40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
 40m Log, Page 169 of 339 Not logged in
ID Date Author Type Category Subject
16755   Mon Apr 4 15:49:06 2022 TegaUpdateOptical LeversSimplified sketch on BS table

I have updated the BS table using feedback from Koji and Paco and the attached pdf document is the latest iteration.

Attachment 1: BS_Table.drawio.pdf
16773   Wed Apr 13 12:50:07 2022 TegaUpdateVACNew Pressure Gauge Install/Pump Spool Vent

[Jordan, JC, Tega]

We have installed all the FRGs and updated the VAC medm screens to display their sensor readings. The replacement map is CC# -> FRG#, where # in [1..4] and PRP1 -> FRG5. We now need to clean up the C1VAC python code so that it is not overloaded with non-function gauges (CC1,CC2,CC3,CC4,PRP1). Also, need to remove the connection cables for the old replaced gauges.

16796   Thu Apr 21 16:36:56 2022 TegaUpdateVACcleanup work for vacuum git repo

git repo - https://git.ligo.org/40m/vac

Finally incorporated the FRGs into the main modbusIOC service and everything seems to be working fine. I have also removed the old sensors (CC1,CC2,CC3,CC4,PTP1,IG1) from the serial client list and their corresponding EPICS channels. Furthermore, the interlock service python script has been updated so that all occurrence of old sensors (turns out to be only CC1) were replaced by their corresponding new FRG sensor (FRG1) and a redundnacy was also enacted for P1a where the interlock condition is replicated with P1a being replaced with FRG1 because they both sense the main volume pressure.

16800   Thu Apr 21 18:42:47 2022 TegaUpdateBHDPart V of BHR upgrade - Align LO and AS beams to BHD BS

[Tega, Yuta, Paco]

We tried aligning the LO and AS beams on to the BHD beamsplitter. During the alignment process, we noticed that the damping loop for AS1 was not working. Paco drew our attention to the fact that the UR OSEM signal was alway close to zero, so we checked to ensure that the magnet was still within the OSEM recess and it looks OK. Next we checked the electrical connection at the interface between the copper OSEM cables to the blue in-vacuum flat cable and this too looks alright also. Since the AS1 coil driver was recently modified, it is possible we might find the problem there, so I'll ask Koji about this.

So Koji clarified that the coil driver board and SATAMP boards are different so we should connect this issue to the coil driver board.

16803   Fri Apr 22 12:03:09 2022 TegaUpdateBHDAS1 UR OSEM problem localized in the chamber

[JC, Tega, Ian, Paco]

We found that the UR cable was clamped to the table by one of the ITMY OPLEV steering mirror mounts that was recently installed. After freeing the cable, the UR signal is now active again.

 Quote: This indicates that the AS1 UR OSEM problem is localized in the chamber. Please check if the DSUB pins are touching the table or something else.

16830   Wed May 4 15:08:59 2022 TegaUpdateBHDXARM alignment to get flashing

[Yuta, Tega]

We aligned the BS, ITMY, and ETMY PIT and YAW to get the flashing on X-arm whilst also keeping the flashing of Y-arm. From attachment 1, it is clear that POXDC photodiode is not receiveing any light, so our next task is to work on POX alignment.

 Quote: Align X-arm cavity and regain flashing. Fix the Oplev path for ITMX. Tune POX11 phase angle to get an error signal with which we can lock the cavity. Finish AS beam path setup.

Attachment 1: IFO_XY_ARMS_Flashing.png
16831   Wed May 4 18:52:43 2022 TegaUpdateBHDPOP beam too high at POP SM4 on the ITMX chamber

[Yuta, Tega]

We needed to sort out the POXDC signal so we could work on X-arm alignment. Given that POXDC channel value was approx 6 compared to POYDC value of approx. 180, we decided to open the ITMX chamber to see if we could improve the situation. We worked on the alignment of POX beam but could not improve the DC level which suggests that this was already optimized for.  As an aside, we also noticed some stray IR beam from the BS chamber, just above the POX beam which we cold not identify.

Next we moved on to the POP beam alignment, where we noticed that the beam level on LO1 and POP_SM4 was a bit on the high side. Basically, the beam was completely missing the 1" POP_SM4 mirror and was close to the top edge of LO1. So we changed TT2 pitch value from 0.0143 to -0.2357 in order to move the beam position on POP_SM4 mirror. This changed the input alignment, so we compensated using PR2 (0.0 -> 49.0) and PR3 (-5976.560 -> -5689.800). This did not get back the alignment as anticipated, so we moved ITMY pitch from 0.9297 to 0.9107. All of these alignment changes moved the POP beam down by approx 1/5 of an inch from outside the mirro to the edge of POP_SM4 mirror, where about half of the beam is clipped.

Next Steps:

We need to repeat these aligment procedures with say 1.5 time the change in TT2 pitch to center the beam on POP_SM4 mirror.

Attachment 1: snnp_pr2_pr3_itmy_aligment.png
16833   Thu May 5 17:05:31 2022 TegaUpdateBHDIMC & X/Y-arm alignment

[Yuta, Tega]

In order to setup POP camera and RFPD on the ITMX table, we decided to first work on the IMC and X/Y-arm alignment.

IMC alignment:

We zeroed IMC WFS outputs and aligned IMC manually to get IMC transmission of 1200 and reflection of 0.35.

Y-arm alignment:

We used the new video game tool that moves the pairs of mirrors - PR3 & ETMY, ITMY & ETMY - in common and differential modes. This brought the Y-arm flashing to 0.8. Note that we used the _OFFSET bias values for PR3 & ETMY alignment instead of the _COMM bias values.

X-arm alignment:

We repeated the same procedure of moving the pairs of mirrors - BS & ETMX, ITMX & ETMX - in common and differential modes but manually this time. This brought the X-arm flashing to ~1.0.

Attachment 1: IFO_aligment_Y_locking_on.png
16838   Mon May 9 18:49:05 2022 TegaUpdateBHDRelocate green TRX and TRY PDs/cams/optics from PSL table to BS table

[Paco, Tega]

Started work on the relocating the green transmission optics, cameras and PDs. Before removing the any of the optics, we checked and confirmed that the PDs and Cams are indeed connected to the GRN TRX/Y medm channels. Then added labels to the cables before moving them.

Plumbing:

• Moved all power and signal cables for the PDs and cameras from PSL table to BS table. See attachment #1

Relocated Optics & PDs & Cameras:

• TRX and TRY cameras
• TRX and TRY PDs
• 1 BS, 2 lens for PDs and a steering mirror, see Atachement #2

Attachment 1: IMG_20220509_184439943.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_20220509_184154722.jpg
16843   Tue May 10 16:31:14 2022 TegaUpdateBHDITMX optlev return beam steered to QPD

Followed the steps below to complete the ITMX optlev installation. The ITMX optlev return beam now reaches its QPD without being blocked by the input steering mirror.

Although, I centered the ITMX optlev readout, this was not done when the XARM flashing is maximized bcos the IMC chamber was being worked on, so this should be done later when the IR beam is back.

Quote:

### Next steps:

• The Oplev beam paths need to be adjusted.
• The ongoing beam steering mirror is blocking the returning beam, so the ongoing path needs to be changed.
• First setup two irises to save ingoing path.
• Then make space for the returning beam by changing the steering mirror positions.
• Then recover the ingoing path to the center of irises.
• Steer the returning beam to the QPD.
• Then maximize the flashing on XARM and center the oplev to save this position.
16848   Thu May 12 19:55:01 2022 TegaUpdateBHDAS path alignment

[Yuta, Tega]

We finally managed to steer the AS beam from ITMY chamber, through BS and IMC chambers, to the in-air AP table.

We moved the AS5 mirror north to its nominal position and we also moved the ASL lens on BS chamber back to its nominal position. Attached photos are taken after today's alignment work.

Attachment 1: AS.JPG
Attachment 2: OMCchamber.JPG
16867   Fri May 20 12:42:23 2022 TegaUpdateVACDoor installation on the end stations

[JC, Tega, Chub]

Today we installed the 200 lbs doors on the end station chambers.

16870   Tue May 24 10:37:09 2022 TegaUpdateVACadded FRG channels to slow channel ini file

[Vacuum gauge sensors]

Paco informed me that the FRG sensor EPICS channels are not available on dataviewer, so I added them to slow channels ini file (/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/chans/daq/C0EDCU.ini). I also commented out the old CC1, CC2, CC3 and CC4 gauges. A service restart is required for them to become available but this cannot be done right now because it would adversely affect the progress of the upgrade work. So this would be done at a later date.

 Quote: git repo - https://git.ligo.org/40m/vac Finally incorporated the FRGs into the main modbusIOC service and everything seems to be working fine. I have also removed the old sensors (CC1,CC2,CC3,CC4,PTP1,IG1) from the serial client list and their corresponding EPICS channels. Furthermore, the interlock service python script has been updated so that all occurrence of old sensors (turns out to be only CC1) were replaced by their corresponding new FRG sensor (FRG1) and a redundnacy was also enacted for P1a where the interlock condition is replicated with P1a being replaced with FRG1 because they both sense the main volume pressure.

16973   Wed Jul 6 15:28:18 2022 TegaUpdateSUSOutput matrix diagonalisation : F2P coil balancing

local dir:  /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/Git/40m/scripts/SUS/OutMatCalc

Here is an update on our recent attempt at diagonalization of the SUS output matrices. There are two different parts to this: the first is coil balancing using existing F2P code which stopped working because of an old-style use of the print function and the second which should now focus on the mixing amongst the various degrees of freedoms (dof) without a DC/AC split I believe. The F2P codes are now working and have been consolidated in the git repo.

TODO:

• The remaining task is to make it so that we only call a single file that combines the characterization code and filter generation code, preferably with the addition of a safety feature that restores any changed values in case of an error or interruption from the user. The safety functionality is already implemented in the output matrix diagonalization stem of the code, so we just need to copy this over.
• Improve the error minimization algorithm for minimizing the cross-coupling between the various dof by adjusting the elements of the output matrix.

Previous work

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4762

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4719

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4688

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4682

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4673

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4327

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4326

https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/40m/4762

16976   Wed Jul 6 22:40:03 2022 TegaSummaryCDSUse osem variance to turn off SUS damping instead of coil outputs

I updated the database files for the 7 BHD optics to separate the OSEM variance trigger and the LATCH_OFF trigger operations so that an OSEM variance value exceeding the max of say 200 cnts turns off the damping loop whereas pressing the LATCH_OFF button cuts power to the coil. I restarted the modbusIOC service on c1susaux2 and checked that the new functionality is behaving as expected. So far so good.

TODO

Figure out the next layer of watchdogging needed for the BHD optics.

 Quote: [Anchal, JC, Ian, Paco] We have now fixed all issues with the PD mons of c1susaux2 chassis. The slow channels are now reading same values as the fast channels and there is no arbitrary offset. The binary channels are all working now except for LO2 UL which keeps showing ENABLE OFF. This was an issue earlier on LO1 UR and it magically disappeared and now is on LO2. I think the optical isolators aren't very robust. But anyways, now our watchdog system is fully functional for all BHD suspended optics.

16979   Thu Jul 7 21:25:48 2022 TegaSummaryCDSUse osem variance to turn off SUS damping instead of coil outputs

[Anchal, Tega]

Implemented ramp down of coil bias voltage when the BHD optics watchdog is tripped. Also added a watchdog reset button to the SUS medm screen that turns on damping and ramps up the coil PIT/YAW bias voltages to their nominal values. I believe this concludes the watchdog work.

 Quote: TODO Figure out the next layer of watchdogging needed for the BHD optics.

16986   Mon Jul 11 17:25:43 2022 TegaUpdateVACfixed obsolete reference bug in serial_XGS600 service

Koji noticed that the FRG sensors were not updating due to reference to an obsolete modbusIOC_XGS service, which was used temporarily to test the operation of the serial XGS sensor readout to EPICS. The information in this service was later moved into modbusIOC.service but the dependence on the modbusIOC_XGS.service was not removed from the serial_XGS600.service. This did not present any issue before the shutdown, probably bcos the obsolete service was already loaded but after the restart of c1vac, the obsolete service file modbusIOC_XGS.service was no longer available. This resulted in  serial_XGS600.service throwing a failure to load error for the missing obsolete modbusIOC_XGS service. The fix involved replacing two references to 'modbusIOC_XGS' with 'modbusIOC' in  /opt/target/services/serial_XGS600.service.

I also noticed that the date logged in the commit message was Oct 2010 and that I could not do a push from c1vac due to an error in resolving git.ligo.org. I was able to push the commit from my laptop git repo but was unable to do a pull on c1vac to keep it synced with the remote repo.

17025   Thu Jul 21 21:50:47 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDc1sus2 IPC update

IPC issue still unresolved.

Updated shared memory tag so that 'SUS' -> 'SU2' in c1hpc, c1bac and c1su2. Removed obsolete 'HPC/BAC-SUS' references from IPC file, C1.ipc. Restarted the FE models but the c1sus2 machine froze, so I did a manual reboot. This brought down the vertex machines---which I restarted using /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/cds/rebootC1LSC.sh---and the end machines which I restarted manually. Everything but the BHD optics now have their previous values. So need to burtrestore these.

# IPC file:
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/chans/ipc/C1.ipc

# Model file locations:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/c1/models/isc/c1hpc.mdl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/c1/models/c1su2.mdl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/c1/models/isc/c1bac.mdl

# Log files:
/cvs/cds/rtcds/caltech/c1/rtbuild/3.4/c1hpc.log
/cvs/cds/rtcds/caltech/c1/rtbuild/3.4/c1su2.log
/cvs/cds/rtcds/caltech/c1/rtbuild/3.4/c1bac.log

SUS overview medm screen :

• Reduced the entire screen width
• Revert to old screen style watchdog layout
17026   Fri Jul 22 15:05:26 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDc1sus2 shared memory and ADC fix

[Tega, Yuta]

We were able to fix the shared memory issue by updating the receiver model name from ''SUS' to 'SU2' and the ADC zero issue by including both ADC0 and ADC1 in the c1hpc and c1bac models as well as removing the grounding of the unused ADC channels (including chn#16 and chn#17 which are actually used in c1hpc) in c1su2. We also used shared memory to move the DCPD_A/B error signals (after signal conditioning and mixing A/B; now named A_ERR and B_ERR) from c1hpc to c1bac.
C1:HPC-DCPD_A_IN1 and C1:HPC-DCPD_B_IN1 are now available (they are essentially the same as C1:LSC-DCPD_A_IN1 and C1:LSC-DCPD_B_IN1, except for they are ADC-ed with different ADC; see elog 40m/16954 and Attachment #1).
Dolphin IPC error in seding signal from c1hpc to c1lsc still remains.

Attachment 1: Screenshot_2022-07-22_15-04-33_DCPD.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_2022-07-22_15-12-19_models.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_2022-07-22_15-15-11_ERR.png
Attachment 4: Screenshot_2022-07-22_15-32-19_GDS.png
17033   Mon Jul 25 17:58:10 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDc1sus2 IPC dolphin issue update

From the 40m wiki, I was able to use the instructions here to map out what to do to get the IPC issue resolved. Here is a summary of my findings.

I updated the /etc/dis/dishost.conf file on the frame builder machine to include the c1sus2 machine which runs the sender model, c1hpc, see below. After this, the file becomes available on c1sus2 machine, see attachment 1, and the c1sus2 node shows up in the dxadmin GUI, see attachment 2. However, the c1sus2 machine was not active. I noticed that the log file for the dis_nodemgr service, see attachment 3, which is responsible for setting things up, indicated that the dis_irm service may not be up, so I checked and confirmed that this was indeed the case, see attachment 4. I tried restarting this service but was unsuccessful. I restarted the machine but this did not help either. I have reached out to Jonathan Hanks for assistance.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_5.43.28_PM.png
Attachment 2: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_5.21.10_PM.png
Attachment 3: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_5.30.58_PM.png
Attachment 4: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_5.35.19_PM.png
17034   Mon Jul 25 18:09:41 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDBHD Homodyne Phase control MEDM screen

[Paco, Tega, Yuta]

Today, we made a custom MEDM screen for the BHD Homodyne Phase Control, which is basically an overview of the c1hpc model. See Attachments 1 & 2 for details.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_6.12.08_PM.png
Attachment 2: Screen_Shot_2022-07-25_at_6.18.09_PM.png
17044   Thu Jul 28 16:51:55 2022 TegaUpdateBHDShaking test for LO beam AS beam to BHD DCPDs

[Yuta, Tega, Yehonathan]

To investigate the BHD power imbalance and clipping issues, we did some shaking test of the mirrors in the LO path and AS paths. The results suggests the following:

• The clipping is happening after the BHD BS in DCPD_A path, as opposed to our initial guess of BHD BS transmission clipping in elog 17040.
• The LO beam we are seeing is probably a ghost beam from PR2

We performed both PIT and YAW shaking of all mirrors and looked at the output at DCPD_A and DCPD_B, see table below for details. Since we only see the dithering signal in DCPD_A, it suggests that the clipping is ocurring after the BHD BS and is also confined to the path between BHD BS and DCPD_A. We also swapped the camera location from DCPD_A to DCPD_B on ITMY table and confirmed that the beam was clipped for DCPD_A but not for DCPD_B.

This result discounts the possiblity of clipping being responsible for the power imbalance and therefore suggests that the power imbalance may actually be due to BHD BS not being 50:50. From the measurement in elog 17040, the transmission of BHD BS is 44$\pm$0.3% and the reflectivity is 56$\pm$0.3%. Note that DCPD_A is the transmission of BHD BS for AS beam, whereas DCPD_B is the reflection of BHD BS for AS beam, elog 16932.

We expect the shaking of PR2 to give no signal in either DCPD_A or DCPD_B when the LO beam is purely in trasmission, however, we see a signal in DCPD_A sugesting that the LO beam transit path through PR2 may not be as expected, i.e. the beam might be exiting the side of PR2 instead of the AR coated surface.

Finally, we measured the coherence between the dithering dof and DCPD_A/B & POP, see attachment 2, where we noticed that both DCPD_A/B have high coherence in the 1Hz-10Hz frequency band whereas ther was no coherence in POP as expected. This suggests that there may also be some small clipping in DCPD_B path.

LO Beam Shaking (LO1, LO2, PR2):

 color OPTIC DOF Freq OSC Amp (cnts) comment Black 0 Reference Blue LO1 YAW 304.4 2000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Orange LO1 PIT 304.4 2000 No signal Magenta LO2 YAW 312.2 10000 No signal Purple LO2 PIT 312.2 10000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Green PR2 YAW 308.8 20000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Red PR2 PIT 308.8 20000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B

AS Beam Shaking (AS1 and AS4)

 color OPTIC DOF Freq OSC Amp (cnts) comment Black 0 Reference Blue AS1 YAW 305.5 2000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Orange AS1 PIT 305.5 2000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Magenta AS4 YAW 313.3 2000 Signal in DCPD_A & No signal in DCPD_B Purple AS4 PIT 313.3 2000 No signal

Attachment 1: Screenshot_2022-07-28_16-58-34_LOandASShaking.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot_2022-07-28_18-08-55_DCPDPOPSuspensionCoherence.png
17046   Fri Jul 29 18:24:53 2022 TegaUpdateBHDLO beam power improved by factor of 6 after LO and AS beam alignment

[Yuta, Tega]

From our previous work (elog 17044) of shaking PR2 and seeing a signal in DCPD_A and the fact that LO beam power is far smaller than the expected nominal value, we decided to use TT1 and TT2 to realign the LO beam. This resulted in LO beam power going up by a factor of 6 and an improvement in the LO beam shape. We are still unable to find LO and AS alignment which realize BHD fringe with no clipping everywhere.

Deformed LO beam issue: Following the TT1 and TT2 alignments, used PR2 and PR3 to recover the transmission of the X and Y arms to 1. We also used LO1 and LO2 offsets to further reduce the beam deformation by eliminating the HOM concentric fringes that surounded the LO beam and to maximize the DCPD outputs. BHD optics in ITMY table was tweaked a lot to keep the LO beam centered on the BHD DCPDs and camera. The improved LO beam is still astigmatic in the yaw direction but at least now looks like a TEM00 mode. We also repositioned the DCPD_A path camera lens to remove the circular diffused fringes due to lens clipping. After the alignment, power was measured to be the following. It also reduced the coherence between DCPD outputs and suspension motions (see attached).

LO         ITMX
C1:HPC-DCPD_A_OUT16    +127.50    +96.24 (ITMX single bounce consistent to 40m/17040)
C1:HPC-DCPD_B_OUT16    +120.51    +141.52
Power at viewport A    504 uW (almost as expected 40m/17040)
Power at viewport B    385 uW

AP table AS beam clipping: We also noticed clipping in the AS beam in AP table which we removed by moving SR2 and AS1 in YAW and then used AS4 to keep the BHD AS beam centered in the BHD DCPDs.

BHD fringe: After overlaping the LO and AS beams, we saw diagonal fringes indicating beam tilt of LO wrt AS, so we tried to remove the AS beam tilt using AS1 and AS4 but failed to do so because the AS4 mirror seemed to completely distort the beam, so intead we decided to use SR2 and AS1 to remove the tilt between LO and AS beams, which realized BHD fringe. But the motion of SR2 and AS1 then moved the AS beam that it is no longer seen in AP table. The alignment to realize LO and AP AS beam without clipping, and that to realize BHD fringe are attached.

Attachment 1: LO_and_oldAS_settings.png
Attachment 2: BHD_fringe_settings.png
Attachment 3: Screenshot_2022-07-29_19-37-39.png
Attachment 4: FromTheLeft-AS-POP-LO.JPG
17052   Mon Aug 1 18:42:39 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDc1sus2 IPC dolphin issue update

[Yuta, Tega]

We decided to give the dolphin debugging another go. Firstly, we noticed that c1sus2 was no longer recogonising the dolphin card, which can be checked using

lspci | grep Stargen

or looking at the status light on the dolphin card of c1sus2, which was orange for both ports A and B.

We decided to do a hard reboot of c1sus2 and turned off the DAQ chassis for a few minutes, then restared c1sus2. This solved the card recognition problem as well as the 'dis_irm' driver loading issue (I think the driver does not get loaded if the system does not recognise a valid card, as I also saw the missing dis_irm driver module on c1testand).

Next, we confirmed the status of all dolphin cards on fb1, using

controls@fb1\$ /opt/DIS/sbin/dxadmin

It looks like the dolphin card on c1sus2 has now been configured and is availabe to all other nodes. We then restated the all FE machines and models to see if we are in the clear. Unfortunately, we are not so lucky since the problem persisted.

Looking at the output of 'dmesg', we could only identity two notable difference between the operational dolphin cards on c1sus/c1ioo/c1lsc and c1sus2, namely: the card number being equal to zero and the memory addresses which are also zero, see image below.

Anyways, at least we can now eliminate driver issues and would move on to debugging the models next.

Attachment 1: c1sus2_dolphin.png
Attachment 2: fb1_dxamin_status.png
Attachment 3: dolphin_num_mem_init2.png
17054   Tue Aug 2 17:25:18 2022 TegaConfigurationBHDc1sus2 dolphin IPC issue solved

[Yuta, Tega, Chris]

We did it!

Following Chris's suggestion, we added "pciRfm=1" to the CDS parameter block in c1x07.mdl - the IOP model for c1sus2. Then restarted the FE machines and this solved the dolphin IPC problem on c1sus2. We no longer see the RT Netstat error for 'C1:HPC-LSC_DCPD_A' and 'C1:HPC-LSC_DCPD_B' on the LSC IPC status page, see attachement 1.

Attachment 2 shows the module dependencies before and after the change was made, which confirms that the IOP model was not using the dolphin driver before the change.

We encountered a burt restore problem with missing snapfiles from yesterday when we tried restoring the EPICS values after restarting the FE machines. Koji helped us debug the problem, but the summary is that restarting the FE models somehow fixed the issue.

Log files:
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/burtcron.log
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/autoburt/autoburtlog.log

Request File list:
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/autoburt/requestfilelist

Snap files location:
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/autoburt/today
/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/autoburt/snapshots

Autoburt crontab on megatron:
19 * * * * /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/autoburt/autoburt.cron > /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/burt/burtcron.log 2>&1
Attachment 1: c1lsc_IPC_status.png
Attachment 2: FE_lsmod_dependencies_c1sus2_b4_after_iop_unpdate.png
17058   Thu Aug 4 19:01:59 2022 TegaUpdateComputersFront-end machine in supermicro boxes

Koji and JC looked around the lab today and found some supermicro boxes which I was told to look into to see if they have any useful computers.

Boxes next to Y-arm cabinets (3 boxes: one empty)

We were expecting to see a smaller machine in the first box - like top machine in attachement 1 - but it turns out to actually contain the front-end we need, see bottom machine in attachment 1. This is the same machine as c1bhd currently on the teststand. Attachment 2 is an image of the machine in the second box (maybe a new machine for frambuilder?). The third box is empty.

Boxes next to X-arm cabinets (3 boxes)

Attachement 3 shows the 3 boxes each of which contains the same FE machine we saw earlier at the bottom of attachement 1. The middle box contains the note shown in attacment 4.

Box opposite Y-arm cabinets (1 empty box)

In summary, it looks like we have 3 new front-ends, 1 new front-end with networking issue and 1 new tower machine (possibly a frame builder replacement).

Attachment 1: IMG_20220804_184444473.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_20220804_191658206.jpg
Attachment 3: IMG_20220804_185336240.jpg
Attachment 4: IMG_20220804_185023002.jpg
17066   Mon Aug 8 17:16:51 2022 TegaUpdateComputersFront-end machine setup

Added 3 FE machines - c1ioo, c1lsc, c1sus -  to the teststand following the instructions in elog15947. Note that we also updated /etc/hosts on chiara by adding the names and ip of the new FE since we wish to ssh from there given that chiara is where we land when we connect to c1teststand.

Two of the FE machines - c1lsc & c1ioo - have the 6-core X5680 @ 3.3GHz processor and the BIOS were already mostly configured because they came from LLO I believe. The third machine - c1sus - has the 6-core X5650 @ 2.67GHz processor and required a complete BIOS config according to the doc.

Next Step:  I think the next step is to get the latest RTS working on the new fb1 (tower machine), then boot the frontends from there.

KVM switch note:

All current front-ends have the ps/2 keyboard and mouse connectors except for fb1, which only has usb ports. So we may not be able to connect to fb1 using a ps/2 KVM switch that works for all the current front-ends. The new tower machine does have a ps/2 connector so if we decide to use that as the bootserver and framebuilder, then we should be fine.

Attachment 1: IMG_20220808_170349717.jpg
17073   Wed Aug 10 20:30:54 2022 TegaSummarySUSCharacterisation of suspension damping

[Yuta, Tega]

We diagnosed the suspension damping of the IMC/BHD/recycling optics by kicking the various degree of freedom (dof) and then tuning the gain so that we get a residual Q of approx. 5 in the cases where this can be achieved.

MC1: Good
MC2: SIDE-YAW coupling, but OK
MC3: Too much coupling between dofs, NEEDS ATTENTION
LO1: Good
LO2: Good
AS1: POS-PIT coupling, close to oscillation, cnt2um off, NEEDS ATTENTION
AS4: PIT-YAW coupling, cannot increase YAW gain because of coupling, No cnt2um, No Cheby, NEEDS ATTENTION
PR2: No cnt2um, No Cheby
PR3: POS-PIT coupling, cannot increase POS/PIT/YAW gain because of coupling, No cnt2um, No Cheby, NEEDS ATTENTION
SR2: No cnt2um

Attachment 1: BHD_SUSPIT_KICK.png
Attachment 2: BHD_SUSPOS_KICK.png
Attachment 3: BHD_SUSSIDE_KICK.png
Attachment 4: BHD_SUSYAW_KICK.png
Attachment 5: IMC_SUSPIT_KICK.png
Attachment 6: IMC_SUSPOS_KICK.png
Attachment 7: IMC_SUSSIDE_KICK.png
Attachment 8: IMC_SUSYAW_KICK.png
Attachment 9: PRSR_SUSPIT_KICK.png
Attachment 10: PRSR_SUSPOS_KICK.png
Attachment 11: PRSR_SUSSIDE_KICK.png
Attachment 12: PRSR_SUSYAW_KICK.png
17074   Wed Aug 10 20:51:14 2022 TegaUpdateComputersCDS upgrade Front-end machine setup

Here is a summary of what needs doing following the chat with Jamie today.

Jamie brought over the KVM switch shown in the attachment and I tested all 16 ports and 7 cables and can confirm that they all work as expected.

TODO

1. Do a rack space budget to get a clear picture of how many front-ends we can fit into the new rack

2. Look into what needs doing and how much effort would be needed to clear rack 1X7 and use that instead of the new rack. The power down on Friday would present a good opportunity to do this work on Monday, so get the info ready before then.

3. Start mounting front-ends, KVM and dolphin network switch

4. Add the BOX rack layout to the CDS upgrade page.

Attachment 1: IMG_20220810_171002928.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_20220810_171019633.jpg
12489   Tue Sep 13 19:02:56 2016 TengUpdateGeneralITMX sensor

[Lydia,Teng]

Something strange happened to the ITMX osem reading around 4.pm. PDT as shown below.

Also the there was no response of the reading as we adjusted the PITCH and YAW. :(

Note that we restarted the slow machine: c1susaux,c1ausex this afternoon because of the unresponced interface.

Attachment 1: 47.png
Attachment 2: 34.png
12505   Mon Sep 19 13:25:03 2016 TengUpdateElectronicsSatellite Amplifier

In order to figure out the difference betweent simulated result and measurement, I tried to measuren the electronic noise by following ways as show in attachment 1

1.measure from the satellite box by SR785 at ETMY ,calibrate to counts by divide by 3267.8. while at that conditin, the set up is in suspension.

2. measure after ADC by diagnostics test tools, with set up on table in history and on uspension currently.

3. use the caculated butterfly channel.

the results are shown in attachmemt 2. The overall nosie level are still much higher than simulation.

Quote:

 If we have some data with one of the optics clamped and the open light hitting the PD, or with the OSEMs removed and sitting on the table, that would be useful for evaluating the end-to-end noise of the OSEM circuit. It seems like we probably have that due to the vent work, so please post the times here if you have them.

The ETMX OSEMs have been attached to its Satellite box and plugged in for the last 10 days or so, with the PD exposed to the unobstructed LED. I pulled the spectrum of one of the sensors (mean detrended, I assume this takes care of removing the DC value?). The DQed channels claim to record um (the raw ADC counts are multiplied by a conversion factor of 0.36). For comparison, re-converted the y-axis for the measured curve to counts, and multiplied the total noise curve from the LISO simulation by a factor of 3267.8cts/V (2^16cts/20V) so the Y axis is noise in units of counts/rtHz. At 1Hz, there is more than an order of magnitude difference between the simulation and the measurement which makes me suspect my y-axis conversion, but I think I've done this correctly. Can such a large discrepancy be solely due to thick film resistors?

18   Fri Oct 26 16:19:29 2007 Tobin FrickeRoutineIOOMC resonances
We would like to measure the absorption of the mode cleaner optics. The plan is to repeat <a href="http://ilog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu:7285/mLIGO/Cleaning_the_Mode_Cleaner">Valera's experiment</a> in which we track the MC's thermal resonances to infer their power absorption. Last night Rana and I hooked up a lock-in amplifier to heterodyne the MC servo signal by 28 kHz and piped the output into an ADC using the MC_AO channel. We did not find any resonances.

Valera recommends we drive the POS of the three MC optics with bandlimited noise to excite the resonances.
16930   Mon Jun 20 19:46:04 2022 TomislavUpdateASCSimulation plots

In the attachment please find IMC ASC simulation plots. Let me know what you think, if you want some other plots, and if you need any clarification.

Attachment 1: pit_mot_cl_MCs.png
Attachment 2: loc_damp_cl_MCs.png
Attachment 3: contr_output_cl_MCs.png
Attachment 4: sens_output_cl_MCs.png
Attachment 5: BS_motion_cl_MCs.png
16934   Tue Jun 21 18:41:46 2022 TomislavUpdateASCSimulation plot

In the attachment please find a comparison of error signals of simulation and reality. For C1:IOO-WFS1/2_PIT_IN1 excess signal ('belly') between a few Hz up to 70-80 Hz might be caused by air turbulence (which is not included in the simulation).

Attachment 1: sens_output_comparison.png
16937   Tue Jun 21 22:22:37 2022 TomislavUpdateASCPlots

In the attachment please find a comparison of error signals of simulation and reality after including air turbulence as input noise.

Attachment 1: sens_output_comparison_with_air_turbulence.png
16948   Sat Jun 25 22:18:41 2022 TomislavUpdateASCSimulation and reality comparisons

In the attachment please find plots comparing controller output, local damping output, and error signals.

Input noises of the simulation are seismic noise, osem noise, input power fluctuations, sensing noises of WFSs and QPD, and air turbulence noise for WFSs. There is also optical torque noise (radiation pressure effect).

The procedure to get optical gains and sensing noises:
Having the actuator response A rad/cnts @ 3 Hz. I was shaking MC1/2/3 in pitch with B cnts @ 3 Hz and getting WFS1/2 QPD signals of C cnts @ 3 Hz, which means WFS1/2 QPD optical gain is D cnts/rad = C / (A * B) cnts/rad. So, if WFS1/2 QPD IN1 has a noise spectrum (at higher freqs) of E cnts/rtHz, that corresponds to E/D rad/rtHz of sensing noise for WFS1/2 QPD.

Actuator response [rad/cts] I was getting shaking mirrors at 3 Hz and measuring amplitudes of OSEM output (knowing the geometry of the mirror). I scaled it to DC. From here I was getting ct2tau_mc (knowing the mirror's moment of inertia, Q, and natural pitch frequencies). OSEM calibration factors [cts/rad] I was getting from the input matrix and geometry of the mirror.

The flat noise at higher frequencies from the local damping and controller output channels is presumably quantization/loss of digits/numerical precision noise which I don't include in simulations for now?!

Regarding air turbulence, in KAGRA it has been reported that air turbulence introduces phase fluctuations in laser fields that propagate in air. According to Kolmogorov’s theory, the PSD of phase fluctuations caused by air turbulence scales as ∝ L*V^(5/3)*f^(−8/3). Here, L is the optical path length and V is a constant wind speed. Since it is not obvious how can one estimate typical V in the beam paths I was taking this excess noise from the error signals data between 10 Hz and 50 Hz, extrapolated it taking into account ∝ f^(−8/3) (not for frequencies below 2 Hz, where I just put constant, since it would go too high). I expect that I won't be able to get a parameterized model that also predicts the absolute value. The slope is all I can hope to match, and this I already know. QPD chamber is much smaller (and better isolated?) and there is no this excess noise.

Regarding other things in simulations (very briefly): beam-spots are calculated from angular motions, length change is calculated from beam-spots and angular motion, cavity power depends on length change and input power, and torque on the mirrors depends on beam-spots and cavity power. From other things, local-sensor basis conversion (and vice versa) is worth noting.

Attachment 1: sens_output_comparison_23_6_new.png
Attachment 2: contr_out_comparison_23_6_new.png
Attachment 3: local_damp_out_comp_23_6_new.png
16958   Tue Jun 28 18:19:09 2022 TomislavUpdateElectronicsElectronics noise

I measured electronics noise of WFSs and QPD (of the WFS/QPD, whitening, ADC...) by closing PSL and measuring the error signal. It was needed to put the offset in C1:IOO-MC_TRANS_SUMFILT_OFFSET to 14000 cts (without offset the sum of quadrants would give zero, and 14000 cts is the value when the cavity is locked). For WFS that are RF, if there is intensity noise at low frequencies, it is not affecting the measurement.

In the attachment please find the power spectrum of the error signal when the PSL shutter is on and off.

Attachment 1: electronics_noise_spectra.png
Attachment 2: error_signal.png
16972   Tue Jul 5 20:05:06 2022 TomislavUpdateElectronicsWhitening electronics noise

For whitening electronics noise for WFS1, I get (attachment). This doesn't seem right, right?

Attachment 1: whitening_noises.png
16992   Tue Jul 12 14:56:17 2022 TomislavSummaryElectronicsElectronics noise measurements

[Paco, Tomislav]

We measured the electronics noise of the demodulation board, whitening board, and ADC for WFSs, and OPLEV board and ADC for DC QPD in MC2 transmission. We were using SR785.

Regarding the demodulation board, we did 2 series of measurements. For the first series of measurements, we were blocking WFS (attachment 1) and measuring noise at the output of the demod board (attachment 2a). This measurement includes dark noise of the WFS, electronics noise of demod board, and phase noise from LO. For the second series of the measurements, we were unplugging input to the demod board (attachment 2b & 2c is how they looked like before unplugging) (the mistake we made here is not putting 50-ohm terminator) and again measuring at the output of the demod board. This measurement doesn't include the dark noise of the WFS. We were measuring it for all 8 segments (I1, I2, I3, I4, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). The dark noise contribution is negligible with respect to demod board noise. In attachments 3 & 4 please find plots that include detection and demodulation contributions for both WFSs.

For whitening board electronics noise measurement, we were terminating the inputs (attachment 5) and measuring the outputs (attachment 6). Electronics noise of the whitening board is in the attachments 7 & 8.

For ADC electronics noise we terminated ADC input and measured noise using diaggui (attachments 9 & 10). Please find these spectra for WFS1, WFS2, and MC TRANS in attachments 11, 12 & 13.

For MC2 TRANS we measured OPLEV board noise. We did two sets of measurements, as for demod board of WFSs (with and without QPD dark noise) (attachments 14, 15 & 16). In the case of OPLEV board noise without dark noise, we were terminating the OPLEV input. Please find the electronics noise of OPLEV's segment 1 (including dark noise which is again much smaller with respect to the OPLEV's electronics noise) in attachment 17.

For the transfer functions, demod board has flat tf, whitening board tf please find in attachment 18, ADC tf is flat and it is (2**16 - 1)/20 [cts/V], and dewhitening tf please find in attachment 19. Also please find the ASD of the spectral analyzer noise (attachment_20).

Measurements for WFS1 demod and whitening were done on 5th of July between 15h and 18h local time. Measurements for WFS2 demod and whitening were done on 6th of July between 15h and 17h local time. All the rest were done on July 7th between 14h and 19h. In attachment 21 also find the comparison between electronics noise for WFSs and cds error signal (taken on the 28th of June between 17h and 18h). Sorry for bad quality of some pictures.

Attachment 1: attachment_1.jpg
Attachment 2: attachment_2a.jpg
Attachment 3: attachment_2b.jpg
Attachment 4: attachment_2c.jpg
Attachment 5: attachment_3.png
Attachment 6: attachment_4.png
Attachment 7: attachment_5.jpg
Attachment 8: attachment_6.jpg
Attachment 9: attachment_7.png
Attachment 10: attachment_8.png
Attachment 11: attachment_9.jpg
Attachment 12: attachment_10.jpg
Attachment 13: attachment_11.png
Attachment 14: attachment_12.png
Attachment 15: attachment_13.png
Attachment 16: attachment_14.jpg
Attachment 17: attachment_15.jpg
Attachment 18: attachment_16.jpg
Attachment 19: attachment_17.png
Attachment 20: attachment_18.png
Attachment 21: attachment_19.png
Attachment 22: attachment_20.png
Attachment 23: attachment_21.png
16763   Thu Apr 7 20:33:42 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work

To access the board remotely through the 40m lab ethernet port, use

ssh -N -L localhost:1137:localhost:9090 xilinx@<ip_address>

Then in the browser go to

localhost:1137/lab

Other SSH commands using different ports or without the -N -L seemed to fail to open Jupyter. This way has been successful thereafter.

 Quote: [Tommy, Paco] Since last week I've worked with tommy on getting the RFSoC 2x2 board to get some TFs from simple minicircuits type filters. The first thing I did was set up the board (which is in the office area) for remote access. I hooked up the TCP/IP port to a wall ethernet socket (LIGO-04) and the caltech network assiggned some IP address to our box. I guess eventually we can put this behind the lab network for internal use only. After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP. We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP.

16764   Thu Apr 7 20:37:06 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC 2x2 Board -- Simple Tone Generator

In the "Tommy" sub folder, I created a new notebook called "SimpleToneGenerator". This tunes the DAC and ADC mixers to a single frequency and reads off the Time Series and Fourier components. We can alos easily check the demodulation scheme and implement butterworth filters to check their function.

16765   Thu Apr 7 20:41:15 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC 2x2 Board -- Gain Plotter

In this file (under Tommy), we have a notebook which runs through a spectrum of frequencies and determines the gain response of the attached filter. Below we have the output of a high pass filter. We use IQ demodulation to change IQ componets to DC. Then using a butterworth filter, we read out the DC components and determine the gain's magnitude and phase. However, the phase seems very noisy. This is because the oscillators in the different tiles are independent and a random phase is introduced by changing the mixer frequency in individual tiles. To resolve this we need Multi Tile Synchronization or "MTS".

Original Pynq Support Forum Query: https://discuss.pynq.io/t/rfsoc-2x2-phase-measurement/3892

We also have the code to fit a resposne function using IIRregular, but this is not as useful without proper phase data.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-04-07_at_8.40.23_PM.png
Attachment 2: Unknown-3.png
Attachment 3: Unknown-4.png
16790   Wed Apr 20 14:56:06 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work & BALUN saga

Here are a few options for replacement BALUNs from Mini Circuits and specs:

Current. TCM1-83X+, 10-8000 MHz, 50 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1, Configuration K

1. Z7550-..., DC-2500 MHz (some DC-2300), 50/75 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1.5, Configuration Q. There are various types of the Z7550 which have different connectors (SMA and BNCs). These have much larger dimensions than the TCM1-83X. Can handle up to 5A DC current with matching loss 0.6 dB.

2. SFMP-5075+, DC-2500 MHz, 50/75 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1.5, Configuration D. This is an SMA connected BALUN. It can handle 350mA, has a matching loss 0.4 dB, and has 1W power handling.

Quote:

Seems like it should be possible to just remove the transformer (aka as a BALUN ... BALanced, UNbalanced), or replace it with a lower frequency part. Its just a usual mini-circuits part. Maybe you can ask Chris Stoughton about this and ask Tommy to checkout some of the RFSoC user forums for how to go to DC.

 Quote: After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP. We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP.

 model_no case_style single2single single2bal bal2bal center_tap dc_iso freq_low freq_high impedance imped_ratio interface tech config SFMP-5075+ FF1891 Y N N N N DC 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE D TCM1-83X+ DB1627 N Y Y N N 10 8000 50 1 SMT CORE & WIRE K Z7550-BFNF+ H795-14 Y N N N N DC 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-BMBF+ QP1876-1 Y N N N N DC 2300 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE D1 Z7550-BMNF+ QP1876 Y N N N N DC 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-FFNM+ H795-1 Y N N N N DC 2300 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-FFSF+ H557-1 Y N N N N DC 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-FMSF+ H795-3 Y N N N N DC 2300 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-FMSFDC+ H795-3 Y N N N Y 1 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q Z7550-NFNF+ H795-10 Y N N N N DC 2500 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE D1 Z7550-NMNF+ H795-4 Y N N N N DC 2300 50/75 1.5 CON CORE & WIRE Q
16807   Sun Apr 24 13:17:08 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsNew RFSoC2x2 Overlay

We recieved an overlay from Chris Stoughton which he used for a ZCU11 board. The overlay is supposed to be compatible with the RFSoC 2x2 and help enable the Multi-Tile Synchronization (MTS) we need. He also provides a .py with the necessary low level connection to the board and its memory along with a few sample notebooks.

Progress So Far:

• The overlay loads properly and in reasonable time.
• We can set the mixer and dac frequencies. However, it is unclear what event_src Chris wanted for the adc mixers. It seems that he was using event_src_immediate (possibly unintenionally) which is not an available adc mixer setting in our board. Instead, we set the event source to "Tile" and will later determine if this is an issue.
• We then go to get data from the buffer. There are two functions called: capture and transfer. These are called on the pynq DMA. Capture runs fine but we get stuck during the transfer at dma.revchannel.wait(). This issue has not been resolved.
16813   Tue Apr 26 16:23:22 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC2x2 MTS

We connected a 8 MHz signal generator to the device in order to sync up the ADCs and DACs and hopefully get phase data.

Some things to note:

• RF Manual (143)- Need to use XRFDC SYSREF for update event
• RF Manual (171)- Synchronization steps require us to first enable all clocks and sysref generators (via xrfdc package)
• RF Manual (173)- Sysref requirments, not clear if PL is syncing as needed.
• RF Manual (181)- XRFDC example code, see also https://github.com/Xilinx/embeddedsw/blob/master/XilinxProcessorIPLib/drivers/rfdc/examples/xrfdc_mts_example.c

Xilinx RF Manual: https://docs.xilinx.com/v/u/2.4-English/pg269-rf-data-converter

16857   Mon May 16 14:46:35 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC MTS Work

We followed the manual's guide for setting up MTS to sync on external signal. In the xrfdc package, we update the RFdc class to have RunMTS, SysRefEnable, and SysRefDisable functions as prescribed on page 180 of the manual. Then, we attempted to run the new functions in the notebook and read the DAC signal outputs on an oscilloscope. The DACs were not synced. We were also unable to get FIFOlatency readings.

16876   Thu May 26 15:55:10 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC Power Spectrum

Finished building power spectrum analyzer for the RFSoC. There are two things that I would like to address down the road. First is that there is an oscillation between positive and negative voltages at the ADC sampling frequency. This creates an undesirable frequency component at the sampling rate. I have not yet figured out the cause of this positive to negative oscillation and have simply removed half of the samples in order to recover the frequency. Therefore, I would like to figure out the root of this oscillation and remove it. Also, we have a decimation factor of 2 as default by the board which we would like to remove but have been unable to do so.

Example: 8 MHz Square Wave from SRL signal generator.

Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-06-02_at_2.51.23_PM.png
16879   Fri May 27 15:53:17 2022 TommyUpdateElectronicsRFSoC MTS Work

With some help from the forums, we printed the status of the DAC MTS sync and were able to determined that our board's vivado design does not have MTS enabled on each tile. To fix this, we will need to construct a new Vivado desgin for the board. We were also warned to "make sure to generate correctly a PL_clock and a PL_sysref with your on board clock synthesizers and to capture them in the logic according to the requirements in PG269" of the RF Manual. From this we should be able to sync the DAC and ADC tiles as desired.

 Quote: We followed the manual's guide for setting up MTS to sync on external signal. In the xrfdc package, we update the RFdc class to have RunMTS, SysRefEnable, and SysRefDisable functions as prescribed on page 180 of the manual. Then, we attempted to run the new functions in the notebook and read the DAC signal outputs on an oscilloscope. The DACs were not synced. We were also unable to get FIFOlatency readings.

14014   Mon Jun 25 19:14:02 2018 UditSummaryGeneralRe: A summary of the Tip-TIlt Mirror Holder design changes

2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder:

The screw length selected here (2") is not interfering with any part of the assembly.

The 'weights' I have here are just thumb nuts from Mcmaster, so their weight is fixed (1.65g each, btw).

Problem I'd like to solve: Find an assortment of weighted, symmetric nuts with caps on one end to fix position on shaft.

3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position:

Thanks for pointing out the mismatch in travel distance of protrusion and clamp screws. To match them, the clamp screw slot now sticks out of the profile (by 1.5mm). The range of the clamp motion is +/- 3 mm.

Also, here's a screenshot of the slot in the mirror holder:

--

- Excluding the weighted screw rod assembly, the height gap between assembly COM and wire release point is 3.1 mm.

 Quote: > 2. Weighted screw rod at the bottom for tilting the mirror-holder: Too long. The design of the holder should be check with the entire assembly. We should be able to make it compact if we heavier weights. How are these weights fixed on the shaft? Also can we have options for smaller weights for the case we don't need such a range? Note the mass of the weights. > 3. Set-screws on both side of wire clamp to adjust its horizontal position: How much is the range of the clamp motion limited by the slot for the side screws and the slot for the protrusion? Are they matched? Can you show us the design of the slot made on the mirror holder? >> Where is the center of mass (CoM) for the entire mirror holder assy and how much is the height gap between the CoM and the wire release points. Can you do this with 3/8" and 1/2" fused silica mirrors?

13429   Thu Nov 16 00:14:47 2017 Udit KhandelwalUpdateSUSSOS Sapphire Prism design

Summary:

• SOS solidworks model is nearly complete
• Having trouble with the design of the sensor/actuator head assembly and the lower clamps
• After Gautam's suggestion, installed Abaqus on computer. Teaching it to myself to eventually do FEM analysis and find resonant frequency of the system
• Goal is to replicate frequency listed in the SOS documents to confirm accuracy of computer model, then replace guide rods with sapphire prisms and change geometry to get same results

Questions:

• How accurate do the details (like fillet, chamfer, placement of little vent holes), and material of the different SOS parts need to be in the model?
• If I could get pictures of the lower mirror clamp (document D960008), it would be helpful in making solidworks model. Document is unclear. Same for sensor/actuator head assembly.
ELOG V3.1.3-