40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  TCS elog, Page 3 of 5  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Typedown Category Subject
  216   Thu Jul 12 18:48:21 2018 Aria ChaderjianLaserGeneralJuly 12, 2018

The beam reflecting off the test mirror was clipping the lens between gold mirror and test mirror, so I reconfigured some of the optics, unfortunately resulting in a larger angle of incidence.

From the test mirror, the beam size increases much too rapidly to fit onto the 2-inch diameter lens with f=8 that was meant to resize the beam for the CCD of the HWS. It seems that the f=8 lens can go about 6 inches from the test mirror, and an f ~ 2.3 (60 mm) lens can go about 2 inches in front of the CCD to give the appropriate beam size. However, the image doesn't seem very sharp.

The beam is also not hitting the CCD currently because of the increase in angle of incidence on the test mirror and limitations of the box. I'd like to move the HWS closer to the SLED (and will then have to move the SLED as well).

  217   Fri Jul 13 16:42:50 2018 Aria ChaderjianLaserGeneralJuly 13, 2018

The table is set up. The HWS and SLED were moved slightly, and a minimal angle between the test mirror and HWS was achieved.

There are two possible locations for the f=60mm lens that will achieve appropriate magnification onto the HWS: 64cm or 50 cm from the f=200mm lens. 

At 64cm away, approximately 79000 saturated pixels and 1054 average value.

At 50cm away, approximately 22010 saturated pixels and 1076 average value.

Currently the setup is at 64cm. Could afford to be more magnified, so might want to move the f=60mm lens around. Also, if we're going to need to be able to access the HWS (i.e. to screw on the array) we might want to move to the 50cm location.

  218   Mon Jul 23 10:04:19 2018 Aria ChaderjianLaserGeneralJuly 20, 2018

With Jon's help, I changed the setup to include a mode-matching telescope built from the f=60mm (1 inch diameter) lens and the f=100mm lens. These lenses are located after the last gold mirror and before the test optic. The height of the beam was also adjusted so that it is more centered on these lenses. Note: these two lenses cannot be much further apart from each other than they currently are, or the beam will be too large for the f=100mm lens.

We considered different possible mounts to use for the test optic, and decided to move it to a mount where there is less contact. The test optic was also moved closer to the HWS to achieve appropriate beamsize on the optic coming from the mode-matching telescope.

The f=200 lens is now approximately 2/3 of the distane from the test optic to the HWS, resulting in an appropriately sized beam at the HWS.

Current was also turned down to achieve 0 saturated pixels.

Attachment 1: 37767216_2077953269190954_5080703241788850176_n.jpg
37767216_2077953269190954_5080703241788850176_n.jpg
  219   Tue Jul 24 16:52:44 2018 Aria ChaderjianLaserGeneralJuly 23, 2018 and July 24, 2018

Attached the grid array of the HWS.

Applied voltage (5V, 7V, 9.9V, 14V) to the heater pad and took measurements of T and spherical power (aka defocus).

The adhesive of the temperature sensor isn't very sticky. The first time I did it it peeled off. (Second time partially peeled off). We want to put it on the side of Al if possible.

Bonded a mirror (thickness ~6 mm) to aluminum disk (thickness ~5 mm) and it's still curing.

  220   Fri Aug 3 15:46:12 2018 Aria ChaderjianLaserGeneralAugust 3, 2018

To the best of my ability, calculated the magnification of the plane of the test optic relative to the HWS (2.3) and input this value.

Increased the temperature slightly and saved data points of defocus to txt files when temperature leveled out. This was a slow process, as it takes a while for things to level out. I only got up to about 28.5C, and will need to continue this process.

I also plotted the best-fit defocus for each temperature from COMSOL (Temperature vs. Defocus), and looking at values from HWS it seems that we're off by a normalization factor of approx. 4.

  113   Thu Feb 24 14:23:58 2011 AidanLab InfrastructureHartmann sensorHartmann Sensor box cut down to size

 I reduced the height of the Hartmann sensor box. This is what it looks like now:

 

Attachment 1: P1000109.jpg
P1000109.jpg
Attachment 2: P1000110.jpg
P1000110.jpg
Attachment 3: P1000111.jpg
P1000111.jpg
Attachment 4: P1000113.jpg
P1000113.jpg
  126   Fri Mar 11 13:11:33 2011 AidanLab InfrastructureDelivery NoteMore Bosch connectors have arrived

 See attached delivery note ...

Attachment 1: Packing_List_05.pdf
Packing_List_05.pdf
  127   Wed Mar 16 15:05:47 2011 AidanLab InfrastructureDelivery NoteMore Bosch equipment has arrived

30mm T-junctions, grounding straps and T-slot covers have arrived

Quote:

 See attached delivery note ...

 

Attachment 1: Packing_List_06.pdf
Packing_List_06.pdf Packing_List_06.pdf Packing_List_06.pdf
  143   Thu Apr 28 22:48:47 2011 AidanLab InfrastructureElectronicsBNC Cables from HWS table to rack

 I labelled and strung 8 of the 16 custom 40' BNC cables from L-Com between the HWS table and the BNC feed-through on the rack. Each cable is labelled HWS TABLE CHxx where 01<= xx <= 08. I'm going to leave the other 8 until we have room in the BNC feedthrough on the rack.

  190   Wed Oct 11 20:19:06 2017 Jon RichardsonLab InfrastructureHartmann sensorInitial Characterization of the SRM Adaptive Wavefront Control

Today I made the first characterization measurements of the mocked-up adaptive wavefront control system planned for the signal recycling mirrors.

The Setup

Inside the light-tight enclosure on the center table, I've assembled and aligned a 10.2 micron CO2 projector which provides a heating beam of up to 150 mW incident on an SRM-like test optic. A co-aligned 633 nm probe beam and Hartmann wavefront sensor are used to measure the resulting thermal lens. I've written and installed new software on the machine hws (10.0.1.167) for viewing the wavefront distortion in real time, as shown in the below screenshot. This viewer is launched from the terminal via the command $stream_gradient_CIT

Screenshot of a thermal lens forming on the test optic, as viewed from the real-time software.
To the right is the induced optical path difference across the surface of the test optic, and to the left is its gradient.  

There is also a second utility program for displaying the raw Hartmann sensor CCD image in real time, which is useful for aligning the probe beam. It is launched by the terminal command $stream_intensity_CIT

Initial Thermal Lens Measurements

Lens Formation Time Scale

First, I made a time-resolved measurement of the thermal lens formation on the test optic at maximum heating beam power (150 mW). The lens appears to reach steady-state after 30 s of heating. When the heating beam is turned off, the lens decays on a very similar time scale.

Lens Strength v. Incident Heating Power

Second, I measured the thermal lens strength as a function of incident heating beam power, which I measured via a power meter placed directly in front of the test optic. Below is the approximate maximum optical path difference induced at several heating beam powers.

Incident Power (mW) Maximum Optical Path Difference (nm)
150 +/- 15 35 +/- 5
85 +/- 2 25 +/- 5
50 +/- 4 15 +/- 5
10 +/- 1 5 +/- 5

The above optical path differences are approximate and were read-off from the live display. I recorded Hartmann sensor frame data during all of these measurements and will be analyzing it further.

  191   Fri Oct 13 15:52:41 2017 AidanLab InfrastructureGeneralBroadband mirror BB2-E03 reflectivity at 532nm

I measured the reflectivity of a possible HWS replacement mirror at 532nm. Thorlabs BB2-EO3

Incident power = 1.28mW

Reflected power = 0.73mW

R = 56% at 45 degrees AOI.

 

Attachment 1: IMG_1223.JPG
IMG_1223.JPG
Attachment 2: IMG_1213.JPG
IMG_1213.JPG
  225   Fri Feb 8 10:48:33 2019 AidanLab InfrastructureGeneralWater damage repair work in the TCS Lab

Caltech Facilities has determined that the walls in the SE corner of the TCS Lab in West Bridge were water damaged during last weekend’s rain. They are going to remove the plaster from the walls and dehumidify the area for a week or so. All tables in the room are going to be covered with plastic for this process. In the short term I’ve shutdown all the equipment in the lab (including FB4). The 2-micron cavity-testing fabrication has been moved next door to the QIL.

  226   Fri Apr 12 17:40:58 2019 aaronLab InfrastructureGeneralMeasurements for Bake Station

I drew up one way we could set up the three available bake ovens in the TCS lab on the single oil pump. 

If this looks feasible to others, we can move the ovens into the TCS lab. Duo and I will be occupied at KNI during Tuesday and Monday morning, so the usual lab cleanup time may not be the best. Perhaps Monday afternooon we can at least get the ovens out of the hallway and get one of them set up for baking.

Attachment 1: BakeStation_Page_1.jpg
BakeStation_Page_1.jpg
Attachment 2: BakeStation_Page_2.jpg
BakeStation_Page_2.jpg
  227   Mon Apr 15 08:12:58 2019 aaronLab InfrastructureGeneralMeasurements for Bake Station

My preference is to have tubes back towards the wall where possible. We might be able to drill a large diameter hole in the table top to accommodate them.

We have to get confirmation that the exhaust can be extracted - otherwise this whole thing is moot.

Quote:

I drew up one way we could set up the three available bake ovens in the TCS lab on the single oil pump. 

If this looks feasible to others, we can move the ovens into the TCS lab. Duo and I will be occupied at KNI during Tuesday and Monday morning, so the usual lab cleanup time may not be the best. Perhaps Monday afternooon we can at least get the ovens out of the hallway and get one of them set up for baking.

 

  228   Thu May 23 11:36:49 2019 aguptaLab InfrastructureBorrowedBorrowed Label Maker

I have borrowed TCS's label maker in CTN for few days. If you need it, you can take it from the top of blue cabinets.

  229   Mon Jun 17 20:29:34 2019 JonLab InfrastructureComputingServer rack cleaned up, new workstation installed

In anticipation of the point absorber SURF project, I cleaned up the server rack and installed a new workstation today.

The workstation replaces the old one, whose hard drive had failed, with a more powerful machine. The hostname (tcs-ws), IP address (10.0.1.168), user name (controls), and standard password (written in the secret place) are all the same as before.

I moved the control consol from its old spot in the back corner of the lab to the bench beside the rack. This is a more convenient location because the Hartmann sensor realtime GUIs can now be easily seen from the optical tables. I mounted the HWS machine in the rack as well and reconnected the video multiplexer to all the machines.

I tested the Hartmann sensor Python software and confirmed it to be working. It required a minor bug fix to the realtime gradient field GUI code. It seems that since this script was last run, the input data file type has switched from pickled numpy to HDF5.

Attachment 1: IMG_3419.jpg
IMG_3419.jpg
  230   Tue Jun 18 19:05:16 2019 JonLab InfrastructureGeneralLarge optical table cleared and set up for point absorbers

Aidan and I continued the lab clean-up today. There's still more to do, but we did fully clear the large optical table which formerly housed the 50 W CO2 laser. I moved the optical enclosure over from the small table to serve as the area for the point absorber experiment. Inside it I mounted the Hartmann sensor and a 532 nm Thorlabs LED source. The LED still needs collimating/focusing optics to be installed.

Attachment 1: IMG_3421.jpg
IMG_3421.jpg
  231   Mon Jul 22 09:44:21 2019 JonLab InfrastructureComputingInstalled Amplifying VGA Splitter

The VGA signal outputted by the multiplexer is too weak to drive two monitors. This has required video cables to be manually switched back and forth between the monitor mounted above the laser table and the desktop console.

Today I solved this problem by installing an amplifying (active) VGA splitter on the video output of the multiplexer. One output of the amplifier goes to the desktop monitor and the other to the laser table. We can now monitor the HWS realtime GUIs directly above the optical setup, with no cable swapping.

Attachment 1: IMG_3522.jpg
IMG_3522.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_3421.jpg
IMG_3421.jpg
  233   Mon Jul 22 18:46:23 2019 Edita BytyqiLab Infrastructure Laser-Lens-HWS Setup

Today, I set up a system consisting of the 520 nm laser, a 2'' mirror and two lenses of focal lengths f1 = 40 cm and f2 = 20 cm. The goal was to collimate the beam coming from the laser, so it goes parallel through the test optic at a radius of ~2.5 cm and then focus it to a radius of ~ 1.2 cm to fit the CCD dimensions of the HWS. The mirror was placed about 1 cm close to the laser and the first lens is setup at a distance~f1=40cm from the mirror. The test optic is placed between the two lenses and the second lens is placed about 10 cm from the CCD. The distance between the two lenses isn't important and could change in the future. The lenses and mirrors are all labeled.

I measured the approximate angle of divergence (0.06 rad) of the laser by taking the beam diameter at different positions along the propagation axis. This allowed for the ABCD matrix calculations to be finalized and the focal lengths of the lenses be chosen accordingly. 

In order to have more space in the box, I removed everything that was not necessary to the side.

Attachment 1: 20190722_183933.jpg
20190722_183933.jpg
Attachment 2: 20190722_183928.jpg
20190722_183928.jpg
  234   Wed Jul 24 16:25:13 2019 Edita BytyqiLab InfrastructureOpticsUpdated 2-lens setup

The previous 2-lens setup focused the beam to a tight spot, however due to the divergence angle of the laser beam, a significant amount of power was not being captured by the fiirst lens at a distance of 40 cm from the source. The divergence angle seems to be bigger than 0.06 by a factor of 2, so a f = 20 cm lens was used to collimate the beam and a f = 30 cm lens was used to focus it. A mirror was used to reflect the beam, so we obtain steering control. Additionally, the focusing lens was placed on a small 1-axis stage in order to control the distance of the lens from the CCD, providing control over the focused beam size.

Note: The 30 cm lens was cleaned with methanol, however it still has some residue on the surface. The beam imaged to the Harrtmann Sensor looks good, however the lens will be cleaned by using a different solvent or replaced by a different 30 cm lens. The 3 lenses at the edge of the box will stay inside in order to prevent contamination, however they will not be used in the design.

Attachment 1: 20190724_161926.jpg
20190724_161926.jpg
  236   Mon Jul 29 18:53:16 2019 Edita BytyqiLab InfrastructureOpticsMounted Reflector and Heater

Since we set up the 2-lens system focusing the laser beam to the CCD, the next step was to mount the spherical reflector (31 mm wide) and the heater (~3 mm diameter). I used a small 3-axis stage to mount the heater, providing 3 degrees of freedom that would allow to manipulate the height of the heater, its position with respect to the reflector (left-right and in-out). The reflector was mounted in such a way that we can control its rotation angle, height and horizontal displacement. The current design is not quite sophisticated as it is just a first test, however I will look into different tools in the lab to see if I can use less mounts to get the same degrees of freedom.

The new heaters are supposed to be heated using AC. We used a DC power supply and ran ~30V through the wire, however only about ~50 mA of current was running through it. Jon will look into the specs of the new heaters to see if the power supply was the problem.

Attachment 1: 20190729_185214.jpg
20190729_185214.jpg
Attachment 2: 20190729_185156.jpg
20190729_185156.jpg
Attachment 3: 20190729_185153.jpg
20190729_185153.jpg
Attachment 4: 20190729_185139.jpg
20190729_185139.jpg
Attachment 5: 20190729_185112.jpg
20190729_185112.jpg
  237   Thu Aug 1 15:20:39 2019 Edita BytyqiLab InfrastructureOpticsReflector Mount and DC Supply

Yesterday, we were able to take some data using the 120 V DC power supply. The reflectors cut at the focal point and radius were both tested; the semi-circle cut proved to give a better focus, likely because roughly half the heat is lost using the focal-point reflectors. For upcoming tests, the semicircle reflectors will be used. We varied the surface shine by using the dull and reflective side of Al foil, as well as using the machined Al itself. The best result was given by using the more reflective side of Al foil.

Figure 1 shows the steady-state surface deformation profile detected by the HWS. The heaters don't have a uniform distribution along the wire, so more heat is radiated in the center of it, thus more of it is being focused to the center of the test optic. The data needs to be analyzed to determine the radius of the focus. Our rough estimate is about ~1.5 - 2 cm. We cannot collect any more data until we get a new power supply (AC 120 V).

Today, I came up with a new design for mounting the reflectors. I used a big 3-axis stage and a small 4-axis stage. This provides 5 degrees of freedom: 3 translational and 2 rotational, which is what we need for fine-tuning the focus and directing it at different angles incident to the test optic. The only problem with this design is that the 3-axis stage is too tall for the box, so the lid won't close.There is a smaller one available, but I have to figure out a way to increase its height, since the screw size is different from the ones on the pedestals available.

Additionally, Chub used metal-to-metal epoxy to glue a screw to the back of a reflector. I will wait until tomorrow to test it, because it is a slow acting epoxy. If it works, I have the necessary tools to do the same with the other reflectors. With the current deisgn the reflector wil be screwed in to where the round screw is in the stage. If it heats up a lot and affects the material of the stages, a small optical post (top of stage) will be used to make up for the absorbed heat.

 

Attachment 1: 20190731_170920.jpg
20190731_170920.jpg
Attachment 2: 20190801_145836.xcf
Attachment 3: 20190801_145836.jpg
20190801_145836.jpg
Attachment 4: 20190801_150635.jpg
20190801_150635.jpg
Attachment 5: 20190801_145842.jpg
20190801_145842.jpg
  242   Tue Sep 3 10:49:57 2019 AidanLab InfrastructureGeneralExhaust duct added for new bake area in TCS lab

Facilities came in on Friday and teed off a new duct to provide exhaust for the proposed new vacuum bake area in the TCS Lab. Photos are attached. 

We installed a plastic sheet between the work area and the rest of the lab (the rest of the lab was overpressurized relative to the work area). Also, they use a vacuum when doing any drilling.

 

Attachment 1: IMG_1627.jpg
IMG_1627.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_1629.jpg
IMG_1629.jpg
Attachment 3: IMG_1628.jpg
IMG_1628.jpg
Attachment 4: IMG_1626.jpg
IMG_1626.jpg
  244   Tue Jun 15 08:47:27 2021 AidanLab InfrastructureGeneralCleaned up HWS table in preparation for lab move

I cleaned up the HWS table in preparation for replacement with the 4x10 table. We still need to move the cabinet and get the enclosure out of the way.

 

 

Attachment 1: IMG_3056.jpg
IMG_3056.jpg
  247   Thu Aug 12 16:13:44 2021 AidanLab InfrastructureFloodCarpentry shop removed wet plaster sections from the wall - it's drying for a few days

The carpentry shop removed wet plaster sections from the wall following the flood (process was gentle scraping of wet plaster flakes, supervised by me). The wet section of wall needs a few days to dry and then they will plaster and paint it.

 

Attachment 1: IMG_4139.jpg
IMG_4139.jpg
  7   Thu Feb 4 14:05:59 2010 AidanElectronicsRing HeaterRing heater transfer function measurement 240mHz-5Hz

I've been trying to measure the ring heater transfer function (current to emitted power) by sweeping the supply voltage and measuring the emitted power with a photodector positioned right next to the ring heater.

Last night the voltage was sweeping with a 1000mV setting on the SR785 which was fed into the Voltage Control of the Kepco Bipolar Operational Power Supply/Amplifier which was biased around 10V.

The results are very, very strange. The magnitude of the transfer function decreases at lower frequency. I'll post the data just as soon as I can (ASCII dumps 13 and 14 on the disk from the SR785).

The circuit looks like this:

 

SR785 drive ----> Amplifier ----> Ring Heater : Photodetector ---> SR560 (5000x gain) ----> SR785 input

 

 

  8   Thu Feb 4 15:26:37 2010 AidanElectronicsRing HeaterRing heater transfer function measurement 240mHz-5Hz

Quote:

I've been trying to measure the ring heater transfer function (current to emitted power) by sweeping the supply voltage and measuring the emitted power with a photodector positioned right next to the ring heater.

Last night the voltage was sweeping with a 1000mV setting on the SR785 which was fed into the Voltage Control of the Kepco Bipolar Operational Power Supply/Amplifier which was biased around 10V.

The results are very, very strange. The magnitude of the transfer function decreases at lower frequency. I'll post the data just as soon as I can (ASCII dumps 13 and 14 on the disk from the SR785).

The circuit looks like this:

 

SR785 drive ----> Amplifier ----> Ring Heater : Photodetector ---> SR560 (5000x gain) ----> SR785 input

 

 

 This is wrong. It turns out the SR785 was wired up incorrectly.

  10   Fri Feb 5 12:42:19 2010 SteveElectronicsPre-amplifierChanges to board

Test entry

  11   Mon Feb 8 10:45:50 2010 Steve O'ConnorElectronicsPre-amplifierreplace Pot with fixed Resistor

 

            Preamp for Bulls eye detector                
                             
  It was felt that the Pot used at the input stage to remove offset added Noise            
  To test this the Pot was replaced with a fixed resistor and the offset removed at the second stage        
  Noise was measured after the first stage and at the monitor point first with the pot and then with the pot replaced with a Resistor  
                             
              First stage gain =1+500/10 test point 1 gain = 51      
              second stage gain=10K/1K test point 2 gain = 510    
  1K Pot (R19) is present                      
                             
  Chan #1                          
    dbVrms/Hz       nV/Hz       Referred Input Noise  nV/Hz      
                    gain = 51        
    200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz    
  Test Point #1 -141.1 -140.0 -136.8   88.1 100.0 144.5   1.7 2.0 2.8    
                    gain = 510        
  Test Point #2 -119.4 -120.4 -118.4   1071.5 955.0 1202.3   2.1 1.9 2.4    
                             
                             
                             
  Pot replaced with Resistor (R4)                    
                             
  Chan #1                          
    dbVrms/Hz       nV/Hz       RIN        
                    gain = 50        
    200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz    
  Test Point #1 -142.7 -142.7 -141.9   73.7 73.3 80.8   1.4 1.4 1.6    
                    gain = 500        
  Test Point #2 -122.0 -121.1 -120.7   794.3 881.0 922.6   1.6 1.7 1.8    
                             
                             
  When the Pot was replaced with R4, the offset was removed with the Pot at the second gain stage          
  R4 was not a thin film metal resistor                    
  12   Mon Feb 8 17:44:38 2010 AidanElectronicsPre-amplifierreplace Pot with fixed Resistor

Quote:

 

            Preamp for Bulls eye detector                
                             
  It was felt that the Pot used at the input stage to remove offset added Noise            
  To test this the Pot was replaced with a fixed resistor and the offset removed at the second stage        
  Noise was measured after the first stage and at the monitor point first with the pot and then with the pot replaced with a Resistor  
                             
              First stage gain =1+500/10 test point 1 gain = 51      
              second stage gain=10K/1K test point 2 gain = 510    
  1K Pot (R19) is present                      
                             
  Chan #1                          
    dbVrms/Hz       nV/Hz       Referred Input Noise  nV/Hz      
                    gain = 51        
    200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz    
  Test Point #1 -141.1 -140.0 -136.8   88.1 100.0 144.5   1.7 2.0 2.8    
                    gain = 510        
  Test Point #2 -119.4 -120.4 -118.4   1071.5 955.0 1202.3   2.1 1.9 2.4    
                             
                             
                             
  Pot replaced with Resistor (R4)                    
                             
  Chan #1                          
    dbVrms/Hz       nV/Hz       RIN        
                    gain = 50        
    200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz   200Hz 100Hz 50Hz    
  Test Point #1 -142.7 -142.7 -141.9   73.7 73.3 80.8   1.4 1.4 1.6    
                    gain = 500        
  Test Point #2 -122.0 -121.1 -120.7   794.3 881.0 922.6   1.6 1.7 1.8    
                             
                             
  When the Pot was replaced with R4, the offset was removed with the Pot at the second gain stage          
  R4 was not a thin film metal resistor                    

 

Just a note: this board was for the QPD not the Bull's eye detector.

 

  14   Thu Feb 11 21:46:23 2010 AidanElectronicsRing HeaterRing heater time constant measurement - start time

After leaving the ring heater off for several hours I turned on a 40V, 0.2A supply at a gps time of 949 988 700

The channel recording the PD response is C2:ATF-TCS_PD_HGCDTE_OUT.

However, there is a delay between the time at which something is supposed to be recorded and the time at which it is recorded. I looked at the GPS clock and it read that time when I started the heater voltage. If you play the channel back in dataviewer you see the temperature start to increase around 80s BEFORE the heater current was switched on. This needs to be calibrated away!!!

  15   Fri Feb 12 11:39:28 2010 AidanElectronicsRing HeaterRing heater transfer function

I applied a step function to the silver WATLOW heater and measured the response with the photodiode. The power spectrum of the derivative of the PD response is attached. The voltage isn't calibrated, but that's okay because right now we're just interested in the shape of the transfer function. It looks like a single pole around 850uHz. The noise floor is too great above 4 or 5 mHz to say anything about the transfer function.

 

 

Attachment 1: watlow_heater_transfer_fn.jpg
watlow_heater_transfer_fn.jpg
  16   Fri Feb 12 21:00:06 2010 AidanElectronicsRing HeaterRing heater step function response - time series

Hideously slow internet at airport is making me write a brief entry. This is the times series of the hesilver watlow heater radiative response to a step function.

Laso United airlines are a bit cheap ....

Attachment 1: silver_watlow_heater_step_function_response_2010-02-12.pdf
silver_watlow_heater_step_function_response_2010-02-12.pdf
  18   Mon Apr 12 17:25:01 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorFiber-Camera Link demonstration

 I installed the EDT PCIe4 DV C-Link frame grabber in a spare Windows XP PC and connected the Dalsa 1M60 camera directly to it via the CameraLink cable. In this configuration I was able to access the menu system in the camera using the supplied serial_cmd.exe routine.

PC --> Frame-Grabber --> Camera-Link Cable --> Dalsa 1M60: works OK

Next, I attached the RCX C-Link: Fiber to Camera Link converters to either end of a 300' fiber, plugged them into the PC and the Dalsa 1M60 and then supplied them with 5V of power. Once again, I was able to access the on-board menu system in the camera (as the attached screen-capture shows). I also did a quick-test using the in-built video display program and verified that I could get an image from the camera - by waving around my hand in front of the CCD I was able to modulate the light in the image on the computer. This, therefore, demonstrates that the camera can be easily accessed and run at a distance of at least 300' via optical fiber.

 

PC --> Frame-Grabber --> RCX C-Link --> 300' optical fiber --> RCX C-Link --> Dalsa 1M60works OK

The attached images:

 hartman_sensor.JPG: a screencap of the Dalsa 1M60 on-board menu system captured with the C-Link to fiber connector running

Fiber_Camera_Link_1.jpg: A RCX C-Link and one end of the 300' fiber connected to the Dalsa 1M60

 

Fiber_Camera_Link_3.jpg: A RCX C-Link and the other end of the 300' fiber connected to the PC

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Attachment 1: hartmann_sensor.JPG
hartmann_sensor.JPG
Attachment 2: Fiber_Camera_Link_1.jpg
Fiber_Camera_Link_1.jpg
Attachment 3: Fiber_Camera_Link_3.jpg
Fiber_Camera_Link_3.jpg
  40   Thu May 20 10:44:13 2010 AidanElectronicsSLEDQPhotonics 980nm source power

dV = 0.385V

Responsivity= 0.65A/W

Transimpedance = 1.5E4 V/A

therefore power= 0.385V / (1.5E4 * 0.65 V/W) = 40uW

 

 

  41   Thu May 20 17:08:36 2010 AidanElectronicsSLEDSLED module - and driver - LIGO D1000892 - and Hartmann sensor

Verified that the test-point for the current limit pot on the driver (Wavelength Electronics - LDTC 0520) was at 0.5V. Driver is set to INTERNAL set point at the moment. This is down about 10% below the current limited point.

Voltage across TP7 and TP9 = 0.970V = LD Current Mon

Voltage across TP2 and TP3 = 0.017V = LD P Mon

 

--- Hartmann sensor ---

-set the sampling rate on the CCD to 16HZ. With the current alignment and intensity this gives as maximum intensity of around 3850 out of 4095. Thus the pixels are not saturated.

- centroid_image located some of the spots - see attached image of spots where those located by the algorithm and circled. I need to play with the threshold level and spot_radius to get this to work properly.

 

 

Attachment 1: 2010-05-20_hartmann_image_and_located_spot.jpg
2010-05-20_hartmann_image_and_located_spot.jpg
  45   Thu May 27 08:25:37 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorHartmann sensor cooling fins added - base piece removed

 8:10AM - I removed the base plate from the Hartmann sensor. I want to know what steady-state temperature the HWS achieves without the plate.

The photo below shows the current configuration.

11:22AM - (Digitizer - 52.2C, Sensor - 43.8C, Ambient - 21.8C)

Attachment 1: HWS_CONFIG2.jpg
HWS_CONFIG2.jpg
  46   Thu May 27 13:18:51 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorRemoved Cooling fins from Hartmann sensor

I removed the cooling fins from the Hartmann sensor to see what steady-state temperature it reached without any passive cooling elements. I also dropped the set-point temperature for the lab to help keep for getting too hot.

After nearly 3 hours the temperature is:

(Digitizer: 54.3C, Sensor: 46.6C, Ambient: 19.6C)

 

 

Attachment 1: HWS_CONFIG3.jpg
HWS_CONFIG3.jpg
  47   Thu May 27 15:42:06 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorHartmann sensor with just the base piece

I switched in just the base piece of the Hartmann sensor. The cooling fins are removed. I bolted the camera securely to the base plate and I bolted the plate securely to the table.

 5:00PM - (Digitizer = 41.9C, Sensor = 33.8C, Ambient = 19.3C)

 

Attachment 1: HWS_CONFIG4.jpg
HWS_CONFIG4.jpg
  48   Thu May 27 17:49:02 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorHartmann sensor cooling fins added - base piece added

 Back to Configuration 1 again - this time the fins were bolted very securely to the camera.

 7:25 PM - [about 2 hours later] - Digitizer = 39.7C, Sensor = 31.4C, Ambient = 19.0C

 

 

Attachment 1: HWS_CONFIG1-tight.jpg
HWS_CONFIG1-tight.jpg
  74   Sat Jul 24 10:50:14 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorLab Temperature and HWS temperature: pre-indium

 Hour-long trend puts the lab temperature at 19.51C

Dalsa temperature:

 

Camera Temperature on Digitizer Board: 41.0 Celsius
Camera Temperature on Sensor Board: 32.9 Celsius
OK>
 
There is currently no Indium in the HWS.

 

  77   Mon Jul 26 12:17:25 2010 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorAdded Indium to HWS

 I added some 0.004" thick indium sheet to the copper heat spreaders and and the heat sinks on the side of the HWS to try and improve the thermal contact. Once installed the steady state temperature of the sensor was the same as before. It's possible that the surface of the copper is even more uneven than 0.004".

 

 

Attachment 1: indium-01.jpg
indium-01.jpg
Attachment 2: indium-03.jpg
indium-03.jpg
Attachment 3: indium-05.jpg
indium-05.jpg
Attachment 4: indium-02.jpg
indium-02.jpg
Attachment 5: indium-04.jpg
indium-04.jpg
  79   Tue Jul 27 08:31:10 2010 AidanElectronicsSLEDLong term SLED test - Day 1

 The measurement from the on-board PD of the Superlum SLED seems to be falling. This effect started around 5PM last night which is right about the time we moved the position of the PD that the SLED is illuminating on the optical table (via optical fiber).

Curiously, the current set point and delivered current to the SLED are dropping as well. 

Attachment 1: SLED_superlum_long_term_test_0002A.pdf
SLED_superlum_long_term_test_0002A.pdf
  80   Wed Jul 28 18:32:12 2010 AidanElectronicsSLEDSLED long term test - Day 2

Here's the data from the last 2 1/2 days of running the SLED. The decrease in photo-current measured by the on-board photo-detector is consistent with the decrease in the current set-point and the delivered current, but it is not clear why these should be changing.

Strictly speaking I should add some analysis that shows that delta_PD_voltage_measured = delta_I_set_measured * [delta_PD_voltage/delta_I_set (I_set)]_calculated ...

Attachment 1: SLED_superlum_long_term_test_0003A.pdf
SLED_superlum_long_term_test_0003A.pdf
  81   Thu Jul 29 10:09:19 2010 AidanElectronicsSLEDSLED long term test - Day 2

I've attached the Acceptance Test Report data from SUPERLUM for this SLED. I've also determined the expected percentage decrease in power/photo-current per mA drop in forward current.

The measured decrease in forward current over the last 2 1/2 days is around 1.4mA from around 111mA. The expected drop in power is thus (4.5% per mA)*(1.4mA) = 6.3%.

The drop in photo-current is around 37.5mA to 35mA = 2.5mA. The percentage drop is around 100*(2.5mA)/(36.3mA) = 6.9%. 

Therefore, the drop in measured power is consistent with what we would expect given the decrease in forward current (which is consistent with the drop in the set point). Why the set-point is dropping is still a mystery.

Quote:

Here's the data from the last 2 1/2 days of running the SLED. The decrease in photo-current measured by the on-board photo-detector is consistent with the decrease in the current set-point and the delivered current, but it is not clear why these should be changing.

Strictly speaking I should add some analysis that shows that delta_PD_voltage_measured = delta_I_set_measured * [delta_PD_voltage/delta_I_set (I_set)]_calculated ...

 

Attachment 1: superlum_SLED_ATR.pdf
superlum_SLED_ATR.pdf
  104   Tue Jan 25 16:38:16 2011 AidanElectronicsPre-amplifierL1 TCSY ISS Board transfer function

 I measured the AC and DC channel transfer functions of the eLIGO L1 TCSY ISS board for PD1 and PD2. The gain is quite high on the AC channels so I added +40dB of attenuation to the source from the SR785. As Frank pointed out, even though this isn't exactly +40dB at low frequencies, it still attenuates and that attenuation is common to both the input to the Channel 1 of the SR785 and the input to the ISS board.

The results are shown in the attached plot. I didn't bother including the phase, I'm just interested in the magnitude for calibration purposes.

 The original data files from the SR785 are attached below: 

Channel Name Filename
L1 TCSY PD1 - AC SRS003.78D
L1 TCSY PD2 - AC SRS004.78D
L1 TCSY PD1 - DC SRS005.78D
L1 TCSY PD2 - DC SRS006.78D

 

Attachment 1: L1TCS_ISS_boards_transfer_functions.pdf
L1TCS_ISS_boards_transfer_functions.pdf
Attachment 2: SRS003.78D
Attachment 3: SRS004.78D
Attachment 4: SRS005.78D
Attachment 5: SRS006.78D
  105   Tue Feb 8 13:02:26 2011 AidanElectronicsDelivery NoteThorlabs S322C 200W power head arrived

 The 200W Thermopile power head from Thorlabs arrive today. The scanned delivery note and calibration info are attached.

Attachment 1: Co2_200W_power_meter_delviery_note.pdf
Co2_200W_power_meter_delviery_note.pdf
Attachment 2: Co2_200W_power_meter_calibration_info.pdf
Co2_200W_power_meter_calibration_info.pdf
  109   Wed Feb 23 20:18:30 2011 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorSuccessfully re-started the Hartmann sensor

 I reattached the Hartmann Sensor to the LENOVO machine that is running Ubuntu and turned it on (it's been disconnected for a couple of months). The /opt/EDTpdv/serial_cmd was able to communicate successfully with the camera.

  119   Tue Mar 1 17:05:45 2011 AidanElectronicsHartmann sensorDalsa 1M60 current draw

Steve and I measured the current drawn by the Dalsa 1M60 by connecting it to the BK Precision 1735 lab power supply that display current and voltage supplied. We tried the camera at a variety of different voltages. The results are presented below:

Voltage  Current(t<5s)  Current(5s<t<10s)   Current(t>10s)

12.7V       0.6A              0.8A              1.11A

15.0V       0.55A             0.69A             0.91A

18.0V       0.41A             0.57A             0.75A

20.0V       0.42A             0.52A             0.67A

Additionally, we tried running the other camera with the lab power supply. I varied the exposure mode and exposure time and checked the current drawn. The supplied voltage was 18.0V.

Exposure Mode 4: current = 0.67A

Exposure Mode 2: 58Hz, exposure time = 16 ms, current = 0.70A

Exposure Mode 2: 58Hz, exposure time = 100 us, current = 0.72A

Exposure Mode 2: 1Hz, exposure time = 998 ms, current = 0.68A

Exposure Mode 2: 1Hz, exposure time = 16 us, gm 0, current = 0.69A

Exposure Mode 2: 1Hz, exposure time = 16 us, gm 2, current = 0.69A

  150   Thu May 26 11:56:46 2011 AidanElectronicsLaserGreen Laser Pointer beam profile

This measurement was made with the Thorlabs DCC1545M-GL camera with an RG850 3mm long-pass filter over the CCD.

The beam radius (w) is 191 pixels, where the beam intensity = exp[-2 (x/w)^2 ]

The pixel size is 5.2um. Hence the beam size is 993.2um, which is basically near enough to 1mm radius.

 

Attachment 1: green_laser_pointer.bmp
Attachment 2: green_laser_pointer.pdf
green_laser_pointer.pdf
Attachment 3: Screen_shot_2011-05-26_at_12.28.20_PM.png
Screen_shot_2011-05-26_at_12.28.20_PM.png
ELOG V3.1.3-