40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Tue Jul 19 18:41:42 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, Contrast measurements for Michelson and ITM-LO
|
Wed Jul 20 18:07:52 2022, Paco, Update, BHD, BHD MICH test
|
Tue Jul 26 20:54:08 2022, Paco, Update, BHD, BHD MICH test - LO phase control
|
Wed Jul 27 18:30:50 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, LO beam power at BHD DCPDs is significantly lower than expected 
|
Thu Jul 28 14:34:40 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, LO beam power at BHD DCPDs is significantly lower than expected
|
Thu Jul 28 16:51:55 2022, Tega, Update, BHD, Shaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs 
|
Thu Jul 28 20:16:26 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, Shaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs
|
Fri Jul 29 18:24:53 2022, Tega, Update, BHD, LO beam power improved by factor of 6 after LO and AS beam alignment   
|
Wed Aug 3 16:00:51 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe aligned with reduced LO and AS beam clipping
|
Tue Aug 9 15:33:12 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast improved from 43% to 74%   
|
Tue Aug 9 15:50:22 2022, Koji, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast improved from 43% to 74%
|
Wed Nov 16 15:09:08 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast measured with unwhitening filters
|
Tue Oct 25 08:25:00 2022, JC, Update, BHD, BHD fringe aligned with reduced LO and AS beam clipping
|
Thu Nov 17 11:24:39 2022, JC, HowTo, LSC, Locking MICH
|
Tue Nov 29 11:38:37 2022, JC, HowTo, LSC, Lock Single Arm After MICH lock
|
|
Message ID: 17046
Entry time: Fri Jul 29 18:24:53 2022
In reply to: 17044
Reply to this: 17056
|
Author: |
Tega |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
BHD |
Subject: |
LO beam power improved by factor of 6 after LO and AS beam alignment |
|
|
[Yuta, Tega]
From our previous work (elog 17044) of shaking PR2 and seeing a signal in DCPD_A and the fact that LO beam power is far smaller than the expected nominal value, we decided to use TT1 and TT2 to realign the LO beam. This resulted in LO beam power going up by a factor of 6 and an improvement in the LO beam shape. We are still unable to find LO and AS alignment which realize BHD fringe with no clipping everywhere.
Deformed LO beam issue: Following the TT1 and TT2 alignments, used PR2 and PR3 to recover the transmission of the X and Y arms to 1. We also used LO1 and LO2 offsets to further reduce the beam deformation by eliminating the HOM concentric fringes that surounded the LO beam and to maximize the DCPD outputs. BHD optics in ITMY table was tweaked a lot to keep the LO beam centered on the BHD DCPDs and camera. The improved LO beam is still astigmatic in the yaw direction but at least now looks like a TEM00 mode. We also repositioned the DCPD_A path camera lens to remove the circular diffused fringes due to lens clipping. After the alignment, power was measured to be the following. It also reduced the coherence between DCPD outputs and suspension motions (see attached).
LO ITMX
C1:HPC-DCPD_A_OUT16 +127.50 +96.24 (ITMX single bounce consistent to 40m/17040)
C1:HPC-DCPD_B_OUT16 +120.51 +141.52
Power at viewport A 504 uW (almost as expected 40m/17040)
Power at viewport B 385 uW
AP table AS beam clipping: We also noticed clipping in the AS beam in AP table which we removed by moving SR2 and AS1 in YAW and then used AS4 to keep the BHD AS beam centered in the BHD DCPDs.
BHD fringe: After overlaping the LO and AS beams, we saw diagonal fringes indicating beam tilt of LO wrt AS, so we tried to remove the AS beam tilt using AS1 and AS4 but failed to do so because the AS4 mirror seemed to completely distort the beam, so intead we decided to use SR2 and AS1 to remove the tilt between LO and AS beams, which realized BHD fringe. But the motion of SR2 and AS1 then moved the AS beam that it is no longer seen in AP table. The alignment to realize LO and AP AS beam without clipping, and that to realize BHD fringe are attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|