|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Wed Jan 16 18:08:06 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
|
 Wed Jan 16 20:27:16 2013, rana, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
| |
Thu Jan 17 00:17:31 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
|
Wed Jan 23 18:16:11 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 
| |
Wed Jan 23 20:24:05 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
| |
Wed Jan 23 22:02:25 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
| |
Thu Jan 24 15:16:50 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
| |
Thu Jan 24 16:23:24 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
| |
Tue Jan 29 14:20:02 2013, Koji, Update, General, Finer rotation stage for optics characterization
| |
Thu Jan 24 16:34:56 2013, rana, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
| |
Fri Jan 25 08:10:42 2013, Steve, Update, General, Laseroptik mirrors
| |
Mon Jan 28 19:07:45 2013, Manasa, Update, General, SN6 Laseroptik mirror - Tranmittance measurements
|
|
|
Message ID: 7943
Entry time: Thu Jan 24 16:34:56 2013
In reply to: 7940
|
| Author: |
rana |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
General |
| Subject: |
Laseroptik mirror - SN6 |
|
|
I have two questions:
1) Are we sure that the T measurement is not being compromised by some systematic? i.e. some leakage is making the apparent T appear too high.
2) IF the T is really so high, how should we decide whether or not to use this one rather than the G&H? Is the 532 nm property more important than the high recycling gain? |