40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Wed Dec 3 20:10:09 2008, Jenne, Rana, Update, PEM, Comparing Wiener subtraction with different seismometers Dec032008_c1wino_seisCombos.png
    Reply  Wed Dec 3 20:36:07 2008, Jenne, Rana, Update, PEM, Comparing Wiener subtraction with different seismometers d.pdfsco.pngfly.pdf
Message ID: 1172     Entry time: Wed Dec 3 20:10:09 2008     Reply to this: 1173
Author: Jenne, Rana 
Type: Update 
Category: PEM 
Subject: Comparing Wiener subtraction with different seismometers 
Attached is a plot of MC_L, and then the residual MC_L after static Wiener filtering, using different combinations of our accelerometers and seismometers.

This is the same type of plot that Rana has included in the past few weeks, using Wiener filters calculated with c1wino.m

This data is from GPS 912312914, duration = 7200 sec, sometime during the night last night.

Unfortunately, it doesn't look like adding the Guralp seismometer to the Accelerometers and the Ranger did much, especially at low frequencies (all sensors = black curve). We'll have to investigate why this is true, and what we can do to get some low-frequency subtraction going on.

In the legend, "Residuals Accels, Guralp, Ranger" implies that the residual has been calculated using all of the sensors listed.
Attachment 1: Dec032008_c1wino_seisCombos.png  27 kB  | Hide | Hide all
Dec032008_c1wino_seisCombos.png
ELOG V3.1.3-