40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Jan 13 03:00:01 2011, Jenne, Update, IOO, WFS shenanigans D990249-B-1_MCWFS_schematic.pdf
    Reply  Thu Jan 13 12:56:57 2011, rana, Update, IOO, WFS shenanigans PerkinElmerQPDs.pdf
    Reply  Fri Jan 28 13:07:31 2011, Jenne, Update, IOO, Beam is back on the WFS 
    Reply  Fri Jan 28 18:19:21 2011, Jenne, Update, IOO, WFS2 has some kind of oil on it Oily_WFS2.jpg
    Reply  Mon Feb 14 15:59:49 2011, Jenne, Update, IOO, WFS quantum efficiency as a function of angle 
       Reply  Wed Jun 15 00:49:34 2011, Suresh, Update, IOO, WFS2 has been fixed. WFS_QE_measurement.pngSensorsBrochure-p12.pdfP6150121.JPGP6150124.JPG
Message ID: 4224     Entry time: Fri Jan 28 18:19:21 2011     In reply to: 4148
Author: Jenne 
Type: Update 
Category: IOO 
Subject: WFS2 has some kind of oil on it 

Mystery solved!

I removed WFS2 from the AP table (after placing markers so I can put it back in ~the same place) so that I could take some reflectivity as a function of angle measurements for aLIGO WFS design stuff.

I was dismayed to discover, upon glancing at the diode itself, that half of the diode is covered with some kind of oil!!!.  The oil is mostly confined to quadrants 3 and 4, which explains the confusion with their quantum efficiency measurements, as well as why the readback values on the MEDM WFS Head screen for WFS2 don't really make sense. 

The WFS QPD has a piece of glass protecting the diode itself, and the oil seems to be on top of the glass, so I'm going to use some lens tissue and clean it off.

Pre-cleaning photos are on Picasa.

Update:  I tried scrubbing the glass with a Q-tip soaked with Iso, and then one soaked in methanol.  Both of these failed to make any improvement.  I am suspicious that perhaps whatever it is, is underneath the glass, but I don't know.  Rana suggested replacing the diode, if we have spares / when we order some spares.



Problem with 2 quadrants of WFS2?

While doing all of this, I noticed that quadrants 3 and 4 of WFS2 seem to be different than all the rest.  You can see this on the MEDM screens in that all 6 other quadrants, when there is no light, read about -0.2, whereas the 2 funny quadrants read positive values.  This might be okay, because they both respond to light, in some kind of proportion to the amount of light on them.  I ended up getting QE of ~72% for both of these quadrants, which doesn't make a whole lot of sense since the spec for green is 70%, and silicon is supposed to be less good for infrared than green.  Anyhow, we'll have to meditate on this.  We should also see if we have a trend, to check how long they have been funny.


ELOG V3.1.3-