40m
QIL
Cryo_Lab
CTN
SUS_Lab
TCS_Lab
OMC_Lab
CRIME_Lab
FEA
ENG_Labs
OptContFac
Mariner
WBEEShop
|
40m Log |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Mon Mar 27 20:41:21 2017, rana, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration  
|
Wed Mar 29 11:41:19 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration  
|
Thu Mar 30 00:16:09 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration
|
Mon Apr 3 17:25:13 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration 
|
Tue Apr 4 17:27:58 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PSL NPRO PZT calibration
|
Thu Mar 30 18:11:01 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration
|
Mon Apr 3 23:07:09 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC DAQ assay for feed-forward integration
|
Tue Apr 11 00:38:37 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC demod moved off servo board
|
Wed Apr 12 00:36:53 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC demod moved off servo board 
|
Tue Apr 18 01:01:03 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated 
|
Tue Apr 18 16:10:00 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated
|
Tue Apr 18 23:37:15 2017, rana, Update, PSL, PMC OLTF measured, DAQ channels calibrated
|
Wed Apr 19 15:13:30 2017, gautam, Update, PSL, PMC/MCL multicoherence
|
|
Message ID: 12928
Entry time: Tue Apr 4 17:27:58 2017
In reply to: 12925
|
Author: |
rana |
Type: |
Update |
Category: |
PSL |
Subject: |
PSL NPRO PZT calibration |
|
|
good cal. I wonder if this data also gives us a good measurement of the cavity pole or if the photo-thermal self-locking effect ruins it. You should look at the data for the positive sweeps and negative sweeps and see if they give the same answer for the cavity poles. Also, maybe we can estimate the PMC cavity pole using the sidebands as well as the carrier and see if they give the same answer? |