40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Sun Feb 3 13:20:02 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis 
|
Mon Feb 4 10:45:51 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Mon Feb 4 11:10:59 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Mon Feb 4 19:33:19 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 02:04:44 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 03:16:51 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 10:09:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Tue Feb 5 11:30:19 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Wed Feb 13 01:26:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
|
Wed Feb 6 15:20:55 2013, yuta, Summary, General, FWHM was wrong
|
Mon Feb 4 15:06:56 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis
|
Mon Feb 4 19:48:32 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, arbcav recalc of PRC with correct ITM transmission 
|
|
Message ID: 7997
Entry time: Tue Feb 5 02:04:44 2013
In reply to: 7994
Reply to this: 7998
|
Author: |
yuta |
Type: |
Summary |
Category: |
General |
Subject: |
rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan |
|
|
I redid PRM-PR2 cavity scan using oscilloscope to avoid anti-aliasing effect.
Measured Finesse was 104 +/- 1.
Method:
1. Splitted POP DC output into three and plugged two into oscilloscope TDS 3034B. Ch1 and Ch2 was set to 1 V/div and 20 mV/div respectively to take the whole signal and higer resolution one at the same time (Koji's suggestion). Sampling frequency was 50 kHz. Sweeping time through FWHM was about 0.001 sec, which is slow enough.
2. Took mode scan data from the oscilloscope via network.
Preliminary results:
Below is the plot of the data for one TEM00 peak.

The data was taken twice.
Measured FWHM was 0.764 MHz and 0.751 MHz. By taking the average, FWHM = 0.757 +/- 0.005 MHz.
This gives you Finesse = 104 +/- 1, which is OK compared with the expectation.
What I need:
I need better oscilloscope so that we can take longer data (~1 sec) with higher resolution (~0.004 V/count, ~50kHz).
TDS 3034B can take data only for 10 ksamples, one channel by one! I prefer Yokogawa DL750 or later. |