40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Jan 16 18:08:06 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
|
Wed Jan 16 20:27:16 2013, rana, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
|
Thu Jan 17 00:17:31 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains
|
Wed Jan 23 18:16:11 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Wed Jan 23 20:24:05 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Wed Jan 23 22:02:25 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Thu Jan 24 15:16:50 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Thu Jan 24 16:23:24 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Tue Jan 29 14:20:02 2013, Koji, Update, General, Finer rotation stage for optics characterization
|
Thu Jan 24 16:34:56 2013, rana, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6
|
Fri Jan 25 08:10:42 2013, Steve, Update, General, Laseroptik mirrors
|
Mon Jan 28 19:07:45 2013, Manasa, Update, General, SN6 Laseroptik mirror - Tranmittance measurements 
|
|
Message ID: 7910
Entry time: Thu Jan 17 00:17:31 2013
In reply to: 7909
Reply to this: 7930
|
Author: |
Jenne |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
Locking |
Subject: |
Expected PRC gains |
|
|
Quote: |
Why would we use such a bad optic in our recycling cavity? Is 1.5% the spec for these mirrors? Is this the requirement that Kiwamu calculated somehow? Did anyone confirm this measurement?
I can't believe that we'll have low noise performance in a RC where we dump so much power.
|
Yeah, Koji mentioned in response to Raji's measurements several months ago that the LaserOptic mirros were pretty far out of spec. We should probably redo the measurement to confirm. |