40m QIL Cryo_Lab CTN SUS_Lab TCS_Lab OMC_Lab CRIME_Lab FEA ENG_Labs OptContFac Mariner WBEEShop
  40m Log, Page 169 of 339  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Type Category Subject
  8585   Wed May 15 22:47:11 2013 JamieSummaryCDSAccounting of ADC/DAC channel availability

Quote:
  1. What are we using 16 DAC channels for in the LSC?

For the new input and output tip-tilts.  Two input, two output, each requires four channels.

Quote:
  1. What are the functions of those IOO DAC channels which go to cross-connects? If they're not properly sending, then we may have malfunctioning MC or MCWFS.

I have no idea.  I don't know what the hardware is, or is supposed to be, connected to.  DAC for WFS??  Was there at some point supposed to be fast output channels in the PSL?

Quote:
  1. Can we just use the SLOW DAC (4116) for the ALS PZTs? We used this for a long time for the input steering and it was OK (but not perfect).

 Probably. I'm not as familiar with that system.  I don't know what the availability of hardware channels is there.  I'll investigate tomorrow.

  8584   Wed May 15 21:27:39 2013 AnnalisaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

 

GREEN

I still have problems in maximizing the power out from the doubler. I realized that the real green power I obtain is about 30 uW, and it is the power which really enters the Faraday.

Before I was measuring it just after the Harmonic separator, and there was some residual IR beam which increased the power on the power meter, that's why I obtained about 200 uW.

I also tried to slightly vary the position of the mode matching lens, but I was not able to get more than 30 uW on the power meter.

TRANSMON PATH

The 50 cm focal length lens has been added in the position shown on Manasa's layout, and the beam has been focused on the PD.

 

 

  8583   Wed May 15 19:32:04 2013 ranaSummaryCDSAccounting of ADC/DAC channel availability
  1. What are we using 16 DAC channels for in the LSC?
  2. What are the functions of those IOO DAC channels which go to cross-connects? If they're not properly sending, then we may have malfunctioning MC or MCWFS.
  3. Can we just use the SLOW DAC (4116) for the ALS PZTs? We used this for a long time for the input steering and it was OK (but not perfect).
  8582   Wed May 15 17:48:25 2013 JamieUpdateCDSmisc problems noticed in models

I noticed a couple potential issues in some of the models while I was investigating the ADC/DAC situation:

c1ioo links to ADC1, but there are broken links to the bus selector that is supposed to be pulling out channels to go into the PSL block.  They're pulling channels from ADC0, which it's not connected to, which means these connections are broken.  I don't know if this means the current situation is broken, or if the model was changed but not recompiled, or what.  But it needs to be fixed.

c1scy connects ADC_0_11, label "ALS_PZT", to an EpicsOutput called "ALS_LASER_TEMP", which means the exposed channel is called "C1:SCY-ALS_LASER_TEMP".  This is almost certainly not what we want.  I don't know why it was done this way, but it probably needs to be fixed.  If we need and EPICS record for this channel it should come from the ALS library part, so it gets the correct name and is available from both ends.

  8581   Wed May 15 17:38:49 2013 JamieSummaryCDSAA/AI requirements

Quote:

What this means:

  • We definitely have enough DACs for the ALS PZTs.  The free channels are also in the right places: at the end stations and in the c1ioo FE, which is close to the PSL and hosts the c1als controller.
  • We appear to have enough ADCs for the QPD in c1ioo.
  • We don't have any available DAC outputs in c1lsc for the Fibox.  If we can move the Fibox to the IOO racks (1X1, 1X2) then we could send LSC channels to c1ioo and use c1ioo's extra DAC channels.

Of course we'll have to investigate the AA/AI situation as well.  I'll try to asses that in a follow up post.

It looks like we have spare channels in the AA chassis for the existing c1ioo ADC inputs to accommodate the POP QPD. 

We need AI interfaces for the ALS PZTs.  What we ideally need is 3x D000186, which are the eurocard AI boards that have the flat IDC input connects that can come straight from the DAC break-out interfaces.  I'm not finding any in the spares in the spare electronics shelves, though.   If we can't find any we'll have to make our own AI interfaces.

  8580   Wed May 15 17:17:05 2013 JamieSummaryCDSAccounting of ADC/DAC channel availability

We need ADC and DAC channels for a couple of things:

  • POP QPD: 3x ADC
  • ALS PZTs: 3x 2x 2x DAC (three pairs of PZTs, at ends and vertex, each with two channels for pitch and yaw)
  • Fibox: 1x DAC

What's being used:

  • c1iscex/c1iscey:
    • DAC_0:   7/16 = 9 free
    • ADC_0: 17/32 = 15 free
  • c1sus:
    • DAC: ?
    • ADC: ?
  • c1ioo
    • DAC_0:   0/16 = 16 free ?? This one is weird. DAC in IO chassis, half it's channels connected to cross connect (going ???), but no model links to it
    • ADC_0: 23/32 = 9 free
    • ADC_1:  8/32 = 24 free
  • c1lsc
    • DAC_0: 16/26 = 0 free
    • ADC_0: 32/32 = 0 free

What this means:

  • We definitely have enough DACs for the ALS PZTs.  The free channels are also in the right places: at the end stations and in the c1ioo FE, which is close to the PSL and hosts the c1als controller.
  • We appear to have enough ADCs for the QPD in c1ioo.
  • We don't have any available DAC outputs in c1lsc for the Fibox.  If we can move the Fibox to the IOO racks (1X1, 1X2) then we could send LSC channels to c1ioo and use c1ioo's extra DAC channels.

Of course we'll have to investigate the AA/AI situation as well.  I'll try to asses that in a follow up post.

PS: this helps to identify used ADC channels in models:

grep adc_ sus/c1/models/c1scx.mdl | grep Name | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq

 

  8579   Wed May 15 15:33:49 2013 SteveUpdateGeneralOn-Track QPD

I tested On-Track (from LLO) OT 301  amp with PSM2-10 qpd. It was responding. Jenne will calibrate it.  The 12V DC ps input is unipolar.

The one AC to DC adapter that Jenne tried was broken.

  8578   Wed May 15 08:29:28 2013 SteveConfigurationRF Systemfiber protection at splitter box area

 I positioned the fiber loaded protecting tubing and anchored them so they can do their job.

However, the area needs a good clean up.

 

Attachment 1: fiberprotect.jpg
fiberprotect.jpg
  8577   Wed May 15 00:45:28 2013 ranaConfigurationLSCOpenloop gain for PRMI lock May 13

 

 Pfft. Why 500 usec delay? We should be using the known parameters for the hardware and software AA/AI.

  8576   Tue May 14 21:03:15 2013 AnnalisaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

 

GREEN

The new lenses arrived, and I put the right 250mm before the doubler. I'm still not so confident with the alignment, because I cannot get more than 11-12 uW out from the "green" Faraday, with more than 200uW going in.

TRANSMON

I replaced the Y1 mirror with an HR1064-HT532. The alignment has to be done. Today the 50cm focal length lens arrived, and I'm going to put in tomorrow.

 

  8575   Tue May 14 20:30:29 2013 JamieSummaryIOOMC error spectrum at various FSS gain settings.

I used the Agilent 4395A and the GPIB network bridge to measure the MC error spectrum at the MC servo board.

I looked at various settings of the FSS Common and FAST gains.

Here is the spectrum of various Common gain settings, with a fixed FAST setting of 23.5:

f23.5.pdf

The peak at 34k is smallest at the largest Common gain setting of 13.0 (probably expected).  The other higher frequency peaks are higher, though, such as the ones at 24.7k, 29.6k, 34.5k, etc.:

f23.5z1.pdf

Here's a blow up of the peak at 1.06M, which peaks at about 9dB of common gain:

f23.5z2.pdf

 Here's the spectrum with a fixed Common gain of 10.5, and various FAST gains:

c10.5.pdf

and here's a zoom around that 1.06 MHz peak, which is smallest at a FAST gain of 23.5 dB:

c10.5z1.pdf

I'm not sure yet what this points to as the best gain settings.  We can of course explore more of the space.  I'm going to leave it at 13/23.5, which leaves the PC RMS at ~1.5 and the FAST Monitor at ~6.0.

If this does turn out to be a good setting we'll need to adjust some of the alarm levels.

Various settings:

MCS
  in1 gain: 15
  offset: 1.174
  boost enabled
  super boost: 2
  VCO gain: 25

FSS:
  input offset: -0.8537
  slow actuator: 0.6304

I include the python scripts I used to remotely control the AG4395 to take the measurements, and make the plots.

PS: I made some changes/improvements to the netgpib stuff that I'll cleanup and commit tomorrow.

 

Attachment 6: getdata
#!/usr/bin/env python

import os
import sys
import time
import numpy as np
sys.path.append('/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/pylibs/')
import pyezcalib as ca
sys.path.append('/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/general/netgpibdata/')
import netgpib
... 64 more lines ...
Attachment 7: plot
#!/usr/bin/env python

import os
#import numpy as np
from pylab import *

#name = sys.argv[1]

#atten = 10 # 10dB

... 31 more lines ...
  8574   Tue May 14 20:27:19 2013 KojiConfigurationLSCOpenloop gain for PRMI lock May 13

The OLTFs for PRCL and MICH for the last night's lock were modelled using Yuta's python script.

Attachment 1: LSCPRCLOLTF.png
LSCPRCLOLTF.png
Attachment 2: LSCMICHOLTF.png
LSCMICHOLTF.png
Attachment 3: 130513.zip
  8573   Tue May 14 19:52:58 2013 RijuConfigurationRF SystemPD frequency response

 [Eric, Riju, Annalisa]

Today we have cleared up the fiber spool near AP table. We have put the 1x16 fiber splitter and a box (we made two openings on it) for fiber spool on a different part of the rack. Also put a plastic tubing or the fibers coming out of AP table. Now the fibers coming out from AP table and also from POX table first enter the box through one opening and the end of the fibers come out of the other opening to get connected to to splitter. Photographs of the work are attached. I don't think enough fiber is there to make a similar loop for fiber coming from POY table.

 

 

Attachment 1: IMG_0520.JPG
IMG_0520.JPG
Attachment 2: IMG_0521.JPG
IMG_0521.JPG
  8572   Tue May 14 16:14:47 2013 Max HortonUpdateSummary PagesImporting New Code

I have figured out all the issues, and successfully installed the new versions of the LAL software.  I am now going to get the summary pages set up using the new code.

  8571   Tue May 14 14:24:56 2013 SteveUpdate40m Upgradingenclosure removal

 

 I'm planning to remove the ETMY optical table enclosure and move it over to CES Shop 8am Thursday morning.

We'll install spring loaded lathes, hooks and quick release pins.

The bridge will be reinforced with steel plate to support release pins on posts.

There will be an other cut out for cable feedtrough as it is shown on elog #8472

Let me know if this timing does not fit your work.

  8570   Tue May 14 02:19:13 2013 KojiUpdateGreen LockingXend Green tweaked

Note that I'm supposed to return one of the two green beat PDs and the power supply.
They are on the REFL path. I'll work on the restoration of the beat configuration.

  8569   Tue May 14 01:56:20 2013 JenneUpdateGreen LockingXend Green tweaked

I locked the Xarm on green.  At the PSL table, I adjusted the steering mirror to get the beam centered on the GTRX DC PD.  We need a lens for this, and presumably for the GTRY as well. 

I then went down to the Xend, and adjusted the steering mirrors to maximize the transmitted green power.  I got as high as 2150 counts.

Either the alignment is particularly delicate, or something isn't quite right, but when I put the lid back on the optical table's box, the arm will no longer lock on the 00 mode.  It's pretty typical that the cavity will unlock while you put on the lid, but usually if you bang on the underside of the table, or toggle the green shutter, you'll get back to the 00 mode.  Tonight however, I can't get the 00 mode if the lid is on.  If I slide the lid off just enough to get my hand inside, then block the green beam with my hand, I immediately lock on the 00 mode.  Even if I gently slide the lid back on, I unlock the cavity, and with the lid on can't get better than a 01 mode in yaw.  I repeated this a few times, with the same result. 

A goal for the next few days:  Re-find the Xgreen beatnote.  Once we have the PRMI locking stably and reliably, we want to move on to PRFPMI.   

  8568   Tue May 14 01:13:35 2013 JenneUpdate40m UpgradingTRY realigned

Koji noticed that earlier this afternoon the Yarm ASS was working, but then after dinner it was no longer working.  I saw that the ETMY trans camera beam was clipped.  These things precipitated a visit to the Yend station. 

I saw that the beam on the optic that steers the camera beam to the camera was very, very low, almost falling off the optic.  The only mirror which steers to this optic is the harmonic separator which reflects the IR, and transmits the green.  I turned the pitch knobs on the harmonic separator until the beam was roughly centered on all 3 optics between the separator and the camera (BS to QPD, BS to TRYDC and Y1 for camera).  The yaw was fine, so I didn't touch it.

I then adjusted the steering mirror to the camera, and the BS pointing to the DC PD.  I have not touched the BS pointing to the QPD.  Once the beam was on the TRY PD, Koji ran the ASS script, and I recentered the beam on the DC PD.  During this time, Koji had the Yarm triggering using -1 in the POYDC element of the matrix.

The harmonic separator is not mounted in a nice way (I'm assuming that Annalisa is in the middle of things, and she'll get back to it after the green work), so the TRY PD and camera will need to be aligned again, so I didn't do any ASS-recentering-ASS iteration tonight.

The Yarm ASS works nicely again, getting TRY to ~0.89 . 

  8567   Mon May 13 23:05:51 2013 JenneUpdatePEMGUR1 masses recentered

[Evan, Jenne]

Evan brought the Guralp handheld readout paddle and cables back from the ATF (Zach is using GUR2 and one of the T240s for gyro stuff this week), and we recentered the GUR1 masses.  N/S and Vert were okay (within 0.1 V), but E/W was at -0.5 V, so we set it at zero.  We then plugged the Guralp back in, and turned on the readout box.

There isn't much of a change on the BLRMS on the wall, so it's possible that we weren't actually having any trouble anyway. 

  8566   Mon May 13 23:05:26 2013 KojiConfigurationLSCPRMI locking

- Disabled MCL path in mcdown/mcupscript.

Nominal gain in mcdown/mcup was -50 and -100 respectively.

- Confirmed the stable lock was just because of the quiet seismic of the Friday night.

- Improvement of the PRM ASC servo
RG3.2 (3.2Hz Q=2 Height 30dB)
=>
RG3.2 (3.2Hz Q=10 Height 30dB) +  zero[f, 1, .5] pole[f, 2, 3] zero[f, 4.5, .5] pole[f, 3.5, 3]

Filter shape comparison is found in the second plot attached.

The resulting spectra (freerun vs controlled) is found in the first plot.

Nominal PRM ASC gain is +70

- Openloop TF measurement

OLTF PRCL 250Hz 30deg / MICH 200Hz 45deg

- REFL55/REFL33 phase adjustment (in lock)

REFL55 phase fine tune (95.25deg) (x1,x0.3)
REFL33 phase (-13.0deg) (x1, x2)

Attachment 1: 130513_PRC_ASC.pdf
130513_PRC_ASC.pdf
Attachment 2: 130513_PRC_ASC_servo.pdf
130513_PRC_ASC_servo.pdf
  8565   Mon May 13 21:35:55 2013 AnnalisaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

Yend table - Current status

OPLEV

Today the 2m focal length lens along the oplev path (just after the laser) has been added. In Manasa's layout it allows to have a beam waist of 3.8mm on the OPLEV QPD, even if it seems to be smaller.

The laser is closer to the box wall than the layout shows (it's on the line n.1 instead of line n.9), so maybe it has to be moved in the position shown in the layout, as Steve suggests, to leave empty space just before the window.

Rana suggests a 2mm diameter beam on the QPD, so a new calculation has to be done to add a second lens.

GREEN

The beam has been aligned until the doubler, but after the crystal it it has a small tilt, so a better alignment has to be done.

Moreover, the beam waist has to be measured after the Faraday for the green, in way to choose the focal length of the lenses necessary for the mode matching.

Then the three steering mirrors to send the beam into the arm have to be put.

TRANSMON PATH

A lens which has to be put on the Transmon path (already ordered) has to be added, and the beam alignment on the QPD-y and on the PDA520 has to be done.

  8564   Mon May 13 18:44:04 2013 JenneUpdateLockingprcl angular motion

I want to redo this estimate of where RIN comes from, since Den did this measurement before I put the lens in front of the POP PD. 

While thinking about his method of estimating the PR3 effect, I realized that we have measured numbers for the pendulum frequencies of the recycling cavity tip tilt suspensions. 

I have been secreting this data away for years.  My bad.  The relevant numbers for Tip Tilts #2 and #3 were posted in elog 3425, and for #4 in elog 3303.  However, the data for #s 1 and 5 were apparently never posted.  In elog 3447, I didn't put in numbers, but rather said that the data was taken.

Anyhow, attached is the data that was taken back in 2010.  Look to elog 7601 for which TT is installed where. 

 

Conclusion for the estimate of TT motion to RIN - the POS pendulum frequency is ~1.75Hz for the tip tilts, with a Q of ~2.

Attachment 1: TT_Q_measurements.pdf
TT_Q_measurements.pdf TT_Q_measurements.pdf
  8563   Mon May 13 17:24:38 2013 JenneUpdateWienerFilteringPRM YAW Wiener filtering

I have done a quicky offline Wiener filter to check how much PRM yaw motion we can subtract using a seismometer in the corner station.  This work may be redundant since Koji got the POP beam shadow sensor feedback loop working on Friday night.

Anyhow, for now, I used the GUR2 channels, since GUR2 was underneath the ITMX chamber (at the north edge of the POX table).  Note that Zach is currently borrowing this seismometer for the week.

I used GUR2_X, GUR2_Y and GUR2_Z to subtract from the PRM_SUSYAW_IN1 channel (the filename of the figure says "GUR1", but that's not true - GUR1 is at the Yend).  All 4 of these channels had been saved at 2kHz, but I downsampled to 256 (I probably should downsample to something lower, like 64, but haven't yet).  There is no pre-filtering or pre-weighting of the data, and no lowpass filters applied at the end, so I haven't done anything to remove the injected noise at higher freqs, which we obviously need to do if we are going to implement this online.

PRM_SUSYAW_subtractUsing_GUR1_xyz.png

If I compare this to Koji's work (elog 8562), at 3.2Hz, he gets a reduction of 2.5x, while this gets 10x.  At all other frequencies, Koji's work beats this, and Koji's method gets reduction from ~0.03Hz - 10Hz, while this is only getting reduction between 0.4Hz and 5Hz.  Also, this does not include actuator noise, so the actual online subtraction may not be quite as perfect as this figure.

  8562   Sat May 11 01:11:52 2013 KojiUpdateASCPRC mode stabilization with a shadow sensor at POP

Ah, AWESOME. Indefinite PRMI lock was finally achieved.

POP setup

- Looked at the POP setup. Checked the spot on POP110 PD. Found some misalignment of the beam.
  The beam spot was aligned to the PD with PRMI locked. The value of POP110I almost doubled by the alignment
  and recovered previous value of 400. Therefore previous normalization values of MICH 0.01 / PRCL 100 were restored.

- Placed PDA36A (Si 3.6mmx3.6mm) on the POP path that Jenne prepared. The gain knob was set to 40dB.
  Since the original spot had been too small, a lens with f=50mm was inserted in order to expand the beam.
  Connected the PD output to the SMA feedthrough on the ITMX table enclosure.
  I found the BNC cable labeled "PO DC" hanging. Connected this cable to the enclosure SMA.

- Went to the LSC rack. Found the corresponding PO DC cable. Stole the POPDC channel from POP110I Bias T to this PO DC cable.

- Razor blade setup: Machined a junk Al bracket in order to fix a razor blade on it. Attached the Al bracket to a sliding stage.

Locking

- Locked the PRMI with REFL33I&AS55Q. Cut the beam into half by the razor blade.

- Made a temporary PRM_ASC_YAW filter.
  Zero: 0Hz Pole: 2kHz
  Resonant Gain 3.2Hz Q:2 Height 30dB
  Butterworth 2nd-order 60Hz

  => Expected UGF 0.1Hz&10Hz

- CDS: By the work described in this entry, the POPDC signal was connected to the "MC" bank of the LSC.
            BTW, the 11th row of the LSC output matrix is connected to the PRM_ASC_YAW.

- The "MC" servo input (i.e. the POPDC signal) was normalized by POP110I (without SQRTing).

- Engaged the PRM ASC path. Gradually increased the gain of PRM_ASC_YAW. G=+100 seemed to be the best so far.
  It was visible that the spot on the POP CCD was stablized in yaw.

- The lock lasted for ~40min. Took several measurements, alignment adjustment, etc.

- Tweaking the PRM ASC unlocked the PRMI.

- Locked again. Switched from REFL33I/AS55Q (x1/x1) combination to REFL55I/REFL55Q (x1/x0.3) combination.
  This also kept the lock more than 20min.

Attachment 1: Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png
Attachment 2: 130510_PRMI.pdf
130510_PRMI.pdf
  8561   Fri May 10 20:05:21 2013 AnnalisaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

I rotated some mounts along the green beam path, and I started aligning the beam again.

The beam is aligned up to the waveplate just before the doubler crystal, even if I couldn't reach more than 88% transmission for the Faraday. Next week I will finish the alignment and I'll put the lenses that Manasa already ordered.

 

  8560   Thu May 9 22:29:23 2013 ManasaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

[Annalisa, Manasa]

More optics have been put on the table. Direction of the rejected beam from the 532nm faraday estimated to be ~1.7 deg along -y axis.

Transmon QPD, TRY and camera have beams on them for locking Y arm. Oplev configuration is waiting for it's lens to arrive.

 

  8559   Thu May 9 15:07:51 2013 JenneUpdateGeneralDistances from CAD drawing

Since I keep asking Manasa to "measure" distances off of the CAD drawing for me, I thought I might just write them all down, and quit asking.

So, these are only valid until our next vent, but they're what we have right now.  All distances are in meters, angles in degrees.

05091301.PDF

  8558   Thu May 9 02:47:23 2013 JenneUpdatePEMT240 at corner station - cabling thoughts

Something that I want to look at is the coherence between seismic motion and PRM motion.  Since Den has been working on the fancy new seismometer installations, I got caught up for the day with getting the new corner seismometer station set up with a T240.  Later, Rana pointed out that we already have a Guralp sitting underneath the POX table, and that will give us a good first look at the coherence.  However, I'm still going to write down all the cable thoughts that I had today:

The cables that came with the electronics that we have (from Vladimir and tilt meter -land) are not long enough to go from the seismometer to 1X7, which is where I'd like to put the readout box (since the acquisition electronics are in that rack). I want to make a long cable that is 19pin MilSpec on one end, and 25pin Dsub on the other.  This will eliminate the creative connector type changes that happen in the existing setup.  However, before making the cable, I had to figure out what pins go to what.  So.

25pin Dsub          19pin MilSpec

1                   P

2                   N

3                   E

4                   No conn

5                   D

6                   R and V

7                   H

8                   J

9                   No connection

10                  T

11                  F

12                  L

13                  No conn

14                  B

15                  A

16                  R and V

17                  No conn

18                  C

19                  G

20                  G

21                  K

22                  U

23                  No conn

24                  S

25                  M 

I am not sure why R and V are shorted to each other, but this connection is happening on the little PCB MilSpec->ribbon changer, right at the MilSpec side.  I need to glance at the manual to see if these are both ground (or something similar), or if these pins should be separate. Also, I'm not sure why 19 and 20 are shorted together.  I can't find (yet) where the short is happening. This is also something that I want to check before making the cable.

Den had one Female 19 pin MilSpec connector, meant for connecting to a T240, but the cable strain relief pieces of the connector have 'walked off'.  I can't find them, and after a solid search of the control room, the electronics bench, and the place inside where all of Den's connectors were stored, I gave up and ordered 2 more.  If we do find the missing bits for this connector, we can use it for the 2nd T240 setup, since we'll need 2 of these per seismometer. If anyone sees mysterious camo-green metal pieces that could go with a MilSpec connector, please let me know.

  8557   Thu May 9 02:19:53 2013 JenneUpdateLocking50% BS installed in POP path

Koji had the good idea of trying to measure the motion of the POP beam, and feeding that signal to PRM yaw to stabilize the motion.  To facilitate this, I have installed a 50% beam splitter before the POP 110/22 PD (so also before the camera). 

Before touching anything, I locked the PRM-ITMY half-cavity so that I had a constant beam at POP.  I measured the POP DC OUT to be 58.16 counts.  I then installed a 1" 50% BS, making sure (using the 'move card in front of optic while watching camera' technique) that I was not close to clipping on the new BS.  I then remeasured POP DC OUT, and found it to be 30.63.  I closed the PSL shutter to get the dark value, which was -0.30 .  This means that I now have a factor of 0.53 less light on the POP110/22 PD.  To compensate for this, I changed the values of the power normalization matrix from 0.01 (MICH) to 0.0189, and 100 (PRCL) to 189.

After doing this, I restored the ITMX and am able to get several tens of seconds of PRMI lock (using AS55Q and REFL33I). 

I found several QPDs in the PD cabinet down the Y arm, but no readout electronics.  The QPD I found is D990272.  I don't really want to spend any significant amount of time hacking something for this together, if Valera can provide a QPD with BNC outputs. For now, I have not installed any DC PD or razor blade (which can be a temporary proxy for a QPD, enough to get us yaw information).

 

  8556   Thu May 9 01:36:32 2013 ManasaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

Progress with end table:

Parts in green show assembled optics that will not require any changes. Parts in yellow are in place but will need either change of lenses in their optical path or change in position.

0509.png 

  8555   Thu May 9 00:05:12 2013 rana, Koji, JenneSummaryLSCAA and AI change

We would like to increase the UGF of the PRC loop so as to allow more suppression of the PRC signal and less pollution of the MICH signal (remember that the PRC/MICH optical gain ratio is huge).

We were already losing phase because of delay in the LSC - SUS digital link. In addition to that, a major source of delay is the analog anti-aliasing (on the LSC error signals before they enter the ADC) and the analog anti-imaging (between the SUS DAC and the coil driver).

 IN addition to these, the other major sources of phase lag in the system are the FM5 filter in the LSC-PRC filter bank, the digital upsampling and downsampling filters, and the DAC sample and hold.

In the near term, we want to modify these analog filters to be more appropriate for our 64 kHz ADC/DAC sample rate. Otherwise, we are getting the double phase lag whammy.

 

Staring at the schematics for the AA (D000076-01) and the AI (D000186-A), we determined a plan of action.

For the AA, we want to remove the multi-pin AA chip filter from Frequency Devices, Inc. and replace it with a passive LC low pass. Hopefully, these chips are socketed. Rana will design an appropriate LC combo and elog; we should make the change on a Wednesday afternoon so that we have enough soldering help.

For the AI, the filter is a dual bi-quad using discrete components and LT1125 opamps. Not so clear what to do with these. The resistors are all the noisy thick film kind and maybe should be replaced. Koji will find some online design tool for these or do it in LISO. Changing the TF is easy; we can just scale the capacitors. But we also want to make sure that the noise of the AI does not destroy the noise reduction action of the dewhitening board which precedes it.

Jenne should figure out how low the noise needs to be at the input to the coil driver.

 

P.S. the matlab code which defines these filters

>> [z,p,k] = ellip(4,4,60,2*pi*7570,'s');
>> misc.ai = zpk(z,p,k*10^(4/20)) * zpk([],-2*pi*13e3,2*pi*13e3);
>>
>> % Fudged Anti-Imaging Filter
>> [z,p,k] = ellip(8,0.001,80,2*pi*7570,'s');
>> misc.aa = zpk(z,p,k*10^(0.001/20)) * zpk([],-2*pi*32768,2*pi*32768);

Attachment 1: AAAI.pdf
AAAI.pdf
  8554   Wed May 8 22:36:42 2013 KojiUpdateASSXARM ASS (YARM ASS - faster and more precise convergence)

Same ASS setup for the X arm has been done.

Now Arm ASS can run simultaneously.

I reverted the number of the lockin banks from 6 to 8 for future implementation of A2L for the ITMX by coil balancing.
Since A2L for the ITMX is just barely visible for now, I am going to leave the coil balance untouched.

Attachment 1: XARM_ASS.png
XARM_ASS.png
  8553   Wed May 8 19:31:17 2013 JamieConfigurationLSCLSC: added new SQRT_SWITCH to power normalization DOF outputs

This removes the old sqrt'ing from the inputs to the POW_NORM matrix (was only on the POP110 I/Q) and moves it to the DOF outputs.  Koji wanted this so that he could use the DC signals for normalization both sqrt'd and not sqrt'd.

The POW_NORM medm screen was updated accordingly.

  8552   Wed May 8 18:33:02 2013 KojiUpdateASSYARM ASS - faster and more precise convergence

Precise arm alignment is more demanded. as the PRMI locking requires good and reliable alignment of the ITMs.

I previously added the output matrix to ASS.

Now the input and output matrix as well as the gains and filters have been updated.

The current concept is

Fast loop: align the arms by the arm mirrors with regard to the given beam.

Slow loop: move the incident beam position and angle to make the spot at the center of the mirrors

This is actually opposite to Den's implementation.

In order to realize the faster alignment of the arm, I increased the corner frequency of the lockins for the arm signals from 0.5Hz to 1Hz.

With the new configuration the arm alignment converges in 10sec and the input pointing does in ~15sec.

The actuation to the input pointing TTs are done together with the feedforward actuation to the arms.
This way we can avoid too much coupling from the input pointing servos to the arm alignment servos.

The corresponding script /opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/scripts/ASS/YARM/DITHER_Arm_ON.py was also modified.

Attachment 1: YARM_ASS.png
YARM_ASS.png
Attachment 2: Screenshot.png
Screenshot.png
  8551   Wed May 8 17:45:49 2013 JamieConfigurationCDSMore bypassing c1rfm for c1mcs --> c1ioo IPCs

As with the last two posts, I eliminated more unnecessary passing through c1rfm for IPC connections between c1mcs and c1ioo.

All models were rebuilt/installed/restarted and svn committed.  Everything is working and we have eliminated almost all IPC errors and significantly simplified things.

  8550   Wed May 8 17:23:04 2013 JamieConfigurationCDSfixed direct IPC connection between c1als and c1mcs

As with the previous post, I eliminated and unnecessary hop through c1rfm for the c1als --> c1mcs connection for the ALS output to MC2 POS.

As a side note, we might considering piping the ALS signals into the LSC input matrix, elevating them to actual LSC error signals, which in some since they are.  It's just that right now we're routing them directly to the actuators without going through the full LSC control.

  8549   Wed May 8 17:03:35 2013 JamieConfigurationCDSmake direct IPC connections between c1lsc and c1sus/c1mcs

Previously, for some reason, many IPC connections were routed through the c1rfm model, even if a direct IPC connection was possible.  It's unclear why this was done.  I spoke to Joe B. about it and he couldn't remember either.  Best guess is that it was just for book keeping purposes.  Or maybe some old timing issue that has been fixed by DMA fixes in the RTS.  So the point is that it's no longer needed, and we can reduce delays by making direct connections.

I made direct IPC connections from c1lsc to both c1sus and c1mcs, bypassing the c1rfm, through which they had previously been routed.  All models were rebuilt/installed/restarted and everything seems to be working fine.

  8548   Wed May 8 16:10:09 2013 JamieUpdateCDSUnknown DAQ channels in c1sus c1x02 IOP?

Someone for some reason added full-rate DAQ specification to some ADC3 channels in the c1sus IOP model (c1x02):

#DAQ Channels

TP_CH15 65536
TP_CH16 65536
TP_CH17 65536
TP_CH18 65536
TP_CH19 65536
TP_CH20 65536
TP_CH21 65536

These appear to be associated with c1pem, so I'm guessing it was Den (particularly since he's the worst about making modifications to models and not telling anyone or logging or svn committing).

I'm removing them.

  8547   Tue May 7 23:03:12 2013 KojiConfigurationCDSCDS work

Summary:

c1rfm / c1lsc / c1ass / c1sus were modified. They were recomplied and installed. They are running fine
and confirmed PRMI locking (attempt), arm locking, and Yarm ass with the new codes.

Motivation:

1a. SQRTing switching for POP110 was wrong. 0 enabled sqrting, 1 disabled sqrting. I wanted to fix this.
1b. Sqrting for POP22 was not implemented.

2. Preparation for the shadow sensor control with POPDC.

3. ASS had only an input. I want to run two ASS for the X and Y arms.

SQRTing for POP110/22:

- Flipped the input of the bypass switch. Correspoding MEDM indicators are fixed on the power normalization screen.
- Copied the sqrting structure from POP110 to POP22. Correspoding MEDM buttom was made on the power normalization screen.

- The function of the sqrting buttons were confirmed.

Additional ASS output:

- The output path "NPRO" was removed. Corresponding RFM channels have also removed.
- The previous NPRO path was turned to the "ASS1" path. The previous "ASS" path was turned to "ASS2".
- Corresponding shared memory channel are created/renamed.
- c1ass was modified to receive the new ASS shared memory channels. ASS1 is assigned to the X arm. ASS2 is assigned to the Y arm
- The output matrix screen and the lockin screen were modified accordingly.
- Only script/ASS/Arm_ASS_Setup.py was affected. The corespoding lines (matrix assignment) was fixed.

- The function of Den's version of  ASS was confirmed.

LSC->PRM ASC path

- We want to connect POPDC to PRM ASC. POPDC is acquired on c1lsc.
- So, for now we use the LSC input matrix to assign POPDC to one of the servo bank.
- The last row of the LSC output matrix was assigned to the PCIE connection to c1sus.
- This PCIE connection was connected to the PRM ASC YAW input.

- The connection between LSC and SUS was confirmed.

- During this process I found that there are bunch of channels transferred from LSC to SUS via RFM.
  These channels are transferred via PCIE(dolphin) and then via RFM. But LSC and SUS are connected
  with dolphin. So this just adds additional sampling delay while there is no benefit. I think we should remove the RFM part.
  Note that we need to use RFM for the end mirrors but this also should use only the RFM connection.


Rebuilding the codes

- Prior to the tests of the new functionalities, the codes were rebuild/installed as usual.
- The suspension were shutdown with the watch dogs before the restart of the realtime codes.
- Once the realtime codes were restarted successfully, the watch dogs were reloaded.
- As we removed/added the channels, fb was restarted.
- c1rfm / c1lsc / c1ass / c1sus codes were checked-in to svn
 

  8546   Tue May 7 20:35:15 2013 ranaUpdatePSLPSL database / screen maintenance
  1. Fixed LOCKMC screen to display the SLOWM voltage instead of the ref cav transmission.
  2. PSL Status .db file updated to trigger on correct limits for FSS FAST and the FSS and PMC local oscillator levels.
  3. SETTINGS_SET screen can now take and display screen snapshots.

All of these changes were committed to the SVN.

  8545   Tue May 7 20:09:10 2013 Jamie, RanaUpdatePSLPMC problem was FSS slow actuator

Rana showed up and diagnosed the problem as a railed FSS SLOW output.  The SLOW Monitor about was showing ~6V, which is apparently a bad mode-hoppy place for the NPRO.  Reducing the SLOW output brought things back into a good range which allowed the PMC to lock again.

In attempting to diagnose the problem I noticed that there is -100 mV DC coming out of the PMC RFPD RF output.  This is not good, probably indicating a problem, and was what I thought was the PMC lock issue for a while.    Need to look at the PMC RFPD RF output.

  8544   Tue May 7 19:58:28 2013 ranaFrogsTreasurerabbitt whole

controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master 0$ ls
C1IOO_LKIN_OUT_MTRX.adl   C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN5.adl     C1IOO_WFS1_I.adl             C1IOO_WFS_LKIN.adl
C1IOO_LOCKMC.adl          C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN6.adl     C1IOO_WFS1_Q.adl             C1IOO_WFS_MASTER.adl
C1IOO_LOCKMC_BAK.adl      C1IOO_MC_ASS_PIT_LOCKIN.adl  C1IOO_WFS1_SETTINGS.adl      C1IOO_WFS_MASTER.adl~
C1IOO_MC_ALIGN.adl        C1IOO_MC_ASS_YAW_LOCKIN.adl  C1IOO_WFS1_SETTINGS.adl.old  C1IOO_WFS_MASTER_BAK.adl
C1IOO_MC_ALIGN.adl~       C1IOO_MC_LOCKINS.adl         C1IOO_WFS2_I.adl             C1IOO_WFS_OUTMATRIX.adl
C1IOO_MC_ALIGN_BAK.adl    C1IOO_MC_SERVO.adl           C1IOO_WFS2_Q.adl             C1IOO_WFS_QPD.adl
C1IOO_MC_ASS.adl          C1IOO_MC_TRANS_QPD.adl       C1IOO_WFS2_SETTINGS.adl      C1IOO_WFS_QPD.adl.old
C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN1.adl  C1IOO_Mech_Shutters.adl      C1IOO_WFS2_SETTINGS.adl.old  fmX
C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN2.adl  C1IOO_MODECLEANER.adl        C1IOO_WFS_HEADS.adl          junk
C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN3.adl  C1IOO_QPDS.adl               C1IOO_WFS_HEADS.adl.old      master
C1IOO_MC_ASS_LOCKIN4.adl  C1IOO_QPDS_BAK.adl           C1IOO_WFS_INMATRIX.adl       svn-commit.tmp~
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/caltech/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master 0$ cd master
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master 0$ helppp
helppp: command not found
controls@rosalba:/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/c1/medm/c1ioo/master/master/master/master 127$ help me
bash: help: no help topics match `me'.  Try `help help' or `man -k me' or `info me'.

  8543   Tue May 7 19:06:45 2013 ManasaUpdate40m UpgradingEndtable upgrade for auxiliary green laser : progress

I have updated the waists (W)  and beam diameters (D) at 1064nm optics on the endtable.

I am not able to locate the characteristics of QPD-Y and oplev PD and hence took the beam diameter to be half of the detector surface area to determine their positions.

Beam diameter on PDA520 used for TRY was calculated using the transimpedance and responsivity of the PD from an old elog in 2004.

ETMY_endtable_New.png 

  8542   Tue May 7 18:42:20 2013 JamieUpdatePSLPMC not locking

I'm just now realizing that the PMC has also not been locked since noon today, and doesn't seem to be responding to anything right now.

wtf is going on here?

  8541   Tue May 7 18:16:37 2013 JamieUpdateComputers40MARS wireless network problems

Here's an example of the total horribleness of what's happening right now:

controls@rossa:~ 0$ ping 192.168.113.222
PING 192.168.113.222 (192.168.113.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=9 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=10 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.113.215 icmp_seq=11 Destination Host Unreachable
64 bytes from 192.168.113.222: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=10341 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.113.222: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=10335 ms
^C
--- 192.168.113.222 ping statistics ---
35 packets transmitted, 2 received, +9 errors, 94% packet loss, time 34021ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10335.309/10338.322/10341.336/4.406 ms, pipe 11
controls@rossa:~ 0$ 

Note that 10 SECOND round trip time and 94% packet loss.  That's just beyond stupid.  I have no idea what's going on.

  8540   Tue May 7 17:43:51 2013 JamieUpdateComputers40MARS wireless network problems

I'm not sure what's going on today but we're seeing ~80% packet loss on the 40MARS wireless network.  This is obviously causing big problems for all of our wirelessly connected machines.  The wired network seems to be fine.

I've tried power cycling the wireless router but it didn't seem to help.  Not sure what's going on, or how it got this way.  Investigating...

  8539   Tue May 7 17:30:28 2013 KojiUpdateRF SystemIdeal PRMI RF frequency

To change the MC length is not the point.

If we can improve the length sensing by the intentional shift of the modulation frequency from the MC FSR, that's worth to try, I thought.

But that is tough as the freq difference is 18kHz that is ~x4 of the line width of the MC.
Not only the 55MHz sidebands, but also the 11MHz sidebands will just be rejected.

Nevertheless: Is there any possibility that we can improve anything by shifting the modulation frequency by ~1kHz?

  8538   Tue May 7 17:13:30 2013 JenneUpdateRF SystemIdeal PRMI RF frequency

Koji asked me to look at what the ideal RF modulation frequency is, for just the PRMI case (no arms).  If we had a perfect interferometer, with the sidebands exactly antiresonant in the arms when the arms resonate with the carrier, this wouldn't be an issue.  However, due to vacuum envelope constraints, we do not have perfect antiresonance of the sidebands in the arm cavities.  Rather, the sideband frequencies (and arm lengths) were chosen such that they pick up a minimum amount of extra phase on reflection from the arms.  But, when the arms are off resonance (ex, the ETMs are misaligned), the sideband frequencies see a different amount of phase.   

We want to know what a rough guess (since we don't have a precise number for the length of the PRC since our last vent) is for the ideal RF modulation frequency in just the PRMI. 

If I take (from Manasa's kind measurements from the CAD drawing yesterday) the relevant distances to be:

L_P[meters] = 1.9045 + 2.1155 + 0.4067

L_X[meters] = 2.3070 + 0.0254*n

L_Y[meters] = 2.2372 + 0.0359*n + 0.0254*n

L_PRCL = L_P + (L_X + L_Y)/2 = 6.7616 meters.

The *n factors (n=1.44963) are due to travel through glass of the BS, and the substrate of the ITMs. 

I find the FSR of the PRC to be 22.1686 MHz. For the sidebands to be antiresonant, we want them to be 11.0843 MHz. This would correspond to a mode cleaner length of 27.0466 meters.  Our current modulation frequency of 11.066134 MHz corresponds to a MC length of 27.091 meters.  So, if we want to use this 'ideal' modulation frequency for the PRC, we need to shorten the mode cleaner by 4.4cm!  That's kind of a lot.

  8537   Tue May 7 16:21:01 2013 JenneSummaryLSCError signal simulation in PRMI

I asked Gabriele why it looked like for the PRCL sweep REFL 55 I&Q were zero at zero, but for the MICH sweep only REFL55 I was zero.  He took a look at his code, and found that he was not at the correct locking point.  Here is his email back to me:

I found the reason for the not zero value. Indeed, if you could zoom into the PRCL sweep, you would see that the error signals does not cross zero exactly at PRCL=0, but instead some 50 pm away from zero. This is enough to change a lot the PRCL signal when sweeping MICH. If I put PRCL to the correct zero point, and I sweep MICH, I now get everything at zero. I'm sending again the plots.

The fact that such a small detuning is enough to change PRCL signal when sweeping MICH is due, I believe, to the fact that MICH optical gain is much smaller than PRCL one.

Here are the redone plots:

Phase not tuned:

michsweep_errsigs_phasenottuned.pngprclsweep_errsigs_phasenottuned.png

 

Phase tuned:

michsweep_errsigs_tunedphase.pngprclsweep_errsigs_tunedphase.png

POP22 resonance for MICH and PRCL:

michsweep_pop22.pngprclsweep_pop22.png

POP110 resonance for MICH and PRCL:

michsweep_pop110.pngprclsweep_pop110.png

  8536   Tue May 7 15:09:38 2013 Max HortonUpdateSummary PagesImporting New Code

 

 I am now working on megatron, installing in /home/controls/lal.  I am having some unmet dependency issues that I have asked Duncan about.

ELOG V3.1.3-