40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Mar 8 12:01:02 2021, Paco, Anchal, Summary, training, Investigate how-to XARM locking
|
Mon Mar 8 12:40:35 2021, gautam, Summary, training, Investigate how-to XARM locking
|
Mon Mar 8 19:22:56 2021, rana, Summary, SUS, IMC suspension characterization
|
Thu Mar 11 08:13:24 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC First Free Swing Test failed due to typo, restarting now
|
Tue Mar 16 19:13:09 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, First success in Input Matric Diagonalization 
|
Wed Mar 17 11:57:54 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Tested New Input Matrix for MC1 
|
Wed Mar 17 16:30:46 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Normalized Input Matrices plotted better than SURF students 
|
Thu Mar 18 09:18:49 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Testing of new input matrices with new data 
|
Thu Mar 18 12:46:53 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Testing of new input matrices with new data
|
Fri Mar 19 10:49:44 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance
|
Mon Mar 22 11:57:21 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance 
|
Mon Mar 22 15:10:00 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance
|
Mon Mar 22 19:07:50 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying coil actuation balance 8x
|
Tue Mar 23 09:16:42 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, Computers, Power cycled C1PSL; restored C1PSL 
|
Wed Mar 24 09:23:49 2021, Paco, Update, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix
|
Thu Mar 25 11:46:31 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates   
|
Thu Mar 25 15:31:24 2021, gautam, Update, IOO, WFS servos
|
Fri Mar 26 11:54:37 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Mon Mar 29 10:44:51 2021, Paco, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates 
|
Mon Mar 29 17:11:54 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Mon Mar 29 17:34:52 2021, rana, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing updates
|
Wed Mar 31 22:58:32 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test
|
Thu Apr 1 13:56:49 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results  
|
Thu Apr 1 18:01:06 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results Success??  
|
Thu Apr 1 18:48:45 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, MC2 Coil Balancing Test Results Success??
|
Thu Apr 1 21:13:54 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Matrix results, new measurement set to trigger
|
Fri Apr 2 14:51:20 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Bug found, need to redo the balancing
|
Tue Apr 6 18:46:36 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Updates on recent efforts
|
Wed Apr 7 17:38:51 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Trying to uncouple only PIT and YAW first    
|
Thu Apr 8 17:04:43 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, First Successful Coil Balancing  
|
Fri Apr 9 13:13:00 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing 
|
Fri Apr 9 17:41:12 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing
|
Mon Apr 12 10:07:35 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, What's F2A??
|
Tue Apr 13 09:51:22 2021, rana, Update, SUS, What's F2A??
|
Wed Apr 14 17:53:38 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Plan for calculating filter banks for output matrix aka F2A aka F2P
|
Thu Apr 15 11:41:43 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Proposed filters for output matrix aka F2A aka F2P
|
Fri Apr 16 11:36:36 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix    
|
Fri Apr 16 15:47:58 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix
|
Mon Apr 19 12:18:19 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, Tested proposed filters for POS colum in MC2 output matrix  
|
Tue Apr 20 10:52:49 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, AC gain coil output balancing for IMC   
|
Tue Apr 20 18:19:30 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 coil balanced at DC  
|
Wed Apr 21 11:38:27 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Damping Gains Optimized 
|
Wed Apr 21 15:50:01 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Wed Apr 21 18:49:29 2021, rana, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Thu Apr 22 08:50:21 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, MC2 Suspension Optimization summary
|
Mon Apr 26 18:55:39 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC2 F2A Filters Tested  
|
Tue Apr 27 10:05:28 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC1 and MC3 F2A Filters Tested   
|
Wed Apr 28 10:56:10 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, IMC Filters diagnosed 7x
|
Wed Apr 28 17:09:11 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Tuned Suspension Parameters uploaded for long term behavior monitoring
|
Thu Apr 29 10:52:56 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Trans QPD and WFS loops step response test 
|
Thu Apr 29 18:53:33 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Suspension Damping Gains Test  
|
Mon May 3 16:24:14 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC Suspension Damping Gains Test Repeated with IMC unlocked  
|
Wed May 5 09:04:47 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, New IMC Suspension Damping Gains uploaded for long term testing
|
Wed May 12 11:45:13 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, New IMC Settings are miserable  
|
Wed Jun 2 09:43:30 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, IMC Settings characterization   
|
Wed Jun 2 16:20:59 2021, Anchal, Paco, Summary, SUS, IMC Suspension gains reverted to old values
|
Sat May 15 14:54:24 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, IMC settings reverted
|
Thu May 20 10:35:57 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, IMC settings reverted
|
Thu Apr 22 12:17:23 2021, Anchal, Paco, Update, SUS, MC1 and MC3 Suspension Optimization Summary
|
Thu Apr 22 14:22:39 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Thu Apr 22 15:36:54 2021, Anchal, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Thu Apr 22 17:04:17 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Settings restored
|
Sat Apr 10 10:07:47 2021, rana, Update, SUS, Faster coil balancing
|
Fri Apr 2 15:22:54 2021, gautam, Update, SUS, Matrix results, new measurement set to trigger
|
Sun Mar 28 14:16:25 2021, Anchal, Summary, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix not providing stable loop
|
Mon Mar 29 17:07:17 2021, gautam, Summary, SUS, MC3 new Input Matrix not providing stable loop
|
Thu Mar 18 13:12:39 2021, gautam, Update, Computer Scripts / Programs, Omnigraffle vs draw.io
|
|
Message ID: 16031
Entry time: Wed Apr 14 17:53:38 2021
In reply to: 16020
Reply to this: 16035
|
Author: |
Anchal |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
SUS |
Subject: |
Plan for calculating filter banks for output matrix aka F2A aka F2P |
|
|
Plan of action
- Get the transfer functions of the suspension plant from actuated DOF to sensed DOF. We'll verify Bhavini's state-space model and get these transfer functions. Use the model TFs, not measured.
- For each of POS->POS, PIT->PIT, and YAW->YAW, we'll get the resonant frequency and Q of the resonance from these models. No, forget about the Q.
- We can correct the resonant frequencies from the measured ones in our free swinging data.
- Now, we'll repeat the following for each column of output matrix filters (inspired from scripts/SUS/F2Pcalc.py, but not fully understood how/why):
- Select col (eg. POS)
- Set f0 to the resonant frequency.
- Calculate
where GUL is the corrected DC gain we got after output matrix optimization earlier. (Not sure how, why?). No, use the SS model.
- Calculate fUR, fLL, and fLR like above.
Set (This just seems like a way of keeping some approximately low Q, ideally we should keep this same to what we got above but that might cause saturation issues like Rana mentioned in the meeting)
- Then, set the following filter in the output matrix element for UL:

which is in zpk form equivalent to:

- Repeat the above for UR, LL, LR.
- Note that this filter function takes values GUL
at DC and at high frequencies while it would dip at the resonant frequency for POS with depth and narrowness directly proportional to QUL. No, the DC gain is different from the AC gain.
- However, the F2P filter plots we found in several places on elog look a bit different. Like here: 40m/4719. One important difference is that the filter magnitude always become 1 after the resonance at higher frequencies. Yes, this is what we want, since you already did the balancing at high frequencies.
- A preliminary plot of the above calculation for the 1,1 output matrix filter bank (POS -> UL) is attached in Attachment 1.
Discussion:
- We can make 12 such filters for the 12 numbers we got for the optimized output matrix. Is that the aim or should we do it only for the POS column as has been done in past?
- We are not sure how the choice of Q is made in setting the above filter function. We'll think more about it to understand this.
- We are also not sure how the choice of fUL is made above. It looks like depending on the correction gain, we want to slide the zero positions with respect to the pole positions which are fixed at the resonant frequency as expected. This seems to have some complex explanation.
- Please let us know if we are planning this right before we dive into these calculations/script writing. Thanks.
Edit Thu Apr 15 08:32:58 2021 :
Comments are from Rana.
Corrected the plot in the attachment. It shows the correct behavior at high frequencies now. |
|
|