40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Thu Jan 4 12:46:27 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay 
|
Thu Jan 11 14:22:40 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Thu Jan 11 20:51:20 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Tue Jan 16 21:50:53 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Thu Jan 18 00:35:00 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay 
|
Fri Jan 19 11:34:21 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Fri Jan 19 23:04:11 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Wed Jan 24 00:33:31 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Wed Jan 24 10:45:14 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Thu Jan 25 23:59:14 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Fri Jan 26 20:03:09 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Wed Jan 31 15:45:22 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
Wed Jan 31 16:29:42 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Modulation depths 
|
Wed Jan 31 16:33:53 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ALS electronics at LSC rack
|
Wed Jan 31 22:32:11 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ALS signal chain + power budget 
|
Thu Feb 1 01:24:56 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 revamp underway
|
Fri Feb 2 00:26:34 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 revamp underway
|
Fri Feb 2 13:16:55 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ALS signals whitening switching 
|
Mon Feb 5 14:11:01 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Huge harmonics in ALS channels 
|
Mon Feb 5 22:57:28 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Huge harmonics in ALS channels
|
Tue Feb 6 11:13:26 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Possible source of ground loop identified
|
Tue Feb 6 22:55:51 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Possible source of ground loop identified
|
Thu Feb 8 00:33:20 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D990694 characterization / THD measurement plan
|
Thu Feb 8 01:27:16 2018, Koji, Update, ALS, D990694 characterization / THD measurement plan
|
Fri Feb 9 13:37:44 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, THD measurement trial
|
Thu Feb 8 12:00:09 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D990694 is NOT differential receiving
|
Thu Feb 8 13:13:14 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D990694 pulled out  
|
Thu Feb 8 18:10:36 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D990694 pulled out
|
Wed Feb 7 15:51:15 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 revamp complete
|
Fri Feb 16 01:34:40 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 in-situ testing 
|
Tue Feb 20 23:08:27 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 in-situ testing
|
Thu Feb 22 00:09:11 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, D0902745 in-situ testing  
|
Sun Feb 25 00:03:12 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Daughter board prototyping    
|
Mon Feb 26 20:55:56 2018, rana, Update, ALS, Daughter board prototyping
|
Tue Feb 27 21:10:45 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Daughter board testing  
|
Wed Feb 28 19:13:25 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ADC test for differential receiving in c1lsc
|
Fri Mar 2 01:45:06 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, new look ALS electronics
|
Mon Mar 5 17:27:34 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, new look ALS electronics - characterization
|
Thu Mar 8 00:40:25 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, new look ALS electronics - characterization
|
Thu Mar 8 19:38:37 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, digital unwhitening of daughter board
|
Thu Mar 8 23:50:27 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, First look at new ALS electronics
|
Fri Mar 9 01:07:01 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, First look at new ALS electronics
|
Mon Mar 12 22:08:31 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Noisy POX
|
Mon Mar 12 23:57:31 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Noisy POX 
|
Mon Mar 19 15:02:29 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Noisy MC sensing
|
Thu Feb 1 15:31:12 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ALS signal chain + power budget
|
Wed Feb 7 10:16:26 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, ALS signal chain + power budget
|
Thu Jan 25 13:18:41 2018, gautam, Update, ALS, Fiber ALS assay
|
|
Message ID: 13655
Entry time: Sun Feb 25 00:03:12 2018
In reply to: 13648
Reply to this: 13657
|
Author: |
gautam |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
ALS |
Subject: |
Daughter board prototyping |
|
|
Using one of the prototype PCB boards given to me by Johannes, I put together v1 of this board and tested it.
Attachment #1 - Schematic with stages grouped by function and labelled.
Attachment #2 - Measured vs modelled Transfer function.
Attachment #3 - Measured vs modelled noise. Measurement shown only between positive output and ground, the other port is basically the same. I will update this attachment to reflect the expected signal level in comparison to the noise, but suffice it to say that given the measured input referred noise, we will have plenty of SNR between 0.1Hz and 10kHz. The single stage of whitening should also be sufficient to amplify the signal above ADC noise in the same frequency band
Attachment #4 - Positive output as viewed on a fast (300 MHz) scope using a Tektronix x1 voltage probe.
Attachment #5 - Daughter board noise with measured ALS noise overlaid (the gain of x10 on the existing audio pre-amp has been divided out).
Comments:
- I may have overlooked the GBW of the OP27 in the design - specifically, the negative feedback is wired for gain x100 at high frequencies, and so the input signal should be filtered above 8MHz/100 ~80kHz. But the LC poles are at ~500kHz. I wonder if the small deviation seen between modelled and masured TFs is reflecting this. Practically, the easier fix is to add a feedback capacitor that rolls off the gain at high frequencies. 300pF WIMA should do the trick, and we have these in stock.
I don't understand why the modelled response starts to roll off around 5kHz, even though the poles of the LC filter at the input stage are at 500kHz. This happens because at low frequencies, the 1.5uH inductor is basically a short - so the RC divider at the input of the Op27 has a pole at 1/2/pi/R/C ~5kHz for R=499, C = 68nF.
- I am not sure what to make of the peaky comb seen in Attachment #3, but I'm pretty sure it's electronic pickup from something. The GPIB adapter power suppy is not to blame. The peaks are 10 Hz spaced.
- From Attachment #4, I don't suspect any opamp oscillations given that the signal seen is tiny, but I don't know what amplitude is characteristic of an oscillating op amp, so I am not entirely confident about this conclusion.
- Initially while thinking about the design, I was trying to think of making the design generic enough that we could use these signals for high-bandwidth ALS control (a.k.a. Fast ALS) but in the current incarnation, no consideration was given to minimizing phase lag at high frequencies.
- Putting the PCB board together was more painful than I imagined as the board is configured for 4 single op amps whereas my design requires 5 - so I needed to do some trace cutting surgery. Rather than make 3 more of these, I'm just going to finish the characterization, and if the design looks good, we can get some custom PCBs printed.
- Power decoupling caps (47nF) are added to all op amp power pins, but is not shown in the schematic.
Given the overall good agreement between model and measurement, I am going to test this with the actual RF beat. For this test, we will need a differential receiving AA board to interface the output of the daughter board with the ADC input.
Quote: |
Next step is to actually make a prototype of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|