40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log, Page 39 of 341  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authorup Type Category Subject
  11532   Thu Aug 27 01:41:41 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOTriply Improved SISO (T240-X) FF of MCL

Earlier today I constructed yet another SISO filter for MCL. The one thing that stands out about this filter is its strong roll off wink. This prevents high frequency noise injection into YARM. The caviat, filter performance suffered broken heart quite a bit, but there is subtraction going on.

I have realized that Vectfit lacks the ability of constraining the fits it produces, (AC coupling, rolloff, etc) even with very nitpicky weighting. So the way I used vectfit to produce this filter will be explained in a future eLOG, I think it might be promising. 

Anyways, the usual plots are shown below. 

 

Filter:

T240-X (SISO)

 

 

Training data + Predicted FIR and IIR subtraction:

 

Online subtraction results:(High freq. stuff shown for noise injection evaluation of the filter)

MCL
 
YARM
 
 
 

Subtraction performace:

 

  11535   Fri Aug 28 00:59:55 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOFinal SISO FF Wiener Filter for MCL

This is my final SISO Wiener filter for MCL that uses the T240-X seismo as its witness.

The main difference between this filter and the one on elog:11532 is the actual 1/f rolloff this filter pocesses. My last filter had a pair of complex zeroes at 2kHz, that gave the filter some unusual behavior at high frequencies, thanks Vectfit. This filter has 10 poles and 8 zeroes, something Vectfit doesn't allow for and needs to be done manually.

The nice thing about this filter is the fact that Eric and I turned this filter on during his 40 min PRFPMI lock last night, Spectra for this is coming soon.

This filter lives on the static Wiener path on the OAF machine, MCL to MC2, filter bank 7.

Anyways, the usual plots are shown below. 

 

Filter:

T240-X (SISO)

 

Training data + Predicted FIR and IIR subtraction:

 

Online subtraction results:(High freq. stuff shown for noise injection evaluation of the filter)

MCL

YARM

Subtraction performace:

  11536   Fri Aug 28 02:20:35 2015 IgnacioUpdateLSCPRFPMI and MCL FF

A day late but here it is.

Eric and I turned on my SISO MCL Wiener filter elog:11535 during his PRFPMI 40min lock. We looked at the CARM_IN and CARM_OUT signals during the lock and with the MCL FF on/off. Here is the spectra:

  11541   Sat Aug 29 04:53:24 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMCL Wiener Feedforward Final Results

After fighting relentlessly with the mode cleaner, I believe I have achieved final results

I have mostly been focusing on Wiener filtering MCL with a SISO Wiener filter for a reason, simplicity. This simplicity allowed me to understand the dificulties of getting a filter to work on the online system properly and to develope a systematic way of making this online Wiener filters. The next logical step after achieving my final SISO Wiener filter using the T240-X seismometer as witness for MCL (see elog:11535) and learning how to produce good conditioned Wiener filters was to give MISO Wiener filtering of MCL a try. 

I tried performing some MISO filtering on MCL using the T240-X and T240-Y as witnesses but the procedure that I used to develope the Wiener filters did not work as well here. I made the decision to ditch it and use some of the training data I saved when the SISO (T240-X) filter was runing overnight to develope another SISO Wiener filter for MCL but this time using T240-Y as witness. I will compare how much more we gain when doing MISO Wiener filtering compared to just a bunch of SISO filtering in series, maybe a lot, or little.

I left both filters running overnight in order to get trainining data for arm and WFS yaw and pitch subtractions.

The SISO filters for MCL are shown below:

The theoretical FIR and IIR subtractions using the above filters:

 

Running the filters on the online system gave the following subtractions for MCL and YARM:

 

Comparing the subtractions using only the T240-X filter versus the T240-X and T240-Y:

 

 

  11543   Sun Aug 30 10:57:29 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMCL Wiener Feedforward Final Results

Big thumbnails? Could it have been this? elog:11498.

Anyways, I fixed the plots and plotted an RMS that can actaully be read in my original eLOG. I'll see what can be done with the MC1 and MC2 Wilcoxon (z-channel) for online subtractions. 

  11546   Sun Aug 30 13:55:09 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOSummary pages MCF

The summary pages show the effect of the MCL FF on MCF (left Aug 26, right Aug 30):

 

I'm not too sure what you meant by plotting the X & Y arm control signals with only the MCL filter ON/OFF. Do you mean plotting the control signals with ONLY the T-240Y MCL FF filter on/off? The one that reduced noise at 1Hz?

 

 

  11547   Sun Aug 30 23:47:02 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMISO Wiener Filtering of MCL

I decided to give MISO Wiener filtering a try again. This time around I managed to get working filters. The overall performance of these MISO filters is much better than the SISO I constructed on elog:11541 .

The procedure I used to develope the SISO filters did not work well for the construction of these MISO filters. I found a way, even more systematic than what I had before to work around Vectfit's annoyances and get the filters in working condition. I'll explain it in another eLOG post.

Anyways, here are the MISO filters for MCL using the T240-X and T240-Y as witnesses:

 Now the theoretical offline prediction:

 

 

The online subtractions for MCL, YARM and XARM. I show the SISO subtraction for reference.

 And the subtraction performance:

  11549   Mon Aug 31 09:36:05 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMISO Wiener Filtering of MCL

MISO Wiener filters for MCL kept the mode cleaner locked for a good 8+ hours.

  11550   Mon Aug 31 14:15:23 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMeasured the MC_F whitening poles/zeroes

I measured the 15 Hz zero and the 150 Hz pole for the whitening filter channels of the Generic Pentek board in the IOO rack. The table below gives these zero/pole pairs for each of the 8 channels of the board.

channel zero [Hz] pole [Hz] Chan
1 15.02 151.05 C1:ASC-POP_QPD_YAW
2 15.09 150.29 C1:ASC-POP_QPD_PIT
3 14.98 150.69 C1:ASC-POP_QPD_SUM
4 14.91 147.65 C1:ALS-TRX
5 15.03 151.19 C1:ALS-TRY
6 15.01 150.51 ---
7 14.95 150.50 C1:IOO-MC_L
8 15.03 150.93 C1:IOO-MC_F

Here is a plot of one of the measured transfer functions,

and the measured data is attached here: Data.zip


EQ: I've added the current channels going through this board. 

More importantly, I found that the jumpers on channel one (QPD X) were set to no whitening, in contrast to all other channels. Thus, the POP QPD YAW signals we've been using for who knows how long have been distorted by dewhitening. This has now been fixed. 

Hence, the current state of this board is that the first whitening stage is disabled for all channels and the second stage is engaged, with the above parameters. 

Attachment 1: Data.zip
  11552   Tue Sep 1 06:58:11 2015 IgnacioUpdateWienerFilteringMCL FF => WFS1 and WFS2 FF => ARMS FF

I took some training data during Sunday night/Monday morning while the MCL MISO FF was turned on. We wanted to see how much residual noise was left in the WFS1/WFS2 YAW and PITCH signals. 

The offline subtractions that can be achieved are:

For WFS1

 

For WFS2

I need to download data for these signals while the MCL FF is off in order to measure how much subtraction was achived indirectly with the MCL FF. In a previous elog:11472, I showed some offline subtractions for the WFS1 YAW and PITCH before any online FF was implemented either by me or Jessica. From the plots of that eLOG, one can clearly see that the YAW1 signal is clearly unchanged in the sense of how much seismic noise was mitigated indirectly torugh MCL. 

Koji has implemented the FF paths (thank you based Koji) necessary for these subtractions to be implemented. The thing to figure out now is where we want to actually actuate and to measure the corresponding transfer functions. I will try to have either Koji or Eric help me measure some of these transfer functions.

Finally, I looked at the ARMS and see what residual seismic noise can be subtracted

 

I'm not too concerned about noise in the arms as if the WFS subtractions turn out to be promising then I expect for some of the arms seismic noise to go down a bit further. We also don't need to measure an actuator transfer function for arm subtractions, give that its essentially flat at low frequencies, (less than 50 Hz).

 

  11553   Tue Sep 1 10:26:24 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOMore MCL Subtractions (Post FF)

Using the training data that was collected during the MISO MCL FF. I decided to look at more MCL subtractions but this time using the accelerometers as Rana suggested.

I first plotted the coherence between MCL and all six accelerometers and the T240-Z seismometer.

For 1 - 5 Hz, based on coherence, I decided to do SISO Wiener filtering with ACC2X and MISO Wiener filtering with ACC2X and ACC1Y. The offline subtractions were as follows (RMS plotted from 0.1 to 10 Hz):

The subtractions above look very much like what you would get offline when using the T240(X,Y) seismometeres during MISO Wiener filtering. But this data was taken with the MISO filters on. This sort of shows the performance deterioration when one does the online subtractions. This is not surprising since the online subtraction performance for the MISO filters, was not too great at 3 Hz. I showed this in some other ELOG but I show it again here for reference:


Anyways, foor 10 - 20 Hz, again based on coherence, I decided to do SISO Wiener filtering with ACC2Z and MISO Wiener filtering with ACC2Z and ACC1Z (RMS plotted from 10 to 20 Hz):

I will try out these subtractions online by today. I'm still debating wether the MISO subtractions shown here are worth the Vectfit shananigans. The SISO subtractions look good enough.

Attachment 4: mclxycoh.png
mclxycoh.png
  11563   Thu Sep 3 00:45:25 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOORemeasured MC2 to MCL TF + Improved subtraction performance

Today, I remeasured the transfer function for MC2 to MCL in order to improve the subtraction performance for MCL and to quantify just how precisely it needs to be.

Here is the fit, and the measured coherence. Data is also attached here: TF.zip

 

OMG, I forgot to post the data and any residuals. LOL!

The transfer function was fitted using vectfit with a weighting based on coherence being greater than 0.95.

I then used the following filters to do FF on MCL online:

Here are the results:

Performance has definelty increased when compared to previous filters. The reason why I think we still have poor performance at 3 Hz, is 1) When I remeasured the transfer function, Eric and I were expecting to see a difference on its shape due to the whitening filters that were loaded a couple days ago. 2) Assuming the transfer function is correct, there is poor coherence at 3 Hz 3) The predicted IIR subtraction is worst at this frequency.

Attachment 1: TF.zip
  11573   Fri Sep 4 08:00:49 2015 IgnacioUpdateCDSRC low pass circuit (1s stage) of Pentek board

Here is the transfer function and cutoff frequency (pole) of the first stage low pass circuit of the Pentek whitening board.

Circuit:

R1 = R2 = 49.9 Ohm, R3 = 50 kOhm, C = 0.01uF. Given a differential voltage of 30 volts, the voltage across the 50k resistor should be 29.93 volts.

Transfer Function: 

Given by, 

H(s) = \frac{1.002\text{e}06}{s+1.002\text{e}06}

So low pass RC filter with one pole at 1 MHz.

I have updated the schematic, up to the changes mentioned by Rana plus some notes, see the DCC link here: [PLACEHOLDER]

I should have done this by hand...crying

Attachment 1: circuit.pdf
circuit.pdf
  11574   Fri Sep 4 09:23:32 2015 IgnacioUpdateCDSModified Pentek schematic

Attached is the modifed Pentek whitening board schematic. It includes the yet to be installed 1nF capacitors  and comments. 

Attachment 1: schematic.pdf
schematic.pdf schematic.pdf schematic.pdf
  11584   Wed Sep 9 11:00:49 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOLast Wiener MCL subtractions

On Thursday night (sorry for the late elog) I decided to give the MCL FF one more try. 

I first remeasured the actuator transfer function because previous measurements had poor coherence ~0.5 - 0.7  at 3 Hz. I did a sine swept to measure the TF. 

Raw transfer function:

The data is attached here: TF.zip

Then I made Wiener filters by fitting the transfer function data with coherence > 0.95 (on the left). Fitting all the data (on the right). Here are the filters:

 

The offline subtractions (high coh fit on left, all data fit on right). Notice the better IIR performance when all the TF data was fitted.

 

The online results: (these were aquired by taking five DTT measurements with 15 averages each and then taking the mean of these measurements)

 

And the subtraction performance:

 

Attachment 3: TF.zip
  11590   Thu Sep 10 09:37:34 2015 IgnacioSummaryIOOFilters left on MCL static module

The following MCL filters were left loaded in the T240-X and T240-Y FF filter modules (filters go in pairs, both on):

FM7: SISO filters for MCL elog:11541

FM8: MISO v1 elog:11547

FM9: MISO v1.1 Small improvement over MISO v1

FM10 MISO v2 elog:11563

FM5 MISO v3.1 elog:11584 (best one)

FM6 MISO 3.1.1 elog:11584 (second best one)

 

  11713   Mon Oct 26 18:10:38 2015 IgnacioUpdateIOOLast Wiener MCL subtractions

As per Eric's request, here is the code and TF measurement that was used to calculate the MC2 FF filter that is loaded in FM5. This filter module has the filter with the best subtraction performance that was achieved for MCL.

code_TF.zip

Attachment 1: code_TF.zip
  11493   Tue Aug 11 11:56:36 2015 Ignacio, JessicaUpdatePEMWasps obliterated maybe...

The wasp terminator came in today. He obliterated the known wasp nest.

We discovered a second wasp nest, right next to the previous one...

Jessica wasn't too happy the wasps weren't gone!

  11530   Tue Aug 25 16:33:31 2015 Ignacio, SteveConfigurationPEMSeismometer enclosure copper foil progress

Steve ordered about two weeks ago a roll of 0.5 mm thick copper foil to be used for the inside of the seismometer cans. The foil was then waterjet cut by someone in Burbank to the right dimensions (in two pieces, a side and a bottom for each of the three cans).

Today, we glued the copper foil (sides only) inside the three seismometer cans. We used HYSOL EE4215/HD3561(Data Sheet) as our glue. It is a "high impact, low viscocity, room temperature cure casting" that offers "improved thermal conductivity and increased resistance to heat and thermal shock." According to Steve, this is used in electronic boards to glue components when you want it to be thermal conductive.

We are going to finish this off tomorrow by gluing the bottom foil to the cans. The step after this involves soldering the side to the bottow and where the side connects. We have realized that the thermal conductivity of the solder that we are using is only ~50. This is 8 times smaller than that of copper and wil probably limit how good a temperature gradient we will have.

Some action shots,

  6003   Thu Nov 24 15:48:27 2011 IllustratorUpdateelogelogd gained an immunity to googlebot

elog_mario.png

golden-monkey.jpeg

 

 

  5020   Fri Jul 22 17:01:41 2011 Iron ManFrogsGeneralProof that Alberto lived through his Iron Man!

Alberto_IronMan_small.jpgIronman Vineman 70.3 logo

print 208 Alberto Stochino 67/129 585/1376 36:02 1:52 830 6:41 2:38:58 21.1 296 4:58 56:33 2:13:40 - 5:40:19
 
  4854   Wed Jun 22 12:29:57 2011 IshwitaSummaryAdaptive FilteringWeekly summary

I started on the 16th with a very intense lab tour & was fed with a large amount of data (I can't guarantee that I remember everything....)

Then... did some (not much) reading on filters since I'm dealing with seismic noise cancellation this summer with Jenne at the 40m lab.

I'll be using the Streckeisen STS-2 seismometers & I need to use the anti aliasing filter board that has the 4 pin lemo connectors with the seismometers & its boxes that require BNC connectors. I spent most of the time trying to solder the wires properly into the connectors. I was very slow in this as this is the first time I'm soldering anything.... & till now I've soldered 59 wires in the BNC connectors....

 

 

  4856   Wed Jun 22 17:35:35 2011 IshwitaUpdateGeneralHot air station

This is the new hot air station for the 40m lab.........

 

Attachment 1: P6220212.JPG
P6220212.JPG
Attachment 2: P6220213.JPG
P6220213.JPG
  4959   Mon Jul 11 10:10:31 2011 IshwitaConfiguration AA board

The AA board shown in attachment 1 will be used in the seismometer hardware setup. A cartoon of this setup is shown in attachment 2.

BNC connectors are required for the seismometer breakout boxes. So the four-pin LEMO connectors present in the AA board were removed and panel mount BNC connectors were soldered to it. Red and blue colored wires were used to connect the BNC connectors to the board. Red wire connects the center of the BNC connector to a point on the board and that connection leads to the third leg (+IN) of the IC U### and the blue wire connects the shield of the BNC connector to the second leg (-IN) of the IC U###.

All the connections (including BNC to the AA board and in the AA board to all the filters) were tested using a multimeter by the beeping method and it was found that channel 10 (marked as C10) had a wrong connection from the point where the red wire (+ve) was connected to the third leg (+IN) of IC U91  and channel 32 (marked as C32) had opposite connections meaning the blue wire is connected to the third leg (+IN) of IC U311 and red wire is connected to the second leg (-IN) of IC U311.

Attachment 1: P7080305.JPG
P7080305.JPG
Attachment 2: seismometers.png
seismometers.png
  5148   Tue Aug 9 02:27:54 2011 Ishwita , ManuelUpdatePEMPower spectra and Coherence of Guralps and STS2

We did offline wiener filtering on 3rd August (Elog entry) using only Guralps' channels X and Y.

Here we report the Power spectrum of the 3 seismometers (Guralp1, Guralp2, STS1) during that time.

and also the coherence between the data from different channels of the 3 seismometers.

We see that the STS is less correlated with the two Guralps. We think it is due to the wrong alignment of the STS with the interferometer's axes.

We are going to align the STS and move the seismometers closer to the stacks of the X arm.

 Pw_gurs_correct.png

 

 


 Pw_gur1_sts1_correct.png


 

 


 

 Coher_gur1_gur2_BW0.01.png

 

 



Coher_gur1_sts1_BW0.01.png

 

 



Coher_sts1_gur2_BW0.01.png

  5168   Wed Aug 10 12:28:22 2011 Ishwita , ManuelUpdatePEMAA board gain

We used a function generator, an oscilloscope and the Data Viewer to check the gain of the new AA board (used for the seismometers). Putting a sine wave of 0.3V (using a function generator) to the AA board, we could see about 500 counts in the Data Viewer. The calibration of the ADC is 214 counts/volt, so the AA board gives to the ADC an output of 0.03V. This proves that the AA board has a gain of 0.1. Guralp1 and STS1 (Bacardi), both have a gain of 10 now, that balance the AAboard gain of 0.1. If we consider the gain of AA board in our calibrated power spectrum plot of seismic signals from Guralp1 and STS1 (Bacardi), we get the following plot:

pw_gur1_sts1_aug10.png

  5172   Wed Aug 10 14:27:39 2011 Ishwita , ManuelUpdatePEMCalibration of Guralp and STS2

ADC: 216counts = 4V Hence, calibration of ADC is 214counts/V.

Gain of the AA board, g1 = 0.1


GURALP

Sensitivity = 800 V/ms-1

214 counts/V x 800  V/ms-1 = 13107200 counts/ms-1 -----> 7.6294e-08 ms-1/count

Gain, g2 = 10

Calibration = 7.6294e-08 ms-1/count x g1 x g2 = 7.6294e-08 ms-1/count


 STS

Sensitivity = 1500 V/ms-1

214 counts/V x 1500  V/ms-1 = 24576000 counts/ms-1 -----> 4.069e-08 ms-1/count

Gain of the STS electronic breakout box, g3 = 10

Calibration = 4.069e-08 ms-1/count x g1 x g3 = 4.069e-08 ms-1/count

  5197   Thu Aug 11 16:21:16 2011 Ishwita , ManuelUpdatePEMPower spectra and Coherence of Guralps and STS2

 

 Following is the power spectrum plot (with corrected calibration [see here]) of seismometers Guralp1 and STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151):

Pw_gur1_sts1_correct.png

 

 The seismometers are placed approximately below the center of the mode cleaner vacuum tube.

  5200   Thu Aug 11 19:14:22 2011 Ishwita , ManuelUpdatePEMSeismometer STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151) moved near ETMX

We moved the STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151) to his new location and laid his cable from rack 1X7 to ETMX. The seismometer was below the mode cleaner vacuum tube before.

Now, (since 6:05pm PDT) its placed near the ETMX.

cable_to_etmx.pngsts2_etmx.png

 

  4968   Thu Jul 14 17:34:35 2011 Ishwita, ManuelHowToWienerFilteringWiener-Hopf equations

Since we are using Wiener filtering in our project, we studied the derivation of Wiener-Hopf equations. Whatever we understood we have written it as a pdf document which is attached below...

Attachment 1: derivwf.pdf
derivwf.pdf derivwf.pdf derivwf.pdf derivwf.pdf derivwf.pdf derivwf.pdf
  4979   Sat Jul 16 18:54:05 2011 Ishwita, ManuelConfigurationElectronicsAA board

We fixed the anti-aliasing board in its aluminum black box,  the box couldn't be covered entirely because of the outgoing wires of the BNC connectors, so we drilled additional holes on the top cover to slide it backwards by 1cm and then screw it.

We had to fix the AA board box in rack 1X7, but there wasn't enough space, so we tried to move the blue chassis (ligo electro-optical fanout chassis 1X7) up with the help of a jack. We removed the blue chassis' screws but we couldn't move it up because of a piece of metal screwed above the blue chassis, then we weren't able to screw the two bottom screws again anymore because it had slided a bit down. Thus, the blue chassis (LIGO ELECTRO-OPTICAL FANOUT CHASSIS 1X7) is still not fixed properly and is sitting on the jack.

To accommodate the AA board (along with the panel-mounted BNC connectors) in rack 1X7 we removed the sliding tray (which was above the CPU) and fixed it there. Now the sliding tray is under the drill press.

 

Attachment 1: DSC_3236.JPG
DSC_3236.JPG
Attachment 2: pic1.png
pic1.png
Attachment 3: DSC_3237.JPG
DSC_3237.JPG
  4999   Wed Jul 20 11:42:47 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdate Weekly summary
  • We gave a white-board presentation on derivation of formula for optimum Wiener filter coefficients and wrote a latex document for the same. relevant elog entry
  • We enjoyed drilling the cover of the AA board and fixing it.
  • The AA board was fixed on rack 1X7 with Jenne's help. relevant elog entry
  • We tried writing a simulation for the transfer function of the stacks in Matlab. Once we get some satisfying results, we will post it on the elog.
  • We started reading the book 'Digital Signal Processing - Alan V. Oppenheim / Ronald W. Schafer' and are still reading it. We also tried watching lecture videos on z-transform...
  5008   Wed Jul 20 22:16:27 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdateElectronicslying seismometer cable and plugging it

We laid the cable along the cable keeper from the BACARDI seismometer to the rack 1X6, the excess cable has been coiled under the X arm.

We plugged the cable to the seismometer and to the seismometer electronics box in rack 1X6. We also plugged the AC power cable from the box to an outlet in rack 1X7 (because the 1X6 outlets are full)

With the help of a function generator we tested the following labeled channels of AA board...

2, 3, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20 and 24

that are the channels that can be viewed by the dataviewer, also the channel 10 can be viewed but it's labeld BAD so we cannot use it.

We leveled the seismometer and unlocked it, and saw his X,Y,Z velocity signals with an oscilloscope.

  5018   Fri Jul 22 14:22:13 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMSTS-2 seismometer hardware testing

We have two STS-2 seismometer boxes... the blue box & the purple box. Initially we used the blue box for the STS-2 seismometer (named Bacardi by Jenne).

  • Oscilloscope powered on battery was used to test the blue box by observing the velocity output of the three axes (X, Y, Z).  It was found out that the mean value of DC volt of...

X = +10 V

Y = +11 V

Z = -0.1 V

Thus, X and Y axes showed abnormally high DC volt. It was also found out that in AC coupling mode of the oscilloscope... changes were observed in the signal received from Z axis when some seismic wave was generated near the Bacardi by jumping near it. No such changes were observed from signals received from X & Y axes.

  • We removed the blue box and used the purple box for the same Bacardi seismometer & used the oscilloscope powered on battery to test it. It was found out that the mean value of DC volt of...

X = +4.4 V

Y = +4.4 V

Z = +4.4 V

In Ac coupling mode of the oscilloscope... changes were observed in the signals from X, Y, Z axes when someone jumped near Bacardi.

  • The above voltages from the two STS-2 seismometer boxes are unsuitable for the ADC box since it works with voltages ranging from +2 V to -2 V.... meaning it will consider any voltage signal above +2 V as +2 V and any signal below -2 V as -2 V. Hence we need to find out how to use these STS-2seismometer boxes with the ADC box.
  • We also tried measuring the DC volt from the shield and the center of a BNC connector corresponding to Y axis of the purple box (lets call it 'BNC-test') by using BNC-to-banana adaptors and banana wires. Signal from shield of BNC-test was sent to oscilloscope's channel 1 (connected to center of its BNC connector) and signal from center of BNC-test was sent to oscilloscope's channel 2 (connected to center of its BNC connector). On the oscilloscope screen it was observed that both the signals gave the same mean voltage output (-2.2V).
  5059   Fri Jul 29 12:25:54 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMSTS-2 seismometer box

The 'Bacardi' STS-2 seismometer was tested with the "purple" breakout box and it was found out that all the three axes gave a voltage of 11 V (as shown on the screen of the oscilloscope) before pressing the auto-zero button and after pressing it the voltage shown was 6 V. We tried again the blue box and it was working perfectly after pushing the auto zero button (the auto zero took a few seconds). The power of the purple box is still on, we will wait a few hours, to see if something changes.

  5175   Wed Aug 10 15:17:39 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMCalibration of Guralp and STS2

Quote:

I'm pretty sure that don't have any ADC's with this gain. It should be +/- 10V for 16 bits. 

Jenne told us that the ADC was +/- 2V for 16 bits so our calibration is wrong. Since, the ADC is +/- 10V for 16 bits we need to change our calibration and now we can also use the purple STS breakout box.

  5185   Thu Aug 11 09:39:25 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMCalibration of Guralp and STS2

Quote:

Quote:

I'm pretty sure that don't have any ADC's with this gain. It should be +/- 10V for 16 bits. 

Jenne told us that the ADC was +/- 2V for 16 bits so our calibration is wrong. Since, the ADC is +/- 10V for 16 bits we need to change our calibration and now we can also use the purple STS breakout box.

 New calibration for Guralp:

ADC: 216counts = 20V Hence, calibration of ADC is (215x0.1) counts/V.


GURALP

Sensitivity = 800 V/ms-1

(215 x 0.1) counts/V x 800  V/ms-1 = 2621440 counts/ms-1 ----->  3.8147e-07 ms-1/count

Calibration = 3.8147e-07 ms-1/count


Using the above calibration we obtain the following plot:

pw_gurs_aug11.png

When we compare this plot with the old plot (see here) we see that in our calibration, we have got a factor of 10 less than the old plot. We do not know the gain of the Guralp. If we assume this missing 10 factor to be the gain of Guralp then we can get the same calibration as the old plot. But is it correct to do so?

  5186   Thu Aug 11 10:56:08 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMMoving Seismometers

Quote:

We turned off the power of the seismometers and moved the Guralp1 close to the STS. Both are now situated below the center of the mode cleaner vacuum tube.

We oriented the X axis of the STS & Guralp1 along the X axis of the interferometer. Then we turned on the power again, but the STS channels don't give any signal. We think this is, because we didn't push the auto zero button.

 After pressing the auto-zero button (a lot of times) of the STS breakout box & aligning the bubble in the STS, we could finally get data from STS (Bacardi). So, now STS2 (Bacardi - Serial NR. 100151) is working!

  5190   Thu Aug 11 13:41:36 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMCoherence of Guralp1 and STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151)

Following is the coherence plot obtained when Guralp1 and STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151) are placed very close to each other (but they aren't touching each other):

coher_gur1_sts1_near.png

The seismometers were placed as shown in the picture below:

coherence_pic.JPG

They are placed below the center of the mode cleaner vacuum tube.

  5196   Thu Aug 11 16:15:59 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMCalibration of Guralp and STS2

 

Finally, we have found the correct calibration of Guralp and STS2 seismometers.

ADC: 216counts = 20V Hence, calibration of ADC is 3.2768e+03 counts/V.


 

GURALP

Sensitivity of seismometer = 800 V/ms-1

Gain of the guralp breakout box (reference elog entry) = 20

Calibration = 3.2768e+03 counts/V x 800  V/ms-1 x 20 = 52428800 counts/ms-1 -----> 1.9073e-08 ms-1/count


STS

Sensitivity = 1500 V/ms-1

Gain of the STS electronic breakout box = 10

Calibration = 3.2768e+03 counts/V x 1500  V/ms-1 x 10 = 49152000 counts/ms-1 -----> 2.0345e-08 ms-1/count

 

  5201   Fri Aug 12 00:18:30 2011 Ishwita, ManuelUpdatePEMCoherence of Guralp1 and STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151)

 

 We moved the seismometer STS2(Bacardi, Serial NR 100151) as we told in this Elog Entry, so the distance between Guralp1 and STS2 is 31.1m. Following is the coherence plot for this case:

coher_gur1_sts1_31m.png

then we also moved the Guralp1 under the BS and plugged it with the Guralp2 cable (at 7:35pm PDT), so now the distance between the two seismometers is 38.5m. Following is the coherence plot for this case:

coher_gur1_sts1_38.png

  14049   Tue Jul 10 16:59:12 2018 Izabella PastranaHowToComputer Scripts / ProgramsTaking Remote TF Measurements with the Agilent 4395A

I copied the netgpibdata folder onto rossa (under the directory ~/Agilent/), which contains all the necessary scripts and templates you'll need to remotely set up, run, and download the results of measurements taken on the AG4395A network analyzer. The computer will communicate with the network analyzer through the GPIB device (plugged into the back of the Agilent, and whose communication protocol is found in the AG4395A.py file in the directory ~/Agilent/netgpibdata/).

The parameter template file you'll be concerned with is TFAG4395Atemplate.yml (again, under ~/Agilent/netgpibdata/), which you can edit to fit your measurement needs. (The parameters you can change are all helpfully commented, so it's pretty straightforward to use! Note: this template file should remain in the same directory as AGmeasure, which is the executable python script you'll be using). Then, to actually set up, run, and download your measurement, you'll want to navigate to the ~/Agilent/netgpibdata/ directory, where you can run on the command line the following: python AGmeasure TFAG4395Atemplate.yml

The above command will run the measurement defined in your template file and then save a .txt file of your measured data points to the directory specified in your parameters. If you set up the template file such that the data is also plotted and saved after the measurement, a .pdf of the plot will be saved along with your .txt file.

Now if you want to just download the data currently on the instrument display, you can run: python AGmeasure -i 192.168.113.105 -a 10 --getdata

Those are the big points, but you can also run python AGmeasure --help to learn about all the other functions of AGmeasure (alternatively, you can read through the actual python script).

Happy remote measuring! :)

 

 

 

 

  16794   Thu Apr 21 11:31:35 2022 JCUpdateVACGauges P3/P4

[Jordan, JC]

It was brought to attention during yesterday's meeting that the pressures in the vacuum system were not equivalent althought the valve were open. So this morning, Jordan and I reviewed the pressure gauges P3 and P4. We attempted to recalibrate, but the gauges were unresponsive. Following this, we proceeded to connect new gauges on the outside to test for a calibration. The two gauges successfully calibrated at atmosperic pressure. We then proceeded to remove the old gauges and install the new ones. 

Attachment 1: IMG_0560.jpeg
IMG_0560.jpeg
Attachment 2: IMG_0561.jpeg
IMG_0561.jpeg
  16808   Mon Apr 25 14:19:51 2022 JCUpdateGeneralNitrogen Tank

Coming in this morning, I checked on the Nitrogen tanks to check the level. One of the tanks were empty, so I went ahead and swapped it out. One tank is at 946 PSI, the other is at 2573 PSI. I checked for leaks and found none.

  16814   Wed Apr 27 10:05:55 2022 JCUpdateCoil DriversCoil Drivers Update

18 (9 pairs) Coil Drivers have been modified. Namely ETMX/ITMX/ITMY/BS/PRM/SRM/MC1/MC2/MC3.

 

ETMX Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3        S2100624                     ETMX Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100631

ITMX Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100620                      IMTX Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100633

ITMY Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100623                   ITMY Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100632

BS Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3            S2100625                     BS Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100649

PRM Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100627                      PRM Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100650

SRM Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100626                        SRM Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100648

MC1 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100628                        MC1 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100651

MC2 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3       S2100629                        MC2 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3         S2100652

MC3 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3        S2100630                        MC3 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3         S2100653

 

 

Will be updating this linking each coil driver to the DCC

  16820   Fri Apr 29 08:34:40 2022 JCUpdateVACRGA Pump Down

Jordan and I, in order to start pumpig down the RGA Volume, we began by opening V7 and VM. Afterwards, we started RP1 and RP3. After this, the pressure in the line between RP1, RP3, and V6 dropped to 3.4 mTorr. Next, we tried to open V6, although an error message popped up. We haven't been able to erase it since. But we were able to turn on TP2 with V4 closed. The pressure in that line is reporting 1.4 mTorr.

 

PRP on the sitemap is giving off an incorrect pressure for the line between RP1, RP3, and V6. This is verified by the pressure by the control screen and the physical controller as well. 

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-04-29_at_8.46.53_AM.png
Screen_Shot_2022-04-29_at_8.46.53_AM.png
  16823   Mon May 2 13:30:52 2022 JCUpdateCoil DriversCoil Drivers Update

The DCC has been updated, along with the modified schematic. Links have been attached.

Quote:

18 (9 pairs) Coil Drivers have been modified. Namely ETMX/ITMX/ITMY/BS/PRM/SRM/MC1/MC2/MC3.

 

ETMX Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3        S2100624                     ETMX Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100631

ITMX Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100620                      IMTX Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100633

ITMY Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100623                   ITMY Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100632

BS Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3            S2100625                     BS Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100649

PRM Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100627                      PRM Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100650

SRM Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100626                        SRM Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100648

MC1 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3         S2100628                        MC1 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3      S2100651

MC2 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3       S2100629                        MC2 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3         S2100652

MC3 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH1/2/3        S2100630                        MC3 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD)now has R=100 // 1.2k ~ 92Ohm for CH3         S2100653

 

 

Will be updating this linking each coil driver to the DCC

 

  16825   Tue May 3 13:18:47 2022 JCUpdateVACRGA Pump Down

Jordan, Tega, JC

Issue has been resolved. Breaker on RP1 was tripped so the RP1 button was reporting ON, but was not actually on which continuously tripped the V6 interlock. Breaker was reset, RP1 and RP3 turned on. The V6 was opened to rough out the RGA volume. Once, pressure was at ~100mtorr, V4 was opened to pump the RGA with TP2. V6 was closed and RP1/3 were turned off.

RGA is pumping down and will take scans next week to determine if a bakeout is needed

Quote:

Jordan and I, in order to start pumpig down the RGA Volume, we began by opening V7 and VM. Afterwards, we started RP1 and RP3. After this, the pressure in the line between RP1, RP3, and V6 dropped to 3.4 mTorr. Next, we tried to open V6, although an error message popped up. We haven't been able to erase it since. But we were able to turn on TP2 with V4 closed. The pressure in that line is reporting 1.4 mTorr.

 

PRP on the sitemap is giving off an incorrect pressure for the line between RP1, RP3, and V6. This is verified by the pressure by the control screen and the physical controller as well. 

 

  16842   Tue May 10 15:46:38 2022 JCUpdateBHDRelocate green TRX and TRY components from PSL table to BS table

[JC, Tega]

Tega and I cleaned up the BS OPLEV Table and took out a couple of mirrors and an extra PD. The PD which was removed is "IP-POS - X/Y  Reversed". In addition to this, the cable is zip-tied to the others located on the outside of the table in case this is required later on. 

Next, we placed the cameras and mirrors for the green beam into their postions. A beam splitter and 4 mirrors were relocated from PSL table and placed onto the BS Oplev table to complete this. I will upload the picture of the newly updated photo with arrows of the beam routes.

Attachment 1: IMG_0741.jpeg
IMG_0741.jpeg
Attachment 2: IMG_0753.jpeg
IMG_0753.jpeg
  16845   Wed May 11 15:49:42 2022 JCUpdateOPLEV TablesGreen Beam OPLEV Alignment

[Paco, JC]

Paco and I began aligning the Green Beam in the BS Oplev Table. while aligning the GRN-TRX, the initial beam was entering the table a bit low. To fix this, Paco went into the chamber and correcting the pitch with the steering mirror. The GRN-TRX is now set up, both the PD and Camera. Paco is continuing to work on the GRN-TRY and will update later on today. 

In the morning, I will update this post with photos of the new arrangement of the BS OPLEV Table.


Update Wed May 11 16:54:49 2022

[Paco]

GRY is now better mode matched to the YARM and is on the edge of locking, but it more work is needed to improve the alignment. The key difference this time with respect to previous attempts was to scan the two lenses on translation stages along the green injection path. This improved the GTRY level by a factor of 2.5, and I know it can be further improved. Anyways, the locked HOMs are nicely centered on the GTRY PD, so we are likely done with the in-vac GTRY GTRX alignment.


Update Wed May 12 10:59:22 2022

[JC]

The GTRX PD is now set up and connected. The camera have been set to an angle because the cable to connect it is too thick for the camera to maintain its original position along the side. 

 

Attachment 1: IMG_0770.jpeg
IMG_0770.jpeg
ELOG V3.1.3-