40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  Cryo Lab eLog  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Thu Jun 27 16:30:42 2013, Dmass, Noise Hunting, General, Acoustic Noise Hunting (part 1) 
    Reply  Tue Jul 2 03:39:50 2013, Dmass, Noise Hunting, General, Acoustic Noise Hunting (part 1) 
Message ID: 799     Entry time: Thu Jun 27 16:30:42 2013     Reply to this: 802
Author: Dmass 
Type: Noise Hunting 
Category: General 
Subject: Acoustic Noise Hunting (part 1) 

 We borrowed the PZT noise hunting buzzer wand from the 40m (it is a bronze or copper dowel attached to a PZT with a BNC input).

Koji was kind enough to loan us a HV amp from the OMC lab (Thorlabs model MDT694A) - we are using it in the 100V max output mode (gain = 10, +/- 10V input, +/- 100V output).

I played around with it a bit yesterday with Koji and even with just the function generator (DS345), we could pretty clearly feel the buzz from 20 Vpp at 100-300 Hz.

Since we want to do band limited white noise, we ended up hooking up the DAC from the CyMac to the HV amp, and using awggui to make noise.

We put the DFD output into an audio receiver and listened to it on headphones while poking things with the calibrated poke stick.

At a signal of ~100V rms into the PZT, 

I turned down the noise level to the PZT wand until I could touch it to the table without hearing any audible difference in the beat noise on headphones. Excitation strength normalized between the different points by letting the weight of the PZT wand itself provide the force pushing the wand to the optic mount (or whatever I was touching).

The loudest couplings by were (in order of noisiness):

  1. Everything connecting to the diode (every part of the LM14S2, the cables connected to it, where the sidebands come in, and the butterfly package itself)
    1. This may be a consequence of the FM sidebands we are putting on, and getting acoustically driven perturbations to the 
  2. The hoses and flanges on the top of the cryostat which lead to the cold chamber
  3. The cryostat itself (poking the side) - this coupling was a good bit quieter than the flange on top of the cryostat which leads to the cold chamber

A couple steering mirrors (and the PDs) things in the PDH path and the readout path were audible as well, but these were both quieter than the butterfly mount and cryostat

Notes and thoughts:

  • The headphone noise sounded different (more high frequency content) when poking the readout optics compared to when we were poking the cryostat -> [ b/c phase vs frequency noise? ]
  • Coupling into cavity length couples directly into frequency
  • Readout is a phase detection

Another thing I noticed while listening to the beat  - when I was tuning the temperature of the laser via the knob on the front of the Thorlabs ITC510s in order to zero out the control signal to the laser, the noise would change a depending on what the control signal level was. The minimum noise (by ear) was not zero, and lock broke at different values on the + vs the - end (was asymmetric by somewhere between a factor of 1.5 and 2). Further investigation needed. I'm guessing it's either an error point offset, or us seeing some of the 7th order mode when we are slightly off one side of the cavity resonance

ELOG V3.1.3-