40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Jan 16 18:08:06 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains 
    Reply  Wed Jan 16 20:27:16 2013, rana, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains 
       Reply  Thu Jan 17 00:17:31 2013, Jenne, Update, Locking, Expected PRC gains 
          Reply  Wed Jan 23 18:16:11 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 sn6_trans.png
             Reply  Wed Jan 23 20:24:05 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 
                Reply  Wed Jan 23 22:02:25 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 
                   Reply  Thu Jan 24 15:16:50 2013, Manasa, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 sn6_trans1.png
                      Reply  Thu Jan 24 16:23:24 2013, Koji, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 
                         Reply  Tue Jan 29 14:20:02 2013, Koji, Update, General, Finer rotation stage for optics characterization 
                      Reply  Thu Jan 24 16:34:56 2013, rana, Update, General, Laseroptik mirror - SN6 
                      Reply  Fri Jan 25 08:10:42 2013, Steve, Update, General, Laseroptik mirrors 
                         Reply  Mon Jan 28 19:07:45 2013, Manasa, Update, General, SN6 Laseroptik mirror - Tranmittance measurements sn6_trans0128.pngtrans_layout.png
Message ID: 7909     Entry time: Wed Jan 16 20:27:16 2013     In reply to: 7905     Reply to this: 7910
Author: rana 
Type: Update 
Category: Locking 
Subject: Expected PRC gains 

Why would we use such a bad optic in our recycling cavity? Is 1.5% the spec for these mirrors? Is this the requirement that Kiwamu calculated somehow? Did anyone confirm this measurement?

I can't believe that we'll have low noise performance in a RC where we dump so much power.

ELOG V3.1.3-