40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Thu Feb 27 01:02:57 2014, Jenne, Update, SUS, Oplev Tuning Party - round 1
|
Thu Feb 27 22:25:29 2014, rana, Update, SUS, Oplev Tuning Party - round 1 commentary
|
Wed Mar 5 09:52:31 2014, Jenne, Update, SUS, Oplev Tuning - Cartoon cost function
|
Thu Mar 6 17:34:03 2014, rana, Update, SUS, Oplev Tuning - Cartoon cost function
|
|
Message ID: 9682
Entry time: Thu Feb 27 22:25:29 2014
In reply to: 9680
Reply to this: 9690
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
SUS |
Subject: |
Oplev Tuning Party - round 1 commentary |
|
|
in order to Win in Loop Tuning, you must draw a cartoon of the cost function on the whiteboard before starting. Some qualitative considerations from our Workshop:
- We want to use the oplev servo to reduce the motion of the mirror in the frequency band where the Oplev is quieter than the mirror, w.r.t. inertial space.
- We can estimate the true mirror motion by some simple stack / pendulum model and compare it to the Oplev noise (not the dark noise). There are several contributions to the mirror angular motion due to the cross-coupling in the stacks and pendula.
- Below ~0.2 Hz, we think that the oplev is not the right reference, but this is not quantitative yet.
- The high frequency noise in the OPLEV ERROR is definitely electronics + shot noise.
- We cannot increase the gain of the loop without posting some loop measurements (Bode + steps). Also have to post estimates of how much PRCL noise is being introduced by the Oplev feedback. Oplev feedback should make less length noise than what we have from seismic.
Give us a cost function in the elog and then keep tuning. |