40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Jul 8 15:31:48 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration prep
|
Tue Jul 9 11:41:22 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration attempt
|
Tue Jul 9 16:08:32 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration attempt
|
Fri Jul 12 21:23:42 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration attempt 
|
Mon Jul 15 17:16:59 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration attempt  
|
Tue Jul 16 01:17:21 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD calibration attempt
|
Tue Jul 23 01:30:27 2013, Jenne, Update, ASC, POP QPD analysis 9x
|
Fri Jul 26 13:39:30 2013, Koji, Update, ASC, POP QPD analysis
|
|
Message ID: 8926
Entry time: Fri Jul 26 13:39:30 2013
In reply to: 8897
|
Author: |
Koji |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
ASC |
Subject: |
POP QPD analysis |
|
|
It was not actually easy to see from the entry what signal was taken in what condition but from the shape of the spectra
I had the impression that the ASC & OPLEV signals were measured under the presence of the ASC control.
That is (moderately to say) tricky as the ASC control imprints the angular noise
from unkown mirror on the PRM, and then the oplev observes it. The original stability of the oplev is
obscured by the injection from the servo and the fair comparison of the stability is almost impossible.
So the true comparison between the ASC and oplev signals should be done without the control loop.
http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/8532
http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/8535
We can recover the free running spectrum of the ASC signals by compensating the loop transfer functions
because the ASC signals are the in-loop error signals. The oplev signals should be measured without
the ASC loop engaged. |