Assuming that PRM is interfering with some other optics, I have estimated the optical distance between PRM and an object that interferes with PRM.
The optical distance is estimated to be 9.5 +/- 0.5 m.
If we believe this number the object is most likely outside of the vacuum chambers.
(Calibration of the MC2 actuator)
Is PRM making some fringes with some other optics ??
I searched for a scattering body in the REFL path.
According to the result the REFL path on the AS table is innocent.
The idea of the search method is given as follows:
I realigned the incident beam to PMC at 23:30. The transmitted light went up from 0.78 to 0.83.
Also I decreased the HEPA level down to 20 % for the night time locking.
One of my goals in this week is : measurement of the current best ALS noise budget.
Last night I took a new noise spectra of the Y arm ALS, which is shown in the attached figure below.
The displacement of the arm cavity observed from the IR PDH is at 66 pm in rms. In the measurement the arm length was stabilized with the ALS technique.
Here is a new time series plot showing how stably ALS can control the arm length.
In the middle of the plot the cavity length was held at the resonance point for ~ 2 min. and then it passed through the resonance point to show the full shape of the PDH signal.
Apparently the PDH signal is now quieter than before (#6133)
One of my goals this week is to get people to make plots with physical units:
Do we have PSL pos and ang QPD trends? We should start watching them, because the PMC drifted back down to 0.76 transmission, ~3.5 days after Kiwamu realigned it (his elog is from last Thurs). Not so awesome.
I walked through the control room just now and found both PMC and MC unlocked. They're both locked now, but with PMC transmission 0.76, MC transmission ~24,500.
I have realigned the beam pointing to PMC. The transmitted light increased from 0.74 to 0.83.
The misalignment was mainly in pitch.
I did some more stuff for the Y arm ALS and updated the noise budget:
After the works, the rms displacement improved a little bit, so it is now at 24 pm in rms.
Though, it turned out that the MFD's ADC is now limiting the noise in a frequency band of 200 mHz - 5 Hz.
So tonight I will increase the gain of the whitening filter to push down the ADC noise more.
(What I did)
+ added the DAC noise and comparator noise based on measurements.
+ redesigned the servo filter shape to suppress the seismic noise below 10 Hz.
The attached plot below shows the newly designed open loop transfer function together with the old one for a comparison.
UGF is at 120 Hz and the phase margin is about 27 deg.
Surprisingly increasing the gain of the whitening filter didn't improve the noise curve.
It suggests that the ADC noise is not the limiting factor below 10 Hz.
I placed an other Y2-LW-1-2050-UV-45P/AR steering mirror into the beam path of the green beam launching in order to avoid the ~30 degrees use of the 45 degrees mirror. The job is not finished.
Indeed the glitches show up in the analog demodulated signals. So it is not an issue of the digital processing.
With an oscilloscope I looked at the I/Q monitor outputs of the LSC demodulators, including REFL11, REFL33, REFL55, POY11, AS55 while keep locking the carrier-resonant PRMI.
I saw some glitches in REFL11, REFL55 and AS55. But I didn't see any obvious glitches in REFL33 and PO11 because the SNR of those signals weren't good enough.
(some example glitches)
The attached plot below is an example shot of the actual signals when the carrier resonant PRMI was locked.
The first upper row is the spectrogram of REFL11_I, REFL55_I, REFL33_I and AS55_Q in linear-linear scale.
The second row shows the actual time series of those data in unit of counts.
The bottom row is for some DC signals, including REFLDC, ASDC and POYDC.
You can see that there are so many glitches in the actual time series of the demod signals (actually I picked up the worst time chunk).
It seems that most of the glitches in REFL11, REFL33 and AS55 coincide.
The typical time scale of the glitches was about 20 msec or so.
Note that the PRMI was locked by REFL33 and AS55 as usual.
During the Y arm ALS I found that the noise of the AS55 demod signal was worse than that of POY11 in terms of the Y arm displacement.
There is a bump from 500 mHz to 100 Hz in the AS55 signal while POY11 didn't show such a structure in the spectrum.
The plot below is the noise spectra of the Y arm ALS. The arm length was stabilized by using the green beat-note fedback to ETMY.
In this measurement, POY11 and AS55 were served as out-of-loop sensors, and they were supposed to show the same noise spectra.
In the plot It is obvious that the AS55 curve is louder than the POY curve.
It started with fire alarm test yesterday at 14:50 All alarms are functioning VERY loud and their flashers are bright. Evacuation drill followed. We assembled at north west corner of the 40m building and counted 6 heads.
Nobody was left sleeping inside. Bob carried the success report of the drill to PMA office immediately.
The alignment is finished after the realization that the 3rd steering mirror had to be adjusted too.
The input power increased from 1.2 to 1.4 mW
The mode cleaner is super unhappy. It's rocking around at ~1Hz.
I turned off the WFS and turned them back on after the MC was locked, and it seems a little happier now. At least it's not falling out of lock ~1/minute.
After I recovered the lock of PMC, I found that the PMC transmission was quite low. It was about 0.26 in the EPICS display.
I zeroed the PSL temperature feedback value which had been -2.3 and then the PMC transmission went back to a normal value of 0.83.
I believe it was because the PSL was running with two different oscillation modes due to the big temperature offset.
I did a fine alignment on the Y end green setup. The green light became able to be locked again.
I went through various IFO configurations to see if there are glitches or not.
Here is a summary table of the glitch investigation tonight. Some of the cells in the table are still not yet checked and they are just left blank.
Low finesse PRMI
The low finesse PRMI configuration is a power-recycled MIchelson with an intentional offset in MICH to let some of the cavity power go through MICH to the dark port.
To lock this configuration I used ASDC plus an offset for MICH and REFL33 for PRCL.
The MICH offset was chosen so that the ASDC power becomes the half of the maximum.
In this configuration NO glitches ( a high speed signal with an amplitude of more than 4 or 5 sigma) were found when it was locked.
Is it because I didn't use AS55 ?? or because the finesse is low ??
Also, as we have already known, the up conversion noise (#6212) showed up -- the level of the high frequency noise are sensitive to the 3 Hz motion.
Our existing 300 series SS plungers from McMastercar #8476A43 are silver plated as Atm2 shows.
Problems: 1, they become magnetized after years being close to the magnets
2, they oxidize by time so it is hard to turn them
I looked around to replace them.
Titanium body, nose and beryllium copper spring. None magnetic for UHV enviorment.
Can be made in 7 weeks at an UNREASONABLE $169.00 ea at quantity of 50
In order to get a better price from Vlier's Tom Chen I changed Ti body back to SS304L-siver plated and music wire spring. The price is still ~$120 ea. at quantity 50
I will talk to Mike G about modifying the McMaster plunger with a hex nut.
Sitting down to start cavity measurements, I found both ITMs tripped. It must have happened a while ago (I didn't bother to check dataviewer trends) because both had rms levels of <5 counts, so they've had a while to sit and quiet down.
The Yarm green laser really wanted to lock on a 01/10 mode, so Kiwamu suggested I go inside and realign the green beam to the arm. I did so, and now it's much happier locked on 00 (the Yarm is resonating both green and IR right now).
Here is a hypothetical scenario which could make the glitches in the LSC error signals. It can be considered as a 4 step phenomenon.
(1) up conversion noise due to a large motion at 3 Hz
=> (2) rms level exceeds the line width (a.k.a. linear range) in some LSC sensors
=> (3) unlocks some of the DOFs in a moment
=> (4) glitches due to the short unlock.
- - plan - -
In order to check this hypothesis the low finesse PRMI must serve as a good test configuration.
What I will do is to gradually decrease the offset in MICH such that the finesse of PRMI becomes higher.
And at each different finesse I will check the spectra, glitch rate, and etc.
The PMC pointing has changed, so MC is resonating in high order modes.
Roscolux filter films #74 night blue, 0.003" thick and #26 light red, 0.002" thick were measured in the beam path of ~6 mm diameter, 1W 1064 nm .
T 90% + - 5% at 0-30 degrees of incident angles and R ~10 %
These sandwitched thin films of policarbonate-polyester filters are not available in thicker forms. Rosco is recommending them to be cooled by air if used in high power beam.
These filters did not get warm at all in 1W, so absorption must be very small.
[Rana / Kiwamu]
We tried to set some parameters for the suspension drift monitor but the old matlab script, which automatically sets the values, didn't run because it uses the old mDV protocol.
The attached link below is a description about the script.
It needs to be fixed or upgraded by pynds.
The 2W Innilight shutdown shut when I opened side door for safety scan. This was not a repeatable by opening -closing side doors later on. Turned laser on, locked PMC and MC locked instantly. The MC was not locked this moring and it seemed that the MC2 spot was still some high order mode
like yesterday. MC lock was lost when the janitor bumped something around the MC.
We found that the laser had completely shut off for ~ 4 hours even with all the PSL doors closed.
We are guessing it is related to the interlock system and Steve is working on it to fix it.
The 2W PSL laser is turned off. The danger laser lights are not illuminated at the entry doors because of malfunctioning electronic circuit!!!
Laser safety glasses are still required! Other lasers are in operation!
BEN fixed the interlock. The laser is turned ON. Thanks for all, Rich and Sam who came over to help. Atm1
All emergency shut- off switches, lights and door indicators are working at this moment. More about this tomorrow.
Atm2, PSL enclosure interlock jungle without REAL schematic drawing.....at this point.... We all agreed it is easier to redo the hole thing than find the problem
Atm3, Emergency shut off switches and illuminated signs from entry doors to AC on-off box ( Use this switches in emergency ONLY, otherwise leave alone , even it is labeled obsolete !)
Summery: I still do not really know what was wrong.
This morning I killed again c1lsc kernel with the new realization of fxlms algorithm. It works fine with gcc compiler during the tests. However, smth forbidden for the kernel is going on. I'll spend some more time on investigatin it. Interesting thing is that I did not even pressed "On" at the OAF MEDM screen to make the code running. c1lsc suspended even before. May be there is some function-name mismatch.
After c1lsc suspention I recomiled back non-working code and rebooted c1lsc. c1sus is also bad after c1lsc reboot as they communicate. I killed x04, lsc, ass, oaf models on the c1lsc computer and sus, mcs, rfm, pem on the c1sus computer. Then I restarted x02 model and restored its burt snapshot from 08:07. After I started all models back and restored their burt snapshots from 08:07. Then I diag reset all started models.
Before starting new fxlms code I've shutted down all the optics so that possible c1lsc suspention would not make them crazy. After reboot I turned the coils back. Everything seems to work fine.
The mode cleaner is a little misaligned in pitch, and is very misaligned in yaw. The lowest order mode that is flashing is TEM11.
I had a look-see at the SUS sensors, to see if there were any big jumps. There were moderately sized jumps on all 3 mode cleaner optics.
The MC's lockloss was at ~8:22am this morning, and went along with a giganto kick to the optics. Steve tells me that Den might have been kicking up optics while doing computer things this morning, before Steve reminded him to shut off the watchdogs. However, Steve was also taking phots/measuring things near MC Refl, so maybe he's not totally absolved of blame. But this really looks like the optics settled to different places after big kicks.
I'm going to try to align the MC mirrors to get back to the sensor numbers from early this morning before chaos began.
Reminder / Moral: Everything cannot be considered to be "working fine" if the MC isn't locking. See if you can figure out why, and especially if it's something that you screwed up, either fix it, or better yet, ask for help and learn how to fix what you broke.
Rough draft of updated interlock drawing by Ben is here.
We moved the MC approximately back to where the sensors for each optic used to be (mostly touching MC2, but a little bit of MC1 to help the refl get back to its max value). MC is now locked, and with the help of the WFS it's back to nominal. I forgot to disable the WFS, so I think we aren't perfectly aligned, but we're close enough for the WFS to get us the rest of the way. We're heading over to JClub right now, so we're going to leave it as-is.
Cold LED lights replaced hot halogen ones. Flat LED MYAL 6S, model #112560002 24VAC
This is a LATE ENTRY. They were purchased in Jan 2010 and installed 6 of them around May 2010
When I left this morning, Steve was still working with the MC and it was unlocked anyway, I could not check it. By "fine" I meant only watchdogs. The thing is that before starting to work with c1lsc I turned off all the coils. Crazyness that Steve saw was after I turned them on back after reboot. This is a confusing thing - restarting models on c1lsc and burt restoring them is not enough. After I did it, everything at the STATUS MEDM screen was green, but the C1:SUS-???_??PD_VAR values went up after turning on coils. So sus and lsc communicated in a bad manner after the reboot. After restarting x02 model, the watchdogs were fine again.
The reason I've killed the c1lsc kernel was the following - when the code starts to run, it initializes some parameters and this takes ~0.2 msec per dof. Now, the old code did nothing with a DOF if C1:OAF-ADAPT_???_ONOFF == OFF. My code still initialized the parameters but then does nothing because no witness channels are given. But it spends 8*0.2 = 1.6 msec for initializing all 8 dof. As the code is called with frequency 2k, this was the reason for crashing. Now I've corrected my code, it compiles, runs and does not kill c1lsc. However, the old code would also kill the kernel if all DOF are filtered. So, when we'll use all 8 DOF, we'll have to split variable initialization.
But this is not the biggest problem. C1OAF model must be corrected, because, as for now, all 8 DOF call the same ADAPT_XFCODE function. As this function uses static variables, they will be all messed up by different DOF signals.
Schott, green welding glass, shade 14, 3 mm thick was measured in the beam path of 1.2W, S polarization of 1064nm at ~1 mm diameter size as MC reflected path.
Absorption 95%, R 5% at incident angle 25-50 degrees. It looks like the perfect material for beam trap.
The attached trend shows a problem with the QPD sums.
Steve - please check on Monday the laser powers and the ETM/ITM reflectivity for HeNe lasers. Maybe we have to increase the transimpedance gain in the heads.
I took one of the spare OSEM satellite amps (schematic) from the cabinet down the Y arm this afternoon to begin testing. I spent most of the day amassing the melange of adapters and connectors I needed to talk to the relic. The most elusive was the über-rare 64-pin IDE connector, for which neither the 40m nor Downs or Bridge had a breakout (despite there being several Phoenix boxes on each electronics rack at the 40m---hmm...). The solution I came up with was to make a breakout cable myself, only there was no 64-pin ribbon. So, I carefully fed a 50-pin and most of a 16-pin ribbon side by side into one push-down connector, and that was that:
I also finally found a 25-pin D-sub breakout just after figuring out the proper pinout for a 25-to-9 adapter, which I thought I was going to have to use. OH WELL.
The first thing I figured I'd do is measure the LED drivers' current noise and see how it compared with LISO. I powered the box up and found that the TO-3 7815 regulator was putting out +20V---bad. I assumed it was broken, so I got another one from Downs and replaced it. Powered it up again and the output was still at +20V (WTF?). My suspicion is that one of the shielding capacitors has failed in some bizarre way, but I didn't have time to check this before I was beckoned to another task. This is where I'll start again next.
Another thing Frank and I noticed as we were figuring out how the driver worked was that the current-specifying resistor of one of the driver stages had not been properly modified along with the others, so it was forcing the feedback loop to rail. This mod was done precariously by adding two perpendicular sandwiched "Radd" resistors on top of the main one, so it's also possible that the ones for this stage had just been knocked off somehow (perhaps by the massive gender-switching ribbon chain hanging down on it). Steve and I noticed that there was a label on the box complaining that some part of the amp for one of the OSEMs wasn't working, but we peeled it off and threw it away because he figured it was outdated.
Anyway, in short, the plan going forward is as follows:
ETMX and ETMY have 0.2 mW returning to their QPDs........so the gain must lower at ETMX
ITMX laser 1103P has only 0.67 mW output and 0.025 mW returning to the QPD.
ITMX and ETMX oplev lanching paths have lenses without AR coating. This is my fault. I will buy them.
ETMX 0.2 mW 900 counts
ITMX 0.025 1300
SRM 0.04 2600
BS 0.05 3500
PRM 0.06 4000
ETMY 0.2 9000
ITMY 0.3 14500
Kiwamu showed me how to do transferfunction of oplev pitch
I did some more investigation on the OSEM box today.
After removing some capacitors and still finding that the +15V rail was at over +20V, I decided to see if the TO-3 7815 that I removed behaved properly all by itself. It did. After some more poking around, I discovered that whoever assembled the board isolated the case of the regulator from the board. It is through the case that this package gets its grounding, so I removed the mica insulator, remounted the regulator, and all worked fine.
Since I had gotten a spare from Downs, I also replaced the LT1031 (precision 10-V reference), for fear that it had been damaged by the floating voltage regulator.
With the above out of the way, I was finally able to take some measurements. The first thing I did was to look at the LED drivers. I fixed the one stage that I mentioned in my last post by adding two 820-ohm resistors in parallel with the 1k, such that it was very close to all the others (which are 806 || 806 || 1k). With that, using a red LED, I measured a current of 34.5 mA (+/- 0.1) out of each of the 5 stages (UL, UR, LL, LR, S).
I then measured the current noise of each one by monitoring the voltage across the 287-ohm resistor in series with the LED. The driver works by putting the LED in the feedback path of an inverting amp. There is a 10-V input from the LT1031, and the values of the input and feedback resistors determine the current drawn through the LED. There is a buffer (LM6321) in the path to provide the necessary current.
The LISO model I made according to that description seems to make sense. I simply modeled the LED as a small resistor and asked LISO for the current through it. The transfer function shows the proper DC response of -49.15 dB(A/V) --> 34.8 mA @ 10 V, but, the estimated current noise doesn't add up with the measured levels:
I have to get to the bottom of this. Two possibilities are: 1) The buffer adds noise, and/or 2) I am modeling this invalidly.
I also began measuring the PD amplifier noise levels, though I only measured two of them for lack of time. I find it odd that there is a 100-ohm input series resistor on what I thought would be just a transimpedance amplifier. For that reason, I want to look into how the OSEMs are connected to this guy.
In any case, I measured the output noise of two of the PD amps by shorting the input side of the 100-ohm resistors to ground, and then I divided by their TF to get the input noise level. Here it is compared with the LISO estimate. I have plotted them in units of voltage noise at the input side of the resistors for lack of a way to infer the equivalent photocurrent noise level.
Above 2 Hz or so, the measured level agrees with the prediction. Below this, the measured noise level increases as 1/f, while it should go as the standard 1/sqrt(f) (the manufacturer-quoted 1/f corner is at 2 Hz). Another thing to get to the bottom of.
SUS- BS, ITMX, ITMY, PRM, SRM, ETMX & ETMY_OLPIT transfer funtion with sine wave excitation 0.1 amplitude:
I'm driving C1:SUS-ITMX_OLYAW and PIT_EXC with amplitude 0,1-0.3 while taking transfer funtions of oplev.
The transfer functions are normal. However I noticed that the LL osem is not responding to this excitations
Healthy sensor respons should be like Atm3
Frank pointed out to me that I had dumbly forgotten to include the voltage reference's noise. The LT1031 has an output noise level of ~125 nV/rHz above 10 Hz or so, and this at least makes the estimate much closer. I had also not included an extra LT1125 stage between the reference and the other stages. I guess I was tired.
The estimate is now within a factor of a few of the measured level, and it has roughly the right shape. Around 1 Hz, it looks like the measured data begin to roll up away from the model, though it's tough to say due to the effect of the AC coupling on the analyzer less than a decade below. If there is indeed extra noise here, Frank thinks it could be due to resistor current noise.
I'll switch one or two out for nicer ones and see if things change.
OL_YAW transfer functions are here.
I had two PHDs helping me to overlap the EXML files in DTT. We failed. This job requires professorial help.
These observations of the OSEMs were taken while taking transfer functions of oplev YAW at excitation amplitude 0.1
Atm1, C1:SUS-ETMX_SENSOR_SIDE cross coupling
Atm2, C1:SUS-ITMX_SENSOR_LL not excitable
Atm3-4, BS and PRM insensitive
Good OSEM list: ITMY, ETMY and SRM
I gave up tonight's locking activity because the MC can't stay locked.
It seems that somehow the seismic noise became louder from about 1:00 AM.
I walked around the outside of the 40-m building to see what's going on, but no one was jumping or partying.
I am leaving the MC autolocker disabled so that the laser won't be driven crazy and the WFS won't kick the MC suspensions.
The attachment is a 3-hour trend of the seismometer outputs and the MC trans.
I worked on the OSEM box a little more today, with the hopes of reducing the measured output current noise. I succeeded, at least modestly. It turns out that most of the noise was indeed caused by the crappy resistors.
Below is the circuit for one of the 5 LEDs. The output of the op-amp structure directly after the LT1031 reference is split between 5 stages identical to the structure on the right. I have shown just one (UR) for clarity. The various measurement points are explained below.
I started from the beginning of the circuit, directly after the LT1031, to make sure that the excess noise seen the other day wasn't just from a noisy reference. Below is the measured output voltage noise along with the LISO estimate. Clearly, the LT1031 is performing to spec (as it should, since it's a new part that I just put in). Note that the apparent better-than-spec performance at low frequencies is just from the AC coupling, which I needed due to the high DC level.
Since the reference was in order, the next step was to switch out some of the crappy old resistors for nicer thin-film ones. In case anyone is interested, Frank has done some detailed investigation of excess 1/f current noise in resistors. I measured the voltage noise level at the point labeled "inter-stage measurement" above, first without any modifications and then after swapping the old 10k resistors (R1 & R2) out for nice Vishay thin-film ones. There is clearly a big improvement, and the modified circuit essentially agrees with LISO now down to 1 Hz. Below this, it looks like there could still be an issue.
I wanted to see what the improvement was in the overall output current noise of the system, so I went about measuring the current noise as I had the other day (by measuring the voltage noise across R55 and dividing by the resistance). The performance was already better than the old measurement, but not at the LISO level. So, I replaced the current-setting resistors (R54 & R55)---which were actually 3 parallel resistors on a single pad in each case---by nice Vishay ones, as well. I didn't have any that were close to the original resistance of ~287 ohms, so I put three 1k ones in parallel. This of course shifts the resistance up to 333 ohms, but that only causes a ~16% change in current. I was sure to convert voltage noise into current noise with this new resistance, though.
With this change, the total output current noise is now very close to the LISO estimate as well down to ~1 Hz.