40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log, Page 29 of 339  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Type Categoryup Subject
  16637   Wed Feb 2 16:22:00 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart III of BHR upgrade - PR2 inpute matrix diagonalized

The free swinging test was successful. I ran the input matrix diagonalization code (/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/Git/40m/scripts/SUS/InMAtCalc/sus_diagonalization.py) on the PR2 free-swinging data collected last night. The logfile and results are stored in /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/Git/40m/scripts/SUS/InMAtCalc/PR2 directory. Attachment 1 shows the power spectral density of the DOF basis data (POS, PIT, YAW, SIDE) before and after the diagonalization. Attachment 2 shows the fitted peaks. I chose to not type out the matrix values now. One can find them in teh repo links above.

 

Attachment 1: PR2_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
PR2_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
Attachment 2: PR2_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
PR2_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
  16638   Wed Feb 2 16:27:57 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart III of BHR upgrade - PR3 inpute matrix diagonalized

The free swinging test was successful. I ran the input matrix diagonalization code (/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/Git/40m/scripts/SUS/InMAtCalc/sus_diagonalization.py) on the PR3 free-swinging data collected last night. The logfile and results are stored in /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/Git/40m/scripts/SUS/InMAtCalc/PR3 directory. Attachment 1 shows the power spectral density of the DOF basis data (POS, PIT, YAW, SIDE) before and after the diagonalization. Attachment 2 shows the fitted peaks. I chose to not type out the matrix values now. One can find them in teh repo links above.

 

Attachment 1: PR3_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
PR3_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
Attachment 2: PR3_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
PR3_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
  16639   Wed Feb 2 16:32:02 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IX of BHR upgrade - AS1 free swing test still not good

We still did not get a good AS1 free swinging spectrum. It seems the Side OSEM is reporting coupling to too many DOFs and some extra resonances than we expect. So we did not upload the new input matrix calculated from this test. I'm attaching teh peak fitting (attachment 1) and the diagonalization attempt (attachment 2) to give some idea of what happened. Note how different this fre swinging spectrum looks from the other optics. Given that Yehonathan also felt that somthing might be off with this optic, we need to reevaluate if the suspension has wire not aligned in grove, or it is imbalanced or something else if touching it still.

 

Attachment 1: AS1_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
AS1_FreeSwingData_PeakFitting_20220125.pdf
Attachment 2: AS1_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
AS1_SUS_InpMat_Diagnolization_20220202.pdf
  16640   Wed Feb 2 18:55:58 2022 KojiSummaryBHDOptomechanics configuration for the in-vacuum aux small optics

Here is more detail of the POP_SM4 mount assembly.

It's a combination of BA2V + PLS-T238 + BA1V + TR-1.5 + LMR1V + Mirror: CM254-750-E03
Between BA1V and PLS-T238, we have to do a washer action to fix the post (8-32) with a 1/4-20 slot. Maybe we can use a 1" post shim from thorlabs/newport.
Otherwise, we should be able to fasten the other joints with silver-plated screws we already have/ordered.

I think TR-1.5 (and a shim) has not been given to Jordan for C&B. I'll take a look at these.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-02-02_at_6.46.46_PM.png
Screen_Shot_2022-02-02_at_6.46.46_PM.png
  16641   Wed Feb 2 21:16:23 2022 KojiSummaryBHDOptomechanics configuration for the in-vacuum aux small optics

Asked Jordan to clean 2x 1.5" posts (0.5 dia) and a washer with 1" dia.

 

Attachment 1: PXL_20220203_050156031.jpg
PXL_20220203_050156031.jpg
  16678   Thu Feb 24 18:05:58 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

{Yehonathan, Anchal, Paco}

Yesterday, Anchal and Paco removed AS1 from the vacuum chamber and moved it into the cleanroom. The suspension wires were cut and the AS1 optic was put on the table.

Two things were noticed:

1. One of the wires was not sitting inside the side block groove (attachment 1)

2. One of the face magnets was grossly tilted (attachment 2). Probably due to uneven polishing of the dumbbell.

We put new wires into the side blocks making sure they sit in their grooves and we removed the tilted magnet. A different, more straight magnet was picked from the remaining spare magnets. The dumbbell and adapter were cleaned from glue residues and a batch of glue was prepared.

In the process of gluing a different magnet was knocked off. We cleaned that magnet too. The 2 magnets were glued on the adapter.

Today I came and saw that the gluing failed completely. One of the magnets was completely away from its socket and the other one wasn't glued at all.

I prepared a new batch of glue and glued the two magnets.

Attachment 1: signal-2022-02-24-173933_003.jpeg
signal-2022-02-24-173933_003.jpeg
Attachment 2: signal-2022-02-24-173933_002.jpeg
signal-2022-02-24-173933_002.jpeg
  16694   Wed Mar 2 14:02:43 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

Yesterday, I rebuilt the OpLev setup in the cleanroom in order to suspend AS1. It took me a while to find all the necessary parts but I found them in the end.

The HeNe laser was placed on the optical table and turned on. The beam was aimed to bounce off a folding mirror to the SOS tower.

The beam's height was controlled by the HeNe laser stage and made to be 5+14/32". The beam from the folding mirror was made parallel to the table, first with an iris and then with the QPD connected to a scope.

Preparing the SOS tower for the suspension I noticed that the wire clamp is scratched on both sides from previous suspensions. I discarded that wire clamp but couldn't find the spares. Time ran out and I had to stop.

  16698   Thu Mar 3 17:09:46 2022 PacoUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

[Anchal, Paco]

Wire clamp spare was installed, furthermore AS1 was reinstalled on adapter, attached wire clamps, and cleaned using ionized air gun. Finally, we suspended it on the SOS tower and left it resting on the bottom earthquake stops; ready for balancing.

Quote:

Yesterday, I rebuilt the OpLev setup in the cleanroom in order to suspend AS1. It took me a while to find all the necessary parts but I found them in the end.

The HeNe laser was placed on the optical table and turned on. The beam was aimed to bounce off a folding mirror to the SOS tower.

The beam's height was controlled by the HeNe laser stage and made to be 5+14/32". The beam from the folding mirror was made parallel to the table, first with an iris and then with the QPD connected to a scope.

Preparing the SOS tower for the suspension I noticed that the wire clamp is scratched on both sides from previous suspensions. I discarded that wire clamp but couldn't find the spares. Time ran out and I had to stop.

 

  16710   Mon Mar 7 16:56:08 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

{Paco, Yehonathan}

We tried to roughly balance the adapter with two counterweights at the front, like with the other thin optics using an iris. As before, we couldn't get the beam above the iris hole no matter how much we inserted the counterweights into the adapter. We noticed that one of the side blocks is actually the one where the clearance for the wire was made on the wrong side. So there was clearance on both the up and bottom sides of the side block (see attachment 1).

Could this be the cause of the balancing issue? Running out of ideas on how to fix it we gave it a try and replaced it with a spare side block. We also found that the wire on the other side block was kinked so we replaced the wire on this one as well.

After inserting new wires into the side blocks, we hung the adapter on the winches and the beam was above the iris aperture! How could this tiny amount of missing mass make this much difference?

We were able to roughly balance the adapter.

We then tried to balance the roll of the adapter but accidentally knocked off the side magnet 😫.

We usually glue several side magnets together and they all together support the metallic plate on which the magnets are magnetically attached to. This time we had only one side magnet to glue so instead of trying to glue the magnet vertically we are trying to glue it horizontally using a flat surface and a stage to clamp it (attachments 2,3).

BTW, the HeNe was not working when we came into the cleanroom. We realized it was the old HeNe that we already determined to be broken but there was no sign on it. I attached a "BAD" sign on it and replaced it with the new HeNe. The OpLeve beam was realigned. All of this happened before all the things described above

Attachment 1: signal-2022-03-07-171520_001.png
signal-2022-03-07-171520_001.png
Attachment 2: signal-2022-03-07-172659_001.jpeg
signal-2022-03-07-172659_001.jpeg
Attachment 3: signal-2022-03-07-172659_003.jpeg
signal-2022-03-07-172659_003.jpeg
  16711   Mon Mar 7 18:53:16 2022 KojiUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

Not sure if that small difference can cause the alignment inability. Particularly, the removed metal was just below the wire. This means that there is no misalignment effect at the first order.

Here is my idea:
You may be able to assist the alignment by adding washers on one side of the four holes to this "H" shaped parts. The holes are away from the center line, adding some weight definitely do some misalignment.

 

  16714   Tue Mar 8 12:24:13 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDRe-susspension of AS1

The gluing seemed to be successful. I assembled the side block with the magnet on the adapter. Paco helped me hang the adapter on the SOS tower.

The height and roll of the adapters were balanced (attachment 1,2).

The QPD was placed at the beam reflection. The beam was centered horizontally on the QPD and then measured vertically. The pitch DOF was balanced using the counterweights. The counterweight was locked. Balance was retained.

I tried to assemble the upper mirror clamp on the tower but for some reason, one of its tap holes was not able to accept screws. I gave it to Jordan for retapping. I measured the motion spectrum using the QPD connected to a scope (attachment 3).

Major peaks are at 668mHz, 942mHz, and 1029mHz.

 

Attachment 1: AS1_Roll_Balance.png
AS1_Roll_Balance.png
Attachment 2: AS1_Height_Balance.png
AS1_Height_Balance.png
Attachment 3: FreeSwingingSpectra_new.pdf
FreeSwingingSpectra_new.pdf
  16715   Tue Mar 8 19:29:36 2022 PacoUpdateBHDRe-balance of AS1

[Paco]

Installed AS1 in vacuum, near the center of the table, and installed the OSEMs. All OSEMS are "balanced" nominally, i.e. their shadow is at the halfway point optimum, but fine tuning is required, which I will attempt tomorrow after restoring the AS1 suspension screen settings. Today, I tried damping the SIDE DOF, but didn't succeed, although there was definitely some oscillating behaviour with high (> 5) gains on the damping, so I believe this is a matter of patience. For now, all OSEMs are looking ok, the SOS is in place, and hopefully it will soon be damped. 

  16716   Wed Mar 9 09:35:26 2022 PacoUpdateBHDRe-balance of AS1

[Paco]

AS1 is installed, OSEMs balanced, and the optic damped successfully. We should run the free swinging test overnight to validate this re-installation.

  16718   Wed Mar 9 11:52:18 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDSimplified BHD readout sketch on ITMY table

I have made an editable draw.io diagram of the planned simplified BHD setup on the ITMY table (see attached).  10 pts = 1 inch.

This is very sketchy but easily adjustable since we are removing everything but the ITMY Oplev from that table.

Attachment 1: ITMY_Table_Sketch.drawio.pdf
ITMY_Table_Sketch.drawio.pdf
  16719   Wed Mar 9 12:57:52 2022 KojiUpdateBHDSimplified BHD readout sketch on ITMY table

- BHD beams were already mixed in the chamber. So we don't need a BS on the table. (Probably there is no BS already)

- We don't need to split each BHD beam. One PD per BHD beam is OK for now.

- Check if the BHD paths have reasonable angles from the windows so that the beams do not hit the chamber wall.

- We need the POY path. POY indeed goes to the BS table

  16729   Tue Mar 15 18:42:37 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IX of BHR upgrade - AS1 resuspended and OSEMs tuned

http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/16722

http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/16716

  16730   Tue Mar 15 18:45:12 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart X of BHR upgrade - BHDBS Path setup

[Paco, Anchal]

BS Chamber work

  • ASL was positioned in nominal place.
  • PR3 was moved to its nominal place from temprorary position.
  • BS Table was rebalanced
  • Earthquake stops were removed from all SOS from BS table (LO2, SR2, BS, PR3)

ITMY Chamber work

  • AS2, AS3, LO3, LO4, and BHDBS were positioned in the nominal place.
  • AS1 was moved to its nominal place from temporary position.
  • ITMY tbale was rebalanced
  • Earthquake stops were removed from all SOS from ITMY table (AS1, AS4, ITMY)
  16732   Thu Mar 17 16:50:53 2022 PacoUpdateBHDXARM AUX alignment

[Ian, Paco]

We opened the ITMX chamber and

  • Inspected PR2 and LO1 and didn't see anything suspicious.
  • Took the EQ stops off ITMX in preparation for alignment

Alignment:

  • Ian started at the ETMX station, slightly tweaking the M1 M2 XAUX mirrors by hand and Paco on the ITMX chamber looking at the beam. The beam was visibly making it to the ITMX optic and reflecting back though at a negative pitch angle. No small motion on the M1-M2 knobs caused visible correction on this.
  • We decided to try adding an alignment offset to ITMX, and quickly saturated to 25000 (on the SUS screen) but fell short of fully correcting this PIT offset.
  • We scanned further the M1 M2 input alignment, and briefly lost the first reflection.
    • We recovered the first reflection, but the beam spot is now incident near the LL OSEM position.
  • We kept scanning M1 - M2 with Ian on the ITMX chamber this time, providing feedback through facetime.
  • Leaning on the ITMX chamber table, we noticed the magnitude of PIT correction left to be done and verified that M1-M2 two axis alignment + ITMX offsets should be enough for it.

We stopped our effort here, the XAUX beam spot is near the lower half of the ITMX face. Tomorrow, we will resume, but we will use airpods and a clean go-pro for real-time audiovisual feedback. Furthermore, ITMX OSEMs should be rebalanced as they haven't been touched after the table was balanced for PR2 and LO1.

  16733   Thu Mar 17 17:23:22 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - Green laser alignment

[Anchal, Yehonathan] (on Y Arm)

We first checked if the PZT mirrors M1 and M2 can be controlled. They indeed show no motion even after being connected with a power supply. So green injection path can not be aligned using cds controls right now.

We also noticed that all ETMY slow controls and monitors are offline. That's because the electronics upgrade did not include acromag chassis. This means that the DC bias adjustment is not accessible for ETMY.

Alignment work:

  • We first aligned the green injection beam to cross two irises in the injection path to ETMY chamber.
  • Then I (Anchal) went inside the ITMY chamber to find the green light. Yehonathan controlled the injection path while I gave feedback from ITMY side. We aligned injection path to get the beam near center of ITMY.
  • Then I aligned ITMY through sitemap>IFO>Align to get counter propagating reflection near the ITMY side.
  • We were able to see reflection from ETMY hitting the beam tube.
  • Since DC alignment controls of ETMY are not accessible, we used the Alignment offset in rtcds model which puts dc offset in the coil driver to get the reflected beam from ETMY to come to ITMY table, about 1 inch above the table and about 3 inch south of ITMY SOS.
  • But we got limitted by the DAC overflow on ETMY at this point. Several back and forth attempts to relief ETMY were unsuccesful.

Possible issues:

  • We think having the HV coil driver set up for ETMY is important for this alignment work if not essential. The coil drivers of ETMY are near saturation.
  • We also think that addition of two new suspensions in ITMY table and then counter weights to balance the table, has depressed table height slightly. We need to work out how to change injection path height and angle accordingly.

[Paco, Ian] (on X Arm)

http://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8080/40m/16732

  16735   Fri Mar 18 17:15:19 2022 PacoUpdateBHDXARM AUX alignment cont.

[Paco, Ian]

First, we re-balanced the ITMX OSEMs so that they would damp at around half-a-shadow.


Then, we set up a clean camera inside ITMX chamber looking at the ITMX optic. Then, using the live feed we aligned the AUX beam from the ETMX station using M1 and M2. The camera was great to help us align the beam properly close to the ITMX center. It wasn't very long until we could see a green beam on the IR card, but we didn't really see any flashing, so this may just be the bare transmission away from XARM resonance (Attachment #1).

Ian checked the reflection from ITMX using the IR card with holes, and he pretty much only saw one beam spot, so we turned to look for a beam scattering on the vacuum tube but didn't really see anything. This could mean that we were hitting the ETMX again, or missing slightly, or missing completely. We tried scanning the ITMX pitch and yaw using the bias (alignment) sliders, and with the illuminators off, try seeing some scattered green beam on the ETMX. We can't really see anything yet, but we will keep trying. If there are any tips on our method, it would be great to know them.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-03-18_at_4.09.38_PM.png
Screen_Shot_2022-03-18_at_4.09.38_PM.png
  16739   Mon Mar 21 18:00:05 2022 Ian MacMillanUpdateBHDXARM AUX alignment cont.

[Ian, Paco]

Continuing with the previous alignment that we stoped on friday, we re set up my heavily cleaned iPhone on FaceTime. The Phone alowed us to see the laser on the ITMX and center it on that optic.

  • We increased the trigger level for the watchdog on the optics.
  • Green beam was centered on th ITMX.
  • aligned the green laser: prompt reflection off of the ETMX to maximize the signal on the reflection PD
  • Went back to ITMX chamber, looked for the beam in the tube to see if the laser was hitting the beam tube off of the ITMX. From there we comunicated how to adjust the beam to move the beam towards the ETMX.
  • On the ETMX the reflection PD signal was measured and the ITMX was adjusted using CDS until ripples/"flashes" were seen in the reflection PD channel (C1:ALS-X_REFL_DC_OUT_DQ).
  • Once we saw flashing we tried to minimize the reflection pd signal using only ITMX alignment slider so that all the light was being held in the cavity.
  • Once we had this going the PDH lock engaged the higher order mode that we were seeing.
  • We removed the phone setup and closed up the ITMX chamber.
  • From here we moved to the control room and continude to adjust the ITMX and ETMX to see if we could lock to a lower order mode.
    • This proved unsuccessful so we will resume by trying to replicate the ASS action manually (with M1 - M2 PZT sliders and the REFL PD)
Attachment 1: PXL_20220322_015247138.jpg
PXL_20220322_015247138.jpg
  16740   Mon Mar 21 18:24:07 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - Green laser alignment on Yarm

[Anchal, Tega]

We did the following alignment steps on Yarm today:

  • We aligned the green beam going into the ETMY chamber to the three irises on the path.
  • We aligned ETMY to get counter-propagating prompt reflection from ETMY.
  • We were able to see light in the reflection photodiode for the green PDH loop.
  • Then we went to ITMY chamber and checked where the beam is coming to. It was coming very low in height.
  • We walked the beam on the end to get it near the center of ITMY.
  • Then we changed the ETMY alignment again to get back the reflection beam on the reflection photodiode.
  • Then we went again to ITMY chamber and changed the ITMY alignment to get counter-propagating reflection from ITMY.

After this, we came back to the control room. One peculiar thing to note is that the C1:LS-Y_REFL_DC_OUT channel is inverted i.e. it is showing negative values for the reflection DC voltage. On this signal, we see a little bit higher-order mode flashing but it is not bright enough to be seen on the face camera of the suspension. We'll continue aligning the cavity using CDS now to get TEM00 mode.


After trying for a bit, we were able to get flash of about 2000 counts which is about 16% of the max value of 12200 counts. We adjusted the ITMY angular position using the IFO_ALIGN screen but used the OPTICAL_ALIGN offset screen to adjust the angular position of ETMY. The pitch and yaw values for ITMY are 1.0360 and -0.260 respectively whereas the pitch and yaw values for ETMY are 5664.0 and -4937.0 respectively. 

  16742   Thu Mar 24 19:20:28 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - Green laser alignment on Yarm

[Anchal, Paco]


Uneloged: yesterday, Paco and Ian tried locking the green laser on Yend to the Y-arm. Nothing noteworthy happened, no luck.


  • Started with aligning the green injection to the Iris on table (it was misaligned) and getting it on the ITMY center.
  • Then we realized that the beam is going through the focusing leans very offceter. This makes the beam warped and deflected inside that needs to be corrected by mirrors.
  • So we decided to adjust the lens position first.
  • We realized that lens position is hard to adjust along with keeping the beam hiting ITMY.
  • So, we decided to remove the lens first and just align the green beam directly with the Iris on the table and the ITMY center. The beam became as big as ITMY when it reached there without the lens in path. We aligned it to fall on the mirror.
  • Then we placed the lens back so that the beam goes through the center of the lens.
  • Then we aligned ETMY to get the reflection back to the reflection PD.
  • But then when we checked the beam at ITMY again, it was severely missing ITMY. The possible reason is that ETMY is a diverging lens for the beam as well and changing its position changed the beam direction in the beam tube.
  • We decided to do another iteration of lens positioning with the new ETMY position. So same steps, removed lens, aligned beam with iris and ITMY, placed back the lens, aligned ETMY again to get reflection back on the PD.
  • This time the beam was still reaching ITMY. So we were glad that our iterations converged in 2 repititions.
  • Then we aligned ITMY to get counter propagating beam.
  • At the end of this alignment:
    • We see dips in relfection photodiode counts from 12200 to 9500.
    • The ETMY oplev is partially out of range (only 1 of the quadrant seeing light) but that could be because we changed the lens position. So Oplev servo is off.
  • We confirmed that the PDH servo is properly connected and loop is on. But we see no HOM catching lock for YARM even after us doing about 10 min search with ITMY-ETMY alignments.
  • We are leaving things as it is. We'll continue trying to align the cavity tomorrow. Everyone is welcome to try as long as they restore the positions of the optics to a good state at the end.

 

 

  16744   Fri Mar 25 18:20:28 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - Green laser alignment on Yarm

[Anchal, Paco, Shruti]

  • Today we found out that the laser controller at the Yend had it's inputs disconnected for the FAST PZT input and the Slow temperature control input. The cables were also not labeled that were lying nearby.
  • I tracked the cables and connected the Fast input adn the slow input.
  • We then adjusted the temperature slider to go to previously marked laser crystal temperature of 40.1 degrees celsius. But we could not find the the beatnote of Y end IR with teh Main laser IR.
  • We scanned the laser crystal temeprature until we could see a beatntoe with the main IR laser and stopped in that region.
  • Then we continued looking for flashing and HOM, but no luck.
  • It was interesting that when the PDH loop was closed, we saw fluctuations in relfection photodiode DC value, but not so much when the loop was not closed.
  • We tried flipping the sign of the loop with no luck and we tried changing the gain of the loop as well, but no luck.
  • The behavior of this Yend laser and its controller is still suspicious to us. When the loop is closed, the PZT feedback signal should not cause a change in amplitude of the light so much as we see it.
  • Also the fact that when loop is clsoed we do not see signs of flashing in the reflection photodiode is interesting. If anyone has any ideas, that would be good.
  16745   Sat Mar 26 13:04:38 2022 PacoSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - Green laser alignment on Yarm

I came for a bit to check on the "1Y0 burning smell" reported by Koji last evening. I agree that there's a toasty smell around the 1Y0 rack, but it is hard to tell where it comes from exactly. I think we can use the FLIR heat camera, but this will have to wait for Monday when someone with an iphone is around.

I also played a bit with the YAUX alignment (which is still poor) but I didn't try anything different nor did I seem to have more success. This is also an outstanding item for Monday, where maybe the next step is to install the GTRY path for a CCD.

  16749   Thu Mar 31 18:58:16 2022 Ian MacMillanSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Xarm

[Ian, Paco]

We continued to try and lock the IR laser to the x-arm. Last time we adjusted TT2 PR2 and PR3 to adjust the beam to hit the center of the ITMX. Today we continued to adjust the same optics to make the beam hit the center of the beam splitter and make sure the beam is going in the direction of the ITMY. Then removed a mirror that wasn't even bolted down. I put it on the front right corner of the hood with all the other optics (right in front of a suspended mirror). With this unknown mirror removed the path was clear and hit the center of ITMX. From there we went and opened the ETMX chamber and using the IR scope we adjusted ITMX to put the beam on the center of the ETMX. We continued adjusting ETMX and ITMX until we had three reflections. We stopped here because we realized we should set up POX. We think this because any adjustment to set up the POX would mess up the work we had done on the x arm alignment.

  16757   Tue Apr 5 18:15:06 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Xarm

[Paco, Anchal, Ian, JC]

We attempted the alignment of IR beam into the arm cavities. We used PR2 and PR3 (moved manually as well as using cdsutils) and got the YAW aligned pretty good on both X and Y directions. PIT alignment however turned out to be much harder to align. PR2 PR3 didn't have much range, so we zeroed there offset and tried to use TT1, TT2, MMT1, and MMT2 to align the PIT but it would get clipped before reaching BS table if we were to correct for PIT misalignment happening downstream. We concluded that the issue is that one of the PR2, PR3 mirrors have too much PIT offset in equilibrium position. We have requested Koji to change the output resistors in the coil drivers of PR2 and PR3 so that we can correct for the PIT offset in them directly using the coils and reduce load on upstream optics. We have tweaked TT1, TT2, MMT1, and MMT2 positions today, so we do not have the previous reference anymore.

  16758   Wed Apr 6 01:20:48 2022 KojiSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Xarm

PR2/PR3 Output R for fame OSEMS reduced from 1.2K to 1.2K//100Ohm

I put the R=100Ohm for PR3 with the functions of the units mistakenly swapped. This affects imbalanced actuation of PR3 right now as well as too strong SD

PR2 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR) / S2100616 / PCB S2100520 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH1/2/3

PR2 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD) / S2100617 / PCB S2100519 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH3

PR3 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR) / S2100619 / PCB S2100516 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH3 only

PR3 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD) / S2100618 / PCB S2100518 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH1/2/3

----

The output R was reduced from 1.2k to 1.2k//100 = 92 Ohm.

This means that the face coil gains were increased by a factor of 13.

The original gains for PR2 Pos/Pit/Yaw were {0.7, 0.3, 0.2}. To keep the same loop gain, the new gains were supposed to be {0.054, 0.023, 0.015}.
With the new gain, the oscillations were very slowly reduced. Therefore, I increased the gains to have the gain margin of 2. (i.e. increased the gains until I have the oscillation, and then made it half.)
The new values were {0.2, 0.1, 0.05}. The side gain was 20 and unchanged

For PR3 the same operation has been done.

The original gains for PR3 Pos/Pit/Yaw were {1, 0.52, 0.2}. They were supposed to be reduced to  {0.077, 0.04, 0.015}.
The gains were increased to {0.5, 0.1, 0.1}. The side gain was also increased from 1 to 5.

Attachment 1: PXL_20220406_060846581.jpg
PXL_20220406_060846581.jpg
Attachment 2: PXL_20220406_014205726.jpg
PXL_20220406_014205726.jpg
Attachment 3: PXL_20220406_060324812.jpg
PXL_20220406_060324812.jpg
Attachment 4: PXL_20220406_015259326.jpg
PXL_20220406_015259326.jpg
  16759   Wed Apr 6 12:03:51 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Yarm

[Anchal, Paco]

After Koji reduced the output resistors on PR2/PR3 coil drivers, we got much better actuation range. We aligned TT1 TT2 again to get beam centered on PR2 and PR3. Then we used only PR2 and PR3 to do the input beam alignment to Y arm cavity. Using access in ETMY chamber, we aligned the input beam parallel to cavity axis. Slight changes were required in ETMY alignment offsets to get first roundtrip in same spot on ITMY. remaining alignment is finer and needs to be done with a help of a reflection photodiode and cameras in the control room. Immediate next step is to setup POY path for locking the Yarm with IR.

Side note: Because of the large PIT correction required in PR3, we found that our upper OSEMs were hitting totally bright limit and lower OSEMs were hitting totally dark limit on PR3. This also destablized our damping loops. We pushed the upper OSEMs slighlty and pulled back the lower OSEMs slightly to get the PD signal in half shadow region again. This worked and our damping loops are stable again. However, we think we should repeat free swing test in future to diagonalize the input matrix for new OSEM positions.

  16760   Wed Apr 6 22:51:47 2022 KojiSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Xarm

[Yuta Koji]

We took out the two coil driver units for PR3 and the incorrect arrangement of the output Rs were corrected. The boxes were returned to the rack.

In order to recover the alignment of the PR3 mirror, C1:SUS_PR3_SUSPOS_INMON / C1:SUS_PR3_SUSPIT_INMON / C1:SUS_PR3_SUSYAW_INMON were monitored. The previous values for them were {31150 / -31000 / -12800}. By moving the alignment sliders, the PIT and YAW values were adjusted to be {-31100 / -12700}. while this change made the POS value to be 52340.

The original gains for PR3 Pos/Pit/Yaw were {1, 0.52, 0.2}. They were supposed to be reduced to  {0.077, 0.04, 0.015}.
I ended up having the gains to be {0.15, 0.1, 0.05}. The side gain was also increased to 50.

----

Overall, the output R configuration for PR2/PR3 are summarized as follows. I'll update the DCC.

PR2 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR) / S2100616 / PCB S2100520 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH1/2/3

PR2 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD) / S2100617 / PCB S2100519 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH3

PR3 Coil Driver 1 (UL/LL/UR) / S2100619 / PCB S2100516 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH1/2/3

PR3 Coil Driver 2 (LR/SD) / S2100618 / PCB S2100518 / R_OUT = (1.2K // 100) for CH3

Attachment 1: PXL_20220406_213356237.MP.jpg
PXL_20220406_213356237.MP.jpg
Attachment 2: PXL_20220406_212936502.MP.jpg
PXL_20220406_212936502.MP.jpg
  16761   Thu Apr 7 11:47:22 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDInitial BHD modeling: AS - LO mode matching

I begin modeling the initial BHD setup using Finesse. I started with copying C1_w_BHD.kat from the 40m/bhd repo and making changes to reflect the current BHD setup:

1. OMCs were removed.

2. Only 1 PD per BHD port was left.

3. Transmission of PR2 was changed to 2.2%. The PRG was calculated to be ~15.5.

4. Actual RoCs of new optics were dialed in (Yesterday me and Paco went into the cleanroom to measure the RoCs and they seem to match the datasheets).

Here's a table comparing the old (design?) RoCs with the new RoCs:

  New RoC Old RoC
LO1 5m 6m
LO2 inf inf
LO3 500mm 750mm
LO4 150mm -450mm
AS1 2m 2.8m
AS2 inf inf
AS3 200mm -2m
AS4 750mm 600mm
PR2 2000m -700m
PR3 1000m 1000m
SR3 1000m -700m

 

The changes looked quite alarming, especially for LO4 and AS3, so I wrote a script to calculate the mode matching between the LO and AS beams called AS_LO_ModeMatching.ipynb and pushed it into the repo. In the notebook a bright AS beam is created by creating a small asymmetry between the arms of ~ 0.003 degrees (~10pm). Amplitude detectors were put at the input ports of the BHD BS to calculate the fields in the AS and LO beams. In particular TEM00, TEM02 and TEM20 were measured for each beam.

The calculation shows that with the old RoCs the mode matching between the LO and AS beams is 99% while for the new RoCs it is ~ 50%.

  16762   Thu Apr 7 17:59:51 2022 AnchalSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Yarm

[Anchal, Paco, JC, Tega]

Today we have aligned the Yarm cavity for IR, with verified 1.5 roundtrips. We also placed following optics in the BS table.

  • POXM1 (installed earlier, not eloged)
  • SRMOL2
  • POYM1
  • SRMOL1
  • POYM2

We also cleared the in-air BS table of all previous optics. JC and Tega setup HeNe laser for Oplevs roughly for now. Tega also transported the POY RFPD from ITMY in-air table to the BS in-air table. We aligned the POY path to the table, but we had to move ITMY after that to get 2nd roundtrip in the arm cavity, which misaligned our POY path again. POY path would need to be modified tomorrow.

 

  16766   Thu Apr 7 21:15:04 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDInitial BHD modeling: AS - LO mode matching

Ok, it turns out these optics were purchased on purpose, as this elog shows. Jon considered building a mode-matching telescope with stock optics as an initial step before purchasing the custom optics (referred to as "design" optics in my elog).

I dialed in the new distances between the optics into the .kat file as described in this elog and pushed the changes to the repo. With the new distances, I got mode-matching of 87% for the full IFO and 89% for FPMI so there's probably no need to worry as the mode-matching with these optics was already designed.

Quote:

I begin modeling the initial BHD setup using Finesse. I started with copying C1_w_BHD.kat from the 40m/bhd repo and making changes to reflect the current BHD setup:

1. OMCs were removed.

2. Only 1 PD per BHD port was left.

3. Transmission of PR2 was changed to 2.2%. The PRG was calculated to be ~15.5.

4. Actual RoCs of new optics were dialed in (Yesterday me and Paco went into the cleanroom to measure the RoCs and they seem to match the datasheets).

Here's a table comparing the old (design?) RoCs with the new RoCs:

  New RoC Old RoC
LO1 5m 6m
LO2 inf inf
LO3 500mm 750mm
LO4 150mm -450mm
AS1 2m 2.8m
AS2 inf inf
AS3 200mm -2m
AS4 750mm 600mm
PR2 2000m -700m
PR3 1000m 1000m
SR3 1000m -700m

 

The changes looked quite alarming, especially for LO4 and AS3, so I wrote a script to calculate the mode matching between the LO and AS beams called AS_LO_ModeMatching.ipynb and pushed it into the repo. In the notebook a bright AS beam is created by creating a small asymmetry between the arms of ~ 0.003 degrees (~10pm). Amplitude detectors were put at the input ports of the BHD BS to calculate the fields in the AS and LO beams. In particular TEM00, TEM02 and TEM20 were measured for each beam.

The calculation shows that with the old RoCs the mode matching between the LO and AS beams is 99% while for the new RoCs it is ~ 50%.

 

  16768   Fri Apr 8 17:21:31 2022 Ian MacMillanSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - IR laser alignment on Yarm

[Ian, Paco, Tega]

Paco and I opened the ETMY and ITMY chamber to work on yesterdays efforts to lock the y arm. We temporarily in stalled a camera behind the ETMY to look at the transmission as we adjusted the ETMY and ITMY. We then moved on to setting up the POY. the beam was too large for the apature of the PD so we installed a lens in the beam path to decrease it.

Once that was installed we saw some flashing on the C1:LSC-POYCD_OUT channel. We also could see the flashing on the monitors in the control room. The flashing beam seemed to be in the middle of ITMY but was slightly to the right on the ETMY. From here we tried to walk the beam using PR3 and ETMY to move the beam to the center of the ETMY.

  16770   Mon Apr 11 21:13:21 2022 PacoSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - POY11 debugging

[Paco, Koji]

I asked Koji for some advice regarding closing the loop on YARM using POY11. A few things seemed off including

  • The YARM transmission; which was peaking at ~ 20 (typically, TRY is normalized so that under nominal input power conditions we see TRY in the range [0, 1])
  • The POY11 DCPD level was quite low; we expect a few tens of uW in this low power configuration where no more than 100 mW are going through IMC.

We looked at the POY11 RFPD first. We tried flashing an incandescent lamp in-situ and saw some weak response using an oscilloscope and the DC Out readout. We then used the OPHIR power meter and recorded ~ 1.2 uW of light incident on the POY11 RFPD... Initially, we suspected our beam was not filling the PD sensitive area (~ 2 mm diameter), but a quick estimate using the 200 mm focusing lens currently installed in the ITMY table gave us quite a generous margin of error... so we questioned the OPHIR measurement. We swapped the power meter and this time got ~ 18.4 uW, which is more in line with what we expected (phew).

Moving on, from the POY11 RFPD responsivity, and our ~ 20 uW of incident power, we expected on the order of a 20 mV of DC Output, but weren't really seeing this on the scope, so we decided to test the pins on the power of the RFPD. The DB15 cable not only supplies bipolar 15 VDC but also monitors several other test points such as Tsens, or DCout in the RFPD. We quickly noticed a weird signal on the ENAB testpoint, so we removed POY11 RFPD from the ITMY table and took it to the PD testbench. After redoing the soldering on the breakout board and RF amplifier (ZXX-500LN+), which we tested separately, we saw the expected behavior using a +- 15 VDC power supply... thus verifying that the RFPD and breakout board seemed to work ok. We turned our attention to the upstream DB15 connection, and after quickly checking the newly run cables, we ended up debugging the eurocrate PD interface. After attempting a simple power cycle and failing, we removed this card and looked at the schematic. It would seem that the logic enabling ICs (one or both) failed, thus preventing the card from enabling its outputs correctly.... We bypassed the logic by soldering pins 4,8,14 on U1, U20 and then checked the circuit in-situ, and we saw it worked fine again.

Now none of the status LEDs (which are driven by the logic IC portion) work on this card, but the card itself works fine at least for POY11.

We moved on, and installed the DB15 cables, checking the functionality at every step... Then we looked at the POY11_I_ERR signal and were happy to see nice pdh wavelets. We pushed forward a little bit more to try and lock YARM. First, we went to the Y end and centered the ETMY Oplev so as to register the position where the YARM is flashing... The ITMY Oplev is still not online. Then, we optimized the ETMY damping gains somewhat to try and make it less noisy, and finally, played with the LSC YARM loop gain to attempt locking. This last push was not as successful, but we have an idea of what next steps are needed to reduce the SUS noise, including

  • Install ITMY Oplevs, and close loop
  • Optimize ITMY damping gains

To be continued....

  16771   Mon Apr 11 21:44:14 2022 KojiSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - POY11 debugging

We took out the right most PD interface board D990543 and removed the 74LS04 chips. In fact two out of 4 were already replaced with enabling wires, however it seemed that one of the remaining two got failed.
These remaining two chips were removed and the enabling signals were connected to VCC (+5V). This operation made the status LED light not functional. (We didn't bother to fixed them by connecting them to the GND)

The new schematic diagram was attached here, and the corresponding DCC entry (https://dcc.ligo.org/D1900318-v1) was modified. Attachments #2-3 show the circuit after the changes, and the front view respectively.

Attachment 1: D990543A1.PDF
D990543A1.PDF D990543A1.PDF D990543A1.PDF
Attachment 2: PXL_20220412_023941730.jpg
PXL_20220412_023941730.jpg
Attachment 3: PXL_20220412_023950567.jpg
PXL_20220412_023950567.jpg
  16778   Thu Apr 14 10:18:35 2022 PacoSummaryBHD2 in oplev mirrors incompatible with LMR2V

[Paco, JC]

We realized the 2 in oplev mirrors (Thorlabs BB2-E02) for ITMYOL, SRMOL, and BSOL, are 0.47 in thick, while the LMR2V fixed mount is 0.46 in deep, even without taking the retaining ring into account. After a brief exchange with Koji, and Ian, we decided to glue the mirrors onto the mounts using Torr Seal (a vac compatible epoxy). They are curating in the clean room and should be ready to install in about 2 hours.

  16779   Thu Apr 14 11:52:57 2022 yehonathanSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - POY11 debugging

{JC, Paco, Yehonathan, Ian}

POY lens was moved to infront of the POY steering mirror to make the POU beam focused on the POY11 RFPD. We measured the DC output with an oscilloscope and optimized it with the steering mirrors. We get ~ 16.5mV.

The new lens position blocked the BS OpLev ingoing beam, so we repositioned the OpLev mirrors to make the beam path not hit the lens.

We went to the control room to observe the PDH signal. We observed a series of PDF osscillation and then the signal died infront of our eyes! There is just noise.

We go and check the +/-15V powering the RFPD and we find that the V- is ~ 14V which is good but the V+ was ~ 2.7V which is not.

We went to the PD interface and measure the POY11 output oltages using a breakout board and got the same result.

The PD interface was taken out for inspection. All the OP27 on channel 3 were replaced with new ICs (without need turns out)...


The PD interface card turned out to be OK. What happened is that one of the Kepcos in the RF rack died because its fan crumbled as seen in Attachment #2 (could this be the source of burning smell?). In response, the rack was drawing from the other Kepco (connected in parallel) way too much current  (4A) and the current limiter dropped its voltage from 15V to 2.7V.

The Kepco pair was removed and replaced with a single Sorensen. The POY PDH signal was restored (see attachment).

Attachment 1: Screenshot_2022-04-14_15-53-39.png
Screenshot_2022-04-14_15-53-39.png
Attachment 2: PXL_20220414_220616875.jpg
PXL_20220414_220616875.jpg
  16780   Thu Apr 14 18:34:51 2022 PacoSummaryBHDITMY Oplev reinstalled (Re: 2 in oplev mirrors incompatible with LMR2V)

[Paco, Yehonathan]

We installed ITMYOL1 and ITMYOL2 on the ITMY chamber. We aligned the ITMY OpLev beam and closed the loop successfully, we then had a second round of YARM aligment, where we brought the Y peak transmission up from 0.04 counts to 0.09 counts (up by a factor of two). We still couldn't close the YARM loop but we have a better alignment.

  16781   Thu Apr 14 18:39:13 2022 PacoSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - POY11 debugging

[Paco]

In reply to Koji's questions;

Q1: What is the product number of the broken Kepco?

A1: Kepco JQE 0-25 V 4A (1/4 rack mountable 100 W linear power supply)

Q2: Do you feel the burning smell on this broken kepco?

A2: Not very clearly. It just smells like generic broken electronic, but the fan was already long gone by the time we detected its problem.

Q3: How much current does the +15 VDC line draw from the Sorensen?

A3: The Sorensen current monitor reads 6.3 Amps

Q4: Is there a linear power supply in the market that can handle this much current with some margin?

A4: Probably... but we would have to look around.

Q5: Do we really need a linear power supply there?

A5: Good question, I guess anything that is not contaminating the RF electronics with HF noise (e.g. switching PS) can work?

Q6: Is the same fan problem happening on other Kepcos?

A6: Other fans are on, but at least one or two have the "ill" sound... It may be worthwile to give them maintenance if we can.

  16785   Mon Apr 18 16:09:07 2022 YehonathanUpdateBHDBHD Readout simulation

I'm planning on simulating the BHD readout noise in a manner very similar to the ALS noise model using Simulink. I've made a sketch of the model for the longitudinal DOFs (attached). A model for ASC will be similar but with more measurement devices (OpLevs, QPDs, WFSs).

I'm not pretending to simulate everything in this diagram on the first go, it is just a sketch of the big picture.

Attachment 1: BHD_Simulink_Sketch.drawio.pdf
BHD_Simulink_Sketch.drawio.pdf
  16786   Mon Apr 18 17:53:45 2022 PacoSummaryBHDPart IIa of BHR upgrade - POY11 debugging

[Paco, Ian]

We aligned the X-arm IR laser

  • First fix pointing on the ITMX by moving the BS (mostly pitch)
  • then open etmx chamber and fine tune the pointing using the BS until it is centered on ETMX
  • using beam card we quickly see the third reflection back misaligned on pitch so we move ITMX pitch to center it on ETMX
  • fine tune the ITMX alignment on ETMX and check higher order reflaction overlaping with input

at this point we checked C1:LSC-TRX_DQ using ndscope and luckly we see a tiny bit of flashing (about 0.04 in normalized high gain PD counts). So we closed ETM chamber and ITM chamber and go to control room to optimize this signal. The optimization was done in the following way:

  • First, just reiterate on the last steps from above, by maximizing the peak transmission using ITMX/ETMX pair.
  • Then, slide BS alignment, mostly in PIT, and return to ITMX/ETMX pair.
    • At some point, turning the BS PIT made a huge improvement, so I turned the control room light off and looked at the camera on the quad monitors.
  • Based on the location of the flashes (now brighter) on the ITMX/ETMX, the beam seemed to be off in PIT more than YAW, so we focused on correcting the pointing (moving BS) and then correcting with ITMX/ETMX, until the flashes got centered around ETMX.

Final peak transmission (C1:LSC-TRX_DQ) was ~ 1.3 in normalized high gain PD counts. Power budgeting tells us the peak should be ~ 2.0. The flashing on this arm is much better than YARM, so we will press on by installing POX11 RFPD and attempt locking tomorrow. This also means that YARM can be improved by a combination of alignment and/or SUS damping.

In the end we turned on the ETMX oplev and centered it to "save" our flashing position using this reference.

  16788   Tue Apr 19 18:10:10 2022 PacoUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - POX11 path, LO path, and ITMX Oplev

[Yuta, Paco]

We set up POX11 beam path from ITMX chamber to the ITMX in-air table. To do this, we first identified the POX reflection on the ITMX chamber, and then steered the POXM1 (in the BSC) by hand until we cleared the viewport. We also checked that the POX beam is centered on POXM1.

We then decided to slide the LO1 YAW to clear the LO beam path, which was otherwise clipping on the PR2 SOS. The slider (DAC limited) range of -25000 counts was barely enough to clear the SOS comfortably and avoid hitting the POXM1. The LO beam is now hitting LO2 mirror, so LO alignment can proceed from BSC and ITMY chamber.

Finally, we aligned the input ITMX Oplev beam to ITMXOL2, then ITMX, then to ITMXOL2, and finally into the ITMX in-air optical table. We took some photos of the Oplev beam (see Attachments) to note their position.

By the end of in-vacuum work there was still some flashing in the arm cavities, but fine alignment is required.


After closing the ITMX Chamber, and BSC, we moved on to center the ITMXOL beam. We accomplished this by using two mirrors instead of one as was previously the case. This relaxed the angle of incidence a little, but we had to change the path and the position of the QPD. The QPD sum reads ~ 6600 counts versus the ~ >8000 counts it read right before the vent. One attempt at closing the OL loop, and the ITMX starting oscillating in YAW (PIT was ok), so we realized that maybe we flipped the order in which the OL1 / OL2 mirror were arranged and so the YAW loop needed to flip its sign. Indeed after changing the C1:SUS-ITMX_OL_YAW_GAIN from -6.0 to 6.0 the OL_YAW loop is stable.

Attachment 1: DJI_0167.JPG
DJI_0167.JPG
Attachment 2: DJI_0169.JPG
DJI_0169.JPG
Attachment 3: DJI_0168.JPG
DJI_0168.JPG
  16789   Wed Apr 20 08:20:22 2022 PacoUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - PR2 weirdness

Yesterday, I tried tuning the PR2 damping gains by increasing the gain until the damping gave the ~5 oscillations (by watching the damped motion using StripTool, and keeping an eye on the PD var). I noticed that often when I changed the gain, some OSEM sensors shifted (gained an offset!!) and the PD var values changed, typically increasing at higher damping gains. I reverted the changes until the PD var looked "normal" again (~ 2 mV) but it is hard to imagine that the damping filters can have such a "DC" effect, given the shape comprises single zero at 0 Hz (and pole at 30 Hz).

  16792   Wed Apr 20 18:50:03 2022 KojiUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - PR2 weirdness

It seemed that it comes from the servo oscillation. This does not happen when the output limitters were set to be 100-ish. But even so the gains looked quite low.

I turned on the Cheby rool-offs for all the DOFs, and this allowed me to increase the damping gain A LOT.
The gains were 2~5 but now they are now 20-25 for the face OSEMs and 150 for SD.

The attached is the example of the damping when all the damping loops are on.

I think we need to tune the servo loops carefully for all the SUSs by actually looking at the openloop transfer functions rather than a personal feeling. => To Do

Attachment 1: Screenshot_2022-04-20_18-46-11.png
Screenshot_2022-04-20_18-46-11.png
  16797   Thu Apr 21 16:49:01 2022 PacoUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - BS Oplev + LO1 offset

[Paco, JC, Yuta]

We aligned the BS oplev using the new BSOL mirror pair. The main change is now the AOI of the oplev on the BS is quite normal. The output beam in the in-air table was quite large (diverging?) so we had to place a short FL lens in front of the QPD.


Separately, I added the LO1 YAW offset of ~ -2500 counts (before the coil driver changes it was -24500 counts) and saw LO beam hitting LO2. This means the alignment of the LO beam can move downstream.

  16799   Thu Apr 21 18:18:42 2022 yehonathanUpdateBHDPOX Alignment

{Yehonathan, Paco}

BS, ITMX and ETMX were aligned to get flashing in the X arm.

I aligned the POX beam on the ITMX table using a mixture of the old POP and POX optics. The beam was stirred to the POX11 RFPD. We measure the DC power using a scope but we see nothing. We went and saw that the POX11 cable was not connected to RF rack so we connected it along with some other RFPD cables.

We return but there is still no DC. We ndscope C1:LSC-POX11_I_ERR_DQ C1:LSC-POX11_Q_ERR_DQ and maximize the signal (attachment). The readout is very weak though. It should be as strong as POY which we already observed to have good SNR.

We also noticed that the one of the beam dumps for the POX RFPD is not glued and easily falls down.

Attachment 1: POX11_alignment.png
POX11_alignment.png
  16800   Thu Apr 21 18:42:47 2022 TegaUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - Align LO and AS beams to BHD BS

[Tega, Yuta, Paco]

We tried aligning the LO and AS beams on to the BHD beamsplitter. During the alignment process, we noticed that the damping loop for AS1 was not working. Paco drew our attention to the fact that the UR OSEM signal was alway close to zero, so we checked to ensure that the magnet was still within the OSEM recess and it looks OK. Next we checked the electrical connection at the interface between the copper OSEM cables to the blue in-vacuum flat cable and this too looks alright also. Since the AS1 coil driver was recently modified, it is possible we might find the problem there, so I'll ask Koji about this.


So Koji clarified that the coil driver board and SATAMP boards are different so we should connect this issue to the coil driver board.

  16801   Thu Apr 21 20:33:31 2022 KojiUpdateBHDAS1 UR OSEM problem localized in the chamber

Tega and Paco reported that the UR OSEM of AS1 lost the response.

- I have checked the LED MON (left) of the satellite amp for AS1. CH1/2/3 had 5V -> This indicates that the OSEM LEDs are (most likely) functioning.
- Then I went to the ITMY flange and connected the OSEM emulator instead of the Dsub25 cable. The attachment shows that the UR OSEM LED/PD worked fine with the OSEM emulator. WIth the vacuum flange connected it lost the response.

This indicates that the AS1 UR OSEM problem is localized in the chamber. Please check if the DSUB pins are touching the table or something else.

 

Attachment 1: Screenshot_from_2022-04-21_20-13-13.png
Screenshot_from_2022-04-21_20-13-13.png
  16803   Fri Apr 22 12:03:09 2022 TegaUpdateBHDAS1 UR OSEM problem localized in the chamber

[JC, Tega, Ian, Paco]

We found that the UR cable was clamped to the table by one of the ITMY OPLEV steering mirror mounts that was recently installed. After freeing the cable, the UR signal is now active again.

Quote:

This indicates that the AS1 UR OSEM problem is localized in the chamber. Please check if the DSUB pins are touching the table or something else.

 

ELOG V3.1.3-