40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
CAML
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Wed Sep 20 16:14:17 2017, gautam, Update, Equipment loan, Impedance test kit borrowed from Downs
|
Thu Sep 21 01:32:00 2017, gautam, Update, ALS, AUX X Innolight AM measurement running   
|
Thu Sep 21 01:55:16 2017, rana, Update, ALS, X End table of Shame   
|
Thu Sep 21 15:23:04 2017, gautam, Omnistructure, ALS, Long cable from LSC->IOO
|
Fri Sep 29 11:16:52 2017, Steve, Update, ALS, Y End table corrected
|
Fri Oct 6 17:08:09 2017, Steve, Update, ALS, X End table beam traps corrected   
|
Sun Sep 24 20:47:15 2017, rana, Update, Computer Scripts / Programs, RF TF Uncertainties 
|
Wed Sep 27 00:20:19 2017, gautam, Update, ALS, More AM sweeps   
|
Wed Sep 27 23:44:45 2017, gautam, Update, ALS, Proposed PM measurement setup
|
|
Message ID: 13329
Entry time: Sun Sep 24 20:47:15 2017
In reply to: 13325
Reply to this: 13335
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
Computer Scripts / Programs |
Subject: |
RF TF Uncertainties |
|
|
I have made several changes to Craig's script for better pythonism. Its more robust with different libraries and syntaxes and makes a tarball by default (w/o a command line flag). These kinds of general util scripts will be going into a general use folder in the git.ligo.org/40m/ team area so that it can be used throughout the LSC.
I don't think we need/want a coherence calculation, so I have not included it. Usually, we use coherence to estimate the uncertainty, and here we are just plotting it directly from the dist of the sweeps so coherence seems superfluous. |
|
|