ID |
Date |
Author |
Type |
Category |
Subject |
16380
|
Tue Oct 5 17:01:20 2021 |
Koji | Update | Electronics | Sat Amp modifications |
Make sure the inputs for the PD amps are open. This is the current amplifier and we want to leave the input pins open for the test of this circuit.
TP6 is the first stage of the amps (TIA). So this stage has the issue. Usual check if the power is properly supplied / if the pins are properly connected/isolated / If the opamp is alive or not.
For TP8, if TP8 get railed. TP5 and TP7 are going to be railed too. Is that the case, if so, check this whitening stage in the same way as above.
If the problem is only in the TP5 and/or TP7 it is the differential driver issue. Check the final stage as above. Replacing the opamp could help.
|
16386
|
Wed Oct 6 16:31:02 2021 |
Tega | Update | Electronics | Sat Amp modifications |
[Tega, Koji]
(S2100737) - Debugging showed that the opamp, AD822ARZ, for PD2 circuit was not working as expected so we replaced with a spare and this fixed the problem. Somehow, the PD1 circuit no longer presents any issues, so everything is now fine with the unit.
(S2100741) - All good.
Quote: |
Trying to finish 2 more Sat Amp units so that we have the 7 units needed for the X-arm install.
S2100736 - All good
S2100737 - This unit presented with an issue on the PD1 circuit of channel 1-4 PCB where the voltage reading on TP6, TP7 and TP8 are -15.1V, -14.2V, and +14.7V respectively, instead of ~0V. The unit also has an issue on the PD2 circuit of channel 1-4 PCB because the voltage reading on TP7 and TP8 are -14.2V, and +14.25V respectively, instead of ~0V.
|
|
16387
|
Thu Oct 7 02:04:19 2021 |
Koji | Update | Electronics | Satellite amp adapter chassis |
The 4 units of Satellite Amp Adapter were done:
- The ears were fixed with the screws
- The handles were attached (The stock of the handles is low)
- The boards are now supported by plastic stand-offs. (The chassis were drilled)
- The front and rear panels were fixed to the chassis
- The front and rear connectors were fixed with the low profile 4-40 stand-off screws (3M 3341-1S)
|
Attachment 1: P_20211006_205044.jpg
|
|
16411
|
Mon Oct 18 16:48:32 2021 |
Tega | Update | Electronics | Sat Amp modifications |
[S2100738, S2100745, S2100751] Completed three more Sat Amp units modification with seven remaining.
|
Attachment 1: IMG_20211018_162918574.jpg
|
|
16427
|
Tue Oct 26 13:27:07 2021 |
Tega | Summary | Electronics | Sat Amp modification Summary |
Modifications and testing of SatAmp units COMPLETE. Attachments 1 & 2 show all 19 units, one installed unit and the remaining 18 units are stacked and ready for install. Detailed notes of the modification for each unit are presented in the summary document in the dcc.
|
Attachment 1: SapAmpModStack.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: SatAmpInstalled.jpg
|
|
16428
|
Tue Oct 26 14:53:24 2021 |
Koji | Update | Electronics | Rack |
1. We have a rack at the 40m storage. We are free to take it to the lab. If there is a tag, tell the info to Liz. Let's move it to the lab tomorrow right after the meeting.
2. We have a few racks in WB B1 (Attachment 1). Liz and I checked a rack which looks suitable for us. 46U height. Caltech transport will move it to the lab. |
Attachment 1: P_20211026_143814.jpg
|
|
16436
|
Wed Oct 27 19:34:52 2021 |
Koji | Summary | Electronics | New electronics racks |
1. The rack we cleaned today (came from West Bridge) will be placed between 1X3 and 1X4, right next to 1X4 (after removing the plastic boxes). (Attachment 1)
For easier work at the side of the 1X4, the side panel of the 1X4 should be removed before placing the new rack. Note that this rack is imperial and has 10-32 threads
2. In terms of the other rack for the Y arm, we found the rack in the storage is quite dirty. Anchal pointed out that we have a few racks standing along the Y arm (as the storage of the old VME/Euro card electronics) (Attachments 2/3)
They are not too dirty and also doing nothing there. Let's vacate one of them (the one right next to the optics preparation table). Use this space as a new storage area placing a wire shelving rack for something.
BTW, I thought it is good to have the rack at the vertex side of 1Y1 (as 1Y0?), but the floor has "KEEP OUT" marking. I have no idea why we have this marking. Is this for crane operation??? Does any one know? |
Attachment 1: P_20211027_180737.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: P_20211027_180443.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: P_20211027_180408.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: P_20211027_180139.jpg
|
|
16513
|
Thu Dec 16 15:04:12 2021 |
Chub | Update | Electronics | ITMX feedthroughs and in-vac cables installed |
The ITMX 10" flange with four DSUB-25 feedthroughs has been install with the cables connected at the in-vac side. See photo; as requested, LO1-1 and LO1-2 are connected to the top row of feedthroughs from left to right respectively and the opposite ends of the cables placed left to right on the laser table. PR2-1 and PR2-2 are connected to the lower row of feedthroughs from left to right respectively, with the opposite ends placed on the surface below the laser from left to right. This seemed the easiest way to keep the cable orientation clear. |
Attachment 1: ITMX_feedthrough_install_12-16-21.jpg
|
|
16515
|
Thu Dec 16 15:54:08 2021 |
Koji | Update | Electronics | ITMX feedthroughs and in-vac cables installed |
Thanks for the installation.
With regard to the connector convention, let's use the attached arrangement so that it will be consistent with the existing flange DSUB configuration. Not a big deal.
|
Attachment 1: PXL_20211216_235056582.jpg
|
|
16530
|
Tue Dec 21 16:52:39 2021 |
Anchal | Summary | Electronics | In-air Sat Amp to Vacuum Flange cables laid for 7 new SOS |
[Anchal, Yehonathan, Chub]
We today laid down 14 70 ft long DB25 cables from 1Y1 (6), 1Y0 (8) to ITMY Chamber (4), BS Chamber (6) and ITMX Chamber (4). The cables have been connected to respective satellite amplifier on the racks and the other ends are connected to the vacuum flange feedthru on ITMX for LO1 and PR2, while the others have been kept near the planned flange postions. LO1 is now ready to be connected to CDS by connecting the in-vacuum cable inside ITMX chamber to the OSEMs. |
16563
|
Mon Jan 10 15:45:55 2022 |
Paco | Update | Electronics | ITMY feedthroughs and in-vac cables installed - part I |
The ITMY 10" flange with 10 DSUB-25 feedthroughs has been installed with the cables connected at the in-vac side. This is the first of two flanges, and includes 5 cables ordered vertically in stacks of 3 & 2 for [[OMC-DCPDs, OMC-QPDs, OMC-PZTs/Pico]] and [[SRM1, SRM2]] respectively from right to left. During installation, two 12-point silver plated bolts were stripped, so Chub had to replace them. |
16569
|
Tue Jan 11 10:23:18 2022 |
Paco | Update | Electronics | ITMY feedthroughs and in-vac cables installed - part II |
[Paco, Chub]
The ITMY 10" flange with 4 DSUB-25 feedthroughs has been installed with the cables connected at the in-vac side. This is the second of two flanges, and includes 4 cables ordered vertically in stacks of 2 & 2 for [[AS1-1, AS1-2, AS4-1, AS4-2]] respectively. No major incidents during this one, except maybe a note that all the bolts were extremely dirty and covered with gunk, so we gave a quick swipe with wet cloths before reinstalling them. |
16574
|
Tue Jan 11 14:21:53 2022 |
Paco | Update | Electronics | BS feedthroughs and in-vac cables installed |
[Paco, Yehonathan, Chub]
The BS chamber 10" flange with 4 DSUB-25 feedthroughs has been installed with the cables connected at the in-vac side. This is the second of two flanges, and includes 4 cables ordered vertically in stacks of 2 & 2 for [[LO2-1, LO2-2, PR3-1, PR3-2]] respectively. |
16586
|
Fri Jan 14 12:01:21 2022 |
Anchal | Update | Electronics | BS & ITMY feedthroughs labeled and connected to Sat Amps |
I labeled all the newly installed flanges and connected the in-air cables (40m/16530) to appropriate ports. These cables are connected to the CDS system on 1Y1/1Y0 racks through the satellite amplifiers. So all new optics now can be damped as soon as they are placed. We need to make more DB9 plugs for setting "Acquire" mode on the HAM-A coil drivers since our Binary input system is not ready yet. Right now, we only have 2 such plugs which means only one optic and be damped at a time.
|
16588
|
Fri Jan 14 14:04:51 2022 |
Paco | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board arrived |
The Xilinx RFSoC 2x2 board arrived right before the winter break, so this is kind of an overdue elog. I unboxed it, it came with two ~15 cm SMA M-M cables, an SD card preloaded with the ARM processor and a few overlay jupyter notebooks, a two-piece AC/DC adapter (kind of like a laptop charger), and a USB 3.0 cable. I got a 1U box, lid, and assembled a prototype box to hold this board, but this need not be a permanent solution (see Attachment #1). I drilled 4 thru holes on the bottom of the box to hold the board in place. A large component exceeds the 1U height, but is thin enough to clear one of the thin slits at the top (I believe this is a fuse of some sort). Then, I found a brand new front panel, and drilled 4x 13/32 thru holes in the front for SMA F-F connectors.
I powered the board, and quickly accessed its tutorial notebooks, including a spectrum analyzer and signal generators just to quickly check it works normally. The board has 2 fast RFADCs and 2 RFDACs exposed, 12 and 14 bit respectively, running at up to 4 GSps. |
Attachment 1: PXL_20220114_211249499.jpg
|
|
16644
|
Thu Feb 3 14:47:12 2022 |
Chub | Update | Electronics | new UPS in place |
Received the new 1100VA APC UPS today and placed it at the bottom of the valve rack. I'd connected the battery and plugged the unit into the AC outlet, but did not turn it on due to the power outage this weekend. |
16689
|
Tue Mar 1 16:01:14 2022 |
Paco | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work & BALUN saga |
[Tommy, Paco]
Since last week I've worked with tommy on getting the RFSoC 2x2 board to get some TFs from simple minicircuits type filters. The first thing I did was set up the board (which is in the office area) for remote access. I hooked up the TCP/IP port to a wall ethernet socket (LIGO-04) and the caltech network assiggned some IP address to our box. I guess eventually we can put this behind the lab network for internal use only.
After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP.
We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP. |
Attachment 1: balun_adc1.png
|
|
Attachment 2: PXL_20220302_001734121.jpg
|
|
16763
|
Thu Apr 7 20:33:42 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work |
To access the board remotely through the 40m lab ethernet port, use
ssh -N -L localhost:1137:localhost:9090 xilinx@<ip_address>
Then in the browser go to
localhost:1137/lab
Other SSH commands using different ports or without the -N -L seemed to fail to open Jupyter. This way has been successful thereafter.
Quote: |
[Tommy, Paco]
Since last week I've worked with tommy on getting the RFSoC 2x2 board to get some TFs from simple minicircuits type filters. The first thing I did was set up the board (which is in the office area) for remote access. I hooked up the TCP/IP port to a wall ethernet socket (LIGO-04) and the caltech network assiggned some IP address to our box. I guess eventually we can put this behind the lab network for internal use only.
After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP.
We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP.
|
|
16764
|
Thu Apr 7 20:37:06 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 Board -- Simple Tone Generator |
In the "Tommy" sub folder, I created a new notebook called "SimpleToneGenerator". This tunes the DAC and ADC mixers to a single frequency and reads off the Time Series and Fourier components. We can alos easily check the demodulation scheme and implement butterworth filters to check their function. |
16765
|
Thu Apr 7 20:41:15 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 Board -- Gain Plotter |
In this file (under Tommy), we have a notebook which runs through a spectrum of frequencies and determines the gain response of the attached filter. Below we have the output of a high pass filter. We use IQ demodulation to change IQ componets to DC. Then using a butterworth filter, we read out the DC components and determine the gain's magnitude and phase. However, the phase seems very noisy. This is because the oscillators in the different tiles are independent and a random phase is introduced by changing the mixer frequency in individual tiles. To resolve this we need Multi Tile Synchronization or "MTS".
Original Pynq Support Forum Query: https://discuss.pynq.io/t/rfsoc-2x2-phase-measurement/3892
We also have the code to fit a resposne function using IIRregular, but this is not as useful without proper phase data. |
Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-04-07_at_8.40.23_PM.png
|
|
Attachment 2: Unknown-3.png
|
|
Attachment 3: Unknown-4.png
|
|
16767
|
Fri Apr 8 16:03:58 2022 |
rana | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work & BALUN saga |
Seems like it should be possible to just remove the transformer (aka as a BALUN ... BALanced, UNbalanced), or replace it with a lower frequency part. Its just a usual mini-circuits part. Maybe you can ask Chris Stoughton about this and ask Tommy to checkout some of the RFSoC user forums for how to go to DC.
Quote: |
After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP.
We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP.
|
|
16790
|
Wed Apr 20 14:56:06 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board -- setup for remote work & BALUN saga |
Here are a few options for replacement BALUNs from Mini Circuits and specs:
Current. TCM1-83X+, 10-8000 MHz, 50 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1, Configuration K
1. Z7550-..., DC-2500 MHz (some DC-2300), 50/75 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1.5, Configuration Q. There are various types of the Z7550 which have different connectors (SMA and BNCs). These have much larger dimensions than the TCM1-83X. Can handle up to 5A DC current with matching loss 0.6 dB.
2. SFMP-5075+, DC-2500 MHz, 50/75 Ohms, Impedance Ratio 1.5, Configuration D. This is an SMA connected BALUN. It can handle 350mA, has a matching loss 0.4 dB, and has 1W power handling.
Quote: |
Seems like it should be possible to just remove the transformer (aka as a BALUN ... BALanced, UNbalanced), or replace it with a lower frequency part. Its just a usual mini-circuits part. Maybe you can ask Chris Stoughton about this and ask Tommy to checkout some of the RFSoC user forums for how to go to DC.
Quote: |
After fiddling around with the tone-generators and spectrum analyzer tools in loopback configuration (DAC --> ADC direct connection), we noticed that lower frequency (~ 1 MHz) signals were hardly making it out/back into the board... so we looked at some of the schematics found here and saw that both RF data converters (ADC & DAC) interfaces are AC coupled through a BALUN network in the 10 - 8000 MHz band (see Attachment #1). This is in principle not great news if we want to get this board ready for audio-band DSP.
We decided that while Tommy works on measuring TFs for SHP-200 all the way up to ~ 2 GHz (which is possible with the board as is) I will design and put together an analog modulation/demodulation frontend so we can upconvert all our "slow" signals < 1MHz for fast, wideband DSP. and demodulate them back into the audio band. The BALUN network is pictured in Attachment #2 on the board, I'm afraid it's not very simple to bypass without damaging the PCB or causing some other unwanted effect on the high-speed DSP.
|
|
model_no |
case_style |
single2single |
single2bal |
bal2bal |
center_tap |
dc_iso |
freq_low |
freq_high |
impedance |
imped_ratio |
interface |
tech |
config |
SFMP-5075+ |
FF1891 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
D |
TCM1-83X+ |
DB1627 |
N |
Y |
Y |
N |
N |
10 |
8000 |
50 |
1 |
SMT |
CORE & WIRE |
K |
Z7550-BFNF+ |
H795-14 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-BMBF+ |
QP1876-1 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2300 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
D1 |
Z7550-BMNF+ |
QP1876 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-FFNM+ |
H795-1 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2300 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-FFSF+ |
H557-1 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-FMSF+ |
H795-3 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2300 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-FMSFDC+ |
H795-3 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
Y |
1 |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
Z7550-NFNF+ |
H795-10 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2500 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
D1 |
Z7550-NMNF+ |
H795-4 |
Y |
N |
N |
N |
N |
DC |
2300 |
50/75 |
1.5 |
CON |
CORE & WIRE |
Q |
|
16807
|
Sun Apr 24 13:17:08 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | New RFSoC2x2 Overlay |
We recieved an overlay from Chris Stoughton which he used for a ZCU11 board. The overlay is supposed to be compatible with the RFSoC 2x2 and help enable the Multi-Tile Synchronization (MTS) we need. He also provides a .py with the necessary low level connection to the board and its memory along with a few sample notebooks.
Progress So Far:
- The overlay loads properly and in reasonable time.
- We can set the mixer and dac frequencies. However, it is unclear what event_src Chris wanted for the adc mixers. It seems that he was using event_src_immediate (possibly unintenionally) which is not an available adc mixer setting in our board. Instead, we set the event source to "Tile" and will later determine if this is an issue.
- We then go to get data from the buffer. There are two functions called: capture and transfer. These are called on the pynq DMA. Capture runs fine but we get stuck during the transfer at dma.revchannel.wait(). This issue has not been resolved.
|
16813
|
Tue Apr 26 16:23:22 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC2x2 MTS |
We connected a 8 MHz signal generator to the device in order to sync up the ADCs and DACs and hopefully get phase data.
Some things to note:
- RF Manual (143)- Need to use XRFDC SYSREF for update event
- RF Manual (171)- Synchronization steps require us to first enable all clocks and sysref generators (via xrfdc package)
- RF Manual (173)- Sysref requirments, not clear if PL is syncing as needed.
- RF Manual (181)- XRFDC example code, see also https://github.com/Xilinx/embeddedsw/blob/master/XilinxProcessorIPLib/drivers/rfdc/examples/xrfdc_mts_example.c
Xilinx RF Manual: https://docs.xilinx.com/v/u/2.4-English/pg269-rf-data-converter |
16857
|
Mon May 16 14:46:35 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC MTS Work |
We followed the manual's guide for setting up MTS to sync on external signal. In the xrfdc package, we update the RFdc class to have RunMTS, SysRefEnable, and SysRefDisable functions as prescribed on page 180 of the manual. Then, we attempted to run the new functions in the notebook and read the DAC signal outputs on an oscilloscope. The DACs were not synced. We were also unable to get FIFOlatency readings. |
16876
|
Thu May 26 15:55:10 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC Power Spectrum |
Finished building power spectrum analyzer for the RFSoC. There are two things that I would like to address down the road. First is that there is an oscillation between positive and negative voltages at the ADC sampling frequency. This creates an undesirable frequency component at the sampling rate. I have not yet figured out the cause of this positive to negative oscillation and have simply removed half of the samples in order to recover the frequency. Therefore, I would like to figure out the root of this oscillation and remove it. Also, we have a decimation factor of 2 as default by the board which we would like to remove but have been unable to do so.
Example: 8 MHz Square Wave from SRL signal generator. |
Attachment 1: Screen_Shot_2022-06-02_at_2.51.23_PM.png
|
|
16878
|
Fri May 27 12:15:30 2022 |
JC | Update | Electronics | CRT TV / Monitor 6 |
[Yehonathan, Paco, Yuta, JC]
As we were cleaning up this morning, we heard a high pitch sound that turned into a buzz. After searching for where the sound came from, we noticed the CRT TV went out. We swapped this out with a moniter and used a BNC to VGA adapter to display the cameras. |
16879
|
Fri May 27 15:53:17 2022 |
Tommy | Update | Electronics | RFSoC MTS Work |
With some help from the forums, we printed the status of the DAC MTS sync and were able to determined that our board's vivado design does not have MTS enabled on each tile. To fix this, we will need to construct a new Vivado desgin for the board. We were also warned to "make sure to generate correctly a PL_clock and a PL_sysref with your on board clock synthesizers and to capture them in the logic according to the requirements in PG269" of the RF Manual. From this we should be able to sync the DAC and ADC tiles as desired.
Quote: |
We followed the manual's guide for setting up MTS to sync on external signal. In the xrfdc package, we update the RFdc class to have RunMTS, SysRefEnable, and SysRefDisable functions as prescribed on page 180 of the manual. Then, we attempted to run the new functions in the notebook and read the DAC signal outputs on an oscilloscope. The DACs were not synced. We were also unable to get FIFOlatency readings.
|
|
16882
|
Tue May 31 14:44:02 2022 |
JC | Update | Electronics | CRT TV / Monitor 6 |
[Paco, JC]
Paco and I fixed the ethernet cable which was hanging. We stopped models c1x07 and c1su2, realigned the cable to follow the shelf from top, and returned to turn on the computers.
Note: There was not a long enough ethernet cable, so we used a female to female adapter and attached 2 ethernet cables.
Quote: |
[Yehonathan, Paco, Yuta, JC]
As we were cleaning up this morning, we heard a high pitch sound that turned into a buzz. After searching for where the sound came from, we noticed the CRT TV went out. We swapped this out with a moniter and used a BNC to VGA adapter to display the cameras.
|
|
16885
|
Wed Jun 1 12:56:44 2022 |
Paco | Summary | Electronics | STEMlab 125 handout |
[Paco, Deeksha]
Yesterday I handed Deeksha a red pitaya (stemlab 125 - 10) to begin her summer work in the lab. The short term goal (~1 week) is to get it to work as a network analyzer and perhaps characterize its ADC/DAC noise spectra. |
16897
|
Tue Jun 7 18:32:46 2022 |
Deeksha | Update | Electronics | Noise Budgeting ADC (of redpitaya) |
Made plots on i/p noise of redpitaya . Need to reconsider sampling frequency (to improve plot at lower freq)
|
Attachment 1: ch1_0.5V.png
|
|
Attachment 2: ch2_0.0V.png
|
|
16939
|
Wed Jun 22 17:04:06 2022 |
Deeksha | Summary | Electronics | Characterising the AUX control loop |
[Cici, Deekha]
Setup loop to measure transfer function of control loop - the aim is to find the open loop gain of the system using the SR785 to inject noise (a swept sine) into the system and taking observations using the scope. We tried to calculate the gain algaebraically, in order to understand what our readings meant and what we can determine from them. Need to figure out how to run python script for the SR785, but took readings from cmd today.
Included - changes/additions made to circuit; frequency reponse obtained (need to check the frequency response as it does not look like the expected result, need to correct the loop itself, or increase the magnitude of the inserted noise as its possible that the noise is currently being suppressed by the system).
To do - circuit needs to be checked + laser lock improved - laser keeps leaving resonance while trying to take readings.
|
Attachment 1: after.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: before.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 3: freq_response.png
|
|
16951
|
Mon Jun 27 13:39:40 2022 |
Deeksha | Update | Electronics | Setting up the MokuLab |
[Cici, Deeksha]
On Friday Cici and I set up the Mokulab to take readings of our loop. The aim is to characterise the PZT, in a similar manner as before, by exciting the circuit using our input noise (a swept sine) and recording the corresponding changes in the output. We used the MokuLab to observe the beat note created by the signals of the AUX and PSL, as well as the ASD of the output signal. The MokuLab simplifies the entire process.
Pictured : The beat note as observed by Cici |
Attachment 1: WhatsApp_Image_2022-06-24_at_5.21.28_PM.jpeg
|
|
16958
|
Tue Jun 28 18:19:09 2022 |
Tomislav | Update | Electronics | Electronics noise |
I measured electronics noise of WFSs and QPD (of the WFS/QPD, whitening, ADC...) by closing PSL and measuring the error signal. It was needed to put the offset in C1:IOO-MC_TRANS_SUMFILT_OFFSET to 14000 cts (without offset the sum of quadrants would give zero, and 14000 cts is the value when the cavity is locked). For WFS that are RF, if there is intensity noise at low frequencies, it is not affecting the measurement.
In the attachment please find the power spectrum of the error signal when the PSL shutter is on and off. |
Attachment 1: electronics_noise_spectra.png
|
|
Attachment 2: error_signal.png
|
|
16963
|
Wed Jun 29 18:53:38 2022 |
rana | Update | Electronics | Electronics noise |
this is just the CDS error signal, but is not the electronics noise. You have to go into the lab and measure the noise at several points. It can't be done from the control room. You must measure before and afte the whitening.
Quote: |
I measured electronics noise of WFSs and QPD (of the WFS/QPD, whitening, ADC...) by closing PSL and measuring the error signal. It was needed to put the offset in C1:IOO-MC_TRANS_SUMFILT_OFFSET to 14000 cts (without offset the sum of quadrants would give zero, and 14000 cts is the value when the cavity is locked). For WFS that are RF, if there is intensity noise at low frequencies, it is not affecting the measurement.
In the attachment please find the power spectrum of the error signal when the PSL shutter is on and off.
|
|
16964
|
Thu Jun 30 17:19:55 2022 |
Deeksha | Summary | Electronics | Measured Transfer Functions of the Control Loop, Servo (OLTF); got Vectfit working |
[Cici, Deeksha]
We were able to greatly improve the quality of our readings by changing the parameters in the config file (particularly increasing the integration and settle cycles, as well as gradually increasing our excitation signals' amplitude). Attached are the readings taken from the same (the files directly printed by ssh'ing the SR785 (apologies)) - Attachment 1 depicts the graph w/ 30 data points and attachment 2 depicts the graph with 300 data points.
Cici successfully vectfit to the data, as included in Attachment 3. (This is the vectfit of the entire control loop's OLTF). There are two main concerns that need to be looked into, firstly, the manner in which to get the poles and zeros to input into the vectfit program. Similarly, the program works best when the option to enforce stable poles is disabled, once again it may be worth looking into how the program works on a deeper level in order to understand how to proceed.
Just as the servo's individual transfer function was taken, we also came up with a plan to measure the PZT's individual transfer function (using the MokuLab). The connections for the same have been made and the Moku is at the Xend (disconnected). We may also have to build a highpass filter (similar to the one whose signal enters the PZT) to facilitate taking readings at high frequencies using the Moku. |
Attachment 1: TFSR785_29-06-2022_114042.pdf
|
|
Attachment 2: TFSR785_29-06-2022_114650.pdf
|
|
Attachment 3: TF_OLG_vectfit.png
|
|
16972
|
Tue Jul 5 20:05:06 2022 |
Tomislav | Update | Electronics | Whitening electronics noise |
For whitening electronics noise for WFS1, I get (attachment). This doesn't seem right, right? |
Attachment 1: whitening_noises.png
|
|
16974
|
Wed Jul 6 18:51:20 2022 |
Deeksha | Update | Electronics | Measuring the Transfer Function of the PZT |
Yesterday, we set up the loop to measure the PZT of the transfer function - the MokuLab sends an excitation (note - a swept sine of 1.0 V) to the PZT. The cavity is locked to the PSL and the AUX is locked to the cavity. In order to measure the effect of our excitation, we take the beat note of the PSL and the AUX. This gives us a transfer function as seen in Attachment 1. The sampling rate of the MokuLab is set to 'ultrafast' (125kHz), so we can expect accurate performance upto 62.5kHz, however, in order to improve our readings beyond this frequency, modifications must be made to the script (MokuPhaseMeterTF) to avoid aliasing of the signal. A script should also be written to obtain and plot the coherence between the excitation and our output.
Also attached are - Attachment 2 - the circuit diagram of the setup, and Attachment 3 - the TF data calculated.
Edit - the SR560 as shown in the circuit diagram has since been replaced by a broadband splitter (Minicircuits ZFRSC-42-S+). |
Attachment 1: pzt_transfer_fn.png
|
|
Attachment 2: ckt_diagram.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 3: MokuPhaseMeterTFData_20220706_174753_TF_Data.txt
|
2.000000000000000364e+04 1.764209350625748560e+07 2.715833132756984014e+00
1.928351995884991265e+04 1.695301366919569671e+07 1.509398637395631626e+00
1.859270710016814337e+04 1.647055321367538907e+07 -2.571975165101855865e+00
1.792664192275710593e+04 1.558169995329630189e+07 6.272729335836754183e-01
1.728443786563210961e+04 1.500850042360494658e+07 -1.500422400597591466e+00
1.666524012797089381e+04 1.456986577652360499e+07 2.046163000975175894e+00
1.606822453133765885e+04 1.376167843637173250e+07 1.736835046956476614e+00
1.549259642266657283e+04 1.326192932667389885e+07 -1.272425049850132606e+00
1.493758961654484847e+04 1.283127345074228011e+07 -2.026149685362535369e+00
1.440246537538758821e+04 1.208854709974890016e+07 -3.248352694840740407e-01
... 11 more lines ...
|
16983
|
Mon Jul 11 11:16:45 2022 |
JC | Summary | Electronics | Startup after Shutdown |
[Paco, Yehonathan, JC]
We began starting up all the electronics this morning beginning in the Y-end. After following the steps on the Complete_Power_Shutdown_Procedures on the 40m wiki, we only came across 2 issues.
- The Green beam at the Y-End : Turn on the controller and the indicator light began flashing. After waiting until the blinking light becomes constant, turn on the beam.
- C1lsc "could not find operating system"-unable to SSH from Rossa : We found an Elog of how to restart Chiara and this worked. We proceeded by adding this to the procedures of startup.
|
16992
|
Tue Jul 12 14:56:17 2022 |
Tomislav | Summary | Electronics | Electronics noise measurements |
[Paco, Tomislav]
We measured the electronics noise of the demodulation board, whitening board, and ADC for WFSs, and OPLEV board and ADC for DC QPD in MC2 transmission. We were using SR785.
Regarding the demodulation board, we did 2 series of measurements. For the first series of measurements, we were blocking WFS (attachment 1) and measuring noise at the output of the demod board (attachment 2a). This measurement includes dark noise of the WFS, electronics noise of demod board, and phase noise from LO. For the second series of the measurements, we were unplugging input to the demod board (attachment 2b & 2c is how they looked like before unplugging) (the mistake we made here is not putting 50-ohm terminator) and again measuring at the output of the demod board. This measurement doesn't include the dark noise of the WFS. We were measuring it for all 8 segments (I1, I2, I3, I4, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). The dark noise contribution is negligible with respect to demod board noise. In attachments 3 & 4 please find plots that include detection and demodulation contributions for both WFSs.
For whitening board electronics noise measurement, we were terminating the inputs (attachment 5) and measuring the outputs (attachment 6). Electronics noise of the whitening board is in the attachments 7 & 8.
For ADC electronics noise we terminated ADC input and measured noise using diaggui (attachments 9 & 10). Please find these spectra for WFS1, WFS2, and MC TRANS in attachments 11, 12 & 13.
For MC2 TRANS we measured OPLEV board noise. We did two sets of measurements, as for demod board of WFSs (with and without QPD dark noise) (attachments 14, 15 & 16). In the case of OPLEV board noise without dark noise, we were terminating the OPLEV input. Please find the electronics noise of OPLEV's segment 1 (including dark noise which is again much smaller with respect to the OPLEV's electronics noise) in attachment 17.
For the transfer functions, demod board has flat tf, whitening board tf please find in attachment 18, ADC tf is flat and it is (2**16 - 1)/20 [cts/V], and dewhitening tf please find in attachment 19. Also please find the ASD of the spectral analyzer noise (attachment_20).
Measurements for WFS1 demod and whitening were done on 5th of July between 15h and 18h local time. Measurements for WFS2 demod and whitening were done on 6th of July between 15h and 17h local time. All the rest were done on July 7th between 14h and 19h. In attachment 21 also find the comparison between electronics noise for WFSs and cds error signal (taken on the 28th of June between 17h and 18h). Sorry for bad quality of some pictures. |
Attachment 1: attachment_1.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: attachment_2a.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: attachment_2b.jpg
|
|
Attachment 4: attachment_2c.jpg
|
|
Attachment 5: attachment_3.png
|
|
Attachment 6: attachment_4.png
|
|
Attachment 7: attachment_5.jpg
|
|
Attachment 8: attachment_6.jpg
|
|
Attachment 9: attachment_7.png
|
|
Attachment 10: attachment_8.png
|
|
Attachment 11: attachment_9.jpg
|
|
Attachment 12: attachment_10.jpg
|
|
Attachment 13: attachment_11.png
|
|
Attachment 14: attachment_12.png
|
|
Attachment 15: attachment_13.png
|
|
Attachment 16: attachment_14.jpg
|
|
Attachment 17: attachment_15.jpg
|
|
Attachment 18: attachment_16.jpg
|
|
Attachment 19: attachment_17.png
|
|
Attachment 20: attachment_18.png
|
|
Attachment 21: attachment_19.png
|
|
Attachment 22: attachment_20.png
|
|
Attachment 23: attachment_21.png
|
|
16995
|
Wed Jul 13 07:16:48 2022 |
JC | Update | Electronics | Checking Sorensen Power Supplies |
[JC]
I went around 40m picking up any Sorensens that were laying around to test if they worked, or in need of repair. I gathered up a total of 7 Sorensens and each one with a Voltmeter. I made sure the voltage would rise on the Sorenson as well as the voltmeter, maxing out at ~33.4 Volts. For the current, the voltmeter can only rise to 10 Amps before it is fused. Many of the Sorensons that I found did not have their own wall connection, so I had to use the same one for multiple.
From these 7, I have found 5 that are well. One Sorenson I have tested has a output shortage above 20V and the other has yet to be tested. |
Attachment 1: 658C5D39-11BD-4EE3-90E2-34CBBC1DBD3C.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: 5328312A-7918-44CC-82B7-54B57840A336.jpeg
|
|
16998
|
Wed Jul 13 13:26:44 2022 |
rana | Summary | Electronics | Electronics noise measurements |
as I said to you yesterday, I don't think image 2a shows the output of the demod board. The output of the demod board is actually the output connector ON the demod board. What you are showing in 2a, is the signal that goes from the whitening board to the ADC I believe. I may be msitaken, so please check with Tega for the signal chain. |
17005
|
Fri Jul 15 12:21:58 2022 |
JC | Update | Electronics | Checking Sorensen Power Supplies |
Of the 7 Sorenson Power Supplies I tested, 5 are working fine, 1 cannot output voltage more than 20 Volts before shorting, and other does not output current. Six Sorensons are behind the X-Arm.
Quote: |
[JC]
I went around 40m picking up any Sorensens that were laying around to test if they worked, or in need of repair. I gathered up a total of 7 Sorensens and each one with a Voltmeter. I made sure the voltage would rise on the Sorenson as well as the voltmeter, maxing out at ~33.4 Volts. For the current, the voltmeter can only rise to 10 Amps before it is fused. Many of the Sorensons that I found did not have their own wall connection, so I had to use the same one for multiple.
From these 7, I have found 5 that are well. One Sorenson I have tested has a output shortage above 20V and the other has yet to be tested.
|
|
Attachment 1: 50DF21D7-D61A-4674-B0DA-463378B00ADB.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: FA4CF579-6C1E-48D5-B152-74F35B4EE90B.jpeg
|
|
17019
|
Tue Jul 19 17:18:34 2022 |
JC | Update | Electronics | New Coil Driver on Rack 1X3 |
[Yehonathan, JC]
Yehonathan and I began to put the electronics on Rack 1X3. To do this, we had to move the monitor over the the PD testing table. Before mounting the Coil Drivers, we added numbers to the spaces to follow the rack plan Koji has provided. The drivers which have been mounted are PRM (Slots 10,11), BS (Slots 15, 16), ITMX (Slots 26, 27), and ITMY (34, 35). |
Attachment 1: 22DC1767-6073-4D82-BEED-915318B57C03.jpeg
|
|
17031
|
Mon Jul 25 09:37:39 2022 |
Deeksha | Update | Electronics | Using the DFD to measure PZT TF |
The DFD was setup to measure the change in beatnote when excited. A long long (128in) cable goes from the SR785 near the DFD all the way to the Xend AUX which it accordingly excites and the DFD is monitored by the oscilloscope at the other end. This was completed on Friday. The wires and stand have been moved to the side but the setup is still a bit chaotic. As of writing this post, there is still atleast some minor issue with the setup as we aren't getting the expected output.
[I will shortly update this elog with more pictures]
Edit: the SR785 was replaced by the AG 4395, and pictures added
|
Attachment 1: ag4395.jpeg
|
|
Attachment 2: dfd.jpeg
|
|
17039
|
Wed Jul 27 14:39:04 2022 |
Deeksha | Update | Electronics | New and improved PZT TF data from the DFD |
Paco and I messed around with the attenuation of the scope and bandwidth of the IF. We also replaced the BNC T's in the circuits with RF splitters. We saw some decent improvements to the data. The data is attached and a diagram of the experiment. [We analytically calculated the impedances to avoid any mismatch taking place]. Working on fitting the data.
We also moved around the wires so that the AG4395 is closer to the PZT.
|
Attachment 1: tf_data.png
|
|
Attachment 2: latest_data.zip
|
Attachment 3: dfd_-_new.drawio.png
|
|
17104
|
Thu Aug 25 15:24:06 2022 |
Paco | HowTo | Electronics | RFSoC 2x2 board -- fandango |
[Paco, Chris Stoughton, Leo -- remote]
This morning Chris came over to the 40m lab to help us get the RFSoC board going. After checking out our setup, we decided to do a very basic series of checks to see if we can at least get the ADCs to run coherently (independent of the DACs). For this I borrowed the Marconi 2023B from inside the lab and set its output to 1.137 GHz, 0 dBm. Then, I plugged it into the ADC1 and just ran the usual spectrum analyzer notebook on the rfsoc jupyter lab server. Attachment #1 - 2 shows the screen captured PSDs for ADCs 0 and 1 respectively with the 1137 MHz peaks alright.
The fast ADCs are indeed reading our input signals.
Before this simple test, we actually reached out to Leo over at Fermilab for some remote assistance on building up our minimally working firmware. For this, Chris started a new vivado project on his laptop, and realized the rfsoc 2x2 board files are not included in it by default. In order to add them, we had to go into Tools, Settings and add the 2020.1 Vivado Xilinx shop board repository path to the rfsoc2x2 v1.1 files. After a little bit of struggling, uninstalling, reinstalling them, and restarting Vivado, we managed to get into the actual overlay design. In there, with Leo's assistance, we dropped the Zynq MPSoC core (this includes the main interface drivers for the rfsoc 2x2 board). We then dropped an rf converter IP block, which we customized to use the right PLL settings. The settings, from the System Clocking tab were changed to have a 409.6 MHz Reference Clock (default was 122.88 MHz). This was not straightforward, as the default sampling rate of 2.00 GSPS was not integer-related so we had to also update that to 4.096 GSPS. Then, we saw that the max available Clock Out option was 256 MHz (we need to be >= 409.6 MHz), so Leo suggested we dropped a Clocking Wizard block to provide a 512 MHz clock input for the rfdc. The final settings are captured in Attachment # 3. The Clocking Wizard was added, and configured on its Output Clocks tab to provide a Requested Output Freq of 512 MHz. The finall settings of the Clocking wizard are captured in Attachment #4. Finally, we connected the blocks as shown in Attachment #5.
We will continue with this design tomorrow. |
Attachment 1: adc0_1137MHz.png
|
|
Attachment 2: adc1_1137MHz.png
|
|
Attachment 3: rfdc_PLLsettings.png
|
|
Attachment 4: clockingwiz_settings.png
|
|
Attachment 5: blockIPdiag.png
|
|
33
|
Tue Oct 30 20:15:24 2007 |
tobin | Other | Environment | earthquake |
Rana, Tobin
Largish (M5.6) earthquake in San Francisco sent our optics swinging. |
47
|
Thu Nov 1 16:42:48 2007 |
Andrey Rodionov | Summary | Environment | End of Daylight Saving Time this weekend |
Useful information for everyone, as a friendly reminder:
According to the web-page
http://www.energy.ca.gov/daylightsaving.html,
this coming weekend there will be the end of Daylight Saving Time.
Clocks will be adjusted backward one hour. |
100
|
Wed Nov 14 12:33:35 2007 |
tobin | AoG | Environment | construction |
The construction crews are running a jack-hammer right outside of the control room. |
Attachment 1: DSC_0172.JPG
|
|