|
40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
| 40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
|
 Thu Jan 3 20:34:43 2013, Riju, Update, , Photodiode transimpedance
|
 Fri Jan 4 13:23:10 2013, rana, Update, Electronics, Photodiode transimpedance
| |
Tue Jan 8 14:07:04 2013, Riju, Update, Electronics, Photodiode transimpedance
|
Tue Jan 8 15:28:41 2013, Riju, Update, Electronics, Photodiode transimpedance 
|
|
|
Message ID: 7881
Entry time: Tue Jan 8 14:07:04 2013
In reply to: 7875
Reply to this: 7882
|
| Author: |
Riju |
| Type: |
Update |
| Category: |
Electronics |
| Subject: |
Photodiode transimpedance |
|
|
| Quote: |
|
You have to correct this transimpedance ratio by correcting for the different levels of DC photocurrent in the two devices.
For the dark noise, you must always include a trace showing the noise of the measurements device (i.e. the analyzer noise must be less than the dark PD noise) with the same input attenuation setting.
|
Hi,
The correction for different levels of DC photocurrent in the two devices had been taken care by one MATLAB code, the code that originally was made by Koji.
The analyzer noise I had not recorded; today I am going to record it.
Riju |