hz of resolution. (See attachment 6 for the carrier at 8A and attachment 7 for HOM 1 at 9A)
We're working on fitting the full complex data.
|
Attachment 1: heater_setup.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: heater_wiring.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: notes.txt
|
Notes for running scans:
1. when first turning on Agilent, set initial stuff
> cd /users/annalisa/postVent/20180718
> AGmeasure TFAG4395Atemplate.yml
2. tweak arm alignment and offset PLL
> sitemap (then IFO --> ALIGN and also PSL --> AUX)
> to increase
3. make sure X-arm is misagligned (hit '! Misalign' button for ITMX, ETMX)
3. run scan
> python AGfast.py startfreq stopfreq points
... 36 more lines ...
|
Attachment 4: FSR_clipped.pdf
|
|
Attachment 5: cylinderHOM5.pdf
|
|
Attachment 6: pt8A_CAR.pdf
|
|
Attachment 7: pt9A_HOM1.pdf
|
|
14121
|
Wed Aug 1 16:23:48 2018 |
Koji | Summary | Computers | Transition of the main NFS disk on chiara |
[Gautam Koji]
Taking the opportunity to shutdown c1ioo for adding a DAC card, we shutdown chiara and worked on moving of the main disk to the bigger home.
We shutdown most of the martian machines including the control machines, megatron, optimus, and nodus.
- Before shutting down chiara, we ran rsync to make the 4TB disk (used to be teh backup) and /cvs/cds synced.
sudo rsync -a --progress /home/cds/ /media/40mBackup
- Modified /etc/fstab
proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
# / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=972db769-4020-4b74-b943-9b868c26043a / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# swap was on /dev/sda5 during installation
UUID=a3f5d977-72d7-47c9-a059-38633d16413e none swap sw 0 0
UUID="90a5c98a-22fb-4685-9c17-77ed07a5e000" /media/40mBackup ext4 defaults,relatime,commit=60 0 0
#fb:/frames /frames nfs ro,bg
UUID=92dc7073-bf4d-4c58-8052-63129ff5755b /home/cds ext4 defaults,relatime,commit=60 0 0
- Shutdown chiara. Put the 4TB disk in the chassis. We also installed a new disk (but later it turned out that it only has 2TB...)
- Restart the mahcine. This already made the 4TB disk mounted as /cvs/cds .
- Restart bind9 with DHCP for the diskless clients (cf. https://wiki-40m.ligo.caltech.edu/CDS/How_to_join_martian)
sudo service bind9 restart
sudo service isc-dhcp-server restart
- Looks like /etc/resolv.conf is automatically overwritten by a tool or something everytime we restart the machine!? I still don't know how to avoid this. (cf. https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/resolvconf-tutorial). But at least for today we manually wrote /etc/resolv.conf
controls@chiara|backup> cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf (8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 192.168.113.104
nameserver 131.215.125.1
nameserver 8.8.8.8
search martian
|
14122
|
Wed Aug 1 19:41:15 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Computers | RTCDS recovery, c1ioo changes |
[Gautam Koji]
After this work, we recovered the nominal RTCDS state. The main points were:
- We needed to restart the bind9 service on chiara such that the FEs knew their IP addresses upon reboot and hence, could get their root filesystems over NFS.
- We recovered suspension local damping, IMC locking and POX/POY locking with nominal arm transmission.
Some stuff that is not working as usual:
- The EX QPD is reporting strange transmission values - even with the PRM completely misaligned, it reports transmission of ~30. But we were able to lock the Xarm with the Thorlabs PD and revover transmission of ~1.15.
- The X arm green does not stay locked to the cavity - the alignment looks fine, and the green flashes are strong, but the lock does not hold. This shouldn't be directly connected to anything we did today since the Green PDH servo is entirely analog.
I made a model change in c1x03 (the IOP model on c1ioo) to add a DAC part. The model compiled, installed and started correctly, and looking at dmesg on c1ioo, it recognises the DAC card as what it is. Next step is to use a core on c1ioo for a c1omc model, and actually try driving some signals.
Note that the only change made to the c1ioo expansion chassis was that a DAC card was installed into the PCIe bus. The adaptor card which allows interfacing the DAC card to an AI board was already in the expansion chassis, presumably from whenever the DAC was removed from this machine.
*I think I forgot to restart optimus after this work...
|
Attachment 1: CDS_overview.png
|
|
14123
|
Wed Aug 1 20:44:57 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Computers | c1omc model (re?)created |
The main motivation behind adding a DAC card in c1ioo was to setup an RTCDS model for the OMC. Attachment #1 shows the new look CDS overview screen. Here is what I did.
Mostly, I followed instructions from when I setup the model for the EX green PZTs.
Simulink model:
The model is just a toy for now (CDS parameters, ADC block and 2 CDS filter modules). I leave it to Aaron to actually populate it, check functionality etc. The path to the model is /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/userapps/release/isc/c1/models/c1omc.mdl. I am listing the parameters set on the CDS_PARAMETERS block:
- host = c1ioo
- site = c1
- rate = 16k
- dcuid = 27 (which I chose after making sure that this dcuid was not used on this list which I also updated by adding c1omc and moving c1imc to "old")
- specific_cpu = 6 (again chosen after checking the available CPUs in the above list and confirming using the cset utility).
- adc_Slave = 1
- shmem_daq = 1
- no_rfm_dma = 1
- biquad = 1
Building and installing model:
Once the model was installed, I logged into c1ioo, and built and installed the models using the usual rtcds make and rtcds install instructions. Before starting the model, I edited /diskless/root.jessie/etc/rtsystab to allow c1omc to be run on c1ioo. Using sudo cset set, I verified that CPU #6 is no longer listed (if I understand correctly, the RTCDS system takes over the core).
MEDM:
To reflect all this on the MEDM CDS OVERVIEW screen, I just edited the screen.
- Moved the orange explanation of bits over to the c1iscey panel to make space in the c1ioo panel.
- Edited the macros to reflect the c1omc parameters.
DAQD:
Finally, I followed the instructions here to get the channels into frames and make all the indicators green. Went into fb and restarted the daqd processes. All looks good . I'm going to leave the model running overnight to investigate stability. I forgot to svn commit the model tonight, will do it tomorrow.
The testing plan (at least initially) is to install the AA and AI boards from the OMC rack in 1X1/1X2. Then we will have short SCSI cables running from the ADC/DAC to these. The actual HV driving stages will remain in the OMC rack (NE corner of AS table).
@Steve, can we get 10 Male-Female D9 cables so that we can run them from 1X1/1X2 to the OMC rack?
Unrelated to this work: There were 2 crashes of the models on c1lsc, one ~6pm and one right now ~1030pm. The restart script brought everything back gracefully ... |
Attachment 1: CDS_OVERVIEW_withOMC.png
|
|
14125
|
Thu Aug 2 20:47:29 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Electronics | X Green "Mystery" solved |
I walked down to the X end and found that the entire AUX laser electronics rack isn't getting any power. There was no elog about this.
I couldn't find any free points in the power strip where I think all this stuff was plugged in so I'm going to hold off on resurrecting this until tomorrow when I'll work with Steve.
Quote: |
The X arm green does not stay locked to the cavity - the alignment looks fine, and the green flashes are strong, but the lock does not hold. This shouldn't be directly connected to anything we did today since the Green PDH servo is entirely analog.
|
|
14126
|
Thu Aug 2 20:54:18 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Computers | c1omc model looks stable |
Actually, c1lsc had crashed again sometime last night so I had to reboot everything this morning. I used the reboot script again, but I increased the sleep time between trying to start up the models again so that I could walk into the VEA and power cycle the c1lsc expansion chassis, as this kind of frequent model crash has been fixed by doing so in the past. Sure enough, there have been no issues since I rebooted everything at ~1030 in the morning.
The c1omc model itself has been stable as well, though of course, there is nothing in there at the moment. I may do a check of the newly installed DAC tomorrow just to see that we can put out a sine wave.
Steve has ordered the D-sub cabling that will allow us to route signals between AA/AI boards in 1X1/1X2 to the HV PZT electronics in the OMC rack. Things look setup for a measurement next week. Aaron will post a block diagram + photoz of what box goes where in the electronics racks. |
14127
|
Thu Aug 2 23:09:25 2018 |
rana | Summary | Computers | X Green "Mystery" solved |
I'm going to guess that this was me: I was disconnecting some octopus power strip nonsense down there (in particular illuminators and cameras), so I might have turned off the AUX rack by mistake.
Quote: |
I walked down to the X end and found that the entire AUX laser electronics rack isn't getting any power. There was no elog about this.
I couldn't find any free points in the power strip where I think all this stuff was plugged in so I'm going to hold off on resurrecting this until tomorrow when I'll work with Steve.
Quote: |
The X arm green does not stay locked to the cavity - the alignment looks fine, and the green flashes are strong, but the lock does not hold. This shouldn't be directly connected to anything we did today since the Green PDH servo is entirely analog.
|
|
|
14128
|
Fri Aug 3 14:35:56 2018 |
gautam | Summary | Electronics | EX AUX electronics power restored |
Steve and I restored the power to the EX AUX electronics rack. The power strip on the lowest shelf of the AUX rack now goes to another power strip laid out vertically along the NW corner of 1X9. The EX green locks to the arm just fine now. |