|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Sun Feb 3 13:20:02 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis 
|
 Mon Feb 4 10:45:51 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Mon Feb 4 11:10:59 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Mon Feb 4 19:33:19 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 02:04:44 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 03:16:51 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 10:09:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Tue Feb 5 11:30:19 2013, Koji, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Wed Feb 13 01:26:08 2013, yuta, Summary, General, rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan
| |
Wed Feb 6 15:20:55 2013, yuta, Summary, General, FWHM was wrong
| |
Mon Feb 4 15:06:56 2013, Koji, Summary, General, Hypothesis
| |
Mon Feb 4 19:48:32 2013, Jamie, Summary, General, arbcav recalc of PRC with correct ITM transmission
|
|
|
Message ID: 7991
Entry time: Mon Feb 4 11:10:59 2013
In reply to: 7990
Reply to this: 7994
|
| Author: |
Koji |
| Type: |
Summary |
| Category: |
General |
| Subject: |
rough analysis of aligned PRM-PR2 mode scan |
|
|
The expected finesse is 100ish. How much can we beleive the measured number of 50?
From the number we need to assume PR2 has ~93% reflectivity.
This does not agree with my feeling that the cavity is overcoupled.
Another way is to reduce the reflectivity of the PRM but that is also unlikely from the data sheet.
The scan passed the peak in 4ms according to the fitting.
How do the analog and digital antialiasing filters affect this number? |