40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Tue Jul 19 18:41:42 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, Contrast measurements for Michelson and ITM-LO
|
Wed Jul 20 18:07:52 2022, Paco, Update, BHD, BHD MICH test
|
Tue Jul 26 20:54:08 2022, Paco, Update, BHD, BHD MICH test - LO phase control
|
Wed Jul 27 18:30:50 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, LO beam power at BHD DCPDs is significantly lower than expected 
|
Thu Jul 28 14:34:40 2022, Yehonathan, Update, BHD, LO beam power at BHD DCPDs is significantly lower than expected
|
Thu Jul 28 16:51:55 2022, Tega, Update, BHD, Shaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs 
|
Thu Jul 28 20:16:26 2022, Anchal, Update, BHD, Shaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs
|
Fri Jul 29 18:24:53 2022, Tega, Update, BHD, LO beam power improved by factor of 6 after LO and AS beam alignment   
|
Wed Aug 3 16:00:51 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe aligned with reduced LO and AS beam clipping
|
Tue Aug 9 15:33:12 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast improved from 43% to 74%   
|
Tue Aug 9 15:50:22 2022, Koji, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast improved from 43% to 74%
|
Wed Nov 16 15:09:08 2022, yuta, Update, BHD, BHD fringe contrast measured with unwhitening filters
|
Tue Oct 25 08:25:00 2022, JC, Update, BHD, BHD fringe aligned with reduced LO and AS beam clipping
|
Thu Nov 17 11:24:39 2022, JC, HowTo, LSC, Locking MICH
|
Tue Nov 29 11:38:37 2022, JC, HowTo, LSC, Lock Single Arm After MICH lock
|
|
Message ID: 17045
Entry time: Thu Jul 28 20:16:26 2022
In reply to: 17044
|
Author: |
Anchal |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
BHD |
Subject: |
Shaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs |
|
|
Some insights from the inside vacuum situation:
- The beam is an incident near normal on PR2 close to the center of the optic. It wasn't hard to align this part, I'm very confident that we aligned it to the center of PR2. So I do not think the LO beam is ghost beam from PR2.
- The place that is most susceptible to clipping is POP_SM5 mirror in front of LO1. The LO beam has little clearance from the edge of the mirror.
- Another possibility of clipping in LO beam is through the cage of LO2. LO2 is a 45-degree incidence mirror, so it is possible we are clipping off the cage or seeing a ghost beam mixed in LO beam here.
- The fact that moving PR2 is affecting LO beam is weird but doesn't necessarily mean it is a ghost from PR2.
|