Mode matching to the cavity has been done.
Now the reflection from the cavity is successfully going into the PD.
However I could not see any obvious error signal.
I should compute and re-check the expected signal level.
(mode matching of the crystal)
On the last Wednesday, Kevin and I measured the mode profile before the PPKTP crystal, and we found the Gaussian beam at the crystal is focused too tightly (w = 38 um).
In order to achieve the best conversion efficiency the waist size should be 50.0 um. So we moved a lens, which was located before the crystal, to 7 cm more away from the crystal. Eventually we obtained a better focus (w = 50.1 um).
Thanks, Kevin. You did a good job.
(mode matching of the cavity)
I put a lens with f=-50 mm after the crystal to diverge the green beam more quickly. Then the beam is going through the Faraday of 532 nm, two final modematching lenses and ETMY at last.
By shifting the positions of these lenses, I obtained the reflection from ITMY with almost the same spot size as that of the incident. This means modemathing is good enough.
I put two more steering mirrors before its injection to the ETM, this allows us to align the beam axis against the cavity.
I aligned the axis by using the steering mirrors and now the green beam are successfully hitting the center of both the ETM and the ITM.
Then the alignment of the ETM and the ITM was adjusted from medm, so that both reflection goes in the same path as that of the incident.
And then I put a PD (Thorlabs PDA36A) to see the reflection rejected by the Faraday.
Connecting a mixer and a local oscillator (Stanford func. generator) with f=200kHz, but I couldn't see any obvious PDH signal....
Since the PD is DC coupled, the signal is almost dominated by DC voltage. Even if I inserted a high pass filter to cut off the DC, the AC signal looks very tiny.. |