40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Mar 8 12:01:02 2021, Paco, Anchal, Summary, training, Investigate how-to XARM locking
|
Mon Mar 8 12:40:35 2021, gautam, Summary, training, Investigate how-to XARM locking
|
Mon Mar 8 19:22:56 2021, rana, Summary, SUS, IMC suspension characterization
|
Thu Mar 11 08:13:24 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC First Free Swing Test failed due to typo, restarting now
|
Tue Mar 16 19:13:09 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, First success in Input Matric Diagonalization 
|
Wed Mar 17 11:57:54 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Tested New Input Matrix for MC1 
|
Wed Mar 17 16:30:46 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Normalized Input Matrices plotted better than SURF students 
|
Thu Mar 18 09:18:49 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Testing of new input matrices with new data 
|
Thu Mar 18 12:46:53 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Testing of new input matrices with new data
|
Fri Mar 19 10:49:44 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance
|
Mon Mar 22 11:57:21 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance 
|
Mon Mar 22 15:10:00 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance
|
Mon Mar 22 19:07:50 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance 8x
|
Tue Mar 23 09:16:42 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, Computers, Power cycled C1PSL; restored C1PSL 
|
Wed Mar 24 09:23:49 2021, Paco, Update, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix
|
Thu Mar 25 11:46:31 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates   
|
Thu Mar 25 15:31:24 2021, gautam, Update, IOO, WFS servos
|
Fri Mar 26 11:54:37 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Mon Mar 29 10:44:51 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates 
|
Mon Mar 29 17:11:54 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Mon Mar 29 17:34:52 2021, rana, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Wed Mar 31 22:58:32 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test
|
Thu Apr 1 13:56:49 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results  
|
Thu Apr 1 18:01:06 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results Success??  
|
Thu Apr 1 18:48:45 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results Success??
|
Thu Apr 1 21:13:54 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Matrix results, new measurement set to trigger
|
Fri Apr 2 14:51:20 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Bug found, need to redo the balancing
|
Tue Apr 6 18:46:36 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Updates on recent efforts
|
Wed Apr 7 17:38:51 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying to uncouple only PIT and YAW first    
|
Thu Apr 8 17:04:43 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, First Successful Coil Balancing  
|
Fri Apr 9 13:13:00 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing 
|
Fri Apr 9 17:41:12 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing
|
Mon Apr 12 10:07:35 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, What's F2A??
|
Tue Apr 13 09:51:22 2021, rana, Update, SUS, What's F2A??
|
Wed Apr 14 17:53:38 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Plan for calculating filter banks for output matrix aka F2A aka F2P
|
Thu Apr 15 11:41:43 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Proposed filters for output matrix aka F2A aka F2P
|
Fri Apr 16 11:36:36 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix    
|
Fri Apr 16 15:47:58 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix
|
Mon Apr 19 12:18:19 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix  
|
Tue Apr 20 10:52:49 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, AC gain coil output balancing for IMC   
|
Tue Apr 20 18:19:30 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 coil balanced at DC  
|
Wed Apr 21 11:38:27 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Damping Gains Optimized 
|
Wed Apr 21 15:50:01 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Wed Apr 21 18:49:29 2021, rana, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Thu Apr 22 08:50:21 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Mon Apr 26 18:55:39 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 F2A Filters Tested  
|
Tue Apr 27 10:05:28 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC1 and MC3 F2A Filters Tested   
|
Wed Apr 28 10:56:10 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, IMC Filters diagnosed 7x
|
Wed Apr 28 17:09:11 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Tuned Suspension Parameters uploaded for long term behavior monitoring
|
Thu Apr 29 10:52:56 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Trans QPD and WFS loops step response test 
|
Thu Apr 29 18:53:33 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Suspension Damping Gains Test  
|
Mon May 3 16:24:14 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Suspension Damping Gains Test Repeated with IMC unlocked  
|
Wed May 5 09:04:47 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, New IMC Suspension Damping Gains uploaded for long term testing
|
Wed May 12 11:45:13 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, New IMC Settings are miserable  
|
Wed Jun 2 09:43:30 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, IMC Settings characterization   
|
Wed Jun 2 16:20:59 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, IMC Suspension gains reverted to old values
|
Sat May 15 14:54:24 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, IMC settings reverted
|
Thu May 20 10:35:57 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC settings reverted
|
Thu Apr 22 12:17:23 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC1 and MC3 Suspension Optimization Summary
|
Thu Apr 22 14:22:39 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Thu Apr 22 15:36:54 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Thu Apr 22 17:04:17 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Sat Apr 10 10:07:47 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing
|
Fri Apr 2 15:22:54 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Matrix results, new measurement set to trigger
|
Sun Mar 28 14:16:25 2021, Anchal, Summary, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix not providing stable loop
|
Mon Mar 29 17:07:17 2021, gautam, Summary, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix not providing stable loop
|
Thu Mar 18 13:12:39 2021, gautam, Update, Computer Scripts / Programs, Omnigraffle vs draw.io
|
|
Message ID: 16094
Entry time: Thu Apr 29 10:52:56 2021
In reply to: 16089
Reply to this: 16102
|
Author: |
Anchal |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
SUS |
Subject: |
IMC Trans QPD and WFS loops step response test |
|
|
In 16087 we mentioned that we were unable to do a step response test for WFS loop to get an estimate of their UGF. The primary issue there was that we were not putting the step at the right place. It should go into the actuator directly, in this case, on C1:SUS-MC2_PIT_COMM and C1:SUS-MC2_YAW_COMM. These channels directly set an offset in the control loop and we can see how the error signals first jump up and then decay back to zero. The 'half-time' of this decay would be the inverse of the estimated UGF of the loop. For this test, the overall WFS loops gain, C1:IOO-WFS_GAIN was set to full value 1. This test is performed in the changed settings uploaded in 16091.
I did this test twice, once giving a step in PIT and once in YAW.
Attachment 1 is the striptool screenshot for when PIT was given a step up and then step down by 0.01.
- Here we can see that the half-time is roughly 10s for TRANS_PIT and WFS1_PIT corresponding to roughly 0.1 Hz UGF.
- Note that WFS2 channels were not disturbed significantly.
- You can also notice that third most significant disturbance was to TRANS_YAW actually followed by WF1 YAW.
Attachment 2 is the striptool screenshot when YAW was given a step up and down by 0.01. Note the difference in x-scale in this plot.
- Here, TRANS YAW got there greatest hit and it took it around 2 minutes to decay to half value. This gives UGF estimate of about 10 mHz!
- Then, weirdly, TRANS PIT first went slowly up for about a minutes and then slowly came dome in a half time of 2 minutes again. Why was PIT signal so much disturbed by the YAW offset in the first place?
- Next, WFS1 YAW can be seen decaying relatively fast with half-life of about 20s or so.
- Nothing else was disturbed much.
- So maybe we never needed to reduce WFS gain in our measurement in 16089 as the UGF everywhere were already very low.
- What other interesting things can we infer from this?
- Should I sometime repeat this test with steps given to MC1 or MC3 optics?
|
|
|
|
|