ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
5461
|
Mon Sep 19 15:41:48 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | SUS diag stuff... just so I remember what I'm doing | The following optics were kicked:
ETMX
Mon Sep 19 15:39:44 PDT 2011 |
|
5465
|
Mon Sep 19 16:56:29 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | SRM oplev pitch calibration | Same measurements for SRM pitch (as
previously done for yaw in entry 5460) are
complete. The QPD is back in the path and |
|
5466
|
Mon Sep 19 17:45:39 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | Some screens fixed |
|
|
5467
|
Mon Sep 19 18:05:27 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | Summary screen |
|
|
5468
|
Mon Sep 19 20:56:36 2011 |
Paul | Summary | SUS | Remaining SRM and ITMY OSEMs calibrations |
I've now taken data for the pitch
and yaw calibrations for the OSEMs of SRM |
   |
5471
|
Mon Sep 19 22:47:44 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | SUS diag stuff... just so I remember what I'm doing | The last person out tonight should
run the following scripts:
In Matlab: |
|
5475
|
Tue Sep 20 03:12:14 2011 |
Anamaria | Update | SUS | Jenne's Scripts started | I followed Jenne's instructions, ran the
matrix filler script and then set the optics
to freeswing. Someone has to burt resture |
|
5476
|
Tue Sep 20 04:12:26 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Jenne's Scripts started |
|
|
5477
|
Tue Sep 20 09:44:44 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Jenne's Scripts started |
|
|
5479
|
Tue Sep 20 14:53:13 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Jenne's Scripts started |
|
|
5480
|
Tue Sep 20 15:23:16 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | free swinging test in vacuum condition | This is using data for the SRM from: 20
Sept 2011 03:20:00 PDT = 1000549215
You can see that there are still |
|
5481
|
Tue Sep 20 15:39:57 2011 |
Koji | Update | SUS | free swinging test in vacuum condition | Can't we use Yuta's auto-Q adjust script?
http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/3723
Edit by KI : |
|
5485
|
Tue Sep 20 16:45:09 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | SUS diag stuff... just so I remember what I'm doing | Has the Q been checked? Still
in progress...
|
|
5487
|
Tue Sep 20 18:03:45 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM oplev calibrations - measured and estimated | The measured calibration factors for the
oplevs are as follows:
SRM pitch: 666urad |
|
5488
|
Tue Sep 20 19:00:49 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM oplev calibrations - measured and estimated |
Kiwamu noticed that the 1/L in the
counts per radian should have just been L, |
|
5493
|
Wed Sep 21 00:34:29 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | SUS diag stuff... just so I remember what I'm doing | ETMX was ringing up when it was mis-aligned
for Y arm locking. I restored the input matrix
to something more diagonal and its now damping |
|
5494
|
Wed Sep 21 00:37:01 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM oplev calibrations - measured and estimated | I found that some of the Optical Lever
Servos were ON today and injecting nonsense
into the interferometer optics. I have set |
|
5496
|
Wed Sep 21 09:10:15 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM oplev calibrations - measured and estimated |
|
|
5499
|
Wed Sep 21 14:44:25 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM open loop transfer functions |
Here are the open loop transfer
functions for ITMY and SRM. The various settings |
|
5500
|
Wed Sep 21 16:22:14 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | Summary screen | The SUS SUMMARY screen is now fully |
|
5501
|
Wed Sep 21 16:31:28 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM actuator response functions | I divided the open loop transfer
functions by the filter response and the
sensor responses (previously measured calibration |
   |
5507
|
Wed Sep 21 23:05:16 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM actuator response functions - fitting results | I used an fminsearch function to
fit the SRM and ITMY actuator response magnitudes.
The testfunction was just that for a single |
   |
5508
|
Wed Sep 21 23:25:51 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | Re:ITMY and SRM actuator response functions - fitting results | Did you take the 180 deg shift into your
account ?
Since your measurement was done when |
|
5509
|
Wed Sep 21 23:44:45 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | Re:ITMY and SRM actuator response functions - fitting results |
|
|
5510
|
Thu Sep 22 00:00:10 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ITMY and SRM actuator response functions - complex fitting results | Here are the results of the complex fitting.
The residuals are bigger this time, but still
probably small enough to be ok(?), with the |
   |
5514
|
Thu Sep 22 10:43:50 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | Power spectrum with different filter gains | I thought it might be informative
before trying to optimise the filter design
to see how the current one performs with |
|
5517
|
Thu Sep 22 13:45:17 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | ETMX actuator response fits | Fitting results:
Pitch
-- Fit completed after 305 iterations--
Started |
 |
5521
|
Thu Sep 22 17:48:20 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | bad oplev on ETMY | It
turned out the oplev controls on ETMY were
just bad. |
|
5523
|
Thu Sep 22 20:12:54 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | ETMY oplev whitening engaged | The
whitening filters for the ETMY oplevs are
back. |
|
5532
|
Fri Sep 23 17:57:34 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | Oplev filter optimization for 2 poles and 2 zeros | I have made a function to optimise
the overall gain, pole frequencies and zero
frequencies for the oplev filter. The script |
 |
5534
|
Sat Sep 24 01:21:11 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | damping test | |
|
5536
|
Sat Sep 24 01:51:02 2011 |
rana | Update | SUS | Oplev filter optimization for 2 poles and 2 zeros |
|
|
5537
|
Sat Sep 24 02:09:43 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | Re:Oplev filter optimization for 2 poles and 2 zeros | Good work for the oplev noise simulations.
Here are some comments/questions:
(A) The noise looks suppressed |
|
5540
|
Sat Sep 24 17:45:56 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | Re:Oplev filter optimization for 2 poles and 2 zeros |
|
|
5544
|
Mon Sep 26 14:21:07 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | ITMX ULSEN shows jumps |
|
 |
5546
|
Mon Sep 26 15:54:46 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | ITMX ULSEN shows jumps | Currently the damping
of the ITMX suspension is intentionally disabled |
|
5547
|
Mon Sep 26 16:42:08 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | ITMX ULSEN : fixed | The
issue on the ITMX UL sensor has been fixed.
|
 |
5554
|
Tue Sep 27 08:51:29 2011 |
Paul | Update | SUS | Oplev filter optimization for 2 poles and 2 zeros |
|
|
5559
|
Tue Sep 27 20:02:19 2011 |
Koji | Update | SUS | Watchdog rearmed | I came to the control room and found the
PMC and IMC were unlocked. ==> Relocked
I found the watch dogs of the vertex |
|
5560
|
Wed Sep 28 00:06:21 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Watchdog rearmed |
|
|
5562
|
Wed Sep 28 07:36:41 2011 |
steve | Update | SUS | ITMY damping restored | ITMY suspention damping restored |
|
5563
|
Wed Sep 28 07:46:42 2011 |
steve | Update | SUS | Dsub connections at the back of 1X5 are fixed |
I'm turning the sus damping
off for Dsub connection fix at the |
|
5587
|
Fri Sep 30 17:01:29 2011 |
steve | Update | SUS | ETMX oplev intensity effect on noise | Kiwamu and Steve,
This is one of the better oplev set
up we have. Single bounce from TM, no mirror |
 |
5594
|
Sun Oct 2 02:21:27 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | free swinging test once more | The following optics were kicked:
MC1 MC2 MC3 ETMX ETMY ITMX ITMY PRM
SRM BS |
|
5597
|
Sun Oct 2 18:33:36 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | inversion of the input matrix on ETMX, ITMX and PRM | The input
matrices of ETMX, ITMX and PRM have been |
  |
5600
|
Mon Oct 3 13:04:12 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | AUXEX, AUXEY rebooted |
|
|
5601
|
Mon Oct 3 14:05:41 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Failing to set SUS summary screen values | I assume it's because the burt restore
didn't work for the SUS summary screen, but
all of the values for the ifo suspensions |
|
5604
|
Mon Oct 3 17:27:23 2011 |
Jenne | Update | SUS | Failing to set SUS summary screen values |
|
|
5618
|
Tue Oct 4 19:31:17 2011 |
kiwamu | Update | SUS | PRM and BS oplev laser died | The
He-Ne laser which has been used for the PRM
and BS oplevs were found to be dead. |
|
5620
|
Wed Oct 5 11:33:25 2011 |
steve | Update | SUS | PRM and BS oplev laser replaced |
JDSU 1103P died after 4 years of
service. It was replaced with new identical |
|