40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Fri Sep 30 05:35:42 2011, kiwamu, Update, LSC, length fluctuations in MICH and PRCL noise.png
    Reply  Fri Sep 30 08:40:02 2011, Koji, Update, LSC, length fluctuations in MICH and PRCL 
    Reply  Sat Oct 8 04:41:07 2011, kiwamu, Update, LSC, length fluctuations in SRCL length_noise.png
       Reply  Mon Oct 10 10:14:43 2011, rana, Update, LSC, length fluctuations in SRCL 
Message ID: 5641     Entry time: Mon Oct 10 10:14:43 2011     In reply to: 5638
Author: rana 
Type: Update 
Category: LSC 
Subject: length fluctuations in SRCL 

 How does it make sense that the motion at 0.1 Hz of PRC is 10x larger than MICH?

EDIT by KI:

 That's actually the point which I was wondering at. One possible reason is that my actuator responses are not so accurate below 1Hz.
I will measure the DC response of all the actuators and it will completely determine the shapes of the actuator responses except for the region around the resonance.
In the process of producing the plot I was assuming that all the actuator response have a 1 Hz resonance with Q of 5.
However in reality this assumption is not true because the resonant frequency is different in each actuator.
ELOG V3.1.3-