40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Mon Dec 19 22:05:09 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, PMC, IMC aligned. The ringdown PD/Lens removed. 
    Reply  Wed Dec 21 21:03:06 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning DSC_0142.JPG
       Reply  Thu Dec 22 18:39:09 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning WFS_error_noise.pdfWFS_error_noise_chans.pdf
          Reply  Fri Dec 23 20:53:44 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning DSC_0144.JPGDSC_0145.JPG
             Reply  Fri Dec 23 21:05:56 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning IMC_WFS_segment_TF.pdfIMC_WFS_channels_TF.pdfIMC_WFS_161221_table1.pdfIMC_WFS_161221_table2.pdfIMC_WFS_161221.xlsx.zip
                Reply  Sun Dec 25 14:39:59 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning 
                   Reply  Mon Dec 26 12:45:31 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning IMC_REFL_TRANS_26hrs.pngIMC_TRANS_P_Y_26hrs.png
          Reply  Thu Dec 29 13:22:21 2016, rana, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning 
             Reply  Thu Dec 29 16:52:51 2016, Koji, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning 
                Reply  Thu Dec 29 21:35:30 2016, rana, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS tuning Screen_Shot_2017-01-03_at_5.55.13_PM.png
                   Reply  Tue Jan 24 01:04:16 2017, gautam, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS RF power levels MC1_misalignment.png
                      Reply  Fri Jan 27 00:14:02 2017, gautam, Summary, IOO, IMC WFS RF power levels 
Message ID: 12684     Entry time: Fri Dec 23 21:05:56 2016     In reply to: 12683     Reply to this: 12685
Author: Koji 
Type: Summary 
Category: IOO 
Subject: IMC WFS tuning 

Signal transfer function measurements

C1:SUS-MC*_ASCPIT_EXC channels were excited for swept sine measurements.

The TFs to WFS1-I1~4, Q1~4, WFS1/2_PIT/YAW, MC2TRANS_PIT/YAW signals were recorded.

The MC1 and MC3 actuation seems to have ~30Hz elliptic LPF somewhere in the electronics chain.
This effect was compensated by subtracting the approximated time delay of 0.022sec.

The TFs were devided by freq^2 to make the response flat and averaged between 7Hz to 15Hz.
The results have been summarized in Attachment 3&4.

Attachment 4 has the signal sensing matrix. Note that this matrix was measured with the input gain of 0.1.

Input matrix for diagonalizing the actuation/sensor response

Pitch

\begin{pmatrix} -1.58983 & -0.901533 & -5592.53 \\ 0.961632 & -0.569662 & 1715.12 \\ 0.424609 & 1.60783 & -5157.38 \end{pmatrix}

e.g. To produce pure WFS1P reaction, => -1.59 MC1P + 0.962 MC2P + 0.425 MC3P

Yaw

\begin{pmatrix} 1.461 & -0.895191 & -4647.9 \\ 0.0797164 & 0.0127339 & -1684.11 \\ 0.223054 & -1.31518 & -4101.14 \end{pmatrix}

Attachment 1: IMC_WFS_segment_TF.pdf  1.550 MB  | Hide | Hide all
IMC_WFS_segment_TF.pdf
Attachment 2: IMC_WFS_channels_TF.pdf  867 kB  | Hide | Hide all
IMC_WFS_channels_TF.pdf
Attachment 3: IMC_WFS_161221_table1.pdf  35 kB  | Hide | Hide all
IMC_WFS_161221_table1.pdf
Attachment 4: IMC_WFS_161221_table2.pdf  21 kB  | Hide | Hide all
IMC_WFS_161221_table2.pdf
Attachment 5: IMC_WFS_161221.xlsx.zip  72 kB
ELOG V3.1.3-